IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,655,689
Granted Patent B2
US 12,655,689 · App. 17/643,361 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Well location optimizer for high inclination complex well trajectories

Inventor: Simon A. Stewart (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
E21B7/04E21B2200/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,655,689
App. No.
17/643,361
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for well location optimization for high inclination complex well trajectories includes calculating a thickness of a target geological layer with respect to a planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer, wherein the target geological layer comprises a known complex geology. A sensitivity of the wellbores is calculated based on reservoir parameters derived from the calculated thickness of the target geological layer at the planned intersection angle. A least sensitive wellbore is selected from the wellbores, wherein the least sensitive wellbore of the wellbores has a lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation.

Claims (46)

1 . A computer-implemented method for well location optimization for high inclination complex well trajectories, the method comprising:

receiving, from one or more downhole logging tools during drilling of a well, measurements indicative of geological layer orientation comprising geological layer dip and geological layer dip azimuth, and wellbore orientation comprising inclination and azimuth;

calculating, with one or more hardware processors, a thickness of a target geological layer with respect to a planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer, wherein the target geological layer comprises a known complex geology and wherein the planned intersection angle is computed as a geometrically complementary angle to a direction cosine associated with a respective wellbore and a pole to bedding of the target geological layer;

calculating, with the one or more hardware processors, a sensitivity of the wellbores based on reservoir parameters derived from the calculated thickness of the target geological layer at the planned intersection angle including at least apparent measured depth (AMD), total vertical thickness (TVT), vertical thickness (VT), and true stratigraphic thickness (TST);

selecting, with the one or more hardware processors, a least sensitive wellbore from the wellbores, wherein the least sensitive wellbore of the wellbores has a lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation; and

responsive to the selecting, controlling a steerable drilling assembly to adjust a trajectory of the well in real time to follow the selected least sensitive wellbore.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the planned intersection angle is calculated as a geometrically complementary angle to a direction cosine associated with a respective wellbore and pole to bedding of the target geological layer.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising varying the planned intersection angle based on a wellbore orientation uncertainty and geological orientation uncertainty to compare sensitives of potential well trajectories.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating, with the one or more hardware processors, geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty with respect to the planned intersection angle;

varying, with the one or more hardware processors, the geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty based on at least one constraint; and

selecting, with the one or more hardware processors, a least impactful combination of geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty as the lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the planned intersection angle and a minimum thickness of the target geological layer are used to calculate the reservoir parameters.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein in response to uncertain reservoir parameters an alternative planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer is selected to calculate the thickness of the target geological layer.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the wellbores represent high inclination, complex well trajectories at a constrained surface location.

8 . A system, comprising:

one or more memory modules;

one or more hardware processors communicably coupled to the one or more memory modules, the one or more hardware processors configured to execute instructions stored on the one or more memory models to perform operations comprising:

receiving, from one or more downhole logging tools during drilling of a well, measurements indicative of geological layer orientation comprising geological layer dip and geological layer dip azimuth, and wellbore orientation comprising inclination and azimuth;

calculating a thickness of a target geological layer with respect to a planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer, wherein the target geological layer comprises a known complex geology and wherein the planned intersection angle is computed as a geometrically complementary angle to a direction cosine associated with a respective wellbore and a pole to bedding of the target geological layer;

calculating a sensitivity of the wellbores based on reservoir parameters derived from the calculated thickness of the target geological layer at the planned intersection angle including at least apparent measured depth (AMD), total vertical thickness (TVT), vertical thickness (VT), and true stratigraphic thickness (TST);

selecting a least sensitive wellbore from the wellbores, wherein the least sensitive wellbore of the wellbores has a lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation; and

responsive to the selecting, controlling a steerable drilling assembly to adjust a trajectory of the well in real time to follow the selected least sensitive wellbore.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the planned intersection angle is calculated as a geometrically complementary angle to a direction cosine associated with a respective wellbore and pole to bedding of the target geological layer.

10 . The system of claim 8 , comprising varying the planned intersection angle based on a wellbore orientation uncertainty and geological orientation uncertainty to compare sensitives of potential well trajectories.

11 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising:

estimating, with the one or more hardware processors, geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty with respect to the planned intersection angle;

varying, with the one or more hardware processors, the geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty based on at least one constraint; and

selecting, with the one or more hardware processors, a least impactful combination of geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty as the lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the planned intersection angle and a minimum thickness of the target geological layer are used to calculate the reservoir parameters.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein in response to uncertain reservoir parameters an alternative planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer is selected to calculate the thickness of the target geological layer.

