IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,620,222
Granted Patent B2
US 12,620,222 · App. 18/505,999 · Granted May 5, 2026

Systems and methods for extracting surface markers for aircraft navigation

Inventors: Vibhor L. Bageshwar (Rosemount, MN); Ashwin Ganapathy (Bangalore, IN); Vijay Venkataraman (Excelsior, MN); Romi Srivastava (Lucknow, IN)
Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
G06V20/17B64D45/08G06T7/12G06T7/136G06V10/752G06V10/754G06T2207/10024G06T2207/10032G06T2207/20016G06T2207/20021G06T2207/20092G06T2207/30181G06T2207/30204
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,620,222
App. No.
18/505,999
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method comprises capturing, with a vehicle vision sensor, a color image of a landing site including landing surface markers; converting the color image to a gray scale image; and performing multi-scale-binarization to detect multiple edges of the gray scale image and produce binary images. The method determines contours of edges of the binary images having closed shapes, detects closed shapes of contours of edges having four corners, and verifies whether four-sided candidate contours are valid as potential landing surface markers. If more than one contour is associated with a valid ID within a surface marker library, then the contour within the smallest window size is selected. If multiple contours with the same window size can be associated with a valid ID, then a mean of corresponding corners of multiple contours is computed. The method then performs corner refinement of valid four-sided candidate contours identified as potential landing surface markers.

Claims (92)

1 . A method comprising:

capturing, with a vision sensor on a vehicle, a color image of a landing site that includes one or more landing surface markers;

converting the color image to a gray scale image;

performing multi-scale-binarization to detect multiple edges of the gray scale image and produce a plurality of binary images having differing sizes, based on the gray scale image;

wherein multiple windows of different sizes are used to detect edges in the gray scale image, and within a given window, an adaptive threshold is used to slide the window across the gray scale image to produce a complete edge map for the given window;

determining contours of edges of the binary images that have closed shapes;

detecting any closed shapes of the contours of edges that have four corners by a process comprising:

selecting the contours of edges that exceed a user-selected threshold for perimeter size;

retaining the selected contours that have four sides;

determining a minimum corner separation of the contours that have four sides;

eliminating any contours that are within a user-selected threshold for distance from an edge of a respective binary image; and

retaining any remaining contours as four-sided candidate contours;

verifying whether the four-sided candidate contours are valid as potential landing surface markers by a process comprising:

warping each four-sided candidate contour into a fixed size square contour that is tested for sufficient variance of an image intensity value by computing a standard deviation of the image intensity value, and if the standard deviation of the image intensity value is above a user-selected threshold, then converting the fixed size square contour into a binary image to determine a candidate bit pattern within the contour;

wherein if an encoded bit error corresponding to a border of each candidate bit pattern is below a user-selected threshold, then accepting the candidate bit pattern for further processing; and

determining if bits of the candidate bit pattern, other than its border bits, match any standard bit patterns within a surface marker library for a given landing site at a vertiport, and if there is a match within a user-selected bit error threshold, then accepting the candidate bit pattern as a valid ID;

wherein if more than one contour is associated with a valid ID within the surface marker library, then selecting the contour within a smallest window size and ignoring all other contours;

wherein if multiple contours within a same window size can be associated with a valid ID within the surface marker library, then computing a mean of corresponding corners of the multiple contours; and

performing corner refinement of valid four-sided candidate contours identified as potential landing surface markers by a process comprising:

using local gradients to move corners of each four-sided candidate contour to a sharpest transition point.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining if a detected ID within a contour is in a list of valid IDs within the surface marker library for the given landing site;

if the detected ID is in the list of valid IDs, accepting the contour with the detected ID as valid for further processing;

if the detected ID is not in the list of valid IDs, ignoring the contour with the detected ID and proceeding to a next contour with a detected ID;

wherein if a valid detected ID has a contour size above a first user-selected threshold, then the contour with the valid detected ID is accepted for further processing;

wherein if a valid detected ID has a contour size below a second user-selected threshold, then the contour with this valid detected ID is rejected;

wherein for any contours with valid detected IDs with a contour size between the first and second user-selected thresholds, the contour with the valid detected ID having a largest size is accepted and all other valid IDs are rejected.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein a combination of contours with valid detected IDs are used to determine a correct landing site at a vertiport with multiple landing sites to avoid landing site ambiguity, when one or more nearby landing sites have common markers.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle comprises an unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) vehicle, an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV), or an urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more landing surface markers comprise one or more Aruco codes.

