IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,725,185
Granted Patent B2
US 12,725,185 · App. 17/887,425 · Granted Sep 1, 2026

System and method for automatic subject line generation

Inventors: Karl Alexander Philip Ekfeldt (Cambridge, MA); Sarah Fathelbab (Cliffside Park, NJ); Ezra Freedman (Boston, MA); Joshua Edward Villarreal (Somerville, MA); Royce Ze Yong Yap (Singapore, SG)
Assignee: Klaviyo, Inc.
G06Q30/0276G06F40/166G06F40/279G06Q30/0243
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,725,185
App. No.
17/887,425
Granted
Sep 1, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Apparatuses, methods, and systems for generating subject lines for electronic messages of electronic campaigns. One method includes receiving, by a server, information related to the electronic campaign, preprocessing the received information, receiving a plurality of N subject lines generated based on the preprocess received information from a generative text engine model, reducing the N subject lines down to M subject lines, applying a fine-tuned enhancer model to enhance existing content for a selected one or more of the M subject lines, and displaying M subject lines with enhanced existing content to a merchant user. For an embodiment, reducing the N subject lines down to M subject lines includes filtering the N subject line to eliminate subject lines based on content, and generating similarity scores between each of the N subject lines and eliminating one or more subject lines based on a similarity with one or more other subject lines.

Claims (71)

1 . A computer-implemented method for processing machine-generated subject lines, comprising:

requesting, via a graphical user interface, information comprising a specified type and description of an electronic campaign;

receiving, by a server, said information related to the electronic campaign;

preprocessing, by the server, the received information for sending to a generative text engine model, wherein the preprocessing comprises checking formatting, removing keywords, and ensuring the user has provided sufficient information;

sending to the generative text engine model the preprocessed received information, wherein the generative text engine model is operable to return text based on a given text prompt;

receiving a plurality of N subject lines generated based on the preprocessed received information from the generative text engine model;

reducing, by the server, the N subject lines down to M subject lines, wherein the reducing comprises:

generating similarity scores by embedding subject lines as vectors using vectorization methods and computing, for each pair of subject lines, a cosine similarity score;

eliminating one of the pair based on whether the cosine similarity score exceeds a first similarity threshold;

computing cosine similarity scores between at least one subject line and the merchant-provided description using the vectorization methods;

eliminating one or more subject lines when a cosine similarity score between a subject line and the merchant-provided description exceeds a second similarity threshold different from the first similarity threshold; and

wherein when the reducing results in less than a threshold number of subject lines, resending a request to the generative text engine model to generate additional subject lines;

assigning, by a trained second discriminator model, a second quality rating for each of the M subject lines, wherein the second discriminator model was trained based on historical tracked customer user actions including opens and clicks that included a displayed subject line; and

reducing the M subject lines to K subject lines based on the second quality rating;

applying a fine-tuned enhancer model to enhance existing content for a selected one or more of the K subject lines;

displaying K subject lines with enhanced content to a merchant user;

displaying select subject lines to customer users at the customer user devices;

tracking customer user actions based on the select subject lines displayed to the customer users at the customer user devices, wherein the customer user devices operate alone or optionally, in conjunction with a server and/or merchant server to sense customer user actions;

analyzing the customer user actions responsive for success metrics corresponding to the displayed subject lines including open rates and click rates;

carrying out a first training, wherein the first training comprises training, through a discriminator improvement cycle, the second discriminator model to assign a second quality rating to a subject line based on the analyzed customer user actions including open rates and click rates, and updating the second discriminator model at the conclusion of the discriminator improvement cycle; and

carrying out a second training, wherein the second training comprises training. through a text generation improvement cycle, the generative text engine model based on subject lines meeting a second quality rating threshold as updated by the second discriminator model during the first training, and updating the generative text engine model at the conclusion of the text generation improvement cycle.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein reducing the N subject lines down to M subject lines, further comprises eliminating subject lines that have greater than a character threshold number of characters.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the reducing the N subject lines to eliminate subject lines comprises filtering the N subject line to eliminate subject lines based on content, including eliminating subject lines that include inappropriate and politically sensitive words.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating similarity scores between each of the N subject lines and eliminating one or more subject lines based on a similarity with one or more other subject lines comprises prioritizing diversity across displayed subject lines based on pairwise similarity scores.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the fine-tuned enhancer model to enhance existing content includes adding emojis to the selected one or more of the K subject lines.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein enhancing the existing content is based on collected information from subject lines of past high-performing electronic campaigns and adjusting content of the subject lines to reflect a brand tone of the merchant user based on content and success of past high-performing electronic campaigns and existing website content.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying a fine-tuned enhancer model to enhance existing content includes adjusting or supplementing the selected one or more of the K subject lines.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the server is electronically connected to the merchant server, and further comprising:

tracking, by the server, merchant actions at the merchant server based on the M subject lines displayed;

assigning, by a first discriminator model, a quality rating for each of the M subject lines based on the tracked merchant actions; and

supplementing data used to train the fine-tuned enhancer model with J highest quality rating subject lines.

