IP Library Granted Patent US 12,631,356
Granted Patent B2
US 12,631,356 · App. 18/314,298 · Granted May 19, 2026

Apparatus, computer program product, and method for evaluating course of degradation in air handling units

Inventor: Zdenek Schindler (Prague, CZ)
Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
F24F11/38F24F11/49F24F2110/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,631,356
App. No.
18/314,298
Filed
May 9, 2023
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2872
USPC
700/276
Abstract

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products are disclosed for monitoring cooling coil degradation. An example method receives a first data set comprising heat transfer data over a first time interval. The method generates, with a machine learning model, a data prediction based upon the first data set, wherein the data prediction comprises expected heat transfer data over a second time interval. The method receives a second data set comprising heat transfer data over the second time interval. The method determines a cooling coil degradation level based on a difference between the data prediction and the second data set.

Claims (49)

1 . An apparatus for determining cooling coil degradation, the apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one non-transitory memory including computer-coded instructions thereon, the computer-coded instructions configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

receive a first data set comprising heat transfer data over a first time interval;

generate, with a machine learning model, a data prediction based at least on the first data set, wherein the data prediction comprises heat transfer data over a second time interval;

receive a second data set comprising heat transfer data over the second time interval;

determine a cooling coil degradation level based on a difference between the data prediction and the second data set; and

wherein the apparatus further caused to:

determine a mixing ratio associated with the data prediction;

determine a mixing ratio associated with the second data set; and

determine an energy waste level based on a difference between the mixing ratio associated with the data prediction and the mixing ratio associated with the second data set.

2 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first data set and the second data set comprise a difference between chilled water supply temperature and chilled water return temperature.

3 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first data set, data prediction, and second data set comprise loss in latent heat.

4 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the cooling coil degradation level is determined based at least on a difference between a heat transfer coefficient associated with the data prediction and a heat transfer coefficient associated with the second data set.

5 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the cooling coil degradation level is determined based at least on a difference between a logarithmic mean temperature difference associated with the data prediction and a logarithmic mean temperature difference associated with the second data set.

6 . The apparatus of claim 1 , the apparatus further caused to:

determine a chiller efficiency level associated with the data prediction;

determine a chiller efficiency level associated with the second data set; and

determine an energy waste level based on a difference between the chiller efficiency level associated with the data prediction and the chiller efficiency level associated with the second data set.

7 . The apparatus of claim 1 , the apparatus further caused to:

determine an excess expenditure value based on the energy waste level.

8 . The apparatus of claim 7 , the apparatus further caused to:

determine an optimal maintenance time based on the excess expenditure value and a cost of maintenance.

9 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first time interval is determined based at least on a rate of expected degradation.

10 . The apparatus of claim 1 , the apparatus further caused to:

smooth the first data set, wherein the first data set is smoothed based at least on a third time interval that is longer than a basic sampling time interval and encompasses the basic sampling time interval.

11 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model comprises a regression model.

12 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model is trained based on the first data set.

13 . A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving a first data set comprising heat transfer data over a first time interval;

generating, with a machine learning model, a data prediction based upon the first data set, wherein the data prediction comprises expected heat transfer data over a second time interval;

receiving a second data set comprising heat transfer data over the second time interval; and

determining a cooling coil degradation level based on a difference between the data prediction and the second data set; and

wherein the computer-implemented method further comprising:

determining a mixing ratio associated with the data prediction;

determining a mixing ratio associated with the second data set; and

determining an energy waste level based on a difference between the mixing ratio associated with the data prediction and the mixing ratio associated with the second data set.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the first data set and the second data set comprise a difference between chilled water supply temperature and chilled water return temperature.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the first data set, data prediction, and second data set comprise loss in latent heat.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the cooling coil degradation level is determined based at least on a difference between a heat transfer coefficient associated with the data prediction and a heat transfer coefficient associated with the second data set.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the cooling coil degradation level is determined based at least on a difference between a logarithmic mean temperature difference associated with the data prediction and a logarithmic mean temperature difference associated with the second data set.

18 . A computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer program code stored thereon that, in execution with at least one processor, is configured for:

receiving a first data set comprising heat transfer data over a first time interval;

generating, with a machine learning model, a data prediction based upon the first data set, wherein the data prediction comprises expected heat transfer data over a second time interval;

receiving a second data set comprising heat transfer data over the second time interval; and

determining a cooling coil degradation level based on a difference between the data prediction and the second data set; and

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determining a mixing ratio associated with the data prediction;

determining a mixing ratio associated with the second data set; and

determining an energy waste level based on a difference between the mixing ratio associated with the data prediction and the mixing ratio associated with the second data set.

19 . The computer program product of claim 18 , wherein the first data set and the second data set comprise a difference between chilled water supply temperature and chilled water return temperature.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2023
From: SCHINDLER, ZDENEK
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 063579/0485 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240377089A1 · Nov 14, 2024
References Cited (11)
US 11248819B2 · Slimacek · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11320164B2 · Roth · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11487277B2 · Turney · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11703246B2 · Alanqar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11835930B2 · Hull · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20200090289A1 · Elbsat · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200278669A1 · Brownie · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200301408A1 · Elbsat · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230243539A1 · Buda · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230288882A1 · Maitra · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240361735A1 · Schindler · 2024 [cited by examiner]