IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,618,853
Granted Patent B2
US 12,618,853 · App. 16/889,404 · Granted May 5, 2026

Methods for analyzing chain mispairing in multispecific binding proteins

Inventor: Fatemeh Tousi (Dedham, MA)
Assignee: Sanofi
G01N33/6854C07K16/00C12P21/02G01N33/5005B01D15/34B01D15/3809C07K2317/31
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,618,853
App. No.
16/889,404
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are methods for monitoring production of a multispecific binding protein and one or more mispaired species by a cell line, as well as methods of production and screening related thereto. In some embodiments, the methods comprise detecting an amount (e.g., a relative amount) of a multispecific binding protein and one or more mispaired species in a cell culture medium by size-exclusion ultra-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (SE-UPLC-MS). In some embodiments, the multispecific binding protein is a multispecific antibody, antibody fragment, or Fc fusion protein.

Claims (59)

1 . A method for monitoring production of a multispecific antibody and one or more mispaired species thereof, the method comprising:

separating a cell culture harvest that comprises a multispecific antibody and one or more mispaired species thereof from a cell line that produces the multispecific antibody and the one or more mispaired species thereof, wherein the separation does not comprise chromatographic separation or protein A affinity chromatography;

without prior chromatographic separation or protein A affinity chromatography, separating and detecting, by denaturing size-exclusion ultra-performance liquid chromatography with online mass spectrometry (SE-UPLC-MS), the multispecific antibody and the one or more mispaired species thereof from the cell culture harvest; wherein, prior to SE-UPLC-MS, the cell culture harvest has been clarified by tangential flow filtration (TFF), depth filtration, and/or centrifugation; and wherein the mass spectrometry (MS) is quadrupole time-of-flight (QToF) MS, thereby monitoring production of the multispecific antibody and one or more mispaired species thereof;

wherein the multispecific antibody comprises a first antibody heavy chain, a first antibody light chain, a second antibody heavy chain different from the first antibody heavy chain, and a second antibody light chain different from the first antibody light chain; and

wherein the one or more mispaired species comprise two or more polypeptide chains of the multispecific antibody in a species other than that of the multispecific antibody.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more mispaired species comprises one or more of:

(i) a species that comprises two of the first antibody heavy chains of the multispecific antibody;

(ii) a species that comprises two of the second antibody heavy chains of the multispecific antibody;

(iii) a species that comprises two of the first antibody light chains of the multispecific antibody; and

(iv) a species that comprises two of the second antibody light chains of the multispecific antibody.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the amount of the multispecific antibody and the one or more mispaired species thereof comprises deconvoluting one or more MS spectra obtained by the MS.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the MS is intact MS.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein SE-UPLC is performed using isocratic elution with a mobile phase.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detection is accomplished in about 33 minutes or less.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the MS is capable of resolving a mass difference of about 300 Da between the multispecific antibody and the one or more mispaired species thereof, or between two mispaired species.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the MS is capable of resolving a mass difference of about 162 Da between the multispecific antibody or mispaired species thereof and one of more glycoforms.

9 . A method for monitoring production of an antibody or antibody fragment and one or more weight variant species thereof, the method comprising:

separating a cell culture harvest that comprises an antibody or antibody fragment and one or more weight variant species thereof from a cell line that produces the antibody or antibody fragment and the one or more weight variant species thereof, wherein the separation does not comprise chromatographic separation or protein A affinity chromatography;

without prior chromatographic separation or protein A affinity chromatography, separating and detecting, by denaturing size-exclusion ultra-performance liquid chromatography with online mass spectrometry (SE-UPLC-MS), the antibody or antibody fragment and the one or more weight variant species thereof from the cell culture harvest; wherein, prior to SE-UPLC-MS, the cell culture harvest has been clarified by tangential flow filtration TFF), depth filtration, and/or centrifugation; and wherein the mass spectrometry (MS) is quadrupole time-of-flight (QToF) MS, thereby monitoring production of the antibody or antibody fragment and one or more weight variant species thereof;

wherein the antibody or antibody fragment and one or more weight variant species thereof differ in molecular weight.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the antibody or antibody fragment and the one or more weight variant species thereof comprise species with a free cysteine that has been cysteinylated, N-acetyl cysteinylated, or glutathionylated.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the antibody or antibody fragment and the one or more weight variant species thereof comprise species comprising a chemically modified cysteine residue.

