IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,614,434
Granted Patent B2
US 12,614,434 · App. 18/529,326 · Granted Apr 28, 2026

Evacuation system

Inventors: Kurt Joseph Wedig (Mount Horeb, WI); Daniel Ralph Parent (Mount Horeb, WI); Tammy Michelle Wedig (Mount Horeb, WI); Kristin Ann Sutter-Parent (Mount Horeb, WI)
Assignee: OneEvent Technologies, Inc.
G08B7/066G08B17/06G08B17/10G08B21/02G08B25/00G08B25/004G08B25/006G08B25/009G08B25/085G08B29/181
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,614,434
App. No.
18/529,326
Granted
Apr 28, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system includes a first sensor configured to identify information regarding an emergency condition associated with a structure and a second sensor configured to identify an occupancy pattern regarding the structure. The system also includes a processor operatively coupled to the first sensor, the second sensor, and a transceiver. The processor is configured to determine a severity of the emergency condition based at least in part on the information regarding the emergency condition and prioritize rescues within the structure based at least in part on the occupancy pattern. The system also includes the transceiver which is configured to transmit an identification of the emergency condition, a location of the structure, the occupancy pattern, the prioritization of rescues, and the severity of the emergency condition.

Claims (47)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving, at a first node located within a structure, an indication of an evacuation condition associated with the structure;

determining, by the first node, a first evacuation route responsive to the indication of the evacuation condition, wherein determining the first evacuation route comprises using an occupancy pattern that has been learned over time by monitoring one or more areas during quiescent conditions; and

determining, by the first node, a second evacuation route, wherein determining the second evacuation route comprises identifying a location along the first evacuation route and matching the location with an ingress of the section evacuation route; and

wherein the second evacuation route considers changes in occupancy patterns along a path of the first evacuation route.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first evacuation route traverses a first portion of the structure and the second evacuation route traverses a second portion of the structure.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first evacuation route comprises a firstexit, wherein the second evacuation route comprises a second exit, and wherein the second exit is different from the first exit.

4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

comparing, by the second node, occupancy information corresponding to the first exit with occupancy information corresponding to the second exit; and

in response to comparing the occupancy information, choosing the second exit for the second evacuation route, wherein comparing the occupancy information indicates that the second exit is less crowded than the first exit.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the occupancy information corresponding to the first and second exits comprises at least one of a number of occupants, a time of occupancy, a historical occupancy pattern, or a predicted occupancy.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by at least one of the first node or a second node, a severity of the evacuation condition at varying locations within the structure;

comparing the severity of the evacuation condition proximate a first exit with the severity of the evacuation condition proximate a second exit; and

in response to determining that the severity of the evacuation condition proximate the first exit is less than the severity of the evacuation condition proximate the second exit, determining the second evacuation route such that the second evacuation route leads to the first exit.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a first type of the evacuation condition within a portion of the structure corresponding to the first evacuation route;

determining a first mode of evacuation for the first evacuation route based on the first type of the evacuation condition;

determining a second type of the evacuation condition within a portion of the structure corresponding to the second evacuation route; and

determining a second mode of evacuation for the second evacuation route based on the second type of the evacuation condition, wherein the second mode is different from the first mode.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

conveying, by the first node, the first evacuation route to occupants within a first portion of the structure; and

conveying, by a second node, the second evacuation route to the occupants within a second portion of the structure.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising;

receiving, by a third node located within the structure, at least one of the first evacuation route or the second evacuation route; and

determining, by the third node, a third evacuation route based upon the first evacuation route and the second evacuation route.

10 . A system comprising:

a first node located within a structure, the first node comprising: a first memory; and

a first processor operatively coupled to the first memory, the first memory comprising software instructions which, when executed by the first processor, cause the first node to:

receive an indication of an evacuation condition within the structure;

determine a first evacuation route responsive to the indication of the evacuation condition, wherein determining the first evacuation route comprises using an occupancy pattern that has been learned over time by monitoring one or more areas during quiescent conditions; and

determine by the first node, a second evacuation route based on changes in occupancy patterns along the first evacuation route, the second evacuation route further determined by identifying a location along the first evacuation route and matching the location with an ingress of the section evacuation route.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the first evacuation route traverses a first portion of the structure and the second evacuation route traverses a second portion of the structure, and wherein the second node matches a location along the first evacuation route with an ingress of the second evacuation route.

12 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the first evacuation route comprises a first exit, wherein the second evacuation route comprises a second exit, and wherein the second exit is different from the first exit.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the second node compares occupancy information corresponding to the first exit with occupancy information corresponding to the second exit to determine that an area proximate the second exit is expected to be less crowded than an area proximate the first exit, and wherein upon determining that the area adjacent the second exit is expected to be less crowded, the second node chooses the second exit for the second evacuation route.

14 . The system of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the first node or a second node determines a severity of the evacuation condition at a plurality of locations within the structure, wherein the system compares the severity of the evacuation condition proximate a first exit with the severity of the evacuation condition proximate a second exit, and upon determining that the severity of the evacuation condition adjacent the first exit is greater than the severity of the evacuation condition adjacent the second exit, the second evacuation route is determined such that the second evacuation route leads to the second exit.

