IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,631,977
Granted Patent B2
US 12,631,977 · App. 17/608,750 · Granted May 19, 2026

Method for determining an alignment model based on an oblique fitting technique

Inventor: Maria Edo Hulsebos (Bergeijk, NL)
Assignee: ASML Netherlands B.V.
G03F9/7046G03F7/70633G03F7/70641G03F7/70683G03F9/7076
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,631,977
App. No.
17/608,750
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are methods of determining an alignment model associated with a mark layout. A method includes obtaining (a) first measurement data a relatively dense mark layout (e.g., more than 200 marks) in comparison with a relatively sparse mark layout (e.g., less than 65 marks) and a second measurement data associated with the relatively sparse mark layout, and (b) a first fitted model that describes object deformation for the relatively dense overlay mark layout; and determining the alignment model based on a second fitted model that describes object deformation for the relatively sparse mark layout, via an fitting technique, based on generalized squares fitting employing an oblique inner product matrix (e.g., W) or an oblique projection least squares fitting employing an oblique projection matrix (e.g., P).

Claims (182)

1 . A method for generating an alignment model associated with a mark layout of alignment marks disposed on a wafer, the mark layout including a relatively sparse mark layout and a relatively dense mark layout, the alignment model used by a lithographic apparatus for correcting wafer distortions during a patterning process of the wafer, the method comprising:

obtaining first measurement data associated with the relatively dense mark layout in comparison with the relatively sparse mark layout and second measurement data associated with the relatively sparse mark layout, wherein the first and second measurement data comprise at least one of alignment mark measurement position data or overlay measurement position data;

modeling a first fitted model that describes deformation of the wafer for the relatively dense mark layout, wherein the wafer deformation includes deformation of a surface of the wafer on which a desired pattern is transferred via the patterning process;

modeling a second fitted model that describes the wafer deformation for the relatively sparse mark layout; and

determining the alignment model, the determined alignment model being associated with the mark layout disposed on the wafer and based on cooperation between the first fitted model and the second fitted model via an oblique fitting technique, wherein the determining comprises:

determining a first output using the first fitted model and the first measurement data;

determining a second output using the oblique fitting technique, the second fitted model, the second measurement data, and the first fitted model; and

adjusting coefficients of the oblique fitting technique such that a difference between the first output of the first fitted model and the second output of the second fitted model is reduced, so that the second fitted model with the adjusted coefficients is the alignment model.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the oblique fitting technique is a generalized least squares fitting employing an oblique inner product matrix.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the adjusting coefficients of the oblique inner product matrix comprises:

executing a mathematical model below:

x

c

=

M

y

⁢

c

w

c

w

=

(

M

x

T

⁢

W

T

⁢

WM

x

)

-

1

⁢

M

x

T

⁢

W

T

⁢

Wx

y

c

=

M

y

(

M

y

T

⁢

M

y

)

-

1

⁢

M

y

T

⁢

y

W

=

arg

⁢

min

W

⁢

y

c

-

x

c

(

W

)

wherein: W is the oblique inner product matrix; c w are fit coefficients of W associated with the second fitted model; M x comprises model functions of the second fitted model associated with the relatively sparse mark layout; M y comprises model functions of the first fitted model associated with the relatively dense mark layout; x c is the second output evaluated on the relatively dense mark layout based on M y associated with the first fitted model, the second measurement data x, and coefficients of W associated with the second fitted model; and y c is the first output based on the first fitted model and the first measurement data y.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the oblique fitting technique is an oblique projection least squares fitting employing an oblique projection matrix.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the adjusting coefficients of the oblique projection matrix comprises:

executing a mathematical model below:

c

p

=

(

M

x

T

⁢

M

x

)

-

1

⁢

M

x

T

⁢

Px

P

=

arg

⁢

min

P

⁢

being

⁢

a

⁢

oblique

⁢

projection

⁢

matrix

⁢

y

c

-

M

y

⁢

c

p

y

c

=

M

y

(

M

y

T

⁢

M

y

)

-

1

⁢

M

y

T

⁢

y

wherein: P is the oblique projection matrix; c p are fit coefficients of the oblique projection matrix P associated with the second fitted model; M x comprises model functions associated with the relatively sparse mark layout; x is the second measurement data; M y comprises model functions of the first fitted model associated with the relatively dense mark layout; y c is the first output described by the first fitted model and evaluated on the first measurement data; and M y c p refers to the second output computed based on M x associated with the second fitted model, the second measurement data x, and evaluated on the relatively dense mark layout using M y associated with the first fitted model.

6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the oblique fitting technique is configured to employ an oblique projection matrix.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second measurement data further comprises displacement data of the sparse mark layout with respect to predetermined nominal position data.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second fitted models are wafer fitted model.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second fitted model and/or the first model are a combination of two sub-models: a first sub-model comprising a first set of parameters, preferably four-parameters, and second sub-model comprising a second set of parameters, preferably six parameters.

