IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,639,822
Granted Patent B2
US 12,639,822 · App. 18/603,550 · Granted May 26, 2026

Deep learning based image segmentation method including biodegradable stent in intravascular optical tomography image

Inventors: Hyeong-Soo Nam (Seoul, KR); Aleksandr Dolgov (Incheon, KR); Sang-Won Lee (Seoul, KR); Sogi Choi (Seoul, KR); Hong-Ki Yoo (Dajeon, KR); Hyung-Il Kim (Incheon, KR)
Assignee: DOTTER INC.
G06T7/162G06F18/211G06N3/045G06N3/0455G06N3/0464G06N3/048G06N3/082G06N3/084G06N3/09G06T3/4046G06T7/11G06V2201/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,639,822
App. No.
18/603,550
Granted
May 26, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is an image segmentation device. The image segmentation device may include: a storage unit storing a segmentation model learned so as to segment at least one predetermined object; and at least one processor inputting input data into the segmentation model and segmenting at least one predetermined object in the input data, in which the segmentation model may include an encoder including at least one dimension reduction block reducing a dimension of the input data, a decoder including at least one dimension increase block increasing the dimension of output data output from the encoder by using data output from at least one dimension reduction block, and an auxiliary classification model receiving the output data and recognizing whether a specific object is included in the output data.

Claims (68)

1 . A method of detecting at least one predetermined object in input data, the method comprising:

inputting the input data, using at least one processor, into a segmentation model of an image segmentation device that comprises the at least one processor and a non-transient, computer- readable storage unit storing the segmentation model trained using learning images so as to segment the at least one predetermined object, wherein the segmentation model includes

an encoder including at least one dimension reduction block reducing a dimension of the input data,

a decoder including at least one dimension increase block increasing the dimension of output data outputted from the encoder by using data outputted from at least one dimension reduction block, and

an auxiliary classification model receiving the output data outputted from the encoder and recognizing whether a specific object is included in the output data to produce a binary classification result,

wherein the at least one predetermined object includes at least one of a strut and tissue of a biodegradable stent, and

wherein the input data is an intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) image, and

wherein the at least one processor optimizes weight values included in the decoder of the segmentation model so as to express each of the at least one predetermined object included in the learning images in a final feature value map of the decoder and wherein the at least one processor optimizes weight values included in the encoder and the auxiliary classification model of the segmentation model so as to recognize whether the specific object is included in the learning images to produce the binary classification result through the auxiliary classification model so that a feature value for strut segmentation of the encoder and the decoder is further optimized when training the segmentation model, wherein further optimization of the encoder and the decoder comprises minimizing a loss function L that is calculated using a term for the binary classification result of the auxiliary classification model, and

wherein the learning images include

a plurality of first learning images including a first biodegradable stent configured by a strut having a first thickness, and

a plurality of second learning images including a second biodegradable stent configured by a strut having a second thickness different from the first thickness; and,

segmenting the at least one predetermined object in the input data, thereby detecting the at least one predetermined object in the input data.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the learning images include at least one patch acquired by randomly cropping an image labeled with each of the at least one predetermined object.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a final output end of the decoder further includes a boundary refine module adjusting a final feature map inputted into a final classification operation so that a boundary for area segmentation related to each of the at least one predetermined object is refined.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the final classification operation includes an operation through at least one convolutional layer and a Softmax activation function.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the boundary refine module has a residual block structure.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one dimension reduction block and the at least one dimension increase block include a multi-scale dilated residual block having a plurality of convolutional layers having different dilation rates arranged in parallel and including a residual connection.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one dimension reduction block includes a dropout layer for preventing overfitting.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein a final layer of the encoder includes the dropout layer.

9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the dropout layer comprises a 2-dimension (D) dropout layer for preventing overfitting for 2D-structure input data.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a bottleneck block is disposed on a final layer of the encoder.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor performs 3D rendering by using final data outputted by inputting the input data into the segmentation model, and the input data.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the auxiliary classification model receives the output data output from a bottleneck block of the encoder.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor generates a graph so as to perform quantitative measurement and comparison for a degree of newborn membrane proliferation of implanted biodegradable stents.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the specific object comprises a strut of a biodegradable stent.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the specific object comprises a tissue.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the learning images comprise at least one patch acquired by random crop of an image labeled with the at least one predetermined object.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the auxiliary classification model is learned whether the specific object is included in a random cropped patch.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the loss function L is calculated using a cross entropy term for the binary classification result of the auxiliary classification model.