15 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the system determines a type of the evacuation condition, wherein in response to receiving the first evacuation route using a first mode of evacuating suitable for the type of the evacuation condition, the system further determines a second mode of evacuating suitable for the type of the evacuation condition in the second evacuation route, and wherein the second mode is different from the first mode.

16 . The system of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the first node or a second node transmits the indication of the evacuation condition to an emergency response center.

17 . The system of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the first node or a second node transmits one or more warning messages indicating the first evacuation route and the second evacuation route.

18 . A non-transitory computer-readable media comprising computer-readable instructions stored thereon that when executed by a processor associated with a first node located within a structure cause the processor to:

receive an indication of an evacuation condition within the structure;

determine, by the first node, a first evacuation route responsive to the indication of the evacuation condition, wherein determining the first evacuation route comprises using an occupancy pattern that has been learned over time by monitoring one or more areas during quiescent conditions; and

determine, by the first node, a second evacuation route wherein determining the second evacuation route comprises:

identifying a location along the first evacuation route, matching the location with an ingress of the second evacuation route; and

considering changes in occupancy patterns along a path of the first evacuation route.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 18 , wherein in response to the first evacuation route traversing a first portion of the structure, the first node determines the second evacuation route to traverse a second portion of the structure such that an egress from the second portion of the structure leads to an ingress of the first portion of the structure.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 18 , wherein in response to the first evacuation route comprising a first exit, the first node determines the second evacuation route to lead to a second exit, and wherein the second exit is different from the first exit.

Continuity (10)
Continuation 17858516 · Jul 6, 2022
Continuation 17104649 · Nov 25, 2020
Continuation 16723726 · Dec 20, 2019
Continuation 16042548 · Jul 23, 2018
Continuation 15494185 · Apr 21, 2017
Continuation 14940969 · Nov 13, 2015
Continuation 14734304 · Jun 9, 2015
Continuation 14283532 · May 21, 2014
Continuation 12346362 · Dec 30, 2008
Related Publication 20240203220A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (99)
US 6150943A · Lehman et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7579945B1 · Richter · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 8044772B1 · Roe · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8253553B2 · Wedig · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8749392B2 · Wedig · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8970365B2 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9129498B2 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9189939B2 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9609594B2 · Snyder · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9633550B2 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9666042B2 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9679255B1 · Mullaly · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9679449B2 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9799205B2 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9990818B2 · Wedig · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10032348B2 · Wedig · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10192411B2 · Wedig · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10244474B2 · Snyder · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10529199B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10540871B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10600292B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10657797B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10665069B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10769903B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10769904B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10777052B2 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10849067B2 · Snyder · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11055973B2 · Wedig · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11145173B2 · Wedig · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11157825B2 · Mullaly · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11238710B2 · Wedig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11393305B2 · Wedig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11395227B2 · Snyder · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11869343B2 · Wedig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11893880B2 · Wedig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11924756B2 · Snyder · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11948450B2 · Kronz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11995976B2 · Wedig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12302243B2 · Snyder · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12322278B2 · Wedig · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12346837B2 · Mullaly · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20050190053A1 · Dione · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20100148672A1 · Hopper · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100164713A1 · Wedig · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100164732A1 · Wedig · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110241877A1 · Wedig · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140167969A1 · Wedig · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140191875A1 · Wedig · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140253317A1 · Wedig · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140269477A1 · Snyder · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150015401A1 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150137967A1 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150170503A1 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150269822A1 · Wedig · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160071401A1 · Wedig · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170221326A1 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170330431A1 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170337485A1 · Mullaly · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170359781A1 · Snyder · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170372568A1 · Wedig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180040232A1 · Wedig · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190066463A1 · Wedig · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190066464A1 · Wedig · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190114881A1 · Wedig · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190221089A1 · Wedig · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190223099A1 · Snyder · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200005609A1 · Murhty · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200082682A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200082683A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200082684A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200134992A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200327785A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200394880A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200410828A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200410844A1 · Wedig · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210104137A1 · Wedig · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210112494A1 · Snyder · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210335107A1 · Wedig · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220005142A1 · Mrozek · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220044140A1 · Mullaly · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220172585A1 · Wedig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220230528A1 · Wedig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220406154A1 · Wedig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230021538A1 · Snyder · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240083455A1 · Kume · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240194041A1 · Wedig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240203220A1 · Wedig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240334325A1 · Snyder · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240346915A1 · Wedig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 119837 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 9519202A1 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
WO 0021053 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006034246 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
Development of Infrared Human Sensor from the Matsushita Electric Works (MEW) Sustainability Report, 2004. [cited by applicant]
“Occupancy Sensor Product Guide”, from Lutron Electronics Co., Inc., Apr. 2006. [cited by applicant]
“Portable Carbon Dioxide Human Occupancy Detector” from catalog of ELP GmbH European Logistics Partners, Nov. 2007. [cited by applicant]
J. Mitchell, “Picking Up the Scent”, Tufts Journal, Aug. 2008, Medford, Massachusetts. [cited by applicant]
S. Pu, et al., “Evacuation Route Calculation of Inner Buildings”, Geo-Information for Disaster Management, 2005, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 1143-1161; Netherlands. [cited by applicant]
Velasco, et al., “Safety.net”, Stevens Institute of Technology; May 2006; Hoboken, New Jersey. [cited by applicant]