IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,724,762
Granted Patent B2
US 12,724,762 · App. 18/987,241 · Granted Sep 1, 2026

Cross-domain ontology integration system

Inventors: Craig Trim (Murfreesboro, TN); Janice Cha (Redwood City, CA); Mary Rudden (Denver, CO); Thanh Chi Lam (Aurora, CO)
Assignee: Bast, Inc.
G06F16/2365G06F18/2321
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,724,762
App. No.
18/987,241
Filed
Dec 19, 2024
Granted
Sep 1, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2166
USPC
707/690
Abstract

A system and method are provided for integrating and managing cross-domain ontologies in explainable artificial intelligence environments. The system features an ontology integration module that maintains concurrent domain-specific ontologies while establishing cross-domain relationships using semantic similarity algorithms, mapping concepts across domains. A relationship mapping engine identifies semantic similarities between concepts across different domain ontologies, while a domain extension mechanism detects emerging domains and establishes initial cross-domain mappings. These techniques advance the field of ontology integration and explainable artificial intelligence by providing a solution for maintaining and extending cross-domain relationships while adapting to emerging domains, thereby enabling more effective knowledge transfer across industry boundaries.

Claims (71)

1 . A non-transitory processor-readable medium storing code representing instructions to be executed by a processor, the code comprising code to cause the processor to:

maintain, via the processor, concurrent domain-specific ontologies for a plurality of industries;

establish, via the processor, cross-domain relationships between concepts across different ontologies using semantic similarity algorithms;

map, via the processor, skills, certifications, and domain concepts across industry boundaries;

identify, via the processor, semantic similarities between concepts across different domain ontologies;

detect, via the processor, emerging domains;

establish, via the processor, initial cross-domain mappings for the emerging domains; and

maintain, via the processor, temporal vectors for tracking relationship evolution across the domains, wherein the processor synchronizes updates to the temporal vectors via conflict-free replicated data types; and

generate and present, via the processor, a cross-domain integration dashboard that visually represents the plurality of industries, cross-domain mappings of the plurality of industries that exceed a predefined confidence threshold, and integration metrics, wherein the integration metrics include the predefined confidence threshold and the processor computes the integration metrics using the semantic similarities.

2 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, density-based spatial clustering with epsilon calculation using k-distance graphs;

apply, via the processor, an epsilon value of 0.3 for technical domains; and

apply, via the processor, an epsilon value of 0.5 for soft skills domains.

3 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, Markov Decision Process modeling for career transitions by:

maintaining, via the processor, a state space comprising skills, roles, industry position, and career stage;

defining, via the processor, an action space comprising upskill, role change, and industry transition; and

implementing, via the processor, a reward function balancing salary gain, growth potential, and market demand.

4 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 3 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

calculate, via the processor, the reward function as w1*salary_gain+w2*growth_potential+w3*market_demand; and

apply, via the processor, weight values of w1=0.4, w2=0.3, and w3=0.3.

5 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

maintain, via the processor, bidirectional mappings using adjacency tensor representation; and

enable, via the processor, constant-time lookups for connected nodes.

6 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, hypergraph-based relationship tracking; and

update, via the processor, weight vectors through gradient descent.

7 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

apply, via the processor, dimensionality reduction techniques with minimum distance preservation constraints for relationship mapping.

8 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, hierarchical clustering with boundary adjustment for emerging skill clusters.

9 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

calculate, via the processor, composite relationship scores using weighted combinations of semantic similarity and usage patterns.

10 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, recursive relationship validation with configurable consistency thresholds.

11 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, conflict resolution using Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types for distributed updates.

12 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

calculate, via the processor, transitivity scores for indirect relationships across domain boundaries.

13 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

implement, via the processor, parallel processing for relationship discovery across multiple domains.

14 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

maintain, via the processor, separate confidence metrics for different relationship types.

15 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

generate, via the processor, relationship evidence chains for cross-domain mappings.

16 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

generate, via the processor, cross-domain transition paths with confidence scoring.

17 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

maintain, via the processor, relationship provenance with version tracking and validation history.

