IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,625,658
Granted Patent B2
US 12,625,658 · App. 18/790,338 · Granted May 12, 2026

Dynamic progress bar

Inventors: Breena Patricia Gormley (Toronto, CA); Eric Mok (Markham, CA); Jonah Tozman (Toronto, CA)
Assignee: The Toronto-Dominion Bank
G06F3/14G06T11/001G06T2200/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,625,658
App. No.
18/790,338
Granted
May 12, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer system provides an operation completion indicator that utilizes screen area efficiently. The computer system comprises a processor, a display coupled to the processor, and a memory coupled to the processor. The memory stores instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to: display an operation completion indicator indicating progress of the operation, the operation completion indicator containing a plurality of regions, each region: being associated with a respective one of a plurality of upper-level suboperations of the operation, each one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations being in one of an active state or an idle state; detect an active one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations; and divide the associated region of the active upper-level suboperation into at least: a first area representing completed parts of the active upper-level suboperations; and a second area representing incomplete parts of the active upper-level suboperation.

Claims (57)

1 . A computer system for displaying progress of an operation, the computer system comprising:

a processor;

a display coupled to the processor;

a memory coupled to the processor, storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to:

display an operation completion indicator indicating progress of the operation, the operation completion indicator containing a plurality of regions, each region associated with a respective one of a plurality of upper-level suboperations of the operation and having a respective size;

determine a number of lower-level suboperations associated with one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations;

determine that the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in an active state; and

configure, in response to determining that the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in the active state, the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations to be divided into a plurality of subregions, each of the plurality of subregions corresponding to a respective one of the number of lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations, the respective size of the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations remaining unchanged after dividing the region.

2 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of upper-level suboperations comprises at most one upper-level suboperation in the active state.

3 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of upper-level suboperations are executed in an order and detecting completion of the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations causes another one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations to enter the active state, the another one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations being the upper-level suboperation to be executed after the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations.

4 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations progresses in response to input received via an input device.

5 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine, that one of the lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in the active state and that another one of the lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is not in the active state;

configure the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the one of the lower-level suboperations is in the active state; and

configure the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the another one of the lower-level suboperations is not in the active state.

6 . The computer system of claim 5 wherein configuring the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations includes displaying the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to be enlarged relative to the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations.

7 . The computer system of claim 5 , wherein:

configuring the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations includes displaying the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations in a first color; and

configuring the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations includes displaying the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations in a second color different from the first color.

8 . The computer system of claim 5 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

detect completion of the one of the lower-level suboperations; and

configure, in response to detecting the completion of the one of the lower-level suboperations:

the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the one of the lower-level suboperations is not in the active state; and

the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the another one of the lower-level suboperations is in the active state.

9 . The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to configure, in response to detecting the completion of the one of the lower-level suboperations, the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the one of the lower-level suboperations is completed.

10 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to, subsequent to configuring the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations to display the plurality of subregions:

detect completion of the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations; and

display, in response to detecting the completion of the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations, the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations as an undivided area.

11 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the number of lower-level suboperations progresses in response to input received via an input device.

12 . The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the operation completion indicator remains displayed in a fixed location on the display throughout the progress of the operation.

13 . A computer-implemented method, the method comprising:

displaying an operation completion indicator indicating progress of an operation, the operation completion indicator containing a plurality of regions, each region associated with a respective one of a plurality of upper-level suboperations of the operation and having a respective size;

determining a number of lower-level suboperations associated with one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations;

determining that the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in an active state; and

configuring, in response to determining that the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in the active state, the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations to be divided into a plurality of subregions, each of the plurality of subregions corresponding to a respective one of the number of lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations, the respective size of the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations remaining unchanged after dividing the region.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining, that one of the lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in the active state and that another one of the lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is not in the active state;

configuring the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the one of the lower-level suboperations is in the active state; and

configuring the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the another one of the lower-level suboperations is not in the active state.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 wherein configuring the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations includes displaying the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to be enlarged relative to the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein:

configuring the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations includes displaying the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations in a first color; and

configuring the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations includes displaying the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations in a second color different from the first color.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the method further comprises:

detecting completion of the one of the lower-level suboperations; and, in response thereto

configuring:

the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the one of the lower-level suboperations is not in the active state; and

the subregion associated with the another one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the another one of the lower-level suboperations is in the active state.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein the method further comprises configuring, in response to detecting the completion of the one of the lower-level suboperations, the subregion associated with the one of the lower-level suboperations to indicate that the one of the lower-level suboperations is completed.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the method further comprises, subsequent to configuring the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations to display the plurality of subregions:

detecting completion of the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations; and

displaying, in response to detecting the completion of the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations, the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations as an undivided area.

20 . A non-transitory computer readable medium storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:

display an operation completion indicator indicating progress of an operation, the operation completion indicator containing a plurality of regions, each region associated with a respective one of a plurality of upper-level suboperations of the operation and having a respective size;

determine a number of lower-level suboperations associated with one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations;

determine that the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in an active state; and

configure, in response to determining that the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations is in the active state, the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations to be divided into a plurality of subregions, each of the plurality of subregions corresponding to a respective one of the number of lower-level suboperations associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations, the respective size of the region associated with the one of the plurality of upper-level suboperations remaining unchanged after dividing the region.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2026
From: GORMLEY, BREENA PATRICIA; MOK, ERIC; TOZMAN, JONAH
To: THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
Reel/Frame 074325/0039 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20260037200A1 · Feb 5, 2026
References Cited (15)
US 7290698B2 · Poslinski et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8122368B2 · Chakra et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8375319B2 · Decker · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8793575B1 · Lattyak et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10016681B2 · Morimura et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10489021B2 · Ekstrand · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US D924258S · Klimer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US D929417S · Li · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20070277122A1 · Frijlink et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080256473A1 · Chakra et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080307348A1 · Jones et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090106684A1 · Chakra et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110145745A1 · Hyeon et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120044520A1 · Goddard · 2012 [cited by examiner]
CN 104536873A · 2015 [cited by applicant]