IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,675,512
Granted Patent B2
US 12,675,512 · App. 19/058,178 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Natural language database generation and query system

Inventors: Javed Qadrud-Din (Union City, CA); Pablo Arredondo (Palo Alto, CA); Walter DeFoor (Rockville, MD); Alan deLevie (Washington, DC)
Assignee: Casetext, Inc.
G06F16/3329G06F40/289G06F40/205
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,675,512
App. No.
19/058,178
Filed
Feb 20, 2025
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Examiner
TRAN, LOC
Art Unit
2164
USPC
707/749
Abstract

A request to update a database system based on a natural language input document may be received. An input metadata extraction prompt may be determined based on the natural language input document and a prompt template including a fillable portion. The input metadata extraction prompt may be determined at least in part by filling the fillable portion with natural language input text selected from the natural language input document. The prompt template and the input metadata extraction prompt may each include natural language instructions to generate novel text identifying data values characterizing the natural language input document and corresponding to one or more database fields in the database system. A completed metadata extraction prompt may be determined by executing the natural language instructions via a generative language model to generate the novel text. A database query updating the database system may be determined based on the novel text.

Claims (51)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving via a communication interface a request to update a database system based on a natural language input document;

determining an input metadata extraction prompt based on the natural language input document and a prompt template, the prompt template including a fillable portion, the input metadata extraction prompt being determined at least in part by filling the fillable portion with natural language input text selected from the natural language input document, the prompt template and the input metadata extraction prompt each including one or more natural language instructions to generate novel text identifying one or more data values based on the natural language input text, the one or more data values characterizing the natural language input document, the one or more data values corresponding to one or more database fields in the database system;

determining a completed metadata extraction prompt by executing the one or more natural language instructions via a generative language model to generate the novel text;

determining a database query based on the novel text, the database query updating the database system to include one or more database field values determined based on the one or more data values;

executing the database query to update the database system to include the one or more database field values;

receiving from a client machine a document analysis request to analyze a comparison document based on information stored in the database system;

analyzing the comparison document to determine one or more comparison values corresponding to the one or more database field values;

determining a comparison of the one or more comparison values to information retrieved from the database system; and

transmitting a query response message to the client machine based on the comparison.

2 . The method recited in claim 1 , wherein the input metadata extraction prompt includes a natural language description of the one or more database fields, and wherein the one or more data values are generated based on the natural language description.

3 . The method recited in claim 1 , wherein the natural language input document includes a plurality of clauses, and wherein the natural language input text includes a subset of the plurality of clauses.

4 . The method recited in claim 1 , wherein the one or more natural language instructions includes a text formatting instruction to format the novel text based on one or more formatting parameters.

5 . The method recited in claim 4 , wherein the one or more formatting parameters are specified in accordance with JavaScript Object Notation (JSON).

6 . The method recited in claim 1 , wherein the natural language input document is a contract, and wherein a database field of the one or more database fields identifies information related to an exchange value in the contract.

7 . The method recited in claim 1 , wherein the natural language input document is a contract, and wherein a database field of the one or more database fields identifies whether the contract includes an indemnification clause.

8 . The method recited in claim 1 , wherein the one or more data values include one or more clause-level data values, and wherein the one or more database field values include one or more one or more document-level database field values, and wherein determining the database query involves aggregating the one or more clause-level data values to determine the one or more document-level database field values.

9 . The method recited in claim 1 , the method further comprising:

dividing the natural language input document into a plurality of clauses, the input metadata extraction prompt including a question, the one or more natural language instructions including an instruction to the generative language model to identify one or more of the plurality of clauses relevant to answering the question.

10 . The method recited in claim 1 , the one or more natural language instructions including an instruction to the generative language model to include in the novel text an explanation of reasoning employed by the generative language model in determining the one or more data values.

11 . The method recited in claim 1 , the method further comprising:

identifying a plurality of search terms based on a natural language input text query element received from a client machine;

searching the database system using the plurality of search terms to identify a set of search results satisfying the natural language input text query element; and

transmitting information selected from one or more of the search results to the client machine.

