IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,646,626
Granted Patent B2
US 12,646,626 · App. 17/367,675 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

Systems and methods for image processing to determine blood flow

Inventors: Sethuraman Sankaran (Palo Alto, CA); Leo J. Grady (Darien, CT); Charles A. Taylor (Atherton, CA)
Assignee: Heartflow, Inc.
G16H50/50A61B5/02007A61B5/02028A61B5/026A61B5/7278A61B6/032A61B6/504A61B6/5217G06T7/0012A61B5/021G06T2207/10081G06T2207/30104
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,646,626
App. No.
17/367,675
Filed
Jul 6, 2021
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Examiner
CLOW, LORI A
Art Unit
1687
USPC
703/2
Abstract

Embodiments include systems and methods for determining cardiovascular information for a patient. A method includes receiving patient-specific data regarding a geometry of the patient's vasculature; creating an anatomic model representing at least a portion of the patient's vasculature based on the patient-specific data; and creating a computational model of a blood flow characteristic based on the anatomic model. The method also includes identifying one or more of an uncertain parameter, an uncertain clinical variable, and an uncertain geometry; modifying a probability model based on one or more of the identified uncertain parameter, uncertain clinical variable, or uncertain geometry; determining a blood flow characteristic within the patient's vasculature based on the anatomic model and the computational model of the blood flow characteristic of the patient's vasculature; and calculating, based on the probability model and the determined blood flow characteristic, a sensitivity of the determined fractional flow reserve to one or more of the identified uncertain parameter, uncertain clinical variable, or uncertain geometry.

Claims (41)

1 . A system for processing angiographic image data to interactively segment blood vessels, wherein the system is configured to execute operations comprising:

at least one data storage device storing instructions for processing angiographic image data to interactively segment blood vessels; and

at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to perform operations comprising:

determining a three-dimensional geometric model based on image data of a patient;

determining one or more uncertain variables based at least in part on the three-dimensional geometric model and/or clinical data associated with the patient;

determining a range of at least one predicted blood flow characteristic value consistent with a predetermined confidence interval based on (i) simulating blood flow through the three-dimensional geometric model and the one or more uncertain variables, or based on (ii) applying a trained machine learning system to the three-dimensional geometric model and the one or more uncertain variables;

generating a visual representation of the three-dimensional geometric model that includes a visual indication of the determined range of the at least one predicted blood flow characteristic in relation to the predetermined confidence interval; and

outputting the visual representation.

2 . The system as defined in claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

determining a sensitivity of a location in the three-dimensional geometric model based on the one or more uncertain variables, wherein determining the sensitivity furthers comprises:

determining one or more locations of the three-dimensional geometric model as functionally significant locations based on a criterion that depends on the three-dimensional geometric model at the one or more locations, and

determining, given an uncertainty in a geometric characteristic of the three-dimensional geometric model, a value of the predicted blood flow characteristic at one or more of the functionally significant locations, wherein the determining further comprises determining the one of the functionally significant locations as a functionally significant location if the confidence interval value of the predicted blood flow characteristic, associated with the uncertainty of the three-dimensional geometric characteristic of the three-dimensional geometric model, is below a predetermined value at one or more of the functionally significant locations.

3 . The system as defined in claim 2 , wherein the criterion is based on determining a geometric characteristic of the three-dimensional geometric model at the one or more locations.

4 . The system as defined in claim 2 , wherein determining functionally significant locations further comprises determining one or more functionally significant locations where the value of the predicted blood flow characteristic at one or more of the functionally significant locations exceeds a predetermined threshold.

5 . The system as defined in claim 2 , wherein displaying the functionally significant locations comprises displaying the three-dimensional geometric model, wherein the functionally significant locations are indicated using visual indications.

6 . The system as defined in claim 2 , wherein the operations further comprise: allowing a user to modify the three-dimensional geometric model, at one or more of the functionally significant locations.

7 . The system as defined in claim 1 , wherein determining functionally significant locations further comprises: determining a value of the predicted blood flow characteristic at the functionally significant locations, and wherein displaying the functionally significant locations comprises displaying a value of an estimated fractional flow reserve (FFR) at the functionally significant locations.

8 . The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein determining the value of the estimated FFR comprises determining a confidence of the value of the estimated FFR at the functionally significant locations, and wherein displaying the functionally significant locations comprises displaying the confidence of the value of the estimated FFR at the functionally significant locations.

9 . The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein determining the value of the estimated FFR comprises determining a range of values of the estimated FFR at the functionally significant locations within a confidence.

10 . The system as defined in claim 1 , wherein the blood vessels include coronary arteries.

11 . A non-transitory computer readable medium for use on a computer system containing computer-executable programming instructions for processing angiographic image data to interactively segment blood vessels, the computer readable medium executing a method comprising:

determining a three-dimensional geometric model based on image data of a patient;

determining one or more uncertain variables based at least in part on the three-dimensional geometric model and/or clinical data associated with the patient;

determining a range of at least one predicted blood flow characteristic value consistent with a predetermined confidence interval based on (i) simulating blood flow through the three-dimensional geometric model and the one or more uncertain variables, or based on (ii) applying a trained machine learning system to the three-dimensional geometric model and the one or more uncertain variables;

generating a visual representation of the three-dimensional geometric model that includes a visual indication of the determined range of the at least one predicted blood flow characteristic in relation to the predetermined confidence interval; and

outputting the visual representation.