18 . The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:

apply, via the processor, spectral clustering overlay with normalized graph Laplacian;

calculate, via the processor, adaptive kernel bandwidth as σ=median_distance*scaling_factor; and

adapt, via the processor, the scaling_factor between 0.1 and 0.3 based on cluster density.

19 . A computer-implemented system for cross-domain ontology integration in explainable AI environments, comprising:

an ontology integration machine learning model configured to:

maintain concurrent domain-specific ontologies for a plurality of industries;

establish cross-domain relationships between concepts across different ontologies using semantic similarity algorithms; and

map skills, certifications, and domain concepts across industry boundaries;

maintain temporal vectors for tracking relationship evolution across the domain-specific ontologies, wherein the computer-implemented system synchronizes updates to the temporal vectors via conflict-free replicated data types;

a relationship mapping engine configured to;

identify semantic similarities between concepts across different domain ontologies;

generate and present a cross-domain integration dashboard that visually represents the plurality of industries, cross-domain mappings of the plurality of industries that exceed a predefined confidence threshold, and integration metrics, wherein the integration metrics include the predefined confidence threshold and the integration metrics are computed using the semantic similarities; and

a domain extension mechanism configured to detect emerging domains and establish initial cross-domain mappings.

20 . A method for providing explainable recommendations, the method comprising:

maintaining, via a processor, concurrent domain-specific ontologies for a plurality of industries;

establishing, via the processor, cross-domain relationships between concepts across different ontologies using semantic similarity algorithms; mapping, via the processor, skills, certifications, and domain concepts across industry boundaries;

identifying, via the processor, semantic similarities between concepts across different domain ontologies;

detecting, via the processor, emerging domains;

establishing, via the processor, initial cross-domain mappings for the emerging domains; and

maintaining, via the processor, temporal vectors for tracking relationship evolution across the domains, wherein the processor synchronizes updates to the temporal vectors via Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types; and

generating and presenting, via the processor, a cross-domain integration dashboard that visually represents the plurality of industries, cross-domain mappings of the plurality of industries that exceed a predefined confidence threshold, and integration metrics, wherein the integration metrics include the predefined confidence threshold and the processor computes the integration metrics using the semantic similarities.

Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20260178562A1 · Jun 25, 2026
References Cited (41)
US 8355905B2 · Fokoue-Nkoutche · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8566347B1 · Patil · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9552200B1 · Dufresne · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9558271B1 · Sathe · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10296913B1 · Breitman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10803106B1 · Beard · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11442963B1 · Lecue · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11520830B2 · Soares · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11989680B1 · Mudholkar · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12086547B2 · Gelli · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12293321B2 · Chevuru · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20070156622A1 · Akkiraju · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090077021A1 · Jung · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100145986A1 · Lim · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20180096062A1 · Lorge · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190362289A1 · Rogynskyy · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200176098A1 · Lucas · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200250203A1 · Calco · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210149671A1 · Sar Shalom · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210150341A1 · Dalli · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210295822A1 · Tomkins · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210358065A1 · Aguilar Achiaga · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210406298A1 · Rudden · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220114417A1 · Dalli · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220284996A1 · Clarkson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220300831A1 · Friede et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220398460A1 · Dalli · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230245651A1 · Wang · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230297588A1 · Sköldström · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240104305A1 · Glesinger · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240104480A1 · Chevuru · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240160626A1 · Crabtree · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240386015A1 · Crabtree · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250094929A1 · Mishra · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250123841A1 · Dolga · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250147957A1 · Verkruyse · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250259082A1 · Crabtree · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250259724A1 · Crabtree · 2025 [cited by applicant]
Trim, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/987,258, Jun. 12, 2026, 27 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Bast Inc., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCTUS2025054029, Mar. 26, 2026, 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Babitha et al., “Cross-Domain Ontology Synthesis for Semantic Web Integration: A Neural Network Approach,” 2024 International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE), IEEE, May 9, 2024 (Ma… [cited by applicant]