IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,731,419
Granted Patent B2
US 12,731,419 · App. 17/284,852 · Granted Sep 8, 2026

System for co-registration of medical images using a classifier

Inventors: Marinus Bastiaan Van Leeuwen (Eindhoven, NL); Koen De Laat (Udenhout, NL)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06V20/695G06T7/0012G06T7/11G06T7/30G06V20/698G06T2207/10056G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084G06T2207/30024
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,731,419
App. No.
17/284,852
Granted
Sep 8, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a system for analysis of microscopic image data representing a plurality of images acquired from cells. The system comprises a data processing system which is configured to read and/or generate ( 120 ) segmentation data for each of the images. For each of the images, the segmentation data are indicative of a segmentation of at least a portion of the respective image into one or more image regions so that each of the image regions is a member of one or more predefined classes of image content. The data processing system further generates co-registration data using at least portions of the segmentation data for co-registering at least portions of different ones of the images. The data processing system further generates mapping data using at least portions of the segmentation data for mapping between image regions of different images.

Claims (30)

1 . A system for analysis of microscopic image data representing a plurality of images acquired from cells, the system comprising a data processing system which is configured to:

generate segmentation data for each of the images using a classifier of an artificial neural network, the classifier configured to perform sliding window classification, wherein for each of the images, the segmentation data are indicative of a segmentation of at least a portion of the respective image into three or more image regions so that each of the image regions is a member of a different one or more of a plurality of different predefined classes of image content, the plurality of different predefined classes of image content representing a plurality of different tissue types, wherein the plurality of different predefined classes comprise: (i) a class representing image regions formed by fatty tissue; (ii) a class representing image regions which are free from sample material; and (iii) a class representing image regions formed by non-fatty tissue;

generate co-registration data using at least portions of the segmentation data for co-registering at least portions of different images; and

generate mapping data using at least portions of the segmentation data for mapping between a plurality of image regions of different images, wherein generating mapping data comprises determining, for each of the image regions, an identification parameter for identifying the respective image region from among the remaining image regions contained in the same image, and wherein the identification parameter is determined depending on the segmentation data.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein a magnification of the segmentation data is lower than a magnification of the image data.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the segmentation data comprise, for each of a plurality of pixels of the images, binary or probabilistic pixel classification data for providing a pixelwise classification of the pixels into one or more of the pre-defined classes.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the classifier is based on supervised and/or unsupervised learning; and

the classifier is configured for performing at least a portion of a segmentation of the image data, wherein the segmentation generates the segmentation data using at least a portion of the image data.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the image regions represent isolated tissue portions.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the data processing system comprises a graphical user interface;

wherein the data processing system is configured to present to the user a one or more graphical representations which are generated depending on the co-registration data and/or depending on the mapping data.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the system comprises an image acquisition unit which is configured to:

receive one or more samples, each of which comprising the cells; and

acquire the image data from the one or more samples.

8 . A method for analyzing microscopic image data representing a plurality of images acquired from cells using a data processing system, the method comprising:

generating, by the data processing system, segmentation data for each of the images using a classifier of an artificial neural network, the classifier configured to perform sliding window classification, wherein for each of the images, the segmentation data are indicative of a segmentation of at least a portion of the respective image into three or more image regions so that each of the image regions is a member of a different one or more of a plurality of different predefined classes of image content, the plurality of different predefined classes of image content representing a plurality of different tissue types, wherein the plurality of different predefined classes comprise two or more of: (i) a class representing image regions formed by fatty tissue; (ii) a class representing image regions which are free from sample material; and (iii) a class representing image regions formed by non-fatty tissue;

generating co-registration data using at least portions of the segmentation data for co-registering at least image portions of different images; and

generating mapping data using at least portions of the segmentation data for mapping between a plurality of image regions of different images, wherein generating mapping data comprises determining, for each of the image regions, an identification parameter for identifying the respective image region from among the remaining image regions contained in the same image, and wherein the identification parameter is determined depending on the segmentation data.

9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

generating a first image of the images and a second image of the images, wherein the first image shows a sample being stained using a first stain and the second image shows a different and/or the same sample being stained using a second stain so that the first and second images show different sample stainings.

