IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,630,146
Granted Patent B2
US 12,630,146 · App. 17/982,875 · Granted May 19, 2026

Method for controlling axle load distribution of a vehicle

Inventors: Jakub Prokes (Gothenburg, SE); Umur Erdinc (Gothenburg, SE)
Assignee: Volvo Truck Corporation
B60W30/02B60W10/16B60W10/22B60W2520/10B60W2520/20B60W2520/28B60W2520/30B60W2530/20B60W2555/20B60W2710/125B60W2710/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,630,146
App. No.
17/982,875
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling axle load distribution of a heavy-duty vehicle during a maneuver, wherein the heavy-duty vehicle comprises a number of wheel axles and one or more motion support devices arranged to adjust a relative axle load of one or more wheel axles of the number of wheel axles, the method comprising obtaining a vehicle model and a tire model, wherein the vehicle model and the tire model are jointly configured to predict a tire scrubbing force in dependence of a vehicle state comprising a relative axle load distribution during the maneuver, determining a nominal tire scrubbing force for a current relative axle load distribution, determining an improved relative axle load distribution maneuver associated with a reduced tire scrubbing force compared to the nominal tire scrubbing force, and controlling the one or more motion support devices to provide the improved relative axle load distribution during the maneuver.

Claims (28)

1 . A method for controlling axle load distribution of a heavy-duty vehicle during a maneuver, wherein the heavy-duty vehicle comprises a number of wheel axles and one or more motion support devices arranged to adjust a relative axle load of one or more wheel axles of the number of wheel axles, the method comprising:

obtaining a vehicle model and a tire model, wherein the vehicle model and the tire model are jointly configured to predict a tire scrubbing force in dependence of a vehicle state comprising a relative axle load distribution during the maneuver;

determining a nominal tire scrubbing force for a current relative axle load distribution during the maneuver, based on the vehicle model and on the tire model;

determining, based on the vehicle model and the tire model, a cost scrub force function corresponding to the nominal tire scrubbing force;

determining, based on the vehicle model and the tire model, a cost maneuverability function corresponding to a desired effective wheelbase of the heavy-duty vehicle during the maneuver;

determining an improved relative axle load distribution for the maneuver associated with a reduced tire scrubbing force by reducing a combined cost function of the cost scrub force function and the cost maneuverability function; and

controlling the one or more motion support devices to provide the improved relative axle load distribution during the maneuver.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the tire model is parameterized by one or more tire parameters obtained from input data related to at least one parameter of a tire on the heavy-duty vehicle.

3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising obtaining the input data related to the at least one parameter of a tire on the heavy-duty vehicle from one or more sensors arranged to measure one or more operating parameters of the tire.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the input data relating to the measured one or more operating parameters comprise any one or more of: vehicle speed, wheel rotation speed, tire pressure, tire temperature, tire acceleration, tire strain, tire GPS position, weather, ambient temperature, rain classification data, amount of water on road, normal load, slip angle, steer angle, and applied torque on one or more wheels.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the input data comprises data obtained from a memory related to tire design, wherein the data related to tire design comprises any one or more of: tire nominal dimension, tire structural characteristics, tire chemical composition, and tire history.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more tire parameters comprise any one or more of: tire wear, tire longitudinal stiffness, tire lateral stiffness, tire rolling resistance, tire peak friction, tire rolling radius, tire contact patch properties, tire balance properties and wheel alignment properties.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determined improved relative axle load distribution is determined by applying a cost function to identify a relative axle load distribution favorable both for reducing tire scrubbing force and improving maneuverability.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a first improved relative axle load distribution for the maneuver associated with a reduced tire scrubbing force compared to the nominal tire scrubbing force and determining a second improved relative axle load distribution based on the desired effective wheelbase of the heavy-duty vehicle during the maneuver, and further selecting one of the first and second improved relative axle load distributions as the improved relative axle load distributions.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising coordinating the one or more motion support devices of the heavy-duty vehicle on the basis of the determined improved relative axle load distribution.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a wheel slip limit for a vehicle motion control in dependence of a pre-determined acceptable target tire scrubbing.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the one or more motion support devices to provide the improved relative axle load distribution during the maneuver comprises adjusting load distribution between different axles.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising coordinating the one or more motion support devices of the heavy-duty vehicle to adjust active suspension systems.

13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising coordinating the one or more motion support devices of the heavy-duty vehicle to engage an inter-axle differential lock between driven axles of the vehicle.

14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining route information; and controlling the one or more motion support devices to provide the improved relative axle load distribution during the maneuver ahead of any detected upcoming path curvature.

15 . A control unit for controlling axle load distribution of a heavy-duty vehicle during a maneuver, the heavy-duty vehicle comprising a number of wheel axles and one or more motion support devices arranged to adjust a relative axle load of one or more wheel axles of the number of wheel axles, the control unit configured to:

obtain a vehicle model and a tire model, wherein the vehicle model and the tire model are jointly configured to predict a tire scrubbing force in dependence of a vehicle state comprising a relative axle load distribution during the maneuver;

determine a nominal tire scrubbing force for a current relative axle load distribution during the maneuver, based on the vehicle model and on the tire model;

determine, based on the vehicle model and the tire model, a cost scrub force function corresponding to the nominal tire scrubbing force;

determine, based on the vehicle model and the tire model, a cost maneuverability function corresponding to a desired effective wheelbase of the heavy-duty vehicle during the maneuver;

determine an improved relative axle load distribution for the maneuver associated with a reduced tire scrubbing force by reducing a combined cost function of the cost scrub force function and the cost maneuverability function; and

control the one or more motion support devices to provide the improved relative axle load distribution during the maneuver.

16 . A vehicle comprising the control unit of claim 15 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2022
From: PROKES, JAKUB; ERDINC, UMUR
To: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061919/0818 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 21208677 · Nov 17, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230150482A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (14)
US 20120187645A1 · Albert · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120187656A1 · Albert · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20180186208A1 · Coombs · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3045339A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
FR 2948621A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
GB 2518053A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 13190570A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
ISO, “International Standard ISO 8855: Road vehicles—Vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability—Vocabulary,” Second Edition, Dec. 2011, International Organization for Standardization, 50 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pacejka, H., “Tire and Vehicle Dynamics,” 2012, Elsevier Ltd., 629 pages. [cited by applicant]
Winkler, C. et al., “Analysis and testing of the steady-state turning of multiaxle trucks,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Heavy Vehicles Weights and Dimensions, Mar. 29-Apr. 2, 1998, Maroochydore, … [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 21208677.1, mailed May 6, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
SAE International, “Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice,” SAE J670, Jan. 2008, 73 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22205118.7, mailed Mar. 20, 2023, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 22205118.7, mailed Aug. 5, 2025, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]