IP Library Granted Patent US 12,646,411
Granted Patent B2
US 12,646,411 · App. 17/358,036 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

Methods and devices for a road user

Inventors: Neslihan Kose Cihangir (Munich, DE); Rafael Rosales (Unterhaching, DE); Florian Geissler (Munich, DE); Michael Paulitsch (Ottobrunn, DE); Ignacio Alvarez (Portland, OR)
Assignee: Intel Corporation
G08G1/123G08G1/056H04W4/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,646,411
App. No.
17/358,036
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Devices and methods for a road user are provided in this disclosure. An apparatus for determining detection of a road user may include a memory configured to store a plurality of data items received from a plurality of further road users. Each of the plurality of data items may include a detection information indicating whether an object has or has not been detected by one of the plurality of further road users. Furthermore, the apparatus may include a processor that is configured to determine a detection result indicating whether the road user has been detected by the one of the plurality of further road users based on the detection information.

Claims (52)

1 . An apparatus comprising:

an interface configured to receive a plurality of data items provided by a plurality of sensors, wherein the plurality of data items comprises information indicating presences of a plurality of road users in a road environment, wherein the plurality of road users comprises a first road user and a second road user;

a processor configured to:

identify a first object related to the first road user and a second object related to the second road user from the plurality of data items;

predict a respective road user trajectory for each of the plurality of road users based on the plurality of data items;

generate road user trajectory data based on the predicted road user trajectories, wherein the road user trajectory data comprises information indicating a respective predicted location of each of the plurality of road users in the road environment;

determine whether the predicted location of the first road user will be occupied by the first road user and the second road user at the same time;

determine locations in the road environment where there will be no occupancy by any one of the plurality of road users for a period of time; and

generate an alternative trajectory for a road user being the first road user of the plurality of road users based on the determination of the locations;

encode a first message based on the determination of the occupancy of the predicted location of the first road user to be transmitted to the first road user; and

encode a second message based on the determination of the occupancy of the predicted location of the first road user to be transmitted to the second road user.

2 . The apparatus of claim 1 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to predict the road user trajectory for the road user based on a road user data item, and

wherein the road user data item comprises at least one of the following information:

an indication of a type of the road user;

an indication of a posture of the road user;

an indication of a behaviour of the road user;

an indication of a state of the road user;

wherein the plurality of data items comprises the road user data item.

3 . The apparatus of claim 1 ,

wherein the plurality of data items comprises a first sensor data item and a second sensor data item; and

wherein the processor is further configured to perform a first prediction based on the first sensor data item, and perform a second prediction based on the second sensor data item.

4 . The apparatus of claim 1 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to determine the occupancy of the predicted location of the first road user based on a second road user information; and

wherein the second road user information comprises at least one of the following:

an indication of a type of the second road user;

an indication of a posture of the second road user;

an indication of a behaviour of the second road user;

an indication of a state of the second road user.

5 . The apparatus of claim 1 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to encode a message for transmission,

wherein the message comprises information indicating the alternative trajectory.

6 . The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a transmitter configured to transmit an encoded message.

7 . A system comprising:

a plurality of indicators configured to be located at a plurality of indicator locations;

a plurality of sensors configured to:

detect an object, and

provide a plurality of data items comprising information indicating whether the object has been detected by one of the plurality of sensors, and

an apparatus comprising a processor configured to:

predict a respective road user trajectory for each of a plurality of road users based on the plurality of data items comprising information indicating presences of the plurality of road users in a road environment,

generate road user trajectory data based on the predicted road user trajectories, wherein the road user trajectory data comprises information indicating a respective predicted location of each of the plurality of road users in the road environment;

determine locations in the road environment where there will be no occupancy by any one of the plurality of road users for a period of time;

determine a location of the road user; and

select one of the plurality of indicators based on the location of the road user and to transmit a signal to the selected indicator; and

generate an alternative trajectory for a road user of the plurality of road users based on the determination of the locations.

8 . The system of claim 7 ,

wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a first sensor and a second sensor, and

wherein the first sensor is configured to detect an area of interest and located to detect the area of interest from a first viewing angle, and

wherein the second sensor is configured to detect at least a portion of the area of interest from a second viewing angle.

9 . The system of claim 8 ,

wherein one of the plurality of sensors are configured to detect a brake light condition of a vehicle, and

