IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,675,781
Granted Patent B2
US 12,675,781 · App. 17/683,173 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Distributed ledger for additive manufacturing in value chain networks

Inventors: Charles H. Cella (Pembroke, MA); Brent Bliven (Austin, TX); Kunal Sharma (Mumbai, IN); Teymour S. El-Tahry (Detroit, MI)
Assignee: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
G06Q20/14B22F10/85B25J9/161B25J9/163B25J9/1653B25J9/1661B25J9/1671B25J9/1682B25J9/1697B29C64/357B29C64/379B29C64/386B29C64/393B33Y10/00B33Y40/00B33Y50/00B33Y50/02G02B3/14G02B26/00G05B13/0265G05B13/042G05B17/02G05B19/402G05B19/4099G05B19/41865G05D1/0027G05D1/0297G05D1/221G05D1/6987G06F30/27G06N3/006G06N3/045G06N3/0464G06N3/084G06N3/088G06N3/09G06N5/025G06N20/00G06N20/10G06N20/20G06Q10/06311G06Q10/0633G06T7/70H04L9/3239H04L9/50H04L63/1441B22F10/70B22F2998/00B29C64/10G05B2219/32015G05B2219/32117G05B2219/32254G05B2219/32291G05B2219/32365G05B2219/33006G05B2219/36252G05B2219/39146G05B2219/39167G05B2219/40113G05B2219/49023G06F2113/10G06Q10/06G06Q10/0631G06Q10/063114G06Q10/06313G06Q10/06316G06Q10/0831G06Q10/0833G06Q10/087G06Q30/0201G06Q2220/00G06T2207/20081Y02P90/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,675,781
App. No.
17/683,173
Filed
Feb 28, 2022
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2115
USPC
700/118
Abstract

An information technology system for a distributed manufacturing network includes an additive manufacturing management platform with an artificial intelligence system configured to learn on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from a set of distributed manufacturing network entities and execute simulations on digital twins of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities to make classifications, predictions, and optimization-related decisions for the set of distributed manufacturing network entities. The information technology system includes a distributed ledger system integrated with a digital thread and configured to provide unified views of workflow and transaction information to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

Claims (42)

1 . An information technology system for a distributed manufacturing network, the information technology system comprising:

a smart contract system;

an additive manufacturing management platform including an artificial intelligence system configured to:

learn on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from a set of distributed manufacturing network entities, wherein the set of distributed manufacturing network entities includes at least one of: printed parts, products, processes, 3D printers, users, customers, packagers, or manufacturing nodes; and

execute simulations on digital twins of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities to make at least one of: classifications, predictions, or optimization-related decisions for the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based, at least partially, on the learned training set; and

a distributed ledger system integrated with a digital thread and configured to, using a blockchain, provide a set of unified views of workflow information and transaction information to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based, at least partially, on the executed simulations on the digital twins,

wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on at least one of: a part twin, a product twin, or a printer twin of the digital twins for generating a quote for three-dimensional (3D) printing of an item relating to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities,

wherein the smart contract system is configured to generate a smart contract based, at least partially, on the quote, and

wherein the distributed ledger system is configured to provide at least one of the set of unified views of the transaction information including the generated smart contract with respect to the item.

2 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, or the printer twin of the digital twins for generating recommendations related to printing to a user of the additive manufacturing management platform.

3 . The information technology system of claim 2 , wherein the recommendations relate to at least one of: a choice of a material for printing or a 3D printing technique.

4 . The information technology system of claim 2 , wherein the recommendations relate to at least one of: a choice of a manufacturing node, a source of manufacturing, a location of manufacturing, timing of scheduling of an additive manufacturing job, a step of the additive manufacturing job, or parameters for design of a printed part.

5 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, or the printer twin of the digital twins for predicting delivery times for 3D printing jobs.

6 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, the printer twin, or a manufacturing node twin of the digital twins for predicting cost over-runs in a manufacturing process performed by the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

7 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, the printer twin, or a manufacturing node twin of the digital twins for optimizing production sequencing of at least one of: parts or products based, at least partially, on at least one of one of: quoted price, delivery, sale margin, or order size.

8 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, the printer twin, or a manufacturing node twin of the digital twins for optimizing manufacturing cycle time.