12 . A computer-implemented segmentation method for processing angiographic image data for interactively segmenting blood vessels, wherein the method comprises:

determining a three-dimensional geometric model based on image data of a patient;

determining one or more uncertain variables based at least in part on the three-dimensional geometric model and/or clinical data associated with the patient;

determining a range of at least one predicted blood flow characteristic value consistent with a predetermined confidence interval based on (i) simulating blood flow through the three-dimensional geometric model and the one or more uncertain variables, or based on (ii) applying a trained machine learning system to the three-dimensional geometric model and the one or more uncertain variables;

generating a visual representation of the three-dimensional geometric model that includes a visual indication of the determined range of the at least one predicted blood flow characteristic in relation to the predetermined confidence interval; and

outputting the visual representation.

13 . The method as defined in claim 12 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining a sensitivity of a location of the three-dimensional geometric model based on the one or more uncertain variables, wherein determining the sensitivity furthers comprises:

determining one or more locations of the three-dimensional geometric model as functionally significant locations based on a criterion that depends on the three-dimensional geometric model at the one or more locations; and

determining, given an uncertainty in a geometric characteristic of the three-dimensional geometric model, a value of the predicted blood flow characteristic at one or more of the functionally significant locations, wherein the determining further comprises determining the one of the functionally significant locations as a functionally significant location if the confidence interval value of the predicted blood flow characteristic, associated with the uncertainty of the three-dimensional geometric characteristic of the three-dimensional geometric model, is below a predetermined value at one or more of the functionally significant locations.

14 . The method as defined in claim 13 , wherein the criterion is based on determining a geometric characteristic of the three-dimensional geometric model at the one or more locations.

15 . The method as defined in claim 13 , wherein determining functionally significant locations further comprises determining one or more functionally significant locations where the value of the predicted blood flow characteristic at one or more of the functionally significant locations exceeds a predetermined threshold.

16 . The method as defined in claim 13 , wherein displaying the functionally significant locations comprises displaying the three-dimensional geometric model, wherein the functionally significant locations are indicated using visual indications.

17 . The method as defined in claim 12 , wherein determining functionally significant locations further comprises: determining a value of the predicted blood flow characteristic at the functionally significant locations, and wherein displaying the functionally significant locations comprises displaying a value of an estimated fractional flow reserve (FFR) at the functionally significant locations.

18 . The method as defined in claim 17 , wherein determining the value of the estimated FFR comprises determining a confidence of the value of the estimated FFR at the functionally significant locations, and wherein displaying the functionally significant locations comprises displaying the confidence of the value of the estimated FFR at the functionally significant locations.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2025
From: HAYFIN SERVICES LLP
To: HEARTFLOW, INC.
Reel/Frame 072876/0775 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2024
From: HEARTFLOW, INC.
To: HAYFIN SERVICES LLP
Reel/Frame 067775/0966 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 6, 2021
From: SANKARAN, SETHURAMAN; GRADY, LEO; TAYLOR, CHARLES A.
To: HEARTFLOW, INC.
Reel/Frame 056758/0641 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 15668943 · Aug 4, 2017
Continuation 14974158 · Dec 18, 2015
Continuation 13864996 · Apr 17, 2013
Provisional Application 61772401 · Mar 4, 2013
Related Publication 20210335497A1 · Oct 28, 2021
References Cited (33)
US 7912528B2 · Krishnan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8315812B2 · Taylor · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20100130878A1 · Lasso · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110071404A1 · Schmitt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120022844A1 · Teixeira · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120041318A1 · Taylor · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130028494A1 · Groth et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150278727A1 · Sankaran et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 102834847A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013534154 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013534154A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 03030074A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011128806 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012021307A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012021307 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015024934A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued in corresponding International PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/019001, mailed Jun. 3, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Sethuraman Sankaran; Alison L. Marsden; “A Stochastic Collocation Method for Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation in Cardiovascular Simulations” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Mar. 2011, ASME, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Sep. 17, 2015, in corresponding International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/019001, filed on Feb. 27, 2014 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Patent Examination Report No. 1 mailed on Oct. 8, 2015, in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2014226326, filed on Feb. 27, 2014 (3 pages). [cited by applicant]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed on Jul. 22, 2015, in corresponding European Patent Application No. 14 713 283.1, filed on Aug. 4, 2014 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed on Feb. 5, 2016, in corresponding European Patent Application No. 14 713 283.1, filed on Aug. 4, 2014 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Liu, Meilin et al., “Adaptive sparse grid algorithms with applications to electron magnetic scattering under uncertainty”, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2011, 61, pp. 24-37. [cited by applicant]
HeartFlow FFRct Analysis Receives Regulatory Approval in Japan, Nov. 17, 2016, Business Wire (available at http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161117005294/en/HeartFlow-FFRct-Analysis-Receives-Regulatory-Approval-Ja… [cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
Deschanges et al. In International Congress Deries (2004) vol. 1268:75-80. [cited by applicant]
Elnakib et al. (2011) Medical Image Segmentation: A Brief Survey (Chapter 1). In: El-Baz A., Acharya UR., Laine A., and Suri, J. (eds) Multi Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodol… [cited by applicant]
Grbic et al. (MICCAI 2013, Part II, LNCS 8150:395-402; K. Mori (Eds.) (2013), published Jan. 1, 2013, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg). [cited by applicant]
Hammer et al. (Ultrasound in Med and Biol (2009) vol. 35, No. 12:2069-2083). [cited by applicant]
Patil et al. (International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing (2013) vol. 2:22-27). [cited by applicant]
Antiga, Luca et al. “An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics.” Medical & biological engineering & computing vol. 46,11 (2008): 1097-112. doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1. [cited by applicant]
De Santis, G., Mortier, P., De Beule, M. et al. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics: structured mesh generation from coronary angiography. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 371-380 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Steinman, David A., Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling in Realistic Arterial Geometries. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 30, 483-497 (2002). [cited by applicant]