12 . One or more non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon for performing a method, the method comprising:

receiving via a communication interface a request to update a database system based on a natural language input document;

determining an input metadata extraction prompt based on the natural language input document and a prompt template, the prompt template including a fillable portion, the input metadata extraction prompt being determined at least in part by filling the fillable portion with natural language input text selected from the natural language input document, the prompt template and the input metadata extraction prompt each including one or more natural language instructions to generate novel text identifying one or more data values based on the natural language input text, the one or more data values characterizing the natural language input document, the one or more data values corresponding to one or more database fields in the database system;

determining a completed metadata extraction prompt by executing the one or more natural language instructions via a generative language model to generate the novel text;

determining a database query based on the novel text, the database query updating the database system to include one or more database field values determined based on the one or more data values;

executing the database query to update the database system to include the one or more database field values;

receiving from a client machine a document analysis request to analyze a comparison document based on information stored in the database system;

analyzing the comparison document to determine one or more comparison values corresponding to the one or more database field values;

determining a comparison of the one or more comparison values to information retrieved from the database system; and

transmitting a query response message to the client machine based on the comparison.

13 . The one or more non-transitory computer readable media recited in claim 12 , wherein the input metadata extraction prompt includes a natural language description of the one or more database fields, and wherein the one or more data values are generated based on the natural language description.

14 . The one or more non-transitory computer readable media recited in claim 12 , wherein the one or more natural language instructions include a text formatting instruction to format the novel text based on one or more formatting parameters specified in accordance with JavaScript Object Notation (JSON).

15 . The one or more non-transitory computer readable media recited in claim 12 , wherein the natural language input document is a contract, and wherein a database field of the one or more database fields identifies information related to an exchange value in the contract.

16 . The one or more non-transitory computer readable media recited in claim 12 , wherein the one or more data values include one or more clause-level data values, and wherein the one or more database field values include one or more one or more document-level database field values, and wherein determining the database query involves aggregating the one or more clause-level data values to determine the one or more document-level database field values.

17 . The one or more non-transitory computer readable media recited in claim 12 , the method further comprising:

dividing the natural language input document into a plurality of clauses, the input metadata extraction prompt including a question, the one or more natural language instructions including an instruction to the generative language model to identify one or more of the plurality of clauses relevant to answering the question.

18 . A system configured to perform a method, the method comprising:

receiving via a communication interface a request to update a database system based on a natural language input document;

determining an input metadata extraction prompt based on the natural language input document and a prompt template, the prompt template including a fillable portion, the input metadata extraction prompt being determined at least in part by filling the fillable portion with natural language input text selected from the natural language input document, the prompt template and the input metadata extraction prompt each including one or more natural language instructions to generate novel text identifying one or more data values based on the natural language input text, the one or more data values characterizing the natural language input document, the one or more data values corresponding to one or more database fields in the database system;

determining a completed metadata extraction prompt by executing the one or more natural language instructions via a generative language model to generate the novel text;

determining a database query based on the novel text, the database query updating the database system to include one or more database field values determined based on the one or more data values;

executing the database query to update the database system to include the one or more database field values;

receiving from a client machine a document analysis request to analyze a comparison document based on information stored in the database system;

analyzing the comparison document to determine one or more comparison values corresponding to the one or more database field values;

determining a comparison of the one or more comparison values to information retrieved from the database system; and

transmitting a query response message to the client machine based on the comparison.

