IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,726,272
Granted Patent B2
US 12,726,272 · App. 18/442,914 · Granted Sep 1, 2026

Laser scanning for spatial acquisition of a satellite receiver

Inventors: Nathan D. Hiller (Irvine, CA); Stephen Lambert (Maryland Heights, MO); Todd Harding Tomkinson (Newbury Park, CA); Steven Fulton Griffin (Kihei, HI)
Assignee: The Boeing Company
H04B10/118H04B10/1129H04B10/503
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,726,272
App. No.
18/442,914
Granted
Sep 1, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A laser beam transmission system comprises a laser beam system and a controller that controls the laser beam system. The controller is configured to direct a laser beam at a location nearest to a maximum of an uncertainty area in which a satellite is expected to be located. The controller is configured to move the laser beam from the location to a next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area in response to not receiving a confirmation that the satellite is at the location. The next location becomes a current location for the laser beam. The controller is configured to continue to move the laser beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

Claims (56)

1 . A laser beam transmission system that comprises:

a laser beam system configured to transmit a laser beam; and

a controller configured to control the laser beam system to:

direct the laser beam at a location nearest to a maximum of an uncertainty area in which a satellite is expected to be located;

move the laser beam from the location to a next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area in response to not receiving a confirmation that the satellite is at the location, wherein the next location becomes a current location for the laser beam; and

continue to move the laser beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location with a dwell time at each location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

2 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 1 , wherein a movement of the laser beam is in a form of a nearest to maximum hexagonal scan.

3 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to direct a hybrid scan.

4 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 1 , wherein in continuing to move the laser beam, the controller is configured to:

continue to move the laser beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location with a continuous movement from one location to another location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

5 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to control the laser beam system to:

move the laser beam to a neighbor location of a nearest neighbor in response to a time for moving the laser beam from the current location to the next location using the location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area being greater than a threshold, wherein the next location becomes the current location; and

continue to move the laser beam from the current location to a subsequent neighbor location of the nearest neighbor from the current location in response to the time for moving the laser beam from the current location to the next location using the location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area being greater than the threshold and in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

6 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 5 , wherein in moving the laser beam to the neighbor location of the nearest neighbor and continuing to move the laser beam from the current location to the subsequent neighbor location of the nearest neighbor from the current location is part of a nearest neighbor scan selected from one of a continuous spiral scan, a step spiral scan, a segmented scan, and a raster scan.

7 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to:

establish communications with the satellite in response to receiving the confirmation.

8 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 7 , wherein the communications are selected from one of unidirectional communications and bidirectional communications.

9 . The laser beam transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the laser beam is selected from a group comprising a continuous laser beam and a pulsed laser beam.

10 . An electromagnetic beam transmission system that comprises:

an electromagnetic beam system configured to transmit an electromagnetic beam; and

a controller configured to control the electromagnetic beam transmission system to:

direct the electromagnetic beam at a location nearest to a maximum of an uncertainty area in which an object is expected to be located;

move the electromagnetic beam from the location to a next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area in response to not receiving a confirmation that the object is at the location, wherein the next location becomes a current location for the electromagnetic beam;

continue to move the electromagnetic beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location with a dwell time at each location in response to not receiving the confirmation that a satellite has received the laser beam; and

continue to move the electromagnetic beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the electromagnetic beam has encountered the object.

11 . The electromagnetic beam transmission system of claim 10 , wherein the object is selected from a group comprising an uncooperative object, a mobile platform, a stationary platform, a land-based structure, an aquatic-based structure, a space-based structure, an aircraft, a commercial aircraft, a rotorcraft, a tilt-rotor aircraft, a tilt wing aircraft, a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, an electrical vertical takeoff and landing vehicle, a personal air vehicle, a surface ship, a tank, a personnel carrier, a train, a spacecraft, a space station, a satellite, a submarine, an automobile, a power plant, a bridge, a dam, a house, a manufacturing facility, a building, and an electromagnetic beam receiver.

12 . An electromagnetic beam transmission system that comprises:

an electromagnetic beam system configured to transmit an electromagnetic beam; and

a controller configured to control the electromagnetic beam transmission system to:

direct the electromagnetic beam to a location in an uncertainty area using a scan metric, wherein the uncertainty area is one in which an object is expected to be located;

move the electromagnetic beam from the location to a next location using the scan metric in response to not receiving a confirmation that the object is at the location, wherein;

the controller selects the next location in the uncertainty area from a set of candidate locations that has a highest value for the scan metric, wherein the scan metric is as follows: M=PDF int /t tot where PDF int is a probability density function integrated over an area of interest for a next potential location and t tot is a total time t tot =t slew +t dwell , t slew is a time to slew a line-of-sight from a current location to the next potential location, and td well is a time the line of site dwells at the next potential location; and

the next location becomes a current location for the electromagnetic beam; and

continue to move the electromagnetic beam from the current location to the next location using the scan metric in response to not receiving the confirmation that the electromagnetic beam has encountered the object.