9 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, the printer twin, a customer twin, or a manufacturing node twin of the digital twins to predict and manage product demand from one or more customers.

10 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, the printer twin, a supplier twin, a customer twin, or a manufacturing node twin of the digital twins to predict and manage supply from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

11 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the at least one of: the part twin, the product twin, the printer twin, a supplier twin, a customer twin, or a manufacturing node twin of the digital twins to optimize production capacity for the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

12 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the set of distributed manufacturing network entities includes at least one of: an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, a Manufacturing Execution system (MES), a Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) system, a maintenance management system (MMS), a Quality Management system (QMS), a certification system, a compliance system, a Robot/Cobot system, or an SCCG system.

13 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the distributed ledger system includes a decentralized application that is downloadable by the set of distributed manufacturing network entities and that relates to the workflow information and the transaction information.

14 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the distributed ledger system includes a user interface configured to provide the set of unified views to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

15 . The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein the distributed ledger system includes a system configured to capture end-to-end traceability of a part produced by the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

16 . A computer-implemented method for a distributed manufacturing network, the method comprising:

learning on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from a set of distributed manufacturing network entities;

executing simulations on digital twins of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities to make at least one of: classifications, predictions, or optimization-related decisions for the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based, at least partially, on the learned training set, wherein the executing simulations includes executing the simulations on at least one of: a part twin, a product twin, or a printer twin of the digital twins for generating a quote for three-dimensional (3D) printing of an item relating to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities;

using a blockchain to provide a set of unified views of workflow information and transaction information to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based, at least partially, on the executed simulations on the digital twins;

generating a smart contract based, at least partially, on the quote; and

using the blockchain to provide at least one of the set of unified views of transaction information including the generated smart contract with respect to the item.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , further including executing simulations on at least one manufacturing node twin of the digital twins for predicting cost over-runs in a manufacturing process performed by the set of distributed manufacturing network entities.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , further including executing simulations on at least one manufacturing node twin of the digital twins for optimizing production sequencing of at least one of: parts or products based, at least partially, on at least one of one of: quoted price, delivery, sale margin, or order size.

19 . An information technology system for a distributed manufacturing network, the information technology system comprising:

a smart contract system;

an additive manufacturing management platform including an artificial intelligence system configured to:

learn on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from a set of distributed manufacturing network entities; and

execute simulations on digital twins of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities to make at least one of: classifications, predictions, or optimization-related decisions for the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based, at least partially, on the learned training set; and

a distributed ledger system integrated with a digital thread and configured to, using a blockchain, provide a set of unified views of workflow information and transaction information to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based, at least partially, on the executed simulations on the digital twins,

wherein the artificial intelligence system further executes the simulations digital twins of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities for generating a quote for three-dimensional (3D) printing of an item relating to the set of distributed manufacturing network entities,

wherein the smart contract system is configured to generate a smart contract based, at least partially, on the quote, and

wherein the distributed ledger system is configured to provide at least one of the set of unified views of transaction information including the generated smart contract with respect to the item.

20 . The information technology system of claim 19 , wherein the artificial intelligence system executes the simulations on the digital twins to predict business outcomes by analyzing relationships between manufacturing parameters and market indicators in the training set, wherein the business outcomes include at least one of: cost variations, product demand trends, or production efficiency metrics.

