IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,655,725
Granted Patent B2
US 12,655,725 · App. 17/993,732 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Hydrogen production, storage and recovery

Inventors: Eva Vinegar (Austin, TX); Harold J. Vinegar (West Lake Hills, TX)
Assignee: TerraH2 LLC
E21B43/006B65G5/00E21B21/068E21B41/0057E21B43/12E21B43/164E21B43/2605E21B49/0875E21B49/088
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,655,725
App. No.
17/993,732
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for operating a kerogen-rich unconventional gas reservoir characterized by there being multiple hydraulically-fractured wells drilled thereinto comprises: recovering a methane-containing gas from a first hydraulically-fractured well drilled into the gas reservoir, steam-methane reforming the recovered methane-containing gas to yield a hydrogen gas and an inorganic carbon-containing gas, injecting at least a portion of the hydrogen gas into a second hydraulically-fractured well drilled into the gas reservoir, and injecting at least a portion of the inorganic carbon-containing gas into a third hydraulically-fractured well drilled into the gas reservoir.

Claims (30)

1 . A method of storing and subsequently recovering hydrogen gas in a kerogen-rich, hydraulically-fractured unconventional gas reservoir, the method comprising:

a. sampling, at a plurality of times, a methane-containing gas recovered from the geological formation through a horizontal wellbore;

b. determining, from each sampling, an isotopic signature of a molecular component in the sampled methane-containing gas, the isotopic signature being based upon an isotope ratio;

c. responsively to and contingent upon detecting an increase in the isotopic signature of at least two successive samplings, injecting hydrogen gas through the wellbore into the geological formation at a pressure higher than a shut-in gas pressure; and

d. recovering, through the wellbore, a hydrogen-containing gas having an H 2 molar fraction of at least 85%.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the isotope ratio is δ( 13 C).

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the isotope ratio is of the form δ(C X H Y-1 D/C X H Y ).

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the molecular component comprises at least one hydrocarbon selected from a hydrocarbon group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, butane, and pentane.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature is based upon an isotope ratio, and the isotopic ratio is of the form δ(C X H Y-1 D/C A H B ), (ii) C X H Y-1 D is a monodeuterated molecule of a first hydrocarbon selected from a hydrocarbon group consisting of: methane, ethane, propane, butane and pentane hydrocarbon, and (iii) C A H B is a non-deuterated molecule of a second hydrocarbon that is not the first hydrocarbon, selected from the hydrocarbon group.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing a monodeuterated multi-alkane sum of respective concentrations of one or more of: monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing a concentration of monodeuterated methane.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing a monodeuterated-methane concentration, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing a respective concentration of any one of: monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing respective concentrations of one or more members of the monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group consisting of monodeuterated methane, monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing respective concentrations of one or more members of said monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group with the exception of the one or more members represented in EXP 1 .

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing any member of the monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group consisting of monodeuterated methane, monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane, and EXP 2 is an expression representing any other member of said monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the isotopic signature is based upon a ratio of isotope ratios and has the form δ( 13 C) ALKANE1 /δ( 13 C) ALKANE2 , where each of ALKANE1 and ALKANE2 includes an alkane selected from an alkane group consisting of: methane, ethane, propane, butane and pentane.

11 . A method of storing and subsequently recovering hydrogen gas in a kerogen-rich unconventional gas reservoir, the method comprising:

a. injecting a fracturing fluid through a horizontal wellbore into the geological formation to cause fracturing within the gas reservoir;

b. recovering a methane-containing gas through the wellbore;

c. monitoring an isotopic signature respective of at least one molecular component of the recovered methane-containing gas;

d. determining an isotopic-signature trigger criterion at or above which hydrogen injected into the geological formation is subsequently recoverable in a hydrogen-containing gas having an H 2 molar fraction of at least 85%;

e. responsively to and contingent upon reaching an isotopic-signature trigger criterion based upon the monitored isotopic signature, injecting hydrogen gas through the wellbore into the geological formation at a pressure higher than a shut-in gas pressure at a wellhead; and

f. recovering, through the wellbore, a hydrogen-containing gas having an H 2 molar fraction of at least 85%.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the isotopic signature is based upon an isotope ratio, and the isotopic ratio is δ( 13 C).

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the isotopic signature is based upon an isotope ratio having the form δ(C X H Y-1 D/C X H Y ).

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one molecular component comprises at least one hydrocarbon selected from a hydrocarbon group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, butane, and pentane.

15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature is based upon an isotope ratio, and the isotopic ratio is of the form δ(C X H Y-1 D/C A H B ), (ii) C X H Y-1 D is a monodeuterated molecule of a first hydrocarbon selected from a hydrocarbon group consisting of: methane, ethane, propane, butane and pentane hydrocarbon, and (iii) C A H B is a non-deuterated molecule of a second hydrocarbon that is not the first hydrocarbon, selected from the hydrocarbon group.

16 . The method of claim 11 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing a monodeuterated multi-alkane sum of respective concentrations of one or more of: monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing a concentration of monodeuterated methane.

17 . The method of claim 11 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing a monodeuterated-methane concentration, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing a respective concentration of any one of: monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane.

18 . The method of claim 11 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing respective concentrations of one or more members of the monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group consisting of monodeuterated methane, monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing respective concentrations of one or more members of said monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group with the exception of the one or more members represented in EXP 1 .

