IP Library Granted Patent US 12,734,374
Granted Patent B2
US 12,734,374 · App. 18/756,991 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Automated qualitative description of anatomical changes in radiotherapy

Inventors: Maria Luiza Bondar (Waalre, NL); Matthieu Frederic Bal (Geldrop, NL); Alfonso Agatino Isola (Norderstedt, DE)
Assignee: Elekta Inc.
A61N5/1049A61N2005/1074
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,734,374
App. No.
18/756,991
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and a method for monitoring anatomical changes in a subject in radiation therapy are provided, as well as an arrangement for medical imaging and analysis and a computer program product for carrying out the method. For monitoring anatomical changes in a subject in radiation therapy, the following steps are performed. First anatomical image data and subsequent anatomical image data of the subject are received. The first anatomical image data and the subsequent anatomical image data are analyzed. This analysis comprises registering the subsequent anatomical data to the first anatomical data. Changes between the first anatomical image data and the subsequent anatomical image data are identified as change states, and the identified change states are matched to corresponding qualitative descriptions. A monitoring report is provided, which comprises the qualitative descriptions of the identified changes.

Claims (37)

1 . A system for monitoring anatomical changes in a subject of radiation therapy, the system comprising:

an analysis unit configured to receive and analyze first and subsequent anatomical image data of the subject;

a change state identification unit configured to identify one or more changes between the first and subsequent anatomical image data as respective change states, wherein the change state identification unit is configured to use a trained learning algorithm for change state identification;

a qualitative translator configured to match the respective change states to corresponding qualