IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,657,941
Granted Patent B2
US 12,657,941 · App. 18/174,971 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

AI-assisted generation of annotated medical images

Inventors: Marvin Teichmann (Erlangen, DE); Andre Aichert (Erlangen, DE); Hanibal Bohnenberger (Bovenden, DE)
Assignees: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG; GEORG-AUGUST-UNIVERSITÄT GÖTTINGEN STIFTUNG ÖFFENTLICHEN RECHTS UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN GÖTTINGEN
G06V20/70G06V10/26G06V10/764G06V10/774G06V10/776G06V10/84G06V2201/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,657,941
App. No.
18/174,971
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A set of pre-annotated medical images is received, and the received set is processed by automatically: training an AI-based uncertainty model using the received set as training data; processing medical images of the received set by determining classified segments and/or uncertainty regions in the medical images using the trained AI-based uncertainty model; selecting at least a part of the processed medical images including classified segments and/or uncertainty regions based on the processing result; and presenting the selected part of processed medical images to a human expert. Furthermore, a modified received set including additional annotations created by the human expert is received.

Claims (61)

1 . A method for AI-assisted generation of annotated medical images, the method comprising:

receiving a set of pre-annotated medical images, a subset of the set of pre-annotated medical images being coarsely annotated by a first human expert;

processing the set of pre-annotated medical images by automatically training an AI-based uncertainty model using the set of pre-annotated medical images as training data,

processing medical images of the set of pre-annotated medical images by determining at least one of classified segments or uncertainty regions in the medical images using the trained AI-based uncertainty model,

selecting at least a part of the processed medical images including the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions based on the processing, and

presenting the part of the processed medical images to a second human expert; and

receiving a modified set of pre-annotated medical images including additional annotations created by the second human expert, wherein the additional annotations are related to the part of the processed medical images.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of:

the medical images include whole slide images,

the AI-based uncertainty model includes an AI-based Bayesian segmentation model, or

the selecting of the at least the part of the processed medical images is performed based on a ranking of the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least the part of the set of pre-annotated medical images are coarsely segmented based on at least one of a line or a closed curve within the set of pre-annotated medical images.

4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein the at least one of the line or the closed curve is at least one of piecewise linear or piecewise polynomial.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the classified segments, the determining of the classified segments including refining a segmentation of coarsely annotated medical images by the first human expert.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the processing the set of pre-annotated medical images and the receiving the modified set of pre-annotated medical images are repeated iteratively using the modified set of pre-annotated medical images as the training data in the training of the AI-based uncertainty model.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the training of the AI-based uncertainty model, the processing of the medical images of the set of pre-annotated medical images, and the selecting at least the part of the processed medical images are repeated iteratively, until a quality criteria for the annotated medical images is achieved.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the uncertainty regions using the trained AI-based uncertainty model; and wherein

the determining of the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions includes

generating a simplified graphical representation of the uncertainty regions, and

extracting the simplified graphical representation for presentation to the second human expert.

9 . The method according to claim 8 , wherein the simplified graphical representation includes at least one of:

a point set based representation, or

a parameter based representation.

10 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the selecting of at least the part of the processed medical images is based on a ranking of the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions, and wherein the ranking is based on a determination of a preferred type of the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions.

11 . The method according to claim 10 , wherein the preferred type includes at least one of:

an image structure systematically neglected by a coarse annotation,

a high uncertainty,

assigned metadata revealing a type of rarely collected medical images, or

image features revealing dissimilar medical images.

12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the AI-based uncertainty model comprises at least one of:

a specialized spatial segmentation loss algorithm,

a feature pyramid pooling algorithm,

a Monte Carlo Dropout algorithm,

a Monte Carlo Depth algorithm, or

a Deep Ensemble algorithm.

13 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the AI-based uncertainty model or an AI-based segmentation model is trained based on the modified set of pre-annotated medical images.

14 . A computer-implemented method for providing a segmented medical image, computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving a generated medical image;

determining a segmented medical image by processing the generated medical image by a trained AI-based segmentation model provided by the method according to claim 13 ; and

providing the segmented medical image.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed at a computer, cause the computer to perform the method of claim 14 .

16 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed at a computer, cause the computer to perform the method of claim 1 .

17 . The method according to claim 4 , wherein the processing the set of pre-annotated medical images and the receiving a modified set of pre-annotated medical images are repeated iteratively using the modified set of pre-annotated medical images as the training data in the training of the AI-based uncertainty model.