13 . The electromagnetic beam transmission system of claim 12 , wherein the controller is further configured to direct a hybrid scan.

14 . A method for pointing a laser beam, the method comprising:

directing the laser beam at a location nearest to a maximum of an uncertainty area in which a satellite is expected to be located;

moving the laser beam from the location to a next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area in response to not receiving a confirmation that the satellite is at the location, wherein the next location becomes a current location for the laser beam; and

continuing to move the laser beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location with a dwell time at each location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein a movement of the laser beam is in a form of a nearest to maximum hexagonal scan.

16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein a controller is configured to direct a hybrid scan.

17 . The method of claim 14 , wherein continuing to move the laser beam comprises:

continuing to move the laser beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location with a continuous movement from one location to another location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

18 . The method of claim 14 further comprising:

moving the laser beam to a neighbor location of a nearest neighbor in response to a time for moving the laser beam from the current location to the next location using the location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area being greater than a threshold, wherein the next location becomes the current location; and

continuing to move the laser beam from the current location to a subsequent neighbor location of the nearest neighbor from the current location in response to the time for moving the laser beam from the current location to the next location using the location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area being greater than the threshold and in response to not receiving the confirmation that the satellite has received the laser beam.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein moving the laser beam to the neighbor location of the nearest neighbor and continuing to move the laser beam from the current location to the subsequent neighbor location of the nearest neighbor from the current location is part of a nearest neighbor scan selected from one of a continuous spiral scan, a step spiral scan, a segmented scan, and a raster scan.

20 . The method of claim 14 further comprising:

establishing communications with the satellite in response to receiving the confirmation.

21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein the communications are selected from one of unidirectional communications and bidirectional communications.

22 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the laser beam is selected is selected from a group comprising a continuous laser beam and a pulsed laser beam.

23 . A method for pointing an electromagnetic beam, the method comprising:

directing the electromagnetic beam at a location nearest to a maximum of an uncertainty area in which an object is expected to be located;

moving the electromagnetic beam from the location to a next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area in response to not receiving a confirmation that the object is at the location, wherein the next location becomes a current location for the electromagnetic beam;

continue to move the electromagnetic beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location with a dwell time at each location in response to not receiving the confirmation that a satellite has received the laser beam; and

