IP Library Granted Patent US 12,656,133
Granted Patent B2
US 12,656,133 · App. 17/996,219 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Predicting wireless quality of service (QoS) for connected vehicles

Inventors: Garnik Kakosyan (Plano, TX); Utsav Agarwal (Issaquah, WA); Alejandro Gil Castellanos (Snoqualmie, WA); Kalyana Chakravarthy Bedhu (McKinney, TX); Shruti Bothe (Santa Clara, CA)
Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ)
G01C21/3461B60W60/001H04L41/40H04W4/40H04W4/44H04W24/08H04W24/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,656,133
App. No.
17/996,219
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of a route prediction system utilizing real-time mobile communication network data. The method includes receiving a route request originating from a connected vehicle, the route request identifying a route, determining segments for the route, localizing mobile communication network resources to the segments, determining key performance indicators for the segments based on at least a current offline model, and sending predicted service level indicators (SLIs) for the segments to the connected vehicle.

Claims (32)

1 . A method of a route prediction system utilizing real-time data obtained for a mobile communication network, the method comprising:

receiving, via a cloud platform, the real-time data and a route request originating from an autonomous vehicle connected to the mobile communication network, the route request identifying a starting location and a destination for the autonomous vehicle, wherein the cloud platform pre-processes the real-time data and identifies a route for the autonomous vehicle from the starting location to the destination;

determining segments of the route corresponding to areas covered by the mobile communication network of a mobile network operator, wherein the segments correlate to mobile communication network resources to be utilized by the autonomous vehicle with particular segments along the route;

localizing the mobile communication network resources for use in communicating with the autonomous vehicle for each of the segments;

determining key performance indicators (KPIs) of the mobile communication network for each of the segments based on at least an offline model to derive a set of KPIs that rate mobile communication network coverage for each of the segments;

adjusting the KPIs of the offline model based on the real-time data;

aggregating the KPIs into predicted service level indicator (SLI) levels;

aggregating the predicted SLI levels for the mobile communication network resources for each segment; and

sending the predicted SLI levels for the segments to the autonomous vehicle via the cloud platform.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the real-time data includes any one or more of coverage area, required quality of service (QoS), current subscriber level, and cell level cellular wireless QoS, and wherein the cell level cellular wireless QoS includes any one or more of antenna, alarms, past performance, and handover settings.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the offline model uses at least one of a Digital Terrain Model (DTM), a clutter map, or both the DTM and the clutter map.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

adjusting the KPIs based on experience data received with the route request, wherein the experience data indicates an actual quality of service (QoS) for a given location and a mobile network operator.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the localizing the mobile communication network resources includes correlating cell towers or geographical grids of network resources with the segments.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the offline model is selected from a plurality of propagation models based on performance.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an experience forecast is generated for each cell tower coverage zone that covers the route, where an approximate probability distribution is made for each cell, and where the experience forecast combines probability distributions as a weighted average.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the KPIs are linked to the route by location from a set of latitude longitude pairs (LLPs) defining the route and expected vehicle speed and distance.

9 . The method of claim 4 , wherein when the experience data includes reports of low quality of service (QoS) for a current segment and selected mobile communication network, a respective KPI is downgraded or similarly adjusted to reflect the experience data.

10 . A network device to implement a route prediction system utilizing real-time data obtained for a mobile communication network, the network device comprising:

a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium having stored therein a route prediction block; and

a processor coupled to the non-transitory machine-readable storage medium, the processor to execute the route prediction block to:

receive, via a cloud platform, the real-time data and a route request originating from an autonomous vehicle connected to the mobile communication network, the route request identifying a starting location and a destination for the autonomous vehicle, wherein the cloud platform pre-processes the real-time data and identifies a route for the autonomous vehicle from the starting location to the destination;

determine segments of the route corresponding to areas covered by the mobile communication network of a mobile network operator, wherein the segments correlate to mobile communication network resources to be utilized by the autonomous vehicle with particular segments along the route;

localize the mobile communication network resources for use in communicating with the autonomous vehicle for each of the segments;

determine key performance indicators (KPIs) of the mobile communication network for each of the segments based on at least an offline model to derive a set of KPIs that rate mobile communication network coverage for each of the segments;

adjust the KPIs of the offline model based on the real-time data;

aggregate the KPIs into predicted service level indicator (SLI) levels;

aggregate the predicted SLI levels for the mobile communication network resources for each segment; and

send the predicted SLI levels for the segments to the autonomous vehicle via the cloud platform.

11 . The network device of claim 10 , wherein the real-time data includes any one or more of coverage area, required quality of service (QoS), current subscriber level, and cell level cellular wireless QoS, and wherein the cell level cellular wireless Qos includes any one or more of antenna, alarms, past performance, and handover settings.

