IP Library Granted Patent US 12,619,212
Granted Patent B2
US 12,619,212 · App. 17/650,479 · Granted May 5, 2026

Reducing CO

Inventors: Muhammad Idris (Udhailiyah, SA); Emad Abbad M. Alabbad (Dammam, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
G05B19/4155G05B2219/41108
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,619,212
App. No.
17/650,479
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

This specification relates to reducing CO2 levels of a gas operation network using a predictive model. The systems and methods described in this specification process an input data set that includes (i) gas flowrate data and (ii) CO2 concentration data. The systems and methods generate the predictive model by processing the input dataset. The systems and methods predict, by the predictive model, a CO2 production target for the gas operation network based on a gas flowrate predicted for each of the plurality of wells by the predictive model. The systems and methods generate control signals to control a respective valve at each well based on the CO2 production target and the predicted gas flowrate for each well. The systems and methods regulate CO2 levels of the gas operation network based on the CO2 production target by controlling the respective valves at each well.

Claims (51)

1 . A method for reducing CO 2 levels of a gas operation network using a predictive model, the gas operation network comprising a plurality of wells, the method comprising:

processing an input data set comprising (i) gas flowrate data for each of the plurality of wells and (ii) CO 2 concentration data for each of the plurality of wells;

generating the predictive model by processing the input dataset in response to applying a reduced gradient algorithm or a linear regression algorithm to data values of the input dataset;

predicting, by the predictive model, a CO 2 production target for the gas operation network based on a gas flowrate predicted for each of the plurality of wells by the predictive model;

generating one or more control signals to control a respective valve at each of the plurality of wells based on the CO 2 production target and the predicted gas flowrate for each of the plurality of wells; and

regulating CO 2 levels of the gas operation network based on the CO 2 production target by controlling the respective valves at each of the plurality of wells using the one or more control signals.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the input data set comprises historical data from a previous time period; and

the predictive model is generated based on a training phase that coincides with the previous time period or overlaps the previous time period.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the previous time period spans at least 100 days.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a threshold CO 2 level for the plurality of wells that is based on (i) the gas flowrate data for each of the plurality of wells and (ii) the CO 2 concentration data for each of the plurality of wells.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the predictive model is based on the threshold CO 2 level for each of the plurality of wells and a corresponding production factor.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the gas operation network comprises a plurality of gas gathering manifolds and a plurality of slug catchers.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein generating the predictive model comprises:

determining a total gas production of each of the plurality of gas gathering manifolds based on historical gas flowrate data for each of the plurality of wells connected to a corresponding gas gathering manifold;

comparing the total gas production of each of the plurality of gas gathering manifolds to a gas flowrate measured at each of the plurality of slug catchers; and

updating the predictive model based on the comparison.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the predictive model comprises:

minimizing a difference between (i) CO 2 production predictions for the gas operation network and (ii) CO 2 production data for the gas operation network.

9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

measuring, by one or more gas flow meters located at each of the plurality of wells, the gas flowrate data;

measuring, by one or more separator tests located at each of the plurality of wells, the CO 2 concentration data; and

measuring, by a CO 2 meter located at a gas processing plant or downstream of the gas processing plant, the CO 2 production data.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the predictive model comprises solving a minimization problem using at least one of a generalized reduced gradient solver and a multiple linear regression solver.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting the CO 2 production target of the gas operation network comprises satisfying one or more production conditions.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more production conditions comprise a maximum CO 2 production level of the gas operation network.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the one or more production conditions comprise a minimum condensate production level of the gas operation network.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting the CO 2 production target for the gas operation network comprises:

predicting a plurality of CO 2 production levels based on a gas flowrate variation for at least one well of the plurality of wells;

determining a plurality of CO 2 production differences between each of the plurality of CO 2 production levels and a baseline CO 2 production level; and

selecting the CO 2 production target based on the plurality of CO 2 production differences.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the gas flowrate variation represents a variation between a reduction in gas production of the at least one well of the plurality of wells by 50% and an increase in gas production of the at least one well of the plurality of wells by 50%.

16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein selecting the CO 2 production target comprises:

predicting a condensate production level for the gas operation network for each of the plurality of CO 2 production levels by multiplying each predicted gas flowrate of the gas flowrate variation with a condensate-gas-ratio for each of the plurality of wells;

determining a plurality of condensate production differences between each of the condensate production levels and a baseline condensate production level; and

selecting the whole network CO 2 production target based on the plurality of CO 2 production differences and the plurality of condensate production differences.

17 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising measuring, by one or more separator tests located at each well of the plurality of wells, the condensate-gas-ratio for each of the plurality of wells.

18 . A system for reducing CO 2 levels of a gas operation network using a predictive model, the gas operation network comprising a plurality of wells, the system comprising:

a plurality of gas flow meters operable to measure a gas flowrate of a gas at each of the plurality of wells;

a CO 2 concentration measurement device operable to measure a CO 2 concentration of the gas at the plurality of wells;

a CO 2 meter operable to measure a network CO 2 production level of the gas, wherein the CO 2 meter is located at a gas processing plant of the gas operation network or downstream of the gas processing plant;

a plurality of valves operable to control a flow of the gas at the plurality of wells;

a computer storing instructions that, when executed by a processor of the computer, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

processing an input data set comprising (i) the measured gas flowrate for each of the plurality of wells and (ii) the measured CO 2 concentration for each of the plurality of wells;

generating the predictive model by processing the input dataset in response to applying a reduced gradient algorithm or a linear regression algorithm to data values of the input dataset;

predicting, by the predictive model, a CO 2 production target for the gas operation network based on a gas flowrate predicted for each of the plurality of wells by the predictive model;

generating one or more control signals to control each of the plurality of valves at each of the plurality of wells based on the CO 2 production target and the predicted gas flowrate for each of the plurality of wells; and

regulating CO 2 levels of the gas operation network based on the CO 2 production target by controlling each of the plurality of valves at each of the plurality of wells using the one or more control signals.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the gas operation network comprises a plurality of gas gathering manifolds.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the gas operation network comprises a plurality of slug catchers.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2022
From: IDRIS, MUHAMMAD; ALABBAD, EMAD ABBAD M.
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 058969/0104 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230251628A1 · Aug 10, 2023
References Cited (26)
US 6101447A · Poe, Jr. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 10260319B2 · Sarduy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 12044818B2 · Hall-Thompson · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20110153103A1 · Brown et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172382A1 · Andrews · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150004009A1 · Verma et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170116359A1 · Jenneman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170242410A1 · Iyer · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20210182460A1 · Yang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220049580A1 · Bremner · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230071756A1 · Liu · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230094640A1 · Shao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230193743A1 · Katterbauer · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230228182A1 · Al-Rubaii · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230359174A1 · Vazquez-Canteli · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240086430A1 · Pickles · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240191616A1 · Bestman · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240192646A1 · Doraiswamy · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250053157A1 · Wright · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250086470A1 · Gunnerud · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250189938A1 · Ahn · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250200328A1 · Arukhe · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250278082A1 · Saati · 2025 [cited by examiner]
EP 3098511B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022013064A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
SAIP Examination Report in Saudi Arabian Appln. No. 123441199, mailed on Aug. 25, 2025, 9 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]