IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,663,768
Granted Patent B2
US 12,663,768 · App. 18/467,569 · Granted Jun 23, 2026

Digital twin-based system and method for reducing peak power and energy consumption in a physical system

Inventor: Robert Horton (Lewisville, TX)
Assignee: Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board
G05B13/048G01C21/3492G01C21/3694G08G9/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,663,768
App. No.
18/467,569
Filed
Sep 14, 2023
Granted
Jun 23, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3663
USPC
701/425
Abstract

A method includes identifying a route for passengers seeking to enter a building. The route includes at least one section of road for automobiles to access a building; or at least one access point inside the building for pedestrians to pass through. The method includes receiving traffic flow information corresponding to the route. The method includes determining whether the received traffic flow information corresponds to a condition that impedes the route, from among a set of pre-trained conditions. The method includes identifying and displaying a list of user-selectable state alternatives related to the condition that impedes the route, based on a determination that the received traffic flow information corresponds to the condition.

Claims (100)

1 . A method implemented by at least one processor, the method comprising:

identifying a route for passengers seeking to enter a building at an original destination, the route including:

at least one section of road, within a physical system, for automobiles to access the building; or

at least one access point, within the physical system, inside the building for pedestrians to pass through;

receiving, from at least one sensor, traffic flow information corresponding to the route;

determining whether the received traffic flow information corresponds to a condition that impedes the route, from among a set of pre-trained conditions respectively impeding the route, the set of pre-trained conditions within a digital twin of the physical system;

identifying and displaying a list of user-selectable state alternatives for redirection of a traffic flow of multiple vehicles or multiple pedestrians in the physical system, based on a determination that the received traffic flow information corresponds to the condition, the list of user-selectable state alternatives related to the condition that impedes the route;

receiving a selection, from among the list of user-selectable state alternatives, of a selected state alternative; and

implementing the selected state alternative in the physical system,

wherein the user is a policymaker associated with the physical system.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving user input that includes the selection of the selected state alternative;

obtaining a predicted traffic flow corresponding to the route, based on the selected state alternative; and

displaying a user interface that includes the route and visual indicators representing the predicted traffic flow based on the selected state alternative.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein obtaining the predicted traffic flow comprises:

transmitting the selected state alternative to a traffic flow optimizer; and

receiving the predicted traffic flow from the traffic flow optimizer, in response to the selected state alternative transmitted.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein:

a first state alternative corresponds to a status quo, from among the list of user-selectable state alternatives;

the selected state alternative is the first state alternative;

obtaining the predicted traffic flow comprises using the received traffic flow information as the predicted traffic flow; and

displaying a user interface that includes the route and visual indicators representing the traffic flow information corresponding to the route.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

controlling an output device located along the route to display a predetermined message corresponding to the selected state alternative,

wherein the predetermined message is associated with at least one of:

the condition that impedes the route; or

a change of mode of transportation.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, from an external device located at the building, a passenger arrival indication that the passengers seeking to enter the building includes a passenger who has arrived at the building and who is ticketed for a transport vehicle scheduled to depart from the building; and

incrementing a count of N on-time passengers for the transport vehicle, based on the passenger arrival indicator received and an estimated travel time from a location of the external device through the at least one access point to a boarding location inside the building for the transport vehicle.

7 . The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

determining an on-time load factor corresponding to an on-time departure of the transport vehicle;

converting the on-time load factor to K passenger seats of the transport vehicle; and

predicting that the transport vehicle will have a delayed departure based on a likelihood that the K passenger seats corresponding to the on-time departure of the transport vehicle will be greater than the count of N on-time passengers at a boarding time, wherein a boarding gate assignment is modified based on the delayed departure predicted.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a state alternative to change of mode of transportation or a state alternative to redirect to a new destination away from the original destination is among the list of user-selectable state alternatives.