19 . The system recited in claim 18 , wherein the input metadata extraction prompt includes a natural language description of the one or more database fields, and wherein the one or more data values are generated based on the natural language description.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2025
From: QADRUD-DIN, JAVED; ARREDONDO, PABLO; DEFOOR, WALTER; DELEVIE, ALAN
To: CASETEXT, INC.
Reel/Frame 070286/0525 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 18515014 · Nov 20, 2023
Continuation 18329035 · Jun 5, 2023
Provisional Application 63487181 · Feb 27, 2023
Related Publication 20250200082A1 · Jun 19, 2025
References Cited (170)
US 7257766B1 · Koppel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7293012B1 · Solaro et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7567953B2 · Kadayam et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8380710B1 · Finne et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8635228B2 · Shahabi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8812291B2 · Brants et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9146967B2 · Dean et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10565639B1 · Ghamsari et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10922484B1 · Pereira · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11086949B1 · Desai et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11263188B2 · Arnold et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11281976B2 · Dua et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11288444B2 · Munro et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11314811B1 · Hume et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11321329B1 · Shih et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11481416B2 · Dua et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11765207B1 · McCarthy · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11797610B1 · Ferrucci et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11860914B1 · Qadrud-Din et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11861320B1 · Gajek et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11861321B1 · O'Kelly et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11972223B1 · DeFoor et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11995411B1 · Qadrud-Din et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12067366B1 · Heller et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12111858B1 · Radhakrishnan et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12159119B2 · Heller et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12229522B2 · Gajek et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20020169595A1 · Agichtein et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040215606A1 · Cossock · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050108219A1 · Huerga · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060074865A1 · Merrigan et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070022109A1 · Imielinski et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070266331A1 · Bicker et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090083248A1 · Liu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100145673A1 · Cancedda · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125734A1 · Duboue et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120030201A1 · Pickering et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130073995A1 · Piantino et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130145241A1 · Salama · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140067374A1 · Wilkins et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140129559A1 · Estes · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172907A1 · Dubbels et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358889A1 · Shmiel et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150016957A1 · Schinko et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150026212A1 · Fink et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150370421A1 · Joshi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160078149A1 · Gaucher et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160196351A1 · Bank et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170286849A1 · Myslinski · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351754A1 · Devarakonda et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075011A1 · Allen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180322110A1 · Rhodes et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180329987A1 · Tata et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190042551A1 · Hwang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190286753A1 · Feng et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190311064A1 · Chakraborty et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190347563A1 · Bruno et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200019642A1 · Dua et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200065346A1 · Boni et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200159783A1 · Shlyunkin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200243076A1 · Kim · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342036A1 · Fowlkes et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342862A1 · Gao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200364403A1 · Choi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210056261A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210081499A1 · Rakshit et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124876A1 · Kryscinski et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210271823A1 · De Ridder · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210326428A1 · Edwards et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210327543A1 · Sato · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210374341A1 · Krause et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210406475A1 · Tang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210406735A1 · Nahamoo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220051479A1 · Agarwal et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220092095A1 · Shukla et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220164397A1 · Escalona et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220180051A1 · Lillemo et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197958A1 · Volynets et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220253447A1 · Boytsov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220261429A1 · Refaeli et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220284174A1 · Galitsky · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220300718A1 · Chen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220318230A1 · Sikka et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220318255A1 · Fei et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220357929A1 · Vijayaraghavan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220366127A1 · Desh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220374459A1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220382975A1 · Gu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230034011A1 · Sarkar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230080674A1 · Attali et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230092702A1 · Mao et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230108863A1 · Gunasekara et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230121711A1 · Chhaya · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230237277A1 · Reza et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230245051A1 · Vuyyuri et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230274084A1 · Modani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230316001A1 · Araki · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230351105A1 · Mammen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240202452A1 · Schillace et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240242037A1 · Heller et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240273309A1 · Heller et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240289363A1 · Qadrud-Din et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240289559A1 · Gajek et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240289561A1 · Qadrud-Din et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240303421A1 · Fabian et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240303424A1 · Reddy et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250005300A1 · O'Kelly et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250005301A1 · DeFoor et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250053754A1 · Heller et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 109213870A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021152837A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