9 . The method of claim 8 further comprising continuously updating the generative text engine model based on continuously generated quality ratings.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

supplementing data used to train the fine-tuned enhancer model with the K highest quality rating subject lines as determined by actions of the one or more customers.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensing the customer actions comprises sensing online action of the one or more customers.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensing the customer actions comprises sensing physical motion of the customer devices of the one or more customers.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein assigning by the second quality rating by the second discriminator model comprises receiving, by the server, customer actions for electronic messages having different subject lines and a same message content.

14 . A system for processing machine-generated subject lines, comprising:

a merchant server operable to sense customer user actions at a plurality of customer user devices and to provide the sensed customer user actions to a management server;

the management server electronically connected to the merchant server through a network, the management server configured to:

receive information from a merchant user of the merchant server;

preprocess the received information for sending to a generative text engine model, wherein the preprocessing comprises checking formatting, removing keywords, and ensuring the user has provided sufficient information;

retrieve a plurality of N subject lines generated based on the preprocessed received information from the generative text engine model;

reduce the N subject lines down to M subject lines, comprising:

generating similarity scores by embedding subject lines as vectors using vectorization methods and computing, for each pair of subject lines, a cosine similarity score;

eliminating one of the pair based on whether the cosine similarity score exceeds a first similarity threshold;

computing cosine similarity scores between at least one subject line and the merchant-provided description using the vectorization methods;

eliminating one or more subject lines when a cosine similarity score between a subject line and the merchant-provided description exceeds a second similarity threshold different from the first similarity threshold; and

wherein when the reducing results in less than a threshold number of subject lines. resending a request to the generative text engine model to generate additional subject lines;

apply a fine-tuned enhancer model to enhance existing content for a selected one or more of the M subject lines, wherein the fine-tuned enhancer model is operable of altering one or more keywords within a subject line and to append text onto the subject line;

the management server further configured to:

communicate the M subject lines to the merchant server;

wherein the merchant server is configured to display the M subject lines with enhanced existing content to the merchant user.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the management server is further configured to:

track merchant actions at the merchant server based on the M subject lines displayed;

wherein a first discriminator model is configured to:

assign a quality rating for each of the M subject lines based on the tracked merchant actions; and

wherein the management server is further configured to:

supplement data used to train the fine-tuned enhancer model with J highest quality rating subject lines.

16 . The system of claim 14 , further comprising a plurality of customer devices electronically connected to the server through the network;

wherein the management server is further configured to:

track customer actions of customers at the customer devices based on the subject lines displayed to one or more customers of a merchant of the merchant server;

train a second discriminator model based on historical tracked customer user actions;

wherein the trained second discriminator model is configured to:

assign a second quality rating for each of the subject lines displayed to the one or more customers based on the tracked customer actions; and

wherein the management server is further configured to:

reduce the M subject lines to K subject lines based on the second quality rating;

send at least one of the displayed K subject lines to customer users;

update the second discriminator model based on the tracked customer user actions to complete a discriminator improvement cycle; and