9 . An electronic device comprising:

at least one processor configured to:

identify a route for passengers seeking to enter a building at an original destination, the route including:

at least one section of road, within a physical system, for automobiles to access the building; or

at least one access point, within a physical system, inside the building for pedestrians to pass through;

receive, from at least one sensor, traffic flow information corresponding to the route;

determine whether the received traffic flow information corresponds to a condition that impedes the route, from among a set of pre-trained conditions respectively impeding the route, the set of pre-trained conditions within a digital twin of the physical system;

identify and display a list of user-selectable state alternatives for redirection of a traffic flow of multiple vehicles or multiple pedestrians in the physical system, based on a determination that the received traffic flow information corresponds to the condition, the list of user-selectable state alternatives related to the condition that impedes the route;

receive a selection, from among the list of user-selectable state alternatives, of a selected state alternative; and

implement the selected state alternative in the physical system,

wherein the user is a policymaker associated with the physical system.

10 . The electronic device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

receive user input that includes the selection of the selected state alternative;

obtain a predicted traffic flow corresponding to the route, based on the selected state alternative; and

display a user interface that includes the route and visual indicators representing the predicted traffic flow based on the selected state alternative.

11 . The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein to obtain the predicted traffic flow, the at least one processor is further configured to:

transmit the selected state alternative to a traffic flow optimizer; and

receive the predicted traffic flow from the traffic flow optimizer, in response to the selected state alternative transmitted.

12 . The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein:

a first state alternative corresponds to a status quo, from among the list of user-selectable state alternatives;

the selected state alternative is the first state alternative;

to obtain the predicted traffic flow, the at least one processor is further configured to use the received traffic flow information as the predicted traffic flow; and

the at least one processor is further configured to display a user interface that includes the route and visual indicators representing the traffic flow information corresponding to the route.

13 . The electronic device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

control an output device located along the route to display a predetermined message corresponding to the selected state alternative,

wherein the predetermined message is associated with at least one of:

the condition that impedes the route; or

a change of mode of transportation.

14 . The electronic device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

receive, from an external device located at the building, a passenger arrival indication that the passengers seeking to enter the building includes a passenger who has arrived at the building and who is ticketed for a transport vehicle scheduled to depart from the building; and

increment a count of N on-time passengers for the transport vehicle, based on the passenger arrival indicator received and an estimated travel time from a location of the external device through the at least one access point to a boarding location inside the building for the transport vehicle.

15 . The electronic device of claim 14 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

determine an on-time load factor corresponding to an on-time departure of the transport vehicle;

convert the on-time load factor to K passenger seats of the transport vehicle; and

predict that the transport vehicle will have a delayed departure based on a likelihood that the K passenger seats corresponding to the on-time departure of the transport vehicle will be greater than the count of N on-time passengers at a boarding time, wherein a boarding gate assignment is modified based on the delayed departure predicted.

16 . A non-transitory computer readable medium embodying a computer program, the computer program comprising computer readable program code that, when executed by a processor of an electronic device, causes the electronic device to:

identify a route for passengers seeking to enter a building at an original destination, the route including:

at least one section of road, within a physical system, for automobiles to access the building; or

at least one access point, within a physical system, inside the building for pedestrians to pass through;

receive, from at least one sensor, traffic flow information corresponding to the route;

determine whether the received traffic flow information corresponds to a condition that impedes the route, from among a set of pre-trained conditions respectively impeding the route, the set of pre-trained conditions within a digital twin of the physical system;

identify and display a list of user-selectable state alternatives for redirection of a traffic flow of multiple vehicles or multiple pedestrians in the physical system, based on a determination that the received traffic flow information corresponds to the condition, the list of user-selectable state alternatives related to the condition that impedes the route;

receive a selection, from among the list of user-selectable state alternatives, of a selected state alternative; and

implement the selected state alternative in the physical system,

wherein the user is a policymaker associated with the physical system.

17 . The non-transitory, computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to:

receive user input that includes the selection of the selected state alternative;

obtain a predicted traffic flow corresponding to the route, based on the selected state alternative; and

display a user interface that includes the route and visual indicators representing the predicted traffic flow based on the selected state alternative.

18 . The non-transitory, computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to obtain the predicted traffic flow further comprises program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to:

transmit the selected state alternative to a traffic flow optimizer; and

receive the predicted traffic flow from the traffic flow optimizer, in response to the selected state alternative transmitted.