14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the wellbores represent high inclination, complex well trajectories at a constrained surface location.

15 . An apparatus comprising a non-transitory, computer readable, storage medium that stores instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, from one or more downhole logging tools during drilling of a well, measurements indicative of geological layer orientation comprising geological layer dip and geological layer dip azimuth, and wellbore orientation comprising inclination and azimuth;

calculating a thickness of a target geological layer with respect to a planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer, wherein the target geological layer comprises a known complex geology and wherein the planned intersection angle is computed as a geometrically complementary angle to a direction cosine associated with a respective wellbore and a pole to bedding of the target geological layer;

calculating a sensitivity of the wellbores based on reservoir parameters derived from the calculated thickness of the target geological layer at the planned intersection angle including at least apparent measured depth (AMD), total vertical thickness (TVT), vertical thickness (VT), and true stratigraphic thickness (TST);

selecting a least sensitive wellbore from the wellbores, wherein the least sensitive wellbore of the wellbores has a lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation; and

responsive to the selecting, controlling a steerable drilling assembly to adjust a trajectory of the well in real time to follow the selected least sensitive wellbore.

16 . The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the planned intersection angle is calculated as a geometrically complementary angle to a direction cosine associated with a respective wellbore and pole to bedding of the target geological layer.

17 . The apparatus of claim 15 , comprising varying the planned intersection angle based on a wellbore orientation uncertainty and geological orientation uncertainty to compare sensitives of potential well trajectories.

18 . The apparatus of claim 15 , further comprising:

estimating geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty with respect to the planned intersection angle;

varying the geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty based on at least one constraint; and

selecting a least impactful combination of geological layer orientation uncertainty and wellbore orientation uncertainty as the lowest uncertainty in geological layer orientation and wellbore orientation.

19 . The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the planned intersection angle and a minimum thickness of the target geological layer are used to calculate the reservoir parameters.

20 . The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein in response to uncertain reservoir parameters an alternative planned intersection angle between wellbores and the target geological layer is selected to calculate the thickness of the target geological layer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2021
From: STEWART, SIMON A.
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 058357/0475 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230175355A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (39)
US 8694257B2 · Zamanian · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8812334B2 · Givens · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8849640B2 · Holl · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8892407B2 · Budiman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9593558B2 · Sequeira, Jr. · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10422924B2 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11015433B2 · Li et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11466555B2 · Samuel · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11815650B2 · Tawil · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12086515B2 · Guillot · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030046005A1 · Haarstad · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20070143020A1 · Bradford · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20110106514A1 · Omeragic · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120048618A1 · Zamanian · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130118809A1 · Veeningen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140278110A1 · Chugunov · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150129306A1 · Coffman · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150134255A1 · Zhang · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150355374A1 · Morton · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160123118A1 · Downton · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170241253A1 · Chapman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180334896A1 · Samuel · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200242286A1 · Marchidan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200386094A1 · Simeonov · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220244415A1 · Stewart · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220291418A1 · Noufal · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230075327A1 · Mishra · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230186000A1 · Ozbek · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230195952A1 · Guillot · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 105089658 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009055152 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009064728A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019051435A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Serhii Petrovych Tyvonchuk (Predicting of the Geometrical Behavior of Formations in Subsurface Based on the Analysis of LWD/MWD Data While Drilling Horizontal Wells, SPE, 2021, pp. 1-18). (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Moradi et al. (Uncertainty assessment of wellbore stability analysis in horizontal sections, Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020, pp. 1-6) (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Riegert et al. (Well Path Design Optimization Under Geological Uncertainty: Application to a Complex North Sea Field, SPE, 2010, pp. 1-11) (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
Nasrabadi, et al., “Well placement optimization: A survey with special focus on application for gas/gas-condensate reservoirs,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Mar. 2012, 5:6-16, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schulze-Riegert, et al., “Well Path Design Optimization Under Geological Uncertainty: Application to a Complex North Sea Field,” SPE Russian Oil & Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 2010, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
SAIP Examination Report in Saudi Arabian Appln. No. 122440759, mailed on Mar. 11, 2025, 13 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]