repeat the send, track, train and update steps through multiple discriminator improvement cycles, for multiple electronic campaigns.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the customer user devices comprise location and motion sensors for tracking the locations and motions of the customer user, and wherein the tracked locations and motions of the customer user can be included within a first score of the customer user action, and wherein a first score that exceeds a threshold score is deemed a customer user action.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 13, 2022
From: EKFELDT, KARL ALEXANDER PHILIP; FATHELBAB, SARAH; FREEDMAN, EZRA; VILLARREAL, JOSHUA EDWARD; YAP, ROYCE ZE YONG
To: KLAVIYO, INC.
Reel/Frame 060801/0315 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240054539A1 · Feb 15, 2024
References Cited (207)
US 6519571B1 · Guheen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7130808B1 · Ranka et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7213202B1 · Kagle · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7257772B1 · Jones et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7287218B1 · Knotz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7533090B2 · Agarwal et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7752607B2 · Larab et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7761524B2 · Carmel · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7845950B2 · Driscoll et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7975000B2 · Dixon et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7975223B2 · Plumley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8117267B2 · Gardner et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8224905B2 · Bocharov et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8250470B2 · Takashima · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8341224B2 · Kasetty et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8434002B1 · Shah et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8484156B2 · Hancsarik et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9237233B2 · Soundar · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9319297B2 · Aurisset · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9356889B2 · Caskey · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9430454B2 · Newman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9485640B2 · Bowers et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10248657B2 · Prahlad et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10313387B1 · Kras · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10331775B2 · Ryan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10438230B2 · Moran et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10503912B1 · Kerr · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10701005B2 · Nutt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10817663B2 · Weald et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11475207B2 · Xie et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11483272B2 · Klink et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11488204B2 · Pisupati et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11710000B1 · Cuan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11734724B1 · Kingman, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11756073B2 · Blanchard et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11769171B1 · Huang · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11783122B1 · Lawson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11783643B1 · Khiabani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11847106B2 · Urdiales et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11880650B1 · Li et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12026742B2 · Blanchard et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12299718B1 · Johnson et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12307481B2 · Blanchard et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12387236B2 · Delbridge · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12412181B2 · Austin et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20020004745A1 · Bascobert et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040006598A1 · Damm et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050273705A1 · McCain · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060162071A1 · Dixon et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060168024A1 · Mehr et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060225040A1 · Waddington · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070100805A1 · Ramer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070250576A1 · Kumar · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070271392A1 · Khopkar et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080065584A1 · Motoyama et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080144813A1 · Damm et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080178073A1 · Gao et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080189156A1 · Voda et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080208910A1 · MacIntyre et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080215692A1 · Bosarge · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080275980A1 · Hansen · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090006936A1 · Parker et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090018996A1 · Hunt et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090037546A1 · Kirsch · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090089131A1 · Moukas et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090125518A1 · Bailor et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090132459A1 · Hicks · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090222296A1 · Wagner et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100049534A1 · Whitnah et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100100370A1 · Khouri · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100268661A1 · Levy et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100281074A1 · Bailor et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110078246A1 · Dittmer-Roche · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270710A1 · Nash · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110307331A1 · Richard et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120042239A1 · O'Brien · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120191546A1 · Phelan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120233554A1 · Vagell et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120294514A1 · Saunders et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130066665A1 · Tamhane et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130080243A1 · Dias · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130124956A1 · Hatfield et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185311A1 · MacMillan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130198376A1 · Landa et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140019443A1 · Golshan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140025608A1 · Miller et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140033101A1 · Rein et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140100964A1 · Kramer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140189714A1 · Lawbaugh et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278747A1 · Gumm · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140282125A1 · Duneau · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140344013A1 · Karty et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140378071A1 · Acosta · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150019662A1 · O'Kane et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150058428A1 · Caskey · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150170213A1 · O'Malley · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150220577A1 · Sengupta et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150227962A1 · Wical et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150294349A1 · Capel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150347925A1 · Zeng · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160070717A1 · Bergner et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160117717A1 · Moreau et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160132472A1 · Campbell et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160162929A1 · Takiela et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160189176A1 · Newnham · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160210657A1 · Chittilappilly et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170019697A1 · Hundemer · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170048323A1 · Schlapfer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170178193A1 · Jagannath et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170221109A1 · Liu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180053199A1 · Mathis et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180060299A1 · Bastide et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180081868A1 · Willcock et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180082326A1 · Vlassis et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180108029A1 · Sinha et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180219808A1 · Wala