IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,730,018
Granted Patent B2
US 12,730,018 · App. 18/256,110 · Granted Sep 8, 2026

Dynamic pressure sensor

Inventors: Piao Huang (Paris, FR); Damien Jacobs (Paris, FR)
Assignee: RXFUNCTION, INC.
G01L1/146A61B5/1038A61B5/6807G01L25/00A61B2560/0223A61B2562/0247
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,730,018
App. No.
18/256,110
Granted
Sep 8, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A pressure sensor including capacitive pressure sensors and computing elements taking into account the dynamic calibration curves of capacitive pressure sensors. Also, an insole including the pressure sensor, which is for insertion into an article of footwear, and a calibration system that includes that includes the insole. Further, a computer-implemented method for determining the notal normal force applied on the pressure sensor.

Claims (42)

1 . A pressure sensor comprising:

a measurement portion comprising a plurality of capacitive pressure sensors; and

a chip portion comprising:

(i) a memory comprising a set of dynamic calibration curves of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors, the dynamic calibration curve being a response to an input;

(ii) a measuring unit electrically connected to the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors; and

(iii) a computing unit configured to compute pressure related data on the basis of the measurements of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors and the dynamic calibration curves.

2 . The pressure sensor according to claim 1 , wherein each dynamic calibration curve is defined by a predetermined rate of variation of the input.

3 . The pressure sensor according to claim 1 , wherein the set of dynamic calibration curves comprise one dynamic calibration curve for each sensor of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensor.

4 . The pressure sensor according to claim 1 , wherein the dynamic calibration curves are polynomial fits of capacitance values as a function of the input on the plurality of capacitive pressure sensor.

5 . The pressure sensor according to claim 4 , wherein the input is a time-dependent input varying over time at a gait simulating rate.

6 . The pressure sensor according to claim 4 , wherein the input is a force, a pressure or a displacement.

7 . The pressure sensor according to claim 1 , wherein the measurement portion extends over a measurement surface having a surface boundary, and wherein the computing unit is further configured to:

(i) determine a sensor boundary, the sensor boundary being a curve surrounding some or the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors and comprised within the surface boundary of the measurement surface;

(ii) apply a first boundary condition to the surface boundary and a second boundary condition to the sensor boundary, said second boundary condition being different from the first boundary condition; and

(iii) compute a field of pressure over the measurement surface, by interpolation on the basis of: the pressure related data, the first boundary condition, and the second boundary condition.

8 . The pressure sensor according to claim 7 , wherein the first boundary condition is a pressure equal to 0 kg·cm −2 at the surface boundary.

9 . An insole for insertion into an article of footwear, the insole comprising a pressure sensor according to claim 1 .

10 . A calibration system, the system comprising an insole according to claim 9 and a calibration unit configured to:

apply an input to at least one capacitive pressure sensor, the input being time-dependent during an interval of time Δt;

measure the capacitance of the at least one capacitive pressure sensor during the interval of time Δt; and

determine a dynamic calibration curve of the at least one capacitive pressure sensor based on the input and the measured capacitance;

wherein the input is a force, a pressure or a displacement.

11 . A computer-implemented method for determining the total normal force applied on a pressure sensor according to claim 1 , comprising the steps of:

a) receiving the dynamic calibration curves of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors;

b) measuring the capacitance of each sensor of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors over a measurement surface included in the measurement portion;

c) for each sensor of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors, converting the measured capacitance into a pressure value on the basis of the dynamic calibration curve of the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors;

d) computing a field of pressure over the measurement surface based on the pressure values obtained in the converting step c); and

e) computing the total normal force applied on the pressure sensor on the basis of the field of pressure.

12 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein the step d) of computing the field of pressure further comprises the following sub-steps:

d.1) determining a sensor boundary, the sensor boundary being a curve comprised within the surface boundary of the measurement surface and surrounding the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors;

d.2) applying a first boundary condition to the surface boundary and a second boundary condition to the sensor boundary;

d.3) computing the field of pressure over a portion of the measurement surface included within the sensor boundary;

d.4) computing the field of pressure over the measurement surface, by interpolation on the basis of the field of pressure over a portion of the measurement surface, the first and second boundary conditions.

13 . The method according to claim 12 , wherein the application step d.2) comprises: applying, as a first boundary condition, a pressure P1 equal to 0 kg·cm −2 and applying, as a second boundary condition, a pressure P2 obtained via the following steps:

selecting a set of sensors from the plurality of capacitive pressure sensors based on a criterion of proximity to the sensor boundary;

calculating a pressure gradient for the selected set of sensors; and

calculating a pressure P2 at the sensor boundary based on the pressure gradient and on the pressure values of the selected set of sensors obtained in the converting step c).