12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the antibody or antibody fragment and one or more weight variant species thereof differ in molecular weight by at least 119 Da.

13 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the method is capable of resolving a mass difference among cysteinylated, N-acetyl cysteinylated, and glutathionylated species.

14 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the antibody or antibody fragment and the one or more weight variant species thereof comprise glycoforms of the antibody or antibody derivative.

15 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the antibody or antibody fragment and one or more weight variant species thereof differ in molecular weight by at least 162 Da.

16 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the method is capable of resolving a mass difference between the antibody or antibody fragment and one of more weight variant species thereof that represent glycoforms of the antibody or antibody fragment.

17 . A method for monitoring production of a multispecific binding protein and one or more mispaired species thereof, the method comprising:

separating a cell culture harvest that comprises a multispecific binding protein and one or more mispaired species thereof from a cell line that produces the multispecific binding protein and the one or more mispaired species thereof, wherein the separation does not comprise chromatographic separation or protein A affinity chromatography;

without prior chromatographic separation or protein A affinity chromatography, separating and detecting, by denaturing size-exclusion ultra-performance liquid chromatography with online mass spectrometry (SE-UPLC-MS), the multispecific binding protein and the one or more mispaired species thereof from the cell culture harvest; wherein, prior to SE-UPLC-MS, the cell culture harvest has been clarified by tangential flow filtration (TFF), depth filtration, and/or centrifugation; and wherein the mass spectrometry (MS) is quadrupole time-of-flight (QToF) MS, thereby monitoring production of the multispecific binding protein and one or more mispaired species thereof;

wherein the multispecific binding protein comprises four polypeptide chains that form the three antigen binding sites,

wherein a first polypeptide chain of the multispecific binding protein comprises a structure represented by the formula:

V L2 -L 1 -V L1 -L 2 -C L   [I]

and a second polypeptide chain of the multispecific binding protein comprises a structure represented by the formula:

V H1 -L 3 -V H2 -L 4 -C H1 -hinge-C H2 -C H3   [II]

and a third polypeptide chain of the multispecific binding protein comprises a structure represented by the formula:

V H3 -C H1 -hinge-C H2 -C H3   [III]

and a fourth polypeptide chain of the multispecific binding protein comprises a structure represented by the formula:

V L3 -C L   [IV]

wherein:

V L1 is a first immunoglobulin light chain variable domain;

V L2 is a second immunoglobulin light chain variable domain;

V L3 is a third immunoglobulin light chain variable domain;

V H1 is a first immunoglobulin heavy chain variable domain;

V H2 is a second immunoglobulin heavy chain variable domain;

V H3 is a third immunoglobulin heavy chain variable domain;

C L is an immunoglobulin light chain constant domain;

C H1 is an immunoglobulin C H1 heavy chain constant domain;

C H2 is an immunoglobulin C H2 heavy chain constant domain;

C H3 is an immunoglobulin C H3 heavy chain constant domain;

hinge is an immunoglobulin hinge region connecting the C H1 and C H2 domains; and

L 1 , L 2 , L 3 and L 4 are amino acid linkers;

wherein the polypeptide of formula I and the polypeptide of formula II form a cross-over light chain-heavy chain pair, wherein V H1 and V L1 form a first antigen binding site, wherein V H2 and V L2 form a second antigen binding site, and wherein V H3 and V L3 form a third antigen binding site; and

wherein the one or more mispaired species comprise two or more polypeptide chains of the multispecific binding protein in a species other than that of the multispecific binding protein.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the one or more mispaired species comprises one or more of:

(i) a species that comprises two of the first polypeptide chains of the multispecific binding protein;

(ii) a species that comprises two of the second polypeptide chains of the multispecific binding protein;

(iii) a species that comprises two of the third polypeptide chains of the multispecific binding protein; and