21 . The information technology system of claim 19 , wherein the distributed ledger system provides network entities with access to manufacturing verification data through a decentralized interface, wherein the verification data includes at least one of: production history, quality metrics, or compliance records.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2022
From: CELLA, CHARLES H.; BLIVEN, BRENT; SHARMA, KUNAL; EL-TAHRY, TEYMOUR S.
To: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
Reel/Frame 061180/0402 →
Priority Claims (2)
IN 202111029964 · Jul 3, 2021 · national
IN 202111036187 · Aug 10, 2021 · national
Continuity (4)
Continuation PCTUS2021064233 · Dec 17, 2021
Provisional Application 63185348 · May 6, 2021
Provisional Application 63127983 · Dec 18, 2020
Related Publication 20220197247A1 · Jun 23, 2022
References Cited (138)
US 9956727B2 · Steele · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10520922B2 · Kumar · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10611085B1 · Janson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11150633B2 · De Souza Borges Ferreira · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11295513B1 · Godbole · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20030081019A1 · Frolik · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20080133383A1 · Regan · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20140223583A1 · Wegner · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140365258A1 · Vestal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150154321A1 · Schmidt · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160375676A1 · Ritchie · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170075944A1 · Overman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170259502A1 · Chapiro · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170285585A1 · Weast et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170334141A1 · Burton · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180024517A1 · Halperin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180069899A1 · Lang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089563A1 · Redding et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180094953A1 · Colson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180114368A1 · Marketsmueller · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136633A1 · Small et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180304370A1 · Myerberg · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180329658A1 · Collomp · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180339448A1 · Fan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180341248A1 · Mehr · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190025800A1 · Goyal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190041835A1 · Cella · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190049929A1 · Good · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190087529A1 · Steingrimsson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190087598A1 · Adkins · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102667A1 · Bashkirov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138662A1 · Deutsch et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190176387A1 · Kuno · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190258747A1 · Milev · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190286384A1 · Torrent · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190303636A1 · Olivastri · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190317935A1 · Berti et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339671A1 · Yona · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190340843A1 · Mccarson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190366644A1 · Blaier · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200027585A1 · Russell, II · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200030979A1 · Bank · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200073850A1 · Roychowdhury · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200103857A1 · Wynne · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200112545A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200125078A1 · Koudal · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200133235A1 · El-Tahry · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200156321A1 · Lin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200174713A1 · Lawson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184278A1 · Zadeh · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200272129A1 · Crothers · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200293822A1 · Anthony et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200295942A1 · Bartolucci · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200306927A1 · Tanikella · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306978A1 · Riek · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341432A1 · Ishibashi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200341452A1 · Bi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200370504A1 · Mook · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210016505A1 · Jau · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210064812A1 · Walkingshaw · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210096827A1 · Stump · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210157312A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210178697A1 · Nilakantan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210236251A1 · Menon · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210256580A1 · Norman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210287459A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210326974A1 · Leng · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210356950A1 · Garvey · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220004678A1 · Harris · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220036404A1 · Choi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220058478A1 · Kuo · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220061958A1 · Savard · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220100171A1 · Miller · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220161497A1 · Karri · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220171898A1 · Rakshit · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220172258A1 · Jain · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220183703A1 · Chi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197522A1 · DeLuca · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220269259A1 · Albrecht · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220292617A1 · Cassoli · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220318752A1 · Bailey · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220334563A1 · Miller · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220391845A1 · Alexa · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220410483A1 · Wang · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220413989A1 · Karri · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230041863A1 · Uozumi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230044533A1 · Horie · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230101500A1 · Iriguchi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230131125A1 · Morita · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230158637A1 · Bright · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240131591A1 · Chaudhry · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2014021657A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 101522110B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020142499A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Banziger et al., “Optimizing human-robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.7,Apr. 3, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Bilberg et al., “Digital twin driven human-robot collaborative assembly” CIRP annals 68.1, pp. 499-502, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.2, Dec. 14, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Yao et al., “Improving just-in-time delivery performance of IoT-enabled fliexible manufacturing systems with AGV based material transportation” Sensors 20.21, Nov. 