IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,647,186
Granted Patent B2
US 12,647,186 · App. 18/425,628 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

Adjustable bandwidth current-to-voltage converter that operates in a dynamic load mode or in an integrate-and-dump mode for use in an optical receiver

Inventors: Michael Y. Frankel (Hallandale Beach, FL); Vladimir Pelekhaty (Baltimore, MD)
Assignee: Ciena Corporation
H04B10/616H04B10/071
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,647,186
App. No.
18/425,628
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2634
USPC
398/37
Abstract

An adjustable bandwidth current-to-voltage converter for use in an optical receiver includes an input configured to receive current from a photodetector; an amplifier stage connected to the input; a feedback path connected to the amplifier stage and to an output, wherein the feedback path includes a feedback element and an operating mode switch configured to set one of photodetector amplifier with dynamic load (PADL) mode and an integrate-and-dump (I&D) mode. The PADL mode is for higher baud operation than the I&D mode.

Claims (32)

1 . A circuit for use in an optical receiver, the circuit comprising:

an input configured to receive current from a photodetector;

an amplifier stage connected to the input; and

a feedback path connected to the amplifier stage and to an output, wherein the feedback path includes a feedback element and an operating mode switch configured to set one of photodetector amplifier with dynamic load (PADL) mode and an integrate-and-dump (I&D) mode,

wherein the feedback element comprises an active dynamic load transistor configured to terminate the current from the photodetector, and wherein the operating mode switch is coupled to a control terminal of the active dynamic load transistor and is configured to selectively couple the control terminal to the output in the PADL mode and to a clock signal in the I&D mode such that the active dynamic load transistor functions as a sampling gate in the I&D mode.

2 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the operating mode switch, in the PADL mode, connects the feedback element to the output, and, in the I&D mode, connects the feedback element to a clock signal which determines a sampling window.

3 . The circuit of claim 2 , wherein the clock signal is synchronized to incoming data on the input.

4 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the feedback element is a P-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor (PMOS) transistor.

5 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the feedback element is a N-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) transistor.

6 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the operating mode switch is a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) transmission gate.

7 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the amplifier stage is a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) inverter.

8 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the PADL mode is for higher baud operation than the I&D mode.

9 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the operating mode switch is set based on a data rate of the optical receiver wherein the operating mode switch is configured to set the PADL mode for a higher data rate and to set the I&D mode for a lower data rate.

10 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the optical receiver is in a satellite optical modem that is configured to operate over a wide range of data rate operation, such that the operating mode switch is set based on the data rate operation.

11 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the optical receiver is in a terrestrial free space optical link having variable channel impairments, such that the operating mode switch is set based on the variable channel impairments.

12 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the optical receiver is in an optical time domain reflectometer (OTDR) that operates over a range of optical sampling pulse widths, such that the operating mode switch is set based on the optical sampling pulse widths.

13 . An optical modem comprising:

an optical front end configured to provide a current to an adjustable bandwidth current-to-voltage converter, the adjustable bandwidth current-to-voltage converter includes

an amplifier stage configured to receive the voltage; and

a feedback path connected to the amplifier stage and to an output, wherein the feedback path includes a feedback element and an operating mode switch configured to set one of a photodetector amplifier with dynamic load (PADL) mode and an integrate-and-dump (I&D) mode wherein the feedback element comprises an active dynamic load transistor configured to terminate the current from the optical front end, and wherein the operating mode switch is coupled to a control terminal of the active dynamic load transistor and is configured to selectively couple the control terminal to the output in the PADL mode and to a clock signal in the I&D mode such that the active dynamic load transistor functions as a sampling gate in the I&D mode.

14 . The optical modem of claim 13 , wherein the PADL mode is for higher baud operation than the I&D mode.

15 . The optical modem of claim 13 , wherein the operating mode switch is set based on a data rate of the optical modem, wherein the operating mode switch is configured to set the PADL mode for a higher data rate and to set the I&D mode for a ower data rate.

16 . The optical modem of claim 13 , wherein the optical modem is in a satellite and is configured to operate over a wide range of data rate operation, such that the operating mode switch is set based on the data rate operation.

17 . The optical modem of claim 13 , wherein the optical modem is in a terrestrial free space optical link having variable channel impairments, such that the operating mode switch is set based on the variable channel impairments.

18 . The optical modem of claim 13 , wherein the optical modem is in an optical time domain reflectometer (OTDR) that operates over a range of optical sampling pulse widths, such that the operating mode switch is set based on the optical sampling pulse widths.