10 . A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions recorded thereon, the instructions when executed by a computer causes the computer to perform a method for generating an alignment model associated with a mark layout of alignment marks disposed on a wafer, the mark layout including a relatively sparse mark layout and a relatively dense mark layout, the alignment model used by a lithographic apparatus for correcting wafer distortions during a patterning process of the wafer, the method comprising:

obtaining first measurement data associated with the relatively dense mark layout in comparison with the relatively sparse mark layout and second measurement data associated with the relatively sparse mark layout, wherein the first and second measurement data comprise at least one of alignment mark measurement position data or overlay measurement position data;

modeling a first fitted model that describes deformation of the wafer for the relatively dense mark layout, wherein the wafer deformation includes deformation of a surface of the wafer on which a desired pattern is transferred via the patterning process;

modeling a second fitted model that describes the wafer deformation for the relatively sparse mark layout; and

determining the alignment model, the determined alignment model being associated with the mark layout disposed on the wafer and based on cooperation between the first fitted model and the second fitted model via an oblique fitting technique, wherein the determining comprises:

determining a first output using the first fitted model and the first measurement data;

determining a second output using the oblique fitting technique, the second fitted model, the second measurement data, and the first fitted model; and

adjusting coefficients of the oblique fitting technique such that a difference between the first output of the first fitted model and the second output of the second fitted model is reduced, so that the second fitted model with the adjusted coefficients is the alignment model.

11 . A measurement system comprising a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions recorded thereon, the instructions when executed by a computer cause the computer to perform a method for generating an alignment model associated with a mark layout of alignment marks disposed on a wafer, the mark layout including a relatively sparse mark layout and a relatively dense mark layout, the alignment model used by a lithographic apparatus for correcting wafer distortions during a patterning process of the wafer, the method comprising:

obtaining first measurement data associated with the relatively dense mark layout in comparison with the relatively sparse mark layout and second measurement data associated with the relatively sparse mark layout, wherein the first and second measurement data comprise at least one of alignment mark measurement position data or overlay measurement position data;

modeling a first fitted model that describes deformation of the wafer for the relatively dense mark layout, wherein the wafer deformation includes deformation of a surface of the wafer on which a desired pattern is transferred via the patterning process;

modeling a second fitted model that describes the wafer deformation for the relatively sparse mark layout; and

determining the alignment model, the determined alignment model being associated with the mark layout disposed on the wafer and based on cooperation between the first fitted model and the second fitted model via an oblique fitting technique, wherein the determining comprises:

determining a first output using the first fitted model and the first measurement data;

determining a second output using the oblique fitting technique, the second fitted model, the second measurement data, and the first fitted model; and

adjusting coefficients of the oblique fitting technique such that a difference between the first output of the first fitted model and the second output of the second fitted model is reduced, so that the second fitted model with the adjusted coefficients is the alignment model.

12 . A lithography apparatus comprising a measurement system comprising a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions recorded thereon, the instructions when executed by a computer cause the computer to perform a method for generating an alignment model associated with a mark layout of alignment marks disposed on a wafer, the mark layout including a relatively sparse mark layout and a relatively dense mark layout, the alignment model used by a lithographic apparatus for correcting wafer distortions during a patterning process of the wafer, the method comprising:

obtaining first measurement data associated with the relatively dense mark layout in comparison with the relatively sparse mark layout and second measurement data associated with the relatively sparse mark layout, wherein the first and second measurement data comprises at least one of alignment mark measurement position data and/or overlay measurement position data;

modeling a first fitted model that describes deformation of the wafer for the relatively dense mark layout, wherein the wafer deformation includes deformation of a surface of the wafer on which a desired pattern is transferred via the patterning process;

modeling a second fitted model that describes the wafer deformation for the relatively sparse mark layout; and

determining the alignment model, the determined alignment model being associated with the mark layout disposed on the wafer and based on cooperation between the first fitted model and the second fitted model via an oblique fitting technique, wherein the determining comprises:

determining a first output using the first fitted model and the first measurement data;

determining a second output using the oblique fitting technique, the second fitted model, the second measurement data, and the first fitted model; and

adjusting coefficients of the oblique fitting technique such that a difference between the first output of the first fitted model and the second output of the second fitted model is reduced, so that the second fitted model with the adjusted coefficients is the alignment model.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2022
From: HULSEBOS, EDO MARIA
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 059018/0247 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 19172514 · May 3, 2019 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220276575A1 · Sep 1, 2022
References Cited (26)
US 6961116B2 · Den Boef · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7583359B2 · Moest · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7791727B2 · Den Boef · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130230797A1 · Van Der Sanden · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150261097A1 · Mathijssen · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160246185A1 · Ypma · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170108783A1 · Kramer · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170277045A1 · Menger et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180314168A1 · Van Haren et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190064680A1 · Schmitt-Weaver et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190086201A1 · Den Boef et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 1744217A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013074294 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017524960 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 20170077214A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
TW 201843534A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011087129 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017194289A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018153711A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019001871A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019149423A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Zvonarev et al. (“Iterative algorithms for weighted and unweighted finite-rank time-series approximations.” (2015) arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.02751). (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Antezana et al. (“Oblique Projections and Frames.” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society) (2006), 134(4), p. 1031-1037) (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
Notification of Reason(s) for Refusal issued by the Japan Patent Office in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-564990; mailed Nov. 1, 2022 (8 pgs.). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority in related International Application No. PCT/EP2020/059411, mailed Jul. 27, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued by the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) in related ROC (Taiwan) Patent Application No. 109113751, issued Mar. 19, 2021. [cited by applicant]