wherein the one of the plurality of sensors is configured to generate one of the plurality of data items comprising an indication of the brake light condition of the vehicle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 11, 2021
From: KOSE CIHANGIR, NESLIHAN; ROSALES, RAFAEL; GEISSLER, FLORIAN; PAULITSCH, MICHAEL; ALVAREZ, IGNACIO
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 057141/0461 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210383695A1 · Dec 9, 2021
References Cited (61)
US 5111401A · Everett, Jr. · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 7755510B2 · Bilimoria · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 9460613B1 · Whiting · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10282996B1 · Buchbut · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10613547B2 · Riess · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 12441353B2 · Braunstein · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20140350837A1 · Galbas · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150091740A1 · Bai · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170025001A1 · Gignac · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170083021A1 · Balaghiasefi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170334350A1 · Rink · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180090005A1 · Philosof · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180232947A1 · Nehmadi · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190049992A1 · Riess · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190329780A1 · Tomescu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190378414A1 · Pari · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200018613A1 · Stenneth · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200049511A1 · Sithiravel · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200209882A1 · Kashi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200257560A1 · Wang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200278681A1 · Gier · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210101620A1 · Buerkle · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210152991A1 · Wu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210155233A1 · Beauchamp · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210183244A1 · Malhan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210300358A1 · Sherrit · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210312795A1 · Schonfeld · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220101732A1 · Saur · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220196410A1 · Hines · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220221575A1 · Velusamy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220248175A1 · Seureau · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220348196A1 · Foltin · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230093053A1 · Joseph · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230136951A1 · Wada · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240194065A1 · Gabb · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240214786A1 · Sharma Banjade · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250218290A1 · Nordbruch · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250308253A1 · Venkatesh · 2025 [cited by examiner]
Andreas Loecken et al., “How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality”, 2019 Automotive User Interfaces, Sep. 21-25, 2019, pp. 262-274, Utrec… [cited by applicant]
Lionel P. Robert Jr., “The Future of Pedestrian-Automated Vehicle Interactions”, XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, Apr. 11, 2019, pp. 30-33, vol. 25, Issue 3. [cited by applicant]
Max Oudshoorn et al., “Bio-inspired intent communication for automated vehicles”, Transportation Research Part F 80 (2021), 2021, pp. 127-140, Elsevier Ltd. [cited by applicant]
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Users and applications requirements; Part 2: Applications and facilities layer common data dictionary”, Sep. 2014, RTS/ITS-00… [cited by applicant]
Marketsandmarkets, “Intelligent transportation system market—Global Forecast To 2023”, Mar. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ashesh Jain et al., “Brain4Cars: Car That Knows Before You Do via Sensory-Fusion Deep Learning Architecture”, arXiv, Jan. 5, 2016, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
World Health Organization, “Make walking safe: a brief overview of pedestrian safety around the world”, 2013, 8 pages, WHO/NMH/VIP13.02. [cited by applicant]
Stéphanie Levéfre et al., “A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles”, Robomech Journal 2014, 2014, 14 pages, vol. 1, p. 1, HAL Id: hal-01053736. [cited by applicant]
Hema S. Koppula et al., “Learning Spatio-Temporal Structure from RGB-D Videos for Human Activity Detection and Anticipation”, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2013, 9 pages, vol. 28,… [cited by applicant]
David F. Bizup et al., “Maneuver detection using the radar range rate measurement”, IEEE Transactions On Aerospace And Electronic Systems, Jan. 2004, pp. 330-336, vol. 40, No. 1. [cited by applicant]
Sea Stachura; “Why Pedestrian Deaths Are At A 30-Year High”; https://www.npr.org/2019/03/28/706481382/why-pedestrian-deaths-are-at-a-30-year-high.?t=1636027148793; NPR; retrieved on Nov. 4, 2021; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
https://zonesafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Crossing-Alert.jpg; retrieved on Nov. 4, 2021; 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Manolis Tsogas et al., “Situation refinement for vehicle maneuver identification and driver's intention prediction”, 10th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2007), Jul. 9-12, 2017, 8 pages, Quebec Ci… [cited by applicant]
Neslihan Koese et al., “Multi-view human activity recognition using motion frequency”, Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Sep. 17-20, 2017, pp. 3963-3967, Beijing, China. [cited by applicant]
Sangheon Park et al., “Infrastructure based Vehicle Recognition System with multi sensor fusion”, 2013, 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS), Dec. 16-18, 2013, 5 pages, IE… [cited by applicant]
BFW Innovations Ltd, “The Pedestrian Crossing Alert System”, Jun. 22, 2021, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Inc. Technology Solutions for Bike Path Safety; http://www.crossalert.com/; retrieved on Nov. 4, 2021; 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Solnick & Associates, LLC; “How Optical Illusions May Trick Montgomery County Drivers Into Slowing Down”; https://www.solnicklawyers.com/optical-illusions-drivers-slow-down/; retrieved on Nov. 4, 2021; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mhafuzul Islam et al., “Vision-based Pedestrian Alert Safety System (PASS) for Signalized Intersections” Transportation Cyber Physical Systems (TCPS), Jul. 2019, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
US Department of Transportation; “VS 13: Intersection Safety Warning and Collision Avoidance”; https://local.iteris.com/arc-it/html/servicepackages/sp57.html#tab-3; retrieved on Nov. 4, 2021; 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Alexandre Alahi et al., “Social LSTM: Human Trajectory Prediction in Crowded Spaces”, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 961-971, IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA. [cited by applicant]
Tung Phan-Minh Caltech et al., “CoverNet: Multimodal Behavior Prediction Using Trajectory Sets”, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jun. 13-19, 2020, pp. 14074-14083, IEEE, Seatt… [cited by applicant]
Artsiom Sanakoyeu; “Winning solution for Kaggle challenge: Lyft Motion Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles”; https://gdude.de/blog/2021-02-05/Kaggle-Lyft-solution; retrieved on Nov. 4, 2021; 17 pages. [cited by applicant]