19 . A method comprising steps of:

receiving current from a photodetector associated with an optical receiver;

converting the current into voltage;

configuring a feedback path after the converting in one of photodetector amplifier with dynamic load (PADL) mode and an integrate-and-dump (I&D) mode, wherein the configuring is based on a baud rate of the optical receiver; and

providing an output that includes a voltage converted from current, the output being adjusted by the feedback path,

wherein the configuring comprises, in the PADL mode, coupling a control terminal of an active dynamic load transistor to the output such that an output voltage controls a conductance of the active dynamic load transistor to terminate the current from the photodetector, and, in the I&D mode, coupling the control terminal of the active dynamic load transistor to a clock signal such that the active dynamic load transistor functions as a sampling gate and a sampling window is determined by the clock signal.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the PADL mode is for higher baud operation than the I&D mode.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2024
From: FRANKEL, MICHAEL Y.; PELEKHATY, VLADIMIR
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 066284/0254 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250247156A1 · Jul 31, 2025
References Cited (64)
US 6243175B1 · Pelekhaty · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6795607B1 · Archambault et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7184215B2 · Pelekhaty · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7415208B1 · Haggans et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7853156B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7853157B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8005375B2 · Frankel · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8625994B2 · Archambault et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8699880B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8977125B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9191117B2 · Alexander et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9270405B2 · Blair et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9374166B2 · Mateosky et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9509410B2 · Mateosky et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9515767B2 · Frankel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9551836B2 · Frankel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10141926B2 · Frankel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10142092B2 · Pelekhaty et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10171169B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10194221B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10200305B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10212496B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10313014B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10313021B1 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10404365B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10476815B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10715888B2 · Swinkels et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10749602B2 · Charlton et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10763968B1 · Li · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11026001B1 · Frankel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11063667B1 · Ritter · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11128373B1 · Podmore et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20050100271A1 · Frankel · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070188740A2 · Rosolem · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20120281740A1 · Fujita et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130038865A1 · McClean · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150229389A1 · Kim · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20180269972A1 · Djordjevic et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190028197A1 · Turner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190182180A1 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200236064A1 · Frankel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210058685A1 · Frankel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210075746A1 · Frankel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220209868A1 · Frankel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20250167884A1 · Archambault · 2025 [cited by examiner]
CN 101917226A · 2010 [cited by examiner]
CN 108879305A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 209151171U · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Atef et al; 10Gb/s Inverter Based Cascade Transimpedance Amplifier in 40nm CMOS Technology ; 2013, IEEE, pp. 1-4. (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Zuo et al; Power-efficient dual-rate optical transceiver; 2005, Optical Society of America; pp. 1-13. (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
Alireza et al; Low-Power CMOS Receivers for Short Reach Optical Communication—2017; IEEE, pp. 1-8. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Timothy et al; An Integrate-and-Dump Receiver for High Dynamic Range Photonic Analog-to-Digital Conversion ; 2012, IEEE, pp. 1-4. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Qi Xiaogang et al., “A survey of routing techniques for satellite networks,” Journal of Communications and Information Networks, vol. 1, No. 4, DOI: 10.11959/j.issn.2096-1081, 2016.058, Review Paper, Dec. 2016, pp. 67-8… [cited by applicant]
Agata Romanova et al., “A Review of Modern CMOS Transimpedance Amplifiers for OTDR Applications,” Electronics 2019, 8, 1073, Published: Sep. 22, 2019, pp. 1-33. [cited by applicant]
Azita Emami-Neyestanak et al., “A IdGb/s, 3 mW CMOS Receiver for Optical Communication,” 7.2, 2002, Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 84-87. [cited by applicant]
Timothy D. Gathman et al., “A 45-nm SOI CMOS Integrate-and-Dump Optical Sampling Receiver,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Regular Paper, vol. 60, No. 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 469-478. [cited by applicant]
Michael Georges et al., “Addressing Link-Level Design Tradeoffs for Integrated Photonic Interconnects,” 978-1-4577-0223-5/11/IEEE, 2011, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Michael Georges et al., “A Monolithically-Integrated Optical Receiver in Standard 45-nm SOI,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 7, Jul. 2012, pp. 1693-1702. [cited by applicant]
Giles et al., “1 Gbit/s Integrate-And-Dump Filter for Digital Communication Systems,” Electronic Letters, Feb. 2, 1989, vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 212-214. [cited by applicant]
Stefanos Sidiropoulos et al., “Current Integrating Receivers for High Speed System Interconnects,” IEEE 1995 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 107-110. [cited by applicant]
Renuka P. Jindal, Silicon MOS Amplifier Operation in the Integrate and Dump Mode for Gigahertz Band Lightwave Communication Systems, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 8, No. 7, Jul. 1990, pp. 1023-1026. [cited by applicant]
Woorham Bae, “CMOS Inverter as Analog Circuit: An Overview,” Journal of Low Power Electronics and Applications, MDPI, Published Aug. 20, 2019, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Samuel Palermo et al., “A 90 nm CMOS 16 Gb/s Transceiver for Optical Interconnects,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 5, May 2008, pp. 1235-1246. [cited by applicant]
Eduard Säckinger, “The Transimpedance Limit,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Regular Papers, vol. 57, No. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 1848-1856. [cited by applicant]