12 . The network device of claim 10 , wherein the offline model uses at least one of a Digital Terrain Model (DTM), a clutter map, or both the DTM and the clutter map.

13 . The network device of claim 10 , wherein the route prediction block is further to adjust the KPIs based on experience data received with the route request, wherein the experience data indicates an actual quality of service (QoS) for a given location and a mobile network operator.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2022
From: KAKOSYAN, GARNIK; AGARWAL, UTSAV; GIL CASTELLANOS, ALEJANDRO; CHAKRAVARTHY BEDHU, KALYANA; BOTHE, SHRUTI
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 061420/0056 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63012042 · Apr 17, 2020
Related Publication 20230194279A1 · Jun 22, 2023
References Cited (103)
US 5610821A · Gazis et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 7023839B1 · Shaffer · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 8676502B2 · Petersen · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9432961B2 · Rao et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9746341B2 · Sheha · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9846049B2 · Krumm · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9881022B2 · Ubhi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10339810B2 · Akiyama · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10581664B1 · Peng · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10746558B2 · Muldoon · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10952081B2 · Peroulas · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10970746B2 · Singhal · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11441916B1 · Konrardy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20010034588A1 · Agrawals · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20040218582A1 · Kennedy · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20070088709A1 · Bailey · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070112504A1 · Krause et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070213925A1 · Sharma et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090080336A1 · Zhang · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090247186A1 · Ji · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100182316A1 · Akbari · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110096675A1 · Li · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110137551A1 · Peri · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120130938A1 · Tamano · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130308470A1 · Bevan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140025298A1 · Spindler · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140067257A1 · Dave · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140141743A1 · Shaw · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140257695A1 · Annapureddy · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150146514A1 · Mahimkar · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150332155A1 · Mermoud et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170086049A1 · Vrzic · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170208560A1 · Papa · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170215094A1 · Akoum · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170219359A1 · Elhoushi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170272972A1 · Egner · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180024901A1 · Tankersley · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180063767A1 · Matos · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180107216A1 · Beaurepaire · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180219753A1 · Arsenie · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180372501A1 · Sahlholm · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190036630A1 · Svennebring · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190044830A1 · Kersch · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190045378A1 · Rosales · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190049259A1 · Galan-Oliveras · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190208001A1 · Stumbo · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190234750A1 · Muldoon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190239086A1 · Shekalim · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190319868A1 · Svennebring et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190383624A1 · Magzimof et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200045687A1 · Lee et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200064140A1 · Tarkiainen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200067793A1 · Dribinski · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200107212A1 · Zielinski · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200112899A1 · Mysore Annaiah · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200116515A1 · Chadha · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200162990A1 · Reimann · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200221314A1 · Cho · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200252310A1 · Thampy · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200264003A1 · Ebner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200311118A1 · Gupta · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200314684A1 · Reimann · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200344267A1 · Adam · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210014755A1 · Caceres · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210112423A1 · Maheshwari · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210114616A1 · Altman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210117869A1 · Plumbley et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210158260A1 · Kolar · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210231447A1 · Ahmed · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210297172A1 · Jornod · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210306887A1 · Kim · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210337432A1 · Lee · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210345129A1 · Gupta · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220014449A1 · Mwanje · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220029896A1 · Mwanje · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220164765A1 · Masche-Pakkala · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220196426A1 · Xu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230194277A1 · Kakosyan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230194278A1 · Kakosyan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230194279A1 · Kakosyan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 20164488 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 3883149A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO 0169570A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016150494A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018115691A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018189576A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021024032A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021031099A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021031100A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021031101A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021209802A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021209803A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/IB2020/056205, Oct. 27, 2022, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/IB2020/056206, Oct. 27, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/IB2020/056207, Oct. 27, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/IB2020/056205, Jan. 19, 2021, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/IB2020/056206, Jan. 13, 2021, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/IB2020/056207, Jan. 14, 2021, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
SAE International, “Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice,” Jun. 2018, 35 pages, J3016™. [cited by applicant]
Seongbok Baik et al., “Machine learning in IMT-2020 and future networks: use cases and basic requirements,” Jun. 17-28, 2019, 50 pages, International Telecommunication Union, 17289-TD1 (190617), Telecommunication Standa… [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/996,219, PCT/IB2020/056205 which Claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 63/012,042. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/996,218, PCT/IB2020/056206 which Claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 63/012,042. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/996,216, PCT/IB2020/056207 which Claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 63/012,042. [cited by applicant]