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Borangiu et al., “Digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry of the future with cyber-physical production systems”, Sci. Technology 23, pp. 3-37, Jan. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Min et al., “Maching learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry”, International Journal of Information Management 49, pp. 502-519, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Integration of digital twin and deep learning in cyber-physical systems: towards smart manufacturing”, IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing 2(1), Mar. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Diemer, “Blockchain-Implications and Use Cases for Additive Manufacturing”, Frankfurt School Blockchain Center, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “A framework for personalized production based on digital twin, blockchain and additive manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0”, 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engine… [cited by applicant]
Mandolla et al., “Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry”, Computers in Industry 109, pp. 134-152, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Trouton et al., “3D opportunity for blockchain: Additive manufacturing links the digital thread”, Deloitte Insights, Nov. 17, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Butt, “Exploring the interrelationship between additive manufacturing and Industry 4.0”, Designs 4.2, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Mukherjee et al., “A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components”, Applied Materials Today 14, pp. 59-65, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Craye et al., “Biovision: a biomimetics platform for intrinsically motivated visual saliency learning”, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Penumuru et al., “Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Valluru et al., “Simulation and Analysis of Liquid Lens Behaviour for Machine Vision Applications—CA13 (AFT)”, 2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), IEEE, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Schwarz et al., “RGB-D object recognition and pose estimation based on pre-trained convolutional neural network features”, 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (IRCA). IEEE, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion and International Search Report for international application No. PCT/US2021/064233, mailed Apr. 22, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chowdhury, S., Mhapsekar, K., and Anand, S. (Dec. 21, 2017). “Part Build Orientation Optimization and Neural Network-Based Geometry Compensation for Additive Manufacturing Process.” ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Mar. 2018; … [cited by applicant]
K. -Y . Fok, N. Ganganath, C. -T. Cheng, H. H. -C. lu and C. K. Tse, “Tool-Path Optimization using Neural Networks,” 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2019, pp. 1-5, doi:… [cited by applicant]
Wilson, “Accenture: building suply chain resilience amidst COVID-19”, Supply Chain Magazine, May 17, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schatteman, “Supply Chain Lessons from Covid-19: Time to Refocus on Resilience”, Bain & Company, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ganeriwalla et al., “Three Paths to Advantage with Digital Supply Chains”, BCG Perspectives, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Deloitte, “Digital Technologies Drive Supply Chain Innovation”, CIO Journal , Sep. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al., “Supply chains and value webs”, Deloitte University Press, 2015. [cited by applicant]
IW Staff, “75% of Companies in ISM Virus Survey Report Supply Chain Disruptions”, Industry Week, Mar. 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
MHI Deloitte, “8. 2019 MHI Annual Industry Report: Elevating Supply Chain Digital Consciousness”, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PwC, “PwC's COVID-19 CFO Pulse”, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
CB Insights, “Supply Chain & Logistics Tech in Numbers” Powerpoint presentation; Jul. 2020. [cited by applicant]
O'Leary, “The Modern Supply Chain is Snapping”, The Atlantic, Mar. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bukova et al., “The Position of Industry 4.0 in the Worldwide Logistics Chain”, LOGI—Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, vol. 9, No. 1, 2018, pp. 18-23. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Here's how global supply chains will change after COVID-19”, World Economic Forum, May 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ferrantino et al., “Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains”, Apr. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “AI Set to Drive Global Supply Chain Technology Market to $440 Billion by 2023”, ABI Research, Jan. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Howells, “How the network economy is revolutionizing supply chains”, World Economic Forum, Jan. 14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Sherif, S.U., Jawahar, N. and Balamurali, M., 2014. Sequential optimization approach for nesting and cutting sequence in laser cutting. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(4), pp. 624-638. (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Wu, S., Kay, M., King, R., Vila-Parrish, A. and Warsing, D., 2014. Multi-objective optimization of 3D packing problem in additive manufacturing. In IIE annual conference. Proceedings (p. 1485). Institute of Industrial a… [cited by applicant]
Reintjes, C. and Lorenz, U., 2021. Bridging mixed integer linear programming for truss topology optimization and additive manufacturing. Optimization and Engineering, 22, pp. 849-893. (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Meng, L., McWilliams, B., Jarosinski, W., Park, H.Y., Jung, Y.G., Lee, J. and Zhang, J., 2020. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: a review. Jom, 72, pp. 2363-2377. (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
C. Narayanaswami, R. Nooyi, S. R. Govindaswamy and R. Viswanathan, “Blockchain anchored supply chain automation,” in IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 63, No. 2/3, pp. 7:1-7:11, Mar.-May 2019, doi: 10.1147/J… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP App 21907970.4, dated Nov. 12, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Morariu Cristina et al., “Machine learning for predictive scheduling and resource allocation in large scale manufacturing systems,” Computers In Industry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 120, May 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
A. Angrish, “Search and Tracking of 3D Product Manufacturing Data Using Deep Learning and Blockchain”, A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University, Industrial Engineering, Raleigh, Nort… [cited by applicant]
Trouton, et al., “3D-opportunity for blockchain”, Deloitte University Press, 2016. [cited by applicant]