et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180225027A1 · Cooke et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293502A1 · Sengupta et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180309764A1 · Kras et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180341873A1 · Fellows · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190121827A1 · Boswell et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190122254A1 · Duquette et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190130333A1 · Li et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190197092A1 · Thiesen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190228063A1 · El-Sherif et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190259041A1 · Jackson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190311301A1 · Pyati · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200104340A1 · Liu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200226640A1 · Kakarlapudi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200319996A1 · Mordo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200327577A1 · Truong et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342500A1 · Kulkarni et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200356624A1 · Cai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200357012A1 · Kendall et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394455A1 · Lee et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004422A1 · Sun et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210034595A1 · Tselikis et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210042830A1 · Burke · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210109897A1 · Brechbuhl et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133287A1 · Ayloo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210133852A1 · Vauthey et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210157974A1 · Xie · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210184999A1 · Klink et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210241325A1 · Clark et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210294978A1 · Chhaya · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210357952A1 · Liu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210389962A1 · Li · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220036311A1 · Didrickson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220113853A1 · Nostrini et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220188740A1 · Nazarali et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220283932A1 · Arbour et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220405783A1 · Kondamudi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220405784A1 · Kondamudi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414325A1 · Bhatnagar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414686A1 · Lawson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414696A1 · Kondamudi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414705A1 · Jain et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230033753A1 · Wang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230124697A1 · Eidelman et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230186342A1 · Ding et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230298368A1 · Berger et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230316186A1 · Miller et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230409821A1 · Lawson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230413020A1 · Lawson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240005365A1 · Chen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240054539A1 · Ekfeldt et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240250922A1 · Natoli et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240281822A1 · Austin et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240312087A1 · Agrawal et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240338413A1 · Fosse et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240362676A1 · Bangad et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240394746A1 · Delbridge · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250124471A1 · Tan et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250139356A1 · Delbridge et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250165897A1 · Boker et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250238839A1 · Blanchard et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250315606A1 · Lawson et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250342498A1 · Delbridge · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250385884A1 · Delbridge et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 113824624A · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 116126620A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 4174577A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
JP 2022176802A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO 2010138512A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Rui, and Joel Tetreault. “This email could save your life: Introducing the task of email subject line generation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.03497 (2019). (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Hao, Yaru, et al. “Language models are general-purpose interfaces.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.06336 (2022). (Year: 2022). [cited by examiner]
11 Best Drag and Drop Word Press Page Builder Plugins, by Anna Fitzgerald, Nov. 13, 2020, pp. 1-21; https://blog.hubspot.com/website/top-5-free-drag-and-drop-wordpress-page-builder-plugins (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
A nonparametric Bayesian analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects in digital experimentation, Matt Taddy, Matt Gardner, Liyun Chen, David Draper, University of California, Santa Cruz, Dec. 18, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Cali, Sedef, et al. “A Bayesian based Approach for Analyzing Customer's Online Sales Data to Identify Weights of Product Attributes.” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 210, Aug. 9, 2022. (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
Frigui, Hichem, et al. “Unsupervised Clustering and Feature Weighting based on Generalized Dirichlet Mixture Modeling.” Sience Direct: Information Sciences 274, pp. 35-54. Mar. 27, 2014. (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Kamalbasha, Shafi, et al. “Bayesian A/B Testing for Business Decisions.” Data Science: Analytics and Applications, p. 50-57. Mar. 5, 2020. (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Kobayashi, Takumi. “Dirichlet-Based Histogram Feature Transform for Image Classification.” National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, CVPR 2014. (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Lindholm (A 3-way Merging Algorithm for Synchronizing Ordered Trees—the 3DM merging and differencing tool for XML, published Sep. 2001, pp. 1-205) (Year: 2001). [cited by applicant]
Lindholm (A Three-way Merge for XML Documents, published Oct. 2004, pp. 1-10) (Year: 2004). [cited by applicant]
Lindholm (XML Three-way Merge as a Reconciliation Engine for Mobile Data, published Sep. 2003, pp. 1-5) (Year: 2003). [cited by applicant]
Miller, Alex, et al. “An Empirical Meta-analysis of E-Commerce A/B Testing Strategies.” The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2020. (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Paulo et al., Leveraging email marketing: Using the subject line to anticipate the open rate, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 207, 2022, 117974. [cited by applicant]
The Bayesian Bootstrap, a short guide to a simple and powerful extension of the bootstrap, Matteo Courthoud, published in the Towards Data Science, Aug. 8, 2022. [cited by applicant]
The Bayesian Bootstrap, Donald B. Rubin, The Annals of Statistics, 1981, vol. 9, No. 1, 130-134. [cited by applicant]
WordPress Editor: Working With Blocks »Blocks, Jan. 1, 2021, pp. 1-6; https://wordpress.com/supporUwordpress-editor/blocks/ (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Y. Yamamoto et al., “IoT-aware online shopping system enhanced with gaze analysis,” 2016 World Automation Congress (WAC), Rio Grande, PR, USA, 2016, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/WAC.2016.7583028. [cited by applicant]
Iachello, G. et al. (2005). Control, Deception, and Communication: Evaluating the Deployment of a Location-Enhanced Messaging Service. In: Beigl, M., Intille, S., Rekimoto, J., Tokuda, H. (eds) UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous … [cited by applicant]
ILC-CMAS Model, summary of research findings and implication for Content Creation and Management Automation System (CMAS), Choo Wou Onn;Halimah Badioze Zaman;Chue Wen Yeen, 2008 International Symposium on Information Te… [cited by applicant]
VWO, A/B Testing Guide, 2023 (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
“A Smart Email Client Prototype for Effective Reuse of Past Replies”. IEEE. 2018. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Adam Hayes et al. Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Prediction Model, 2023. [cited by applicant]
H. Roth, J. Schiefer, H. Obweger and S. Rozsnyai, “Event data warehousing for Complex Event Processing,” 2010 Fourth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), Nice, France, 2010, pp.… [cited by applicant]