10 . A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a program element for analysis of microscopic image data representing a plurality of images acquired from cells, wherein the analysis is performed using a data processing system, wherein the program element, when being executed by a processor of the data processing system, is adapted to carry out:

generating, by the data processing system, segmentation data for each of the images using a classifier of an artificial neural network, the classifier configured to perform sliding window classification, wherein for each of the images, the segmentation data are indicative of a segmentation of at least a portion of the respective image into three or more image regions so that each of the image regions is a member of a different one or more of a plurality of different predefined classes of image content, the plurality of different predefined classes of image content representing a plurality of different tissue types, wherein the plurality of different predefined classes comprise two or more of: (i) a class representing image regions formed by fatty tissue; (ii) a class representing image regions which are free from sample material; and (iii) a class representing image regions formed by non-fatty tissue;

generating co-registration data using at least portions of the segmentation data for co-registering at least image portions of different images; and

generating mapping data using at least portions of the segmentation data for mapping between a plurality of image regions of different images, wherein generating mapping data comprises determining, for each of the image regions, an identification parameter for identifying the respective image region from among the remaining image regions contained in the same image, and wherein the identification parameter is determined depending on the segmentation data.

11 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein a magnification of the segmentation data is lower than a magnification of the image data.

12 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the segmentation data comprise, for each of a plurality of pixels of the images, binary or probabilistic pixel classification data for providing a pixelwise classification of the pixels into one or more of the pre-defined classes.

13 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the program element is adapted to further carry out:

performing at least a portion of a segmentation of the image data, wherein the segmentation generates the segmentation data using at least a portion of the image data.

14 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the image regions represent isolated tissue portions.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2021
From: VAN LEEUWEN, MARINUS BASTIAAN; DE LAAT, KOEN
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 055900/0635 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 18200520 · Oct 15, 2018 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210390278A1 · Dec 16, 2021
References Cited (23)
US 8229194B2 · Grunkin · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9607379B1 · Potts · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10885605B2 · Van Leeuwen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20130016886A1 · Schoenmeyer · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140376824A1 · Levenson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160232425A1 · Huang · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160335478A1 · Brendo · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2608150A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Trahearn, Nicholas, et al. “Hyper-stain inspector: a framework for robust registration and localised co-expression analysis of multiple whole-slide images of serial histology sections.” Scientific Reports 7.1 (2017): 56… [cited by examiner]
Xu Y, Jia Z, Wang LB, Ai Y, Zhang F, Lai M, Chang El. Large scale tissue histopathology image classification, segmentation, and visualization via deep convolutional activation features. BMC bioinformatics. Dec. 2017; 18… [cited by examiner]
B. Ehteshami Bejnordi et al., “Deep learning-based assessment of tumor-associated stroma for diagnosing breast cancer in histopathology images,” 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017), … [cited by examiner]
PCT International Search Report, International application No. PCT/EP2019/077749, Jan. 16, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Shamonin D.P. et al., “Fast Parallel Image Registration on CPU and GPU for Diagnostic Classification of Alzheimer's Disease”, Journal Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Jan. 2014, vol. 7, article 50, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Mehta S. et al., “Learning to Segment Breast Biopsy Whole Slide Images”, https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02554, Sep. 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Lowe D.G. et al., “Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints”, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60(2), pp. 91-110, 2004. [cited by applicant]
El-Baz A. et al., “Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodologies, vol. 1”, In: “Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodologies, vol. 1”, Jan. 1,… [cited by applicant]
Trahearn N. et al., “Hyper-Stain Inspector: A Framework for Robust Registration and Localised Co-Expression Analysis of Multiple Whole-Slide Images of Serial Histology Sections”, Scientific Reports, vol. 7, No. 1, Jul. … [cited by applicant]
Ruifrok A. et al., “Quantification of Histochemical Staining by Color Deconvolution”, Journal of Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 291-299, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Macenko A.M. et al., “A Method for Normalizing Histology Slides for Quantitative Analysis”, Journal Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: from Nano to Macro, pp. 1107… [cited by applicant]
Long J. et al., “Fully Convolutional Networks for Segmantic Segmentation”, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3431-3440. [cited by applicant]
Fu X. et al., “Segmentation of Histological Images and Fibrosis Identification with a Convolutional Neural Network”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, York, NY, US, vol. 98, May 16, 2018 (May 16, 2018), pp. 147-158, XP… [cited by applicant]
Wang J. et al., “A Deep Learning Approach for Semantic Segmentation in Histology Tissue Images”, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2016, Oct. 17, 2016 (Oct. 17, 2016), pp. 176-184, XP0555… [cited by applicant]
Ruqayya A. et al., “Deep Autoencoder Features for Registration of Histology Images”, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 894, Jul. 9, 2018 (Jul. 9, 2018), pp. 371-378, XP055576471. [cited by applicant]