19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the loss function L is calculated using the following equation:

L

=

λ

1

⁢

L

logloss

+

λ

2

⁢

L

L

⁢

1

+

λ

3

⁢

L

aux

+

λ

4

⁢

W

F

2

where λ i is the weight, λ logloss is a weighted average cross entropy term, L L1 is an L1 distance term for considering sparsity in segmenting a strut area, L aux is a cross entropy term for the binary classification result of the auxiliary classification model, and

W

F

2

is a Frobenius norm of all weights of the segmentation model.

20 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising implanting the biodegradable stent into a body organ having a tubular structure of a patient prior to inputting the input data.

Assignments (2)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THE RECEIVING PARTY DATA CHANGING DOTTER CO., LTD. TO DOTTER INC. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 67135 FRAME 911. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 17, 2025
From: NAM, HYEONG-SOO; DOLGOV, ALEKSANDR; LEE, SANG-WON; CHOI, SOGI; YOO, HONG-KI; KIM, HYUNG-IL
To: DOTTER INC.
Reel/Frame 070882/0983 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 17, 2024
From: NAM, HYEONG-SOO; DOLGOV, ALEKSANDR; LEE, SANG-WON; CHOI, SOGI; YOO, HONG-KI; KIM, HYUNG-IL
To: DOTTER CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 067135/0911 →
Priority Claims (2)
KR 10-2021-0033568 · Mar 15, 2021 · national
KR 10-2021-0058636 · May 6, 2021 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17695477 · Mar 15, 2022
Related Publication 20240221171A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (36)
US 10402689B1 · Bogdanovych · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10474713B1 · Kim · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11026749B1 · Chatzizisis · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20090222437A1 · Niu · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110119213A1 · Elisseeff · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20160213253A1 · Wang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200125823A1 · Lo · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200222018A1 · van Walsum · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200226422A1 · Li · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210378505A1 · Sobol · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210406596A1 · Hoffman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220012890A1 · Wu · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220061920A1 · Long · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230140881A1 · De Sisternes · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230267616A1 · Cahyo · 2023 [cited by examiner]
AU 2009305771A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 2752172B1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011135103A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “Lesion-Aware Segmentation Network for Atrophy and Detachment of Pathological Myopia on Fundus Images”, 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) Apr. 3-7, 2020, Iowa City, Iowa, US… [cited by applicant]
Bologna et al., “Automatic segmentation of optical coherence tomography pullbacks of coronary arteries treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Application to hemodynamics modeling”, PLoS ONE, 2019, vol. 14, No. 3… [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “End to End Video Segmentation for Driving: Lane Detection for Autonomous Car”, Deep Learning'18, 2018, State College, PA, USA, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Cervical image classification based on image segmentation preprocessing and a CapsNet network model”, Int J Imaging System Technology, 2018, vol. 29, pp. 19-28. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2021 for corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2021-0058636, 13 pages (with English language translation). [cited by applicant]
Amendment dated Sep. 5, 2021 for corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2021-0058636, 11 pages (with English language translation). [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al. (“Retinal Vessels Segmentation Based on Dilated Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network,” IEEE Access (vol. 7); Date of Publication: Jun. 13, 2019) (Year: 2019). [cited by applicant]
Feng et al. (“Patch-based fully convolutional neural network with skip connections for retinal blood vessel segmentation,” IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; Date of Conference: Sep. 17-20, 2017) (Year: … [cited by applicant]
Li et al. (“Residual U-Net for Retinal Vessel Segmentation,” IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; Date of Conference: Sep. 22-25, 2019) (Year: 2019). [cited by applicant]
Rampat et al. (“A randomized trial comparing two stent sizing strategies in coronary bifurcation treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds—The Absorb Bifurcation Coronary (ABC) trial,” Cardiovascular Revasculariza… [cited by applicant]
Badrinarayanan et al. (“SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (vol. 39, Issue: 12, Dec. 1, 2017) (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Lin et al. (“Multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017) (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Amer et al. (“ResDUnet: Residual Dilated UNet for Left Ventricle Segmentation from Echocardiographic Images,” 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society; Date of Conferenc… [cited by applicant]
Tsantis et al. (“Automatic vessel lumen segmentation and stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomography”, Med Phys. 39(1), Jan. 2012) (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Ughi et al. (“Automatic segmentation of in-vivo intra-coronary optical coherence tomography images to assess stent strut apposition and coverage,” Int. J. Cardiovasc Imaging 28(2), Feb. 25, 2011) (Year: 2011). [cited by applicant]
Bailey, (“Theoretical Advantages and Disadvantages of Stent Strut Materials, Design, Thickness, and Surface Characteristics”, Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2009) (Year: 2009). [cited by applicant]
Paoletti et al. (“Computer-assisted quantitative analysis of new interventional treatment methods,” Computing in Cardiology 2013; 40:1207-1210) (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
English Translation of PT 2752172 T. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]