(iv) a species that comprises two of the fourth polypeptide chains of the multispecific binding protein.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2020
From: TOUSI, FATEME
To: SANOFI
Reel/Frame 053744/0530 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 20315271 · May 28, 2020 · regional
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62926313 · Oct 25, 2019
Related Publication 20210123926A1 · Apr 29, 2021
References Cited (80)
US 10626169B2 · Beil et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10882922B2 · Yang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11129905B2 · Yang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11186649B2 · Wu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11192960B2 · Yang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11254737B2 · Beil et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11365261B2 · Cameron et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11530268B2 · Wu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11613576B2 · Beil et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11779651B2 · Yang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11932704B2 · Yang · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12227573B2 · Beil et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20150315296A1 · Schaefer · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170320967A1 · Yang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180237511A1 · Beil · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190054182A1 · Yang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190106504A1 · Wu · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200054765A1 · Yang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200140552A1 · Wu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200317761A1 · Beil et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200399369A1 · Asokan · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210061925A1 · Yang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220041746A1 · Cameron et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220119553A1 · Yang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220226495A1 · Yang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220275102A1 · Cameron et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230220079A1 · Beil et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240279362A1 · Yang · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250250337A1 · Beil et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250250338A1 · Beil et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250312475A1 · Yang et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012061558A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012135345A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017074878A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017180913A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018151841A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019060718A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019074973A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020076853A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020210386A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020210392A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021080649A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Vandenheede et al., “Denaturing and Native Size-Exclusion Chromatography Coupled to High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Detailed Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates,” LCGC Europe, vo… [cited by examiner]
Tousi et al., “Intact Protein Mass Spectrometry of Cell Culture Harvest Guides Cell Line Development for Trispecific Antibodies”, Anal. Chem. 2020, vol. 92, pp. 2764-2769 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/054,734, Wu et al., filed Nov. 11, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Baeuerle, P.A. et al. (Jun. 15, 2009, e-pub. Jun. 9, 2009). “Review—Bispecific T-Cell Engaging Antibodies for Cancer Therapy,” Cancer Res. 69(12):4941-4944. [cited by applicant]
Chothia, C. et al. (Aug. 20, 1987). “Canonical Structures for the Hypervariable Regions of Immunoglobulins,” J. Mol. Biol. 196(4):901-917. [cited by applicant]
Chothia, C. et al. (Dec. 21/28, 1989). “Conformations of Immunoglobulin Hypervariable Regions,” Nature 342 (6252):877-883. [cited by applicant]
Chusainow, J. et al. (Mar. 1, 2009, e-pub. Oct. 8, 2008). “A study of Monoclonal Antibody-Producing CHO Cell Lines: What Makes A Stable High Producer?” Biotechnology And Bioengineering 102(4):1182-1196. [cited by applicant]
Correnti, C.E. et al. (May 2018, e-pub. Jan. 31, 2018). “Simultaneous Multiple Interaction T-Cell Engaging (SMITE) Bispecific Antibodies Overcome Bispecific T-Cell Engager (Bite) Resistance Via CD28 Co-Stimulation,” Leu… [cited by applicant]