6 . A system comprising:

at least one vision sensor mounted on a vehicle;

at least one processor operatively coupled to the at least one vision sensor;

wherein the at least one processor includes program instructions, executable by the at least one processor, to perform a method comprising:

capturing, with the at least one vision sensor, a color image of a landing site that includes one or more landing surface markers;

converting the color image to a gray scale image;

performing multi-scale-binarization to detect multiple edges of the gray scale image and produce a plurality of binary images having differing sizes, based on the gray scale image;

wherein multiple windows of different sizes are used to detect edges in the gray scale image, and within a given window, an adaptive threshold is used to slide the window across the gray scale image to produce a complete edge map for the given window;

determining contours of edges of the binary images that have closed shapes;

detecting any closed shapes of the contours of edges that have four corners by a process comprising:

selecting the contours of edges that exceed a user-selected threshold for perimeter size;

retaining the selected contours that have four sides;

determining a minimum corner separation of the contours that have four sides;

eliminating any contours that are within a user-selected threshold for distance from an edge of a respective binary image; and

retaining any remaining contours as four-sided candidate contours;

verifying whether the four-sided candidate contours are valid as potential landing surface markers by a process comprising:

warping each four-sided candidate contour into a fixed size square contour that is tested for sufficient variance of an image intensity value by computing a standard deviation of the image intensity value, and if the standard deviation of the image intensity value is above a user-selected threshold, then converting the fixed size square contour into a binary image to determine a candidate bit pattern within the contour;

wherein if an encoded bit error corresponding to a border of each candidate bit pattern is below a user-selected threshold, then accepting the candidate bit pattern for further processing; and

determining if bits of the candidate bit pattern, other than its border bits, match any standard bit patterns within a surface marker library for a given landing site at a vertiport, and if there is a match within a user-selected bit error threshold, then accepting the candidate bit pattern as a valid ID;

wherein if more than one contour is associated with a valid ID within the surface marker library, then selecting the contour within a smallest window size and ignoring all other contours;

wherein if multiple contours within a same window size can be associated with a valid ID within the surface marker library, then computing a mean of corresponding corners of the multiple contours; and

performing corner refinement of valid four-sided candidate contours identified as potential landing surface markers by a process comprising:

using local gradients to move corners of each four-sided candidate contour to a sharpest transition point.

7 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the at least one processor includes further program instructions, executable by the at least one processor, to further perform a method comprising:

determining if a detected ID within a contour is in a list of valid IDs within the surface marker library for the given landing site;

if the detected ID is in the list of valid IDs, accepting the contour with the detected ID as valid for further processing;

if the detected ID is not in the list of valid IDs, ignoring the contour with the detected ID and proceeding to a next contour with a detected ID;

wherein if a valid detected ID has a contour size above a first user-selected threshold, then the contour with the valid detected ID is accepted for further processing;

wherein if a valid detected ID has a contour size below a second user-selected threshold, then the contour with this valid detected ID is rejected;

wherein for any contours with valid detected IDs with a contour size between the first and second user-selected thresholds, the contour with the valid detected ID having a largest size is accepted and all other valid IDs are rejected.

8 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the vehicle comprises an unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) vehicle, an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV), or an urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle.

9 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more landing surface markers comprise one or more Aruco codes.

10 . A system comprising:

at least one vision sensor mounted on a vehicle;

at least one processor onboard the vehicle and operatively coupled to the at least one vision sensor; and

a navigation system onboard the vehicle and operatively coupled to the at least one processor;

wherein the at least one processor hosts a set of program modules operative for extracting landing site surface marker information for use in navigation of the vehicle, the program modules comprising:

a detect markers function module, which is operative to receive an input image captured by the at least one vision sensor and convert the input image to a gray scale image;

a detect marker candidates function module, called from the detect markers function module, and operative to receive the gray scale image from the detect markers function module, wherein the detect marker candidates function module is operative to determine contours and corresponding corners from the gray scale image that satisfy user-selected criteria on number of corners and contour length, to detect potential candidates for markers;

an identify marker candidates function module operative to receive the contours and corners detected from the detect marker candidates function module, check their validity for a potential marker valid ID within a surface marker library, return those contours and corners that correspond to a valid ID, and return a corresponding ID number;

a filter detected markers function module operative to filter out multiple detections for a same marker, and retain a marker that is detected at a smallest window size for a given ID; and

a corner refinement function module operative to refine a detected corner by aligning the detected corner with an actual marker corner as closely as possible;