continuing to move the electromagnetic beam from the current location to the next location nearest to the maximum of the uncertainty area from the current location in response to not receiving the confirmation that the electromagnetic beam has encountered the object.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 16, 2024
From: HILLER, NATHAN D.; LAMBERT, STEPHEN; TOMKINSON, TODD HARDING; GRIFFIN, STEVEN FULTON
To: BOEING COMPANY, THE
Reel/Frame 066480/0807 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250266907A1 · Aug 21, 2025
References Cited (95)
US 4279036A · Pfund · 1981 [cited by examiner]
US 4359640A · Geiger · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4836672A · Naiman et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5216477A · Korb · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5465142A · Krumes et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6839520B1 · Dreischer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8693947B2 · Silny et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 11488046B2 · McCormick · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11522607B2 · Boroson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11799548B2 · McCormick · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12025982B2 · Ray et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12505753B2 · Hiller · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20010012142A1 · Carlson · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20050158059A1 · Vaananen · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050180753A1 · Wirth · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050238356A1 · Gilbert · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060024061A1 · Wirth · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060109573A1 · Jackson · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070052950A1 · Taylor · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070058161A1 · Nichols · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080158044A1 · Talbot · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080247758A1 · Nichols · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090030551A1 · Hein · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090222153A1 · Johnson · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090324236A1 · Wu · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120039599A1 · Von Schwake · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150106047A1 · Lukashin · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150125157A1 · Chao · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150303646A1 · Levy · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160065308A1 · Coleman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170026122A1 · Everett · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170034250A1 · Sobhani · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170205534A1 · Prikryl · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170302377A1 · Boroson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170366264A1 · Riesing · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190025423A1 · Sajwaj · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190154439A1 · Binder · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190291720A1 · Xiao · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190372669A1 · Ziegler et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200005656A1 · Saunamaeki · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200007232A1 · Cahoy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200207389A1 · Moth et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200209394A1 · Mark et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200277087A1 · Kaen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200341117A1 · Sandford · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200389232A1 · Danesh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210112647A1 · Coleman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210162912A1 · Spero · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210293659A1 · Ray et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372793A1 · Nikulin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210396888A1 · McCormick · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220026195A1 · Fertig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220155452A1 · Rawat · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230040954A1 · Hayashi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230057677A1 · Beuschel et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230421244A1 · Tsunemachi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240171275A1 · Iqbal · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250070875A1 · Sonoda · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250266908A1 · Hiller · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 108347279A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 113489540A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 116886178A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 118131181A · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP H1065620A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
KR 20230131378A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 102689477B1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016097832A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018110788A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Simon Kim et al., “Analysis of Space Debris Orbit Prediction Using Angle and Laser Ranging Data from Two Tracking Sites under Limited Observation Environment,” Mar. 31, 2020, Sensor,2020, 20, 1950,pp. 1-13. [cited by examiner]
Yunjie Teng et al.,“The Optimization Design of Sub-Regions Scanning and Vibration Analysis for Beaconless Spatial Acquisition in the Inter-Satellite Laser Communication System,” Dec. 13, 2018,IEEE Photonica Journal,vol.… [cited by examiner]
Xin Li et al.,“Analytical expression and optimization of spatial acquisition for intersatellite optical communications,” Jan. 25, 2011, Optics Express,vol. 19, No. 3,Jan. 31, 2011,pp. 1-7. [cited by examiner]
Bing Jia et al., “Improved Target Laser Capture Technology for Hexagonal Honeycomb Scanning,” May 6, 2023,photonics,2023, 10, 541,pp. 1-13. [cited by examiner]
Keith E. wilson et al., “Development of Laser Beam Transmission Strategies for Future Ground-to-Space Optical Communications,” May 4, 2007,Proc. of SPIE vol. 6551,pp. 65510B-1-65510B-12. [cited by examiner]
W. A. Coles et al.,“A Radio System for Avoiding Illuminating Aircraft with a Laser Beam,” Jan. 6, 2012, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 124:42-50, Jan. 2012,pp. 42-48. [cited by examiner]
Morio Toyoshima et al., “Optimum divergence angle of a Gaussian beam wave in the presence of random jitter in free-space laser communication systems,” Aug. 24, 2001, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A,Mar. 2002, vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 567… [cited by examiner]
Yunjie Teng et al., “The Optimization Design of Sub-Regions Scanning and Vibration Analysis for Beaconless Spatial Acquisition in the Inter-Satellite Laser Communication System,” Dec. 13, 2018, IEEE Photonics Journal, v… [cited by examiner]
Dominicus, Jacco. “New generation of counter UAS systems to defeat of low slow and small (LSS) air threats.” (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Hu, S. G., et al. “Efficiency analysis of intercepting UAV swarm by various air defense methods.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. vol. 2472. No. 1. IOP Publishing, (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Liao, Longwen, Xiaoliang Huang, and Fengyu Xie. “Development status and operation analysis of laser weapon in anti-drone warfare.” 2023 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS). IEEE, (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jul. 30, 2025, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 18/442,984, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bloom et al., Understanding the performance of free-space optics [Invited], Journal of Optical Networking, Jun. 2003, vol. 2, Issue 6, pp. 178-200. [cited by applicant]
Jia et al., “Improved Target Laser Capture Technology for Hexagonal Honeycomb Scanning,” Photonics 2023, May 6, 2023, pp. 1-17, vol. 10, Issue. 5, MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, accessed Dec. 22, 2023, https://www.mdpi.com/2… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Analytical expression and optimization of spatial acquisition for intersatellite optical communications, Optics Express, Jan. 31, 2011, vol. 19, Issue 3, pp. 2381-2390. [cited by applicant]
Runkel, et al., “An Overview of Raster Scanning for ICF-Class Laser Optics,” Boulder Damage Symposium XXXIV: Annual Symposium on Optical materials for High Power Lasers, Oct. 30, 2002, 13 pages, U.S. Department of Energ… [cited by applicant]
Toyoshima et al., Optimum divergence angle of a Gaussian beam wave in the presence of random jitter in free-space laser communication systems, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Mar. 2002, vol. 19, Issue 3, pp… [cited by applicant]
Hiller et al., “Laser Beam Based Flight Path Clearing System,” U.S. Appl. No. 18/442,984, filed Feb. 15, 2024, 49 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hiller et al., “Laser Sensor System With Pattern Scanning,” U.S. Appl. No. 18/442,953, filed Feb. 15, 2024, 51 pages. [cited by applicant]
Edstrom, Marten. “Laser Power Beaming for in-Flight Charging of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles—a Viability Study.” (2025). [cited by applicant]
Kiehn, Daniel, et al. “Adaptive Wind Field Estimation Using an Empirical Bayesian Approach.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47.11 (2024): 2386-2396. (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 11, 2025, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 18/442,984, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Satat, Guy, Matthew Tancik, and Ramesh Raskar. “Towards photography through realistic fog.” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP). IEEE, 2018. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Zheng, Jianhua, et al. “Review on Security Range Perception Methods and Path-Planning Techniques for Substation Mobile Robots” Energies 17.16 (2024): 4106. (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 7, 2026, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 18/829,853, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jun. 2, 2026, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 18/829,853, 65 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jun. 5, 2026, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 18/442,953, 56 pages. [cited by applicant]