KR 101868421B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024151396A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2025006030A1 · 2025 [cited by applicant]
WO 2025006031A1 · 2025 [cited by applicant]
WO 2025006032A1 · 2025 [cited by applicant]
Wang, Shuyue, and P. Jin. “A Brief Summary of Prompting in Using GPT Models.” (Apr. 2023), pp. 1-14 (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Wang, Wenjin, et al. “Layout and task aware instruction prompt for zero-shot document image question answering.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00526 (Jun. 1, 2023), pp. 1-11 (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Yue Xiang et al: “Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Models”, Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, [Online] May 10, 2023 (May 10, 2023), pp. 4615-4635, XP093214168, D… [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Yanzhe, et al. “Llavar: Enhanced visual instruction tuning for text-rich image understanding.” arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.17107 (Jun. 29, 2023), pp. 1-21 (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Aggarwal, Vi nay, et al. “Clause Rec: A Clause Recommendation Framework for AI-aided Contract Authoring.” arXiv preprint arXiv :2110.15794 (2021), pp. 1-7 (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/154,175, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 30, 2023, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/154,175, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2023, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/154,175, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2023, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,701, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2023, 42 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,701, Non Final Office Action mailed May 3, 2023, 38 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,707, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Sep. 16, 2024, 1 pg. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,707, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2024, 38 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,707, Non Final Office Action mailed May 10, 2023, 33 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,707, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2024, 31 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,707, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 16, 2024, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/329,035, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 25, 2023, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/329,039, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 22, 2024, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/333,320, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 7, 2023, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/333,320, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 22, 2023, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/344,344, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 30, 2023, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/362,733, Final Office Action mailed May 31, 2024, 46 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/362,733, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 17, 2024, 33 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/362,738, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2023, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/362,738, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 4, 2024, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/515,014, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2024, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/515,014, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 6, 2024, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/515,025, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2024, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/515,025, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 14, 2024, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/640,591, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 7, 2024, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/640,591, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 22, 2025, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Arruda, Andrew. “An ethical obligation to use artificial intelligence: An examination of the use of artificial intelligence in law and the model rules of professional responsibility.” Am. J. Trial Advoc. 40 (2016), pp. … [cited by applicant]
Barsha et al., “Natural Language Interface to Database by Regular Expression Generation.” 2021 5th International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT). IEEE, (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Chalkidis, Ilias, et al. “Legal-Bert: The muppets straight out of law school.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02559 (2020), pp. 1-7 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al. (“Data Extraction via Semantic Regular Expression Synthesis.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10401 (May 17, 2023)) (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Definition of Database at dictionary.com, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20221213223226/https://www.dictionary.com/ browse/database (archived on Dec. 13, 2022) (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US23/84899, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 21, 2024, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US23/84903, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 26, 2024, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US23/84905, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 26, 2024, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US23/84915, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 24, 2024, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US24/24021, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 16, 2024, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US24/24038, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 30, 2024, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US24/24047, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 24, 2024, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Application Serial No. PCT/US24/36934, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 13, 2024, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ji Ziwei Zjiad@Connect UST HK et al: “Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY14853, vol. 55, No. 12, Mar. 3, 2023 (M… [cited by applicant]
Joshi, Sagar, et al. “Investigating Strategies for Clause Recommendation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10716 (Jan. 21, 2023), pp. 1-10 (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Kolt, Noam. “Predicting consumer contracts.” Berkeley Tech. LJ 37 (2022), pp. 71-138. (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
Lam, Kwok-Yan, et al, “Applying Large Language Models for Enhancing Contract Drafting”. (Jun. 19, 2023), pp. 1-11 (Year:2023). [cited by applicant]
Lewis, Patrick et al. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Facebook AI Research, University College London; New York University; Apr. 12, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Phelps, Teresa, and Kevin Ashley.““Alexa, Write a Memo”: The Promise and Challenges of AI and Legal Writing.” Legal Writing: J. Legal Writing Inst. 26 (2022), pp. 329-387 (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
Ratner Nir et al: Parallel Context Windows for Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 1: Long Papers), [online] Aug. 1, 2023 (Aug. 1, 2023), … [cited by applicant]
Tianyu Gao et al: “Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations”, arxiv. org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, May 24, 2023 (May 24, 2023), XP091517228,… [cited by applicant]
Trummer, Immanuel. “CodexDB: Generating Code for Processing QL Queries using GPT-3 Codex.” arXiv preprint arXiv: 2204.08941 (2022), pp. 1-7 (Year:2022). [cited by applicant]
Trummer, Immanuel. “CodexDB: Generating Code for Processing SOL Queries using GPT-3 Codex.” arXiv preprint arXiv: 2204.08941 (2022), pp. 1-7 (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/084905, mailed on Sep. 11, 2025, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]