14 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein the step d) of computing the field of pressure over the measurement surface comprises the following steps:

computing a discrete field of pressure on the basis of the pressure values obtained in the converting step c); and

applying an interpolation function to the discrete field of pressure so as to obtain a continuous field of pressure;

wherein the step e) of computing the total normal force comprises integration of the continuous field of pressure over the measurement surface.

15 . The method according to claim 14 , wherein the interpolation function is a linear function.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 31, 2025
From: FEETME
To: RXFUNCTION, INC.
Reel/Frame 073342/0896 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2023
From: HUANG, PIAO; JACOBS, DAMIEN
To: FEETME
Reel/Frame 064182/0986 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 20306521 · Dec 9, 2020 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240044727A1 · Feb 8, 2024
References Cited (104)
US 1540430A · Sims · 1925 [cited by applicant]
US 1658170A · La Chapelle · 1928 [cited by applicant]
US 3881496A · Vredenbregt et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 4510699A · Nakamura et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4569352A · Petrofsky et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4745930A · Confer · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4760850A · Phillips et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4813436A · Au · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5121747A · Andrews · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5253510A · Allen · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 5551445A · Nashner · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US D382995S · Hale · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5678448A · Fullen et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5790256A · Brown et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5896608A · Whatley · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5919149A · Allum · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5979067A · Waters · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6063046A · Allum · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6174294B1 · Crabb et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6273863B1 · Avni et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6389883B1 · Berme et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US D467408S · Chen · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6505522B1 · Wilssens · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US D496155S · Londono · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6788976B2 · Gesotti · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6832987B2 · David et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6978684B2 · Nurse · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7124628B2 · Wildman · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US D536867S · Sexson · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US D537623S · Dennis et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7403821B2 · Haugland et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US D625204S · Kimura · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7883479B1 · Stanley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US D637918S · Cobbett et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US D640143S · Virgili · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7998092B2 · Avni et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8151487B2 · Mclinden · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8209036B2 · Nathan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US D672127S · Walker · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8556830B2 · Sherman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8597210B2 · Sherman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8694110B2 · Nathan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US D724556S · Choi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8974402B2 · Oddsson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9289174B2 · Oddsson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9402580B2 · Oddsson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10178970B2 · Oddsson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10653352B2 · Oddsson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11451931B1 · Hariharan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020055779A1 · Andrews · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030027118A1 · Abraham-Fuchs et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040059543A1 · Abraham-Fuchs et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050103092A1 · Chiarito et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050131317A1 · Oddsson et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090161653A1 · Kumar et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110299472A1 · Kumar · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120188997A1 · Zakrzewski et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130118265A1 · Besling · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130215712A1 · Geiser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130236867A1 · Avni et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140174224A1 · Zhang · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140309534A1 · Pichler et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150025816A1 · Ross · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150123802A1 · Oddsson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160235557A1 · Herr et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160295589A1 · Nikopour et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170035329A1 · Gavish · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170055880A1 · Agrawal et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170188950A1 · Gazdag et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170225033A1 · Czaja · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170273599A1 · Reese et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170307376A1 · Zihajehzadeh et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180077663A1 · Davis et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190158202A1 · Madine et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190175107A1 · Lu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190336040A1 · Chang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200054931A1 · Martin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200078638A1 · Statham et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200214595A1 · Roberts et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200318972A1 · Couvet · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210382978A1 · Jeon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220051779A1 · Marcus et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220299321A1 · Zhao et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220338759A1 · Vidal et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230260552A1 · Bose et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240230434A1 · Jo et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250344966A1 · Zanotto et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 109655373A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109945775A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 110049440A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 0970657A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
EP 1369677A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
EP 2848908A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3340827A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3714785A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3731238A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018114277A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015183677A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017033036A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021213634A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022101366A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued on Feb. 24, 2022, in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2021/084898, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sorrentino et al., “A Novel Sensorised Insole for Sensing Feet Pressure Distributions” , arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, Oct. 14, 2019, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lidstone, et al., “Electronic measurement of plantar contact area during walking using an adaptive thresholding method for Medilogic pressure-measuring insoles ”, The Foot, Elsevier, vol. 39, Jan. 17, 20219, XP085876938… [cited by applicant]