19 . The non-transitory, computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein:

a first state alternative corresponds to a status quo, from among the list of user-selectable state alternatives;

the selected state alternative is the first state alternative;

the program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to obtain the predicted traffic flow further comprises program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to use the received traffic flow information as the predicted traffic flow; and

the program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to display a user interface that includes the route and visual indicators representing the traffic flow information corresponding to the route.

20 . The non-transitory, computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to:

control an output device located along the route to display a predetermined message corresponding to the selected state alternative,

wherein the predetermined message is associated with at least one of:

the condition that impedes the route; or

a change of mode of transportation.

21 . The non-transitory, computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the program code that, when executed, causes the electronic device to:

receive, from an external device located at the building, a passenger arrival indication that the passengers seeking to enter the building includes a passenger who has arrived at the building and who is ticketed for a transport vehicle scheduled to depart from the building; and

increment a count of N on-time passengers for the transport vehicle, based on the passenger arrival indicator received and an estimated travel time from a location of the external device through the at least one access point to a boarding location inside the building for the transport vehicle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2023
From: HORTON, ROBERT
To: DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD
Reel/Frame 064911/0636 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63376988 · Sep 23, 2022
Provisional Application 63375828 · Sep 15, 2022
Related Publication 20240096226A1 · Mar 21, 2024
References Cited (97)
US 6718779B1 · Henry · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 8090532B2 · Tashev · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9002532B2 · Asmus · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10101731B2 · Asmus et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10732584B2 · ElBsat et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10761547B2 · Risbeck et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10996641B2 · Yan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11047586B2 · Hoff · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20050021227A1 · Matsumoto · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070272493A1 · Legez · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090157302A1 · Tashev · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20130013121A1 · Henze et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130297387A1 · Michael · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140166261A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150134244A1 · Hershey et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160047578A1 · Warren · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160327295A1 · Ward et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160334236A1 · Mason · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170069209A1 · Beaurepaire · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170292851A1 · Chen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170374530A1 · Ramasamy · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180018572A1 · Wang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180211541A1 · Rakah · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190295007A1 · Shimode et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190332072A1 · Beaty et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190353493A1 · Takahashi · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210003308A1 · Venne · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210041253A1 · Walpuck · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210063983A1 · Anderson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210296897A1 · Cruickshank, III · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210381861A1 · Brown et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220187028A1 · Ben Nun et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220373206A1 · Tillack · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240177536A9 · Cella · 2024 [cited by examiner]
C. T. Barba, M. Á. Mateos, P. R. Soto, A. M. Mezher and M. A. Igartua, “Smart city for VANETs using warning messages, traffic statistics and intelligent traffic lights,” 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Madrid,… [cited by examiner]
Nel Samama, “Maps,” in Indoor Positioning: Technologies and Performance , IEEE, 2019, pp. 295-310, doi: 10.1002/9781119421887.ch13. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
P. Siriaraya et al., “Beyond the Shortest Route: A Survey on Quality-Aware Route Navigation for Pedestrians,” in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 135569-135590, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3011924. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
M. Arikawa, S. Konomi and K. Ohnishi, “Navitime: Supporting Pedestrian Navigation in the Real World,” in IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 21-29, Jul.-Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2007.61. (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
J. Zheng, A. Winstanley, Z. Pan and S. Coveney, “Spatial Characteristics of Walking Areas for Pedestrian Navigation,” 2009 Third International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Qingdao, China, 2009, p… [cited by examiner]
