IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,678,828
Granted Patent B2
US 12,678,828 · App. 18/351,165 · Granted Jul 14, 2026

Device and method for classifying fruits

Inventor: Hojae Gwak (Seongnam-si, KR)
Assignee: AIO Farm Corp.
B07C5/3422B07C5/16B07C2501/009
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,678,828
App. No.
18/351,165
Filed
Jul 12, 2023
Granted
Jul 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Examiner
TRAN, KHOI H
Art Unit
3656
USPC
700/223
Abstract

Disclosed is a device and method for identifying fruits that sorts fruits by sequentially sorting a plurality of fruits which are input, generating image data, determining the grade of each fruit based on the weight of the fruit, and determining a defective state or a normal state by using a defect feature certainty.

Claims (54)

1 . A fruit identification device comprising:

a fruit inserting unit configured to align a plurality of fruits in a row and to rotate the aligned fruits;

a fruit sorting unit configured to sequentially classify the aligned fruits under control of a control unit;

an image acquisition unit configured to generate pieces of image data for one fruit by sequentially capturing the rotated fruits; and

wherein the control unit configured to:

generate pieces of fruit image data by extracting only a fruit from the pieces of image data;

segment each piece of fruit image data into a plurality of localized image fragments corresponding to different surface regions of the fruit;

determine, using an artificial-intelligence model, a defect probability value for each of the localized image fragments;

aggregate the defect probability values of the localized image fragments to generate a plurality of defect feature certainties for the fruit;

compare the defect feature certainties with a predetermined reference defect feature certainty;

determine that the fruit is in a defective state or a normal state based on the comparison result;

determine a weight of the fruit by using the pieces of fruit image data;

determine a grade of the fruit by using the weight of the fruit;

when the fruit is in the defective state, move the fruit to a defective region through the fruit sorting unit, and generate a visual projection of defect regions onto the localized image fragments for display; and

when the fruit is in the normal state, move the fruit to a normal region corresponding to the grade of the fruit among a plurality of normal regions through the fruit sorting unit.

2 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 , wherein the control unit is configured to:

when at least one of the defect feature certainties is greater than or equal to the reference defect feature certainty, determine that the fruit is in the defective state; and

when all of the defect feature certainties are less than the reference defect feature certainty, determine that the fruit is in the normal state.

3 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 , wherein the defective state includes at least one of a wound, a bruise, a spoilage, or pest infestation of a fruit.

4 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 , further comprising:

a display unit,

wherein the control unit is configured to:

when the fruit is in the defective state, display the grade of the fruit, the defect feature certainties, and the pieces of fruit image data, onto which a defect feature is projected, through the display unit; and

when the fruit is in the normal state, display the grade of the fruit and the defect feature certainties through the display unit.

5 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 , further comprising:

a communication unit,

wherein the control unit is configured to:

generate identification result data for the fruits; and

transmit the identification result data to a mobile terminal of a user through the communication unit.

6 . A method for identifying a fruit, the method comprising:

aligning, by a control unit, a plurality of fruits in a row and rotating the aligned fruits, through a fruit inserting unit;

generating, by the control unit, pieces of image data for one fruit by sequentially capturing the rotated fruits through an image acquisition unit;

generating, by the control unit, pieces of fruit image data by extracting only a fruit from the pieces of image data;

segmenting, by the control unit, each piece of fruit image data into a plurality of localized image fragments corresponding to different surface regions of the fruit;

determining, by the control unit and using an artificial-intelligence model, a defect probability value for each of the localized image fragments;

aggregate, by the control unit, the defect probability values of the localized image fragments to generate a plurality of defect feature certainties for the fruit;

compare, by the control unit, the defect feature certainties with a predetermined reference defect feature certainty;

determine, by the control unit, that the fruit is in a defective state or a normal state based on the comparison result;

determining, by the control unit, a weight of the fruit by using the pieces of fruit image data and determining a grade of the fruit by using the weight of the fruit;

when the fruit is in the defective state, moving, by the control unit, the fruit to a defective region, and generating a visual projection of defect regions onto the localized image fragments for display; and

when the fruit is in the normal state, moving, by the control unit, the fruit to a normal region corresponding to the grade of the fruit among a plurality of normal regions.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the determining that the fruit is in the defective state or the normal state includes:

when at least one of the defect feature certainties is greater than or equal to the reference defect feature certainty, determining that the fruit is in the defective state; and

when all of the defect feature certainties are less than the reference defect feature certainty, determining that the fruit is in the normal state.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the defective state includes at least one of a wound, a bruise, a spoilage, or pest infestation of a fruit.

9 . The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

generating, by the control unit, identification result data for the fruits; and

transmitting, by the control unit, the identification result data to a mobile terminal of a user through a communication unit.

10 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 ,

wherein the artificial-intelligence model comprises a convolutional neural network including a plurality of convolution layers, pooling layers, and fully connected layers configured to output the defect probability values for the localized image fragments.

11 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 ,

wherein determining that the fruit is in the defective state comprises determining that at least one of the defect feature certainties is equal to or greater than 90 percent (90%).

12 . The fruit identification device of claim 1 ,

wherein the control unit is further configured to generate a visual projection of defect regions onto corresponding localized image fragments for display.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2023
From: GWAK, HOJAE
To: AIO FARM CORP.
Reel/Frame 064230/0296 →
Priority Claims (1)
KR 10-2021-0005676 · Jan 15, 2021 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTKR2022000645 · Jan 13, 2022
Related Publication 20240131558A1 · Apr 25, 2024
References Cited (24)
US 4735323A · Okada · 1988 [cited by examiner]
US 6271520B1 · Tao · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6610953B1 · Tao · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 7121399B2 · Mills · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 9919345B1 · Lu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10249054B2 · Amat Roldan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10757861B2 · Robertson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10877015B2 · Liu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11003958B2 · Dasari · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11132726B2 · Farmer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11900642B2 · Nomura · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20130146509A1 · Soler Esteban · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20170124727A1 · Amat Roldan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020148620A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020170056716A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 101839548B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020200126849A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 102285603B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015193711A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued in PCT/KR2022/000645; mailed Apr. 5, 2022. [cited by applicant]
A Notice of Office Action mailed by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Jul. 17, 2022, which corresponds to Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-0099577 with English language translation. [cited by applicant]
Jeong, Soo-Ho et al.; “A Study on Deep Learning based Apple Quality Classification System”; The Graduate School of Sunchon National University; 2019; Total 44 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Koo, Min-jeong et al.; “A fruite grader system base on Digital image”; Papers presented at the 38th Summer Conference of the Korea Computer Information Society; vol. 16, Issue 1; 2008; pp. 237-241. [cited by applicant]
“Why do we use ‘e’ in the softmax function?”; online, Posted by Max Level Developer; Oct. 2019, retrieved Jul. 14, 2022; Total 3 Pages; URL:https://lv99.tistory.com/7. [cited by applicant]