IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,648,505
Granted Patent B2
US 12,648,505 · App. 17/990,129 · Granted Jun 9, 2026

Systems and methods for monitoring the status of shank assemblies of agricultural implements

Inventor: Michael R. Cozza (Pittsburgh, PA)
Assignee: CNH Industrial America LLC
A01B79/005A01B35/08A01B63/24A01B49/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,648,505
App. No.
17/990,129
Filed
Nov 18, 2022
Granted
Jun 9, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3666
USPC
701/50
Abstract

In one aspect, a system for monitoring the status of shank assembly of agricultural implements includes a shank assembly configured to supported relative to an agricultural implement, the shank assembly including a shank. The system also includes a surface profile sensor configured generate data indicative of a surface profile of an aft portion of the field located rearward of the shank assembly relative to a direction of travel of the agricultural implement. Additionally, the system includes a controller communicatively coupled to the surface profile sensor. The controller is configured to monitor the data received from the surface profile sensor and determine an operating status of the shank assembly based at least in part on the surface profile of the aft portion of the field.

Claims (41)

1 . A system for monitoring the status of shank assemblies of agricultural implements, the system comprising:

a shank assembly configured to be supported relative to an agricultural implement, the shank assembly including a shank configured to penetrate into the ground;

a surface profile sensor configured to generate data indicative of a surface profile of an aft portion of the field located rearward of the shank assembly relative to a direction of travel of the agricultural implement; and

a controller communicatively coupled to the surface profile sensor, the controller being configured to monitor the data received from the surface profile sensor and determine an operating status of the shank assembly based at least in part on the surface profile of the aft portion of the field,

wherein the controller is configured to determine the operating status of the shank assembly by comparing the surface profile of the aft portion of the field to a baseline surface profile,

wherein the surface profile of the aft portion of the field comprises a lane profile associated with a lane of the field worked by the shank assembly, the lane profile comprising at least one of a lane width or a lane depth,

wherein the baseline surface profile comprises an expected lane profile associated with the shank assembly, the expected lane profile comprising at least one of an expected lane width or an expected lane depth, and

wherein the controller is configured to determine the operating status of the shank assembly by comparing the lane profile detected within the field to the expected lane profile associated with the shank assembly.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the operating status comprises one of an installation status of a shank attachment member of the shank assembly relative to the shank or the occurrence of a trip/float event.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to determine that a shank attachment member of the shank assembly is no longer installed relative to the shank when a dimension or shape of a surface feature associated with the lane profile detected within the field differs from a dimension or shape of a corresponding surface feature associated with the expected lane profile.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to determine that the shank assembly is experiencing a trip/float event when a dimension or shape of a surface feature associated with the lane profile detected within the field differs from a dimension or shape of a corresponding surface feature associated with the expected lane profile.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to initiate a control action based on the determined operating status of the shank assembly.

6 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the control action comprises generating an operator notification associated with the operating status of the shank assembly.

7 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the control action comprises identifying a location at which it was determined that a shank attachment member of the shank assembly is no longer installed relative to the shank or a location at which it was determined that the shank assembly is experiencing a trip/float event.

8 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the control action comprises adjusting an operation of at least one of the agricultural implement or a work vehicle towing the agricultural implement.

9 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the shank attachment member comprises a tillage point.

10 . A method for monitoring the status of shank assemblies of agricultural implements, the method comprising:

receiving, with a computing device, data indicative of a surface profile of an aft portion of a field located rearward of a shank assembly of an agricultural implement relative to a direction of travel of the agricultural implement, the shank assembly configured to penetrate into the ground;

analyzing, with the computing device, the surface profile of the aft portion of the field to determine an operating status of the shank assembly by comparing the surface profile to a baseline surface profile; and

initiating, with the computing device, a control action based on the determined operating status of the shank assembly,

wherein the surface profile of the aft portion of the field comprises a lane profile associated with a lane of the field worked by the shank assembly, the lane profile comprising at least one of a lane width or a lane depth,