Ugirumurera, J. et al., “A modeling framework for designing an evaluating curbside traffic management policies at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 153, … [cited by applicant]
Sigler, D. et al., “Route optimization for energy efficient airport shuttle operations—A case study from Dallas Fort worth International Airport,” Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 94, Jul. 2021, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sigler, D. et al., “Airport Infrastructure Planning Using Multi-stage Stochastic Programming,” Oct. 2021, retrived from URL <https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/80951.pdf>, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lunacek, M. et al., “A data-driven operational model for traffic at the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport,” Journal of Transport Management, vol. 94, Jul. 2021, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Q. et al., “ASPIRES: Airport Shuttle Planning and Improved Routing Event-driven Simulation,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2676, Issue 12, Jun. 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Z. et al., “Data-driven simulation-based planning for electric airport shuttle systems: A real-world case study,” Applied Energy, vol. 332, Feb. 2023, 56 pages. [cited by applicant]
Slgler, D. et al., “Transportation Hub Infrastructure Expansion: Decision Support Under Uncertainty,” Aug. 2021, retrieved from URL <https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/80637.pdf>, 89 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ge, Y. et al., “Joint Modeling of Access Mode and Parking Choice of Air Travelers Using Revealed Preference Data,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2675, Issue 11, Jul. … [cited by applicant]
National Renewal Energy Laboratory, “Athena: wisdom to guide mobility transformations at U.S. ports (overview),” Feb. 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75902.pdf>, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
National Renewal Energy Laboratory, “Optimization and Electrification of Airport Shuttle Bus Fleets,” Sep. 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/77601.pdf>, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
National Renewal Energy Laboratory, “Airport Traffic Management and Planning Frameworks,” Sep. 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/77629.pdf>, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
National Renewal Energy Laboratory, “Airport Surface Transportation Digital Twin Framework,” Sep. 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/77602.pdf>, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Chinde, V. et al., “Model predictive control for optimal dispatch of chillers and thermal energy storage tank in airports,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 311, May 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 30, 2023, in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2023/032769, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 19, 2023, in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2023/032785, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aw, J. “Letter to the Editor: The non-contact handheld cutaneous infra-red thermometer for fever screening during the COVID-19 global emergency,” Journal of Hospital Infection, 104(4), Apr. 2020, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Childs, C. et al., “Infra-red thermal imaging of the inner canthus: correlates with the temperature of the injured human brain,” Engineering, 4(10B):53-56, Oct. 2012, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gostic, K. et al., “Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19,” Elife, 9: e55570, Feb. 2020, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ghassemi, P. et al., “Best practices for standardized performance testing of infrared thermographs intended for fever screening,” PloS one, 13(9):e0203302, Sep. 2018, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Klepeis, N. et al., “The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A Resource for Assessing Exposure to Environmental Pollutants,” Journal for Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 11(3):231-252, Jul. 200… [cited by applicant]
Nguyen A.V. et al., “Comparison of 3 Infrared Thermal Detection Systems and Self-Report for Mass Fever Screening. Emerging Infectious Diseases,” 16(11):1710-1717, Nov. 2010, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Teunissen, L.P.J. et la., “Infrared thermal imaging of the inner canthus of the eye as an estimator of body core temperature,”: Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 35(3-4):134-138, Apr. 2011, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wilhelmi, J., “Airport Roles in Reducing Transmission of Communicable Diseases: Summary of a Workshop of the Airport Cooperative Research Program's 2018 Insight Event,” Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedin… [cited by applicant]
World Health Organization (WHO), “Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it,” 2023, URL <https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronav… [cited by applicant]
Allam, Z., et al., “Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) provided early detection of the coronavirus (COVID-19) in China and will influence future Urban health policy internationally,” A.I., 1(2):156-165, Apr. 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Appold, S., et al., “The Airport City Phenomenon: Evidence from Large US Airports,” Urban Studies, 50(6):1239-1259, 2013, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bodin, O., et al., “Improving network approaches to the study of complex social-ecological interdependencies,” Nature Sustainability, 2(7):551-559, Jul. 2019, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
De Leeuw, E., et al., “Healthy Airports,” Sydney: Center for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), Feb. 2018, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
