Method for modeling measurement data over a substrate area and associated apparatuses
Disclosed is a method for determining a process correction for at least a first process of a lithographic process, comprising at least the first process performed on at least a first substrate using at least a first apparatus and a second process performed on at least said first substrate using at least a second apparatus, where a correction actuation capability of the first apparatus differs from the second apparatus, comprising: obtaining metrology data relating to said first substrate; modeling said metrology data using a first model, the model being related to said first apparatus; and controlling said first process based on the modeled metrology data; the modeling step and/or an additional processing step comprises distributing a penalty in a performance parameter across said first process and said second process such that the distributed penalties in the performance parameter are within their respective specifications of the performance parameter.
1 . A method for determining a process correction for at least a first process of a lithographic process, said lithographic process comprising at least the first process performed on at least a first substrate using at least a first apparatus and a second process performed on at least said first substrate using at least a second apparatus, where a correction actuation capability of the first apparatus differs from the second apparatus, the method comprising:
obtaining metrology data relating to said first substrate;
modeling said metrology data using a first model, said first model being related to said first apparatus; and
controlling said first process based on the modeled metrology data;
wherein said modeling and/or an additional processing comprises distributing a lithographic error penalty in a lithographic performance parameter across said first process and said second process such that distributed lithographic error penalties in the lithographic performance parameter for said first and second processes are within respective specifications of said first and second processes for the performance parameter.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said modeling and/or said additional processing further comprises fitting the first model to the metrology data so as to generate a first set of model parameters.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said distributing the lithographic error penalty comprises optimizing a cost function comprising a sum of a lithographic error penalty in the lithographic performance parameter for the first process and a lithographic error penalty in the lithographic performance parameter for the second process.
4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said cost function comprises a sum of each of said lithographic error penalties per direction of a substrate plane.
5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said sum is a weighted sum, and the method comprises determining the weights for said weighted sum based on required specifications for the lithographic performance parameter.
6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said modeling and/or an additional processing comprises modifying said first set of model parameters to obtain a modified set of model parameters; and
determining the lithographic error penalty in said lithographic performance parameter for said first process based on a deviation from said first set of model parameters when applying said modified set of model parameters to said first model.
7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein said modeling and/or said additional processing further comprises mapping the first set of model parameters to said modified set of model parameters using a model mapping matrix.
8 . The method of claim 3 , comprising determining the lithographic error penalty in said lithographic performance parameter for said second process based on the difference of said modified set of model parameters and a converted set of model parameters that is calculated with a conversion matrix that converts said modified set of model parameters into a second set of model parameters to the model basis functions of said first model, said second set of model parameters being related to a second model which is related to the second apparatus.
9 . The method of claim 2 , wherein said fitting comprises imposing a regularization based on an estimated lithographic error penalty in said lithographic performance parameter for said second process.
10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein said regularization is equal to said estimated lithographic error penalty in said lithographic performance parameter for said second process.
11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein said fitting comprises minimizing a cost function comprising first model residuals of said metrology data and said estimated lithographic error penalty in said lithographic performance parameter for said second process.
12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said metrology data comprises alignment data for the first process and said first model comprises an alignment model.
13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second apparatus is a lithographic exposure apparatus and the second process is a lithographic exposure process.
14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second apparatus is a bonding apparatus and the second process is a bonding process for bonding said first substrate to a second substrate, subsequent to lithographic performance of said lithographic exposure process.
15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein said metrology data relates to both of said first substrate and second substrate, and said distributing the lithographic error penalty in the lithographic performance parameter across said first process and second process comprises distributing said lithographic error penalties in the lithographic performance parameter for said first process over said first substrate and second substrate.
16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first apparatus is a lithographic exposure apparatus and first process is a lithographic exposure process.
17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the first process comprises exposing lithographically a layer on the first substrate.
18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein said metrology data relates to at least a final layer, said final layer being the final layer exposed on said first substrate prior to said second process.
19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein said metrology data relates to one or more additional layers other than said final layer exposed on said first substrate, and said distributing the lithographic error penalty in the lithographic performance parameter across said first process and said second process comprises distributing said lithographic error penalties in the lithographic performance parameter for said first process over said one or more additional layers in addition to said final layer.
20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling said first process comprises applying the process correction within the first apparatus so as to distribute the lithographic error penalty in the lithographic performance parameter across said first process and said second process.
21 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lithographic performance parameter is overlay.
22 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising computer program instructions operable to perform the method of claim 1 .
23 . A processing arrangement comprising:
the non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 ; and
a processor operable to run the computer program instructions comprised on said non-transitory computer readable medium.
24 . A lithographic apparatus comprising:
an alignment sensor;
a patterning device support for supporting a patterning device;
a substrate support for supporting a substrate; and
the processing arrangement of claim 23 .