wherein the baseline surface profile comprises an expected lane profile associated with the shank assembly, the expected lane profile comprising at least one of an expected lane width or an expected lane depth, and

wherein comparing the surface profile to the baseline surface profile comprises comparing the lane profile detected within the field to the expected lane profile associated with the shank assembly.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the operating status comprises one of an installation status of a shank attachment member of the shank assembly or the occurrence of a trip/float event.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein it is determined that a shank attachment member of the shank assembly is no longer installed relative to a shank of the shank assembly when a dimension or shape of a surface feature associated with the lane profile detected within the field differs from a dimension or shape of a corresponding surface feature associated with the expected lane profile.

13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein it is determined that the shank assembly is experiencing a trip/float event when a dimension or shape of a surface feature associated with the lane profile detected within the field differs from a dimension or shape of a corresponding surface feature associated with the expected lane profile.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein initiating the control action comprises generating an operator notification associated with the operating status of the shank assembly.

15 . The method of claim 10 , wherein initiating the control action comprises identifying a location at which it was determined that a shank attachment member of the shank assembly is no longer installed relative to a shank of the shank assembly or a location at which it was determined that the shank assembly is experiencing a trip/float event.

16 . The method of claim 10 , wherein initiating the control action comprises adjusting an operation of at least one of the agricultural implement or a work vehicle towing the agricultural implement.

17 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the lane profile comprises the lane width and the lane depth;

wherein the expected lane profile comprises the expected lane width and the expected lane depth; and

wherein the controller is configured to determine that a shank attachment member of the shank assembly is no longer installed relative to the shank when the lane width is narrower than the expected lane width and the lane depth is greater than the expected lane depth.

18 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the lane profile comprises the lane depth;

wherein the expected lane profile comprises the expected lane depth; and

wherein the controller is configured to determine that the shank assembly is experiencing a trip/float event when the lane profile transitions from matching the expected lane profile, to having a dimension where the lane depth is shallower than the expected lane depth, then returns to matching the expected lane profile.

19 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the lane profile comprises the lane width and the lane depth;

wherein the expected lane profile comprises the expected lane width and the expected lane depth; and

wherein determining that a shank attachment member of the shank assembly is no longer installed relative to a shank of the shank assembly comprises the lane width being narrower than the expected lane width and the lane depth being greater than the expected lane depth.

20 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the lane profile comprises the lane depth;

wherein the expected lane profile comprises the expected lane depth; and

wherein determining that the shank assembly is experiencing a trip/float event comprises the lane profile transitioning from matching the expected lane profile, to having a dimension where the lane depth is shallower than the expected lane depth, then returning to matching the expected lane profile.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2022
From: COZZA, MICHAEL R.
To: CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC
Reel/Frame 061826/0604 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240164239A1 · May 23, 2024
References Cited (31)
US 4854161A · Drits · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 7689394B2 · Furem et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 9405039B2 · Anderson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9485900B2 · Connell et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9554098B2 · Casper et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9670649B2 · Bewley et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9875535B2 · Finch et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10165725B2 · Sugumaran et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10262206B2 · Posselius · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 12078988B2 · Hurd · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20160134844A1 · Casper et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160237640A1 · Carpenter et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170094893A1 · Rains · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170112043A1 · Nair et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180220577A1 · Posselius et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180336410A1 · Posselius · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180352718A1 · Kovach et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190059198A1 · Schnaider et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190110392A1 · Gresch · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190124824A1 · Hubner · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190208698A1 · Maxton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190254223A1 · Eichhorn et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200260633A1 · Kovach · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200344939A1 · Sporrer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210105928A1 · Henry · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230093751A1 · Schroeder · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240065131A1 · Ellaboudy · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240164239A1 · Cozza · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240303801A1 · Sharma · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017163822 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018020310 · 2018 [cited by applicant]