DFW Airport, “Sustainability Management Plan. DFW Airport: Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport,” 2014, 98 pages. [cited by applicant]
Doss-Gollin, J., et al. “How unprecedented was the Feb. 2021 Texas cold snap?” Environmental Research Letters, 16(6):064056, Jun. 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fox-Lent, C., et al., “A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula,” Environment Systems and Decisions, 35:209-218, Jun. 2015, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Henao, A., et al., “Airport analyses informing new mobility shifts: Opportunities to adapt energy-efficient mobility services and infrastructure,” Intelligent Transportation Society of America, 2018 Annual Meeting, Jun.… [cited by applicant]
Kapur, A. “Airport infrastructure: The emerging role of the private sector,” The World Bank Technical Paper No. 313, Dec. 1995, 100 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kelemen, Z., “Possible Solution of the Airport Information System Integration,” Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 32(1-2):57-64, Dec. 2004, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kiker, G., et al., “Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making,” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2):95-108, Apr. 2005, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Linkov, I., et al., “Measurable Resilience for Actionable Policy,” Environmental Science & Technology, 47(18): 10108-10110, Sep. 2013, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu, J., et al., “Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems,” Science, 317(5844): 1513-1516, Sep. 2007, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Marcotullio, P., et al., “What is a city? An essential definition for sustainability,” Urbanization and Sustainability: Linking Urban Ecology, Environmental Justice and Global Environmental Change, 2013, pp. 11-25, Spri… [cited by applicant]
Miller, B., et al., U.S. Airport Infrastructure Funding and Financing: Issues and Policy Options Pursuant to Section 122 of the 2018 Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act (No. RR-3175). Rand Corporation, S… [cited by applicant]
Neubauer, K., et al., A Guidebook for Safety Risk Management for Airports. ACRP Report 131, Transportation Research Board, 2015, 211 pages. [cited by applicant]
National Weather Service, “Significant North Texas Snow and Ice Events,” Retrieved Mar. 28, 2021, from https:// www.weather.gov/fwd/dsnows, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ramaswami, A., et al., “A social-ecological-infrastructural systems framework for interdisciplinary study of sustainable city systems: An integrative curriculum across seven major disciplines,” Journal of Industrial Eco… [cited by applicant]
Raymond, C., et al., “Understanding and managing connected extreme events,” Nature Climate Change, 10(7): 611-621, Jun. 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ryerson, M., et al., “A drive for better air service: How air service imbalances across neighboring regions integrate air and highway demands,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 114:237-255, 2018, 53 … [cited by applicant]
Schwartz, H., et al., “Chapter 5—Transportation,” Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, 2014, Retrieved Mar. 27, 2021, from https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/sectors/t… [cited by applicant]
Sharifi, A., et al., “Chapter 1: Resilience-oriented urban planning,” Resilience-oriented urban planning: Theoretical and empirical insights, 2018, 3-27, Springer, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sneddon, C., et al., “Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world,” Ecological economics, 57(2): 253-268, May 2006, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Dallas-Fort Worth: Ozone History. Retrieved Mar. 28, 2021, from https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/sip/dfw/dfw-ozone-history, 2019, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vespa, J., et al., “Demographic turning points for the United States: Population projections for 2020 to 2060,” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau, M… [cited by applicant]
Young, A., “Chapter 7: Urbanization, Environmental Justice, and Social-Environmental Vulnerability in Brazil,” Urbanization and Sustainability: Linking Urban Ecology, Environmental Justice and Global Environmental Chang… [cited by applicant]
Allan, R., et al., “IPCC, 2021: summary for Policymakers,” Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change… [cited by applicant]
Bruneau, M., et al., “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 19(4):733-752, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen, C.C., et al., From modularity to emergence: a primer on the design and science of complex systems, Technical Report CUED/C-EDC/TR.166, University of Cambridge, Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering,… [cited by applicant]
Comes, T., et al., “Critical airport infrastructure disaster resilience: A framework and simulation model for rapid adaptation,” Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(5):04020059, 2020, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Horton, R., et al., “International airports as agents of resilience,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 30(2):217-221, Feb. 2022, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tainter, J., “Social complexity and sustainability,” Ecological complexity, 3(2):91-103, Jun. 2006, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Trauer, J., et al., “What is a Digital Twin?—Definitions and Insights from an Industrial Case Study in Technical Product Development,” Proceedings of the Design Society: Design Conference, vol. 1, Cambridge University P… [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2025, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/467,519, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]