IP Library Granted Patent US 12,655,030
Granted Patent B2
US 12,655,030 · App. 17/382,054 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Systems and methods to treat flue gas desulfurization and metal-bearing waste streams to recover value-added materials

Inventors: Lucien M. Papouchado (Aiken, SC); Barry E. Scheetz (Lemont, PA); Joseph D. Preston (Bainbridge Island, WA)
Assignee: Davy Powersports Inc.
C01C1/244C01F11/182C01P2004/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,655,030
App. No.
17/382,054
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods from processing flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum feedstock and ash feedstocks, either separately or together. FGD gypsum conversion comprises reacting FGD gypsum (e.g. calcium sulfate) feedstock, in either batch or continuous mode, with ammonium carbonate reagent to produce commercial products wherein the commercial products comprise ammonium sulfate and calcium carbonate. Ash conversion comprises a leach process followed by a precipitation process to selectively precipitate components at predetermined pHs resulting in metal hydroxides which may be optionally converted to oxides or carbonates. The processes may be controlled by use of one or more processors.

Claims (21)

1 . A method for processing a waste stream, the method comprising:

configuring a processor to operate a process comprising:

loading a first powder feedstock into a first reactor, wherein the first powder feedstock comprises a calcium sulfate component;

introducing an ammonium carbonate reagent to the first reactor to produce ammonium sulfate and calcium carbonate in a reaction slurry;

pumping the reaction slurry to a second reactor when a reaction to produce ammonium sulfate and calcium carbonate is complete thereby forming a reacted slurry;

filtering the reacted slurry resulting in a calcium carbonate residue and ammonium sulfate filtrate liquor;

loading a second powder feedstock into a third reactor, wherein the second powder feedstock comprises a metal-bearing component, a silica component, and an aluminosilicate component;

leaching the second powder feedstock by at least one of contacting, passing, and percolating an acid and hydrogen peroxide through the second powder feedstock and collecting a metal-bearing leachate formed in the third reactor, wherein after collecting the metal bearing leachate, the third reactor comprises dried solids comprising silicates;

responsive to collecting the metal-bearing leachate, adjusting a pH value of the metal-bearing leachate to a first predetermined pH value to precipitate a first component from the metal-bearing leachate, wherein the first predetermined pH value is 4, and wherein the first component comprises iron and aluminum;

responsive to precipitating the first component, separating by filtration the first component, and collecting a first filtrate in a fourth reactor; and

responsive to collecting the first filtrate, adjusting the first filtrate to a second predetermined pH value to precipitate a second component from the first filtrate, separating by filtration the second component to result in a second filtrate, and collecting the second filtrate in a fifth reactor.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the processor uses the predetermined pH values to separate the components based on predetermined logic.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein leaching the second powder feedstock is performed in one or more stages.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the acid comprises sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, or any combination thereof.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the first filtrate to the second predetermined pH value using a base component that is at least one of calcium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and ammonium hydroxide.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first component and the second component are hydroxides of at least one of iron, aluminum, and a mischmetal, wherein the mischmetal is a mixed metal alloy of rare-earth elements.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first component or the second component includes a mischmetal, wherein the mischmetal is a mixed metal alloy of rare-earth elements and wherein the mischmetal is at least one of a cerium mischmetal and a rare-earth mischmetal, wherein the rare-earth mischmetal comprises at least one of cerium, lanthanum, scandium, and neodymium.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first component further comprises scandium or uranium.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the process further comprises calcining the first component.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the first component comprises iron in the form of ferric hydroxide, and wherein calcining the first component results in the formation of a ferric oxide product.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pH of the metal-bearing leachate is about 1.5.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 2, 2023
From: ELIXSYS INC.
To: DAVY POWERSPORTS INC.
Reel/Frame 065442/0834 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 15, 2021
From: PAPOUCHADO, LUCIEN M.; SHEETZ, BARRY E.; PRESTON, JOSEPH D.
To: ELIXSYS, INC.
Reel/Frame 057805/0989 →
Continuity (10)
Continuation PCTUS2020015102 · Jan 24, 2020
Continuation 16752477 · Jan 24, 2020
Continuation 16749860 · Jan 22, 2020
Provisional Application 62878542 · Jul 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62824523 · Mar 27, 2019
Provisional Application 62810066 · Feb 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62796549 · Jan 24, 2019
Provisional Application 62796541 · Jan 24, 2019
Provisional Application 62796550 · Jan 24, 2019
Related Publication 20210347648A1 · Nov 11, 2021
References Cited (38)
US 8758719B2 · Hasinoff et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9193601B2 · Ghosh et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9682868B2 · Hasinoff et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10399862B2 · Paynter et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20140044619A1 · Hasinoff · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150075328A1 · Boudreault · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150211094A1 · Vaisanen · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150328645A1 · Filippov et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150344318A1 · Lee et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160221834A1 · Hasinoff et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180265948A1 · Laudal et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190153562A1 · Wang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 105671304A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 105087934B · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109231249A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016123301A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018011567A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Weibel, Gisela. Optimized metal recovery from fly ash from municipal solid waste incineration. Diss. Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Bern, 2017 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Mattila, Hannu-Petteri, et al. “CO2 Chemistry”, Jan. 1, 2014, vol. 66, pp. 347-384. [cited by applicant]
Msila, Xolani et al. “Capture and storage of CO2 into waste phosphogypsum: the modified Merseburg process” Clean Techn Environ Policy (2016) 18:2709-2715. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report in EP Application No. 20744889.5 dated Aug. 26, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Ammonium Sulfate WFGD Technology—Overview for General Industry Information,” Marsulex Environmental Technologies, Jul. 2007, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chou M.I.M., et al., “Manufacture of Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer for Gypsum-Rich Byproduct of Flue Gas Desulfurization—A Prefeasibility Cost Estimate,” Dec. 12, 1996, pp. 580-586. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/015102, mailed Apr. 20, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wazne M., et al., “Production of Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer from Waste Gypsum,” Nov. 18, 2009, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 3,127, 106, issued Nov. 21, 2023 (6 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Zeller, E. “Factors Influencing Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Jan. 1956, vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 140-152. [cited by applicant]
Matilla, H. “Production of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate from Steel Converter Slag and Other Calcium-Containing Industrial Wastes and Residues” Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 66, pp. 347-384. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Re-Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,479,472 filed Feb. 1, 2024, 35 pages. [cited by applicant]
Matilla, H. “Mineral Carbonation of Phosphogypsum Waste for Production of Useful Carbonate and Sulfate Salts” Frontiers in Energy Research, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,396 mailed Sep. 5, 2024, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Order Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination in U.S. Pat. No. 11,479,472, mailed Feb. 23, 2024, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination in U.S. Pat. No. 11,148,956 filed Jan. 18, 2024, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Order Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination in U.S. Pat. No. 11,148,956, mailed Feb. 23, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,383 mailed Jun. 13, 2024, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate issued in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,383, issued Sep. 25, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,383, mailed Aug. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 3,127,106 dated Dec. 16, 2024, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]