18 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the quality criteria is met when a first modified set of pre-annotated medical images from a first iteration is less than a threshold difference from a second modified set of pre-annotated medical images from a second iteration after the first iteration.

19 . An annotation assistance device, comprising:

a communication interface configured to receive a set of pre-annotated medical images;

a model training unit configured to train an AI-based uncertainty model using the set of pre-annotated medical images as training data, a subset of the set of pre-annotated medical images being coarsely annotated by a first human expert;

a processing unit configured to determine at least one of classified segments or uncertainty regions in medical images of the set of pre-annotated medical images using the trained AI-based uncertainty model; and

a selection unit configured to select at least a part of the medical images including the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions,

wherein the communication interface is configured to

present the part of the medical images to a second human expert, and

receive a modified set of pre-annotated medical images including additional annotations created by the second human expert, the additional annotations being related to the part of the medical images.

20 . An annotation assistance device, comprising:

at least one processor configured to execute computer-executable instructions to cause the annotation assistance device to

train an AI-based uncertainty model using a set of pre-annotated medical images as training data, a subset of the set of pre-annotated medical images being coarsely annotated by a first human expert,

determine at least one of classified segments or uncertainty regions in medical images of the set of pre-annotated medical images using the trained AI-based uncertainty model,

select at least a part of the medical images including the at least one of the classified segments or the uncertainty regions,

present the part of the medical images to a second human expert, and

receive a modified set of pre-annotated medical images including additional annotations created by the second human expert, the additional annotations being related to the part of the medical images.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2025
From: BOHNENBERGER, HANIBAL
To: GEORG-AUGUST-UNIVERSITÄT GÖTTINGEN STIFTUNG ÖFFENTLICHEN RECHTS UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN GÖTTINGEN
Reel/Frame 071932/0442 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2025
From: TEICHMANN, MARVIN; AICHERT, ANDRÉ
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 071932/0602 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066267/0346 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 22159493 · Mar 1, 2022 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230282011A1 · Sep 7, 2023
References Cited (17)
US 20210375435A1 · O'Connor · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230342927A1 · Aichert et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Anklin V., Pushpak P.:“Learning whole-slide segmentation from inexact and incomplete labels using tissue graphs”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03129, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Shen, Y.; Ke, J.: “Representative Region Based Active Learning for Histological Classification of Colorectal Cancer”, in: 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Apr. 13-16, 2021, Nice, France… [cited by applicant]
Hanchao, Li et al: “Pyramid Attention Network for Semantic Segmentation”; BMVC 2018. [cited by applicant]
Nazeri K. et al.:“Two-stage convolutional neural network for breast cancer histology image classification” In International Conference Image Analysis and Recognition, pp. 717-726. Springer, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Yang, L.; Zhang, Y. et al: “Suggestive annotation: A deep active learning framework for biomedical image segmentation”, in: International conference on medical image computing and computerassisted intervention, Springer… [cited by applicant]
Ming Y.Lu, Drew FK et al.:“Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images”. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 5(6):555-570, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Ström P-et al.:“Pathologist-level grading of prostate biopsies with artificial intelligence” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.01368, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kather J.N. et al.:“Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer”. Nature medicine, 25(7):1054-1056, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Jin Xu et al:“Reducing the Annotation Cost of Whole Slide Histology Images using Active Learning”, 2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems, ACMPUB27, New York, NY, USA, May 2… [cited by applicant]
Sungduk Cho, Jang H. et al.: Deepscribble: Interactive pathology image segmentation using deep neural networks with scribbles. In 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 761-765. IEEE, 2… [cited by applicant]
Raczkowski Lukasz et al: “ARA: accurate, reliable and active histopathological image classification framework with Bayesian deep learning”, Scientific Reports, [Online] vol. 9, No. 1, Oct. 4, 2019, pp. 1-12, ISSN: 2045-… [cited by applicant]
Kather, J.N. et al.:“Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations”, in: Nat Cancer. Aug. 2020 ; 1(8): 789-799. doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0087-6. [cited by applicant]
Guilherme A. et al.:“: BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. Medical image analysis”, 56:122-139, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Nagpal K. et al:“Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving gleason scoring of prostate cancer” NPJ digital medicine, 2(1):1-10, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Redekop, E.; Chernyavskiy, A.:“Uncertainty-Based Method for Improving Poorly Labeled Segmentation Datasets”, in: 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) Apr. 13-16, 2021, Nice, France., pp. 1… [cited by applicant]