wherein extracted landing site surface marker information is sent to the navigation system for further processing to provide guidance for use during takeoff or landing of the vehicle.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the detect marker candidates function module is further operative to perform multi-scale-binarization to detect multiple edges of the gray scale image and produce a plurality of different edges within the same gray scale image.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein multiple windows of different sizes are used to detect edges in the gray scale image, and within a given window, an adaptive threshold is used as the window slides across the gray scale image to produce a complete edge map of the gray scale image using the window.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the detect marker candidates function module is further operative to:

determine contours of edges of binary images that have closed shapes; and

detect any closed shapes of the contours of edges that have four corners by a process that comprises:

selecting the contours of edges that exceed a user-selected threshold for perimeter size;

retaining the selected contours that have four sides;

determining a minimum corner separation of the contours that have four sides;

eliminating any contours that are within a user-selected threshold for distance from an edge of a respective binary image; and

retaining any remaining contours as four-sided candidate contours.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the identify marker candidates function module is further operative to verify whether the four-sided candidate contours are valid as potential landing surface markers by a process that comprises:

warping each four-sided candidate contour into a fixed size square contour that is tested for sufficient variance of an image intensity value by computing a standard deviation of the image intensity value, and if the standard deviation of the image intensity value is above a user-selected threshold, then converting the fixed size square contour into a binary image to determine a candidate bit pattern within the contour;

wherein if an encoded bit error corresponding to a border of each candidate bit pattern is below a user-selected threshold, then accepting the candidate bit pattern for further processing; and

determining if bits of the candidate bit pattern, other than its border bits, match any standard bit patterns within a surface marker library for a given landing site at a vertiport, and if there is a match within a user-selected bit error threshold, then accepting the candidate bit pattern as a valid ID.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein if more than one contour is associated with a valid ID within the surface marker library, the filter detected markers function module is further operative to select the contour within a smallest window size and ignore all other contours.

16 . The system of claim 14 , wherein if multiple contours within a same window size can be associated with a valid ID within the surface marker library, then the filter detected markers function module is further operative to compute a mean of corresponding corners of the multiple contours.

17 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the corner refinement function module is further operative to perform corner refinement of valid four-sided candidate contours identified as potential landing surface markers by using local gradients to move corners of each four-sided candidate contour to a sharpest transition point.

18 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the potential landing surface markers comprise one or more Aruco codes.

19 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the vehicle comprises an unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) vehicle, an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV), or an urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2023
From: BAGESHWAR, VIBHOR L.; GANAPATHY, ASHWIN; VENKATARAMAN, VIJAY; SRIVASTAVA, ROMI
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 065544/0071 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 202311064467 · Sep 26, 2023 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250104419A1 · Mar 27, 2025
References Cited (22)
US 10699413B1 · Ansari · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20160122038A1 · Fleischman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190156698A1 · Kurowski · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200387553A1 · Tyulyaev · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220351517A1 · Mousavi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 106127201B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109767442A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110543837A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110989674A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 109823552B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 108453738B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 110989687B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 114012736A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
He, Y., Zeng, Z., Li, Z., & Deng, T. (2023). A New Vision-based Method of Autonomous Landing for UAVs. 2023 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Control and Robotics (EECR), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.11… [cited by examiner]
Zea, A., & Hanebeck, U. D. (2019). Refined Pose Estimation for Square Markers Using Shape Fitting. 2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.23919/FUSION43075.2019.901123… [cited by examiner]
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, dated Jan. 29, 2025, from U.S. Appl. No. 18/505,999, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 18/505,999, pp. 1 through 19, Published: EP. [cited by applicant]
He et al., “A New Vision-based Method of Autonomous Landing for UAVs”, 2023 the 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Control and Robotics (EECR), Feb. 24, 2023, pp. 1 through 6. [cited by applicant]
Rannestad et al., “Visual close-range Navigation and Docking of Underwater Vehicles”, Oceans 2023, Limerick, Jun. 5, 2023, pp. 1 through 10. [cited by applicant]
Romero-Ramire et al., “Fractal Markers: A new Approach for Long-Range Marker Pose Estimation Under Occlusion”, IEEE Access, vol. 7, Dec. 2, 2019, pp. 169908 through 169919. [cited by applicant]
Tocci et al. “ArUCo marker-based displacement measurement technique: uncertainty analysis”, Engineering Research Express, vol. 3, No. 3, 035032, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. Cover Page through 11. [cited by applicant]
Xiang et al., A Multi-stage Precision Landing Method for Autonomous eVTOL Based on Multi-marker Joint Localization, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Dec. 5, 2022, pp. 2015 through … [cited by applicant]
Zea et al., “Refined Pose Estimation for Square Markers Using Shape Fitting”, 2019, 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSIOM), Jul. 2, 2019, pp. 1 through 8. [cited by applicant]