19 . The method of claim 11 , wherein (i) the isotopic signature has the form δ(EXP 1 /EXP 2 ), (ii) EXP 1 is an expression representing any member of the monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group consisting of monodeuterated methane, monodeuterated ethane, monodeuterated propane, monodeuterated butane, and monodeuterated pentane, and (iii) EXP 2 is an expression representing any other member of said monodeuterated C1-C5 alkane group.

20 . The method of claim 11 , wherein monitoring the isotopic signature includes detecting a decrease in the isotope ratio from an initial value to a minimum value and, subsequently thereto, detecting an increase in the isotope ratio.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 11, 2024
From: VINEGAR, EVA; VINEGAR, HAROLD J.
To: TERRAH2 LLC
Reel/Frame 069551/0966 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 17665707 · Feb 7, 2022
Provisional Application 63301503 · Jan 21, 2022
Provisional Application 63294139 · Dec 28, 2021
Provisional Application 63240961 · Sep 5, 2021
Provisional Application 63195151 · May 31, 2021
Provisional Application 63146847 · Feb 8, 2021
Related Publication 20230160284A1 · May 25, 2023
References Cited (57)
US 4709577A · Thompson · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 5085274A · Puri · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 7121342B2 · Mnegar et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7152675B2 · Heard · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8230929B2 · Kaminsky · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8760657B2 · Pope et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9810064B2 · Garcia · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10131593B2 · Okada · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11680466B2 · Vinegar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040200393A1 · Zauderer · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050109504A1 · Heard · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050220704A1 · Morrow et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090115190A1 · Devine · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090255181A1 · Rhinesmith et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110000133A1 · Rhinesmith et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110223100A1 · Monereau · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110229780A1 · Kershaw · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130240369A1 · McAlister · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140102885A1 · Devine · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140161533A1 · Oates · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140245827A1 · Pope · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150285032A1 · Vinegar et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150321846A1 · Strybos et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160010220A1 · Bower · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160046443A1 · Oates · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160060038A1 · Oates · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160060738A1 · Nagao et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160251217A1 · Fujisawa et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160354622A1 · James · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160354625A1 · James · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170341936A1 · Wasserscheid et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180312935A1 · Nagao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190219558A1 · Villar De Andrade E Silva · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210404439A1 · Kinsella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220034448A1 · Meheen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220064770A1 · Nagao · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220146048A1 · Ewan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220251935A1 · Vinegar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230077276A1 · Vinegar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230160284A1 · Vinegar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230167719A1 · Vinegar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230167720A1 · Vinegar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
RU 2493366C2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Search report and written opinion of PCT/US22/15486 filed on Feb. 7, 2022 [Search report mailed by the PCT search authority ISA/US on Jun. 24, 2022. [cited by applicant]
RU2493366C2 Machine Translation (by google patents)—published Sep. 20, 2013; BP Exploration Operating Company. [cited by applicant]
Pichler, Assesment of Hydrogen—Rock Interactions During Geological Storage of CH4-H2 Mixtures, Masters thesis; Department Mineral Resources & Petroleum Engineering Chair of Reservoir Engineering; 2013. [cited by applicant]
Evans, M. (2016). Unconventional Hydrocarbons and the US Technology Revolution. In R. Grafton, I. Cronshaw, & M. Moore (Eds.), Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas: A Global Perspective (pp. 59-91). Cambr… [cited by applicant]
Li W, Lu S, Li J, Zhang P, Wang S, Feng W, Wei Y. 2020. Carbon isotope fractionation during shale gas transport: Mechanism, characterization and significance. Science China Earth Sciences, 63: 674-689. [cited by applicant]
Ziarani, A.S., Aguilera, R. Knudsen's Permeability Correction for Tight Porous Media. Transp Porous Med 91, 239-260 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Zhang, T., Ellis, G. S., Ruppel, S. C., Milliken, K., & Yang, R. (2012). Effect of organic-matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale-gas systems. Organic geochemistry, 47, 120-131. [cited by applicant]
Londe, L. F. (Dec. 2021). Four Ways to Store Large Quantities of Hydrogen. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference. OnePetro. [cited by applicant]
Mohammad, A. K., & Sabeeh, N. S. (2018). Comparative study for adsorption of hydrogen-methane mixtures on activated carbon and 5A molecular sieve. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 35, 795-804. [cited by applicant]
Ehlig-Economides, Christine , and Dimitrios G. Hatzignatiou. “Blue Hydrogen Economy—A New Look at an Old Idea.” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE, Sep. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Wang, X., & Sheng, J. (2017). Gas sorption and non-Darcy flow in shale reservoirs. Petroleum Science, 14(4), 746-754. [cited by applicant]
Osawa, S., Kusumi, S., & Ogino, Y. (1976). Physical adsorption of gases at high pressure: IV. an improvement of DA equation. J. Colloidal Interface Sci, 56, 83-91. [cited by applicant]
Underground Sun Storage: Final Report Public 13—Jan. 2020, Seite 1 von 172. [cited by applicant]
Kobos, Peter Holmes, Lord, Anna Snider, Borns, David James, & Klise, Geoffrey T. A life cycle cost analysis framework for geologic storage of hydrogen : a user's tool . . . United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1029761. [cited by applicant]