Graf, T. et al. (Dec. 1, 2018). “Development of a Multi-Product SE-UHPLC Method for the Determination of Size-Variants in Bispecific Antibody Formats”, LCGC North America 36(12):870-879, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Haberger, M. et al. (2016, e-pub. Jan. 28, 2016). “Rapid Characterization of Biotherapeutic Proteins by Size-Exclusion Chromatography Coupled to Native Mass Spectrometry,” MAbs 8(2):331-339. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the Searching Authority mailed on Sep. 14, 2020, for Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/035587, filed Jun. 1, 2020, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kitazawa, T. et al. (Oct. 2012, e-pub. Sep. 30, 2012). “A Bispecific Antibody to Factors IXa and X Restores Factor VIII Hemostatic Activity In a Hemophilia A Model,” Nature Medicine 18(10):1570-1574. [cited by applicant]
Krah, S. et al. (Oct. 2017, e-pub. Jan. 27, 2017). “Engineering Bispecific Antibodies With Defined Chain Pairing,” New Biotechnology 39:167-173. [cited by applicant]
Lefranc, M.P. et al. (Jan. 2003). “IMGT Unique Numbering for Immunoglobulin and T Cell Receptor Variable Domains and Ig Superfamily V-Like Domains,” Dev. Comp. Immunol. 27(1):55-77. [cited by applicant]
MacCallum, R.M. et al. (1996). “Antibody-Antigen Interactions: Contact Analysis and Binding Site Topography,” J. Mol. Biol. 262:732-745. [cited by applicant]
Martin, A.C.R. (2010). “Protein Sequence and Structure Analysis of Antibody Variable Domains,” Chapter 3 In Antibody Engineering, vol. 2. Kontermann R., Dübel S., eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 33-51. [cited by applicant]
Masui, S. et al. (Mar. 1, 2005). “An Efficient System to Establish Multiple Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Carrying an Inducible Expression Unit,” Nucleic Acids Res. 33(4):e43, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Niwa, H. et al. (Dec. 1991). “Efficient Selection for High-Expression Transfectants with a Novel Eukaryotic Vector,” Gene. 108(2):193-199. [cited by applicant]
Padlan, E.A. et al. (Jun. 2017). “Identification of Specificity-Determining Residues in Antibodies,” FASEB J. 9 (1):133-139. [cited by applicant]
Ridgway, J.B.B. et al. (1996). “‘Knobs-into-holes’ Engineering of Antibody CH3 Domains for Heavy Chain Heterodimerization,” Protein Eng. 9(7):617-621. [cited by applicant]
Schachner, L. et al. (Nov. 21, 2016). “Characterization of Chain Pairing Variants of Bispecific IgG Expressed in a Single Host Cell By High Resolution Native and Denaturing Mass Spectrometry,” Anal Chem. 88 (24):12122-1… [cited by applicant]
Schaefer, W. et al. (Jan. 2016, e-pub. Dec. 9, 2015). “Heavy and Light Chain Pairing of Bivalent Quadroma and Knobs-Into-Holes Antibodies Analyzed by UHR-ESI-QTOF Mass Spectrometry,” MABS 8(1):49-55. [cited by applicant]
Spiess, C. et al. (Sep. 13, 2013). “Development of a Human IgG4 Bispecific Antibody for Dual Targeting of Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Cytokines,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288(37):26583-265… [cited by applicant]
Thompson, J.D. (Nov. 11, 1994). “Clustal W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment Through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice,” Nucleic Acids Res. … [cited by applicant]
Tousi, F. et al. (2019). “Intact Protein Mass Spectrometry Guiding Cell Line Development for Tri-specific Antibodies,” Poster presented at 67th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry & Allied Topics, Framingham, MA, Jun. … [cited by applicant]
Tousi, F. et al. (2020, e-pub. Jan. 15, 2020). “Intact Protein Mass Spectrometry of Cell Culture Harvest Guides Cell Line Development for Trispecific Antibodies,” Anal Chem. 92(3):2764-2769, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/515,227, Yang et al., filed Oct. 29, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/737,814, filed May 5, 2022, for Dabdoubi et al. [cited by applicant]
Wang, C. et al. (Sep. 2018). “A Systematic Approach for Analysis and Characterization of Mispairing in Bispecific Antibodies With Asymmetric Architecture,” MABS 10(8):1226-1235. [cited by applicant]
Woods, R.J. et al. (September/Oct. 2013, e-pub. Jun. 24, 2013). “LC-MS Characterization and Purity Assessment of a Prototype Bispecific Antibody,” mAbs 5(5):711-722. [cited by applicant]
Xu, L. et al. (Oct. 6, 2017; e-pub. Sep. 20, 2017). “Trispecific Broadly Neutralizing HIV Antibodies Mediate Potent SHIV Protection in Macaques,” Science 358(6359):85-90, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yin, Y. et al. (2016, e-pub. Nov. 1, 2016). “Precise Quantification of Mixtures of Bispecific IgG Produced in Single Host Cells by Liquid Chromatography-Orbitrap High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry,” MAbs 8(8):1467-1476. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/183,107, Beil et al., filed Mar. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/433,295, Yang et al., filed Feb. 5, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/458,060, filed Aug. 29, 2023, for Yang et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 19/012,409, Beil et al., filed Jan. 7, 2025. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/960,890, filed Nov. 26, 2024, for Yang et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 19/012,367, Beil et al., filed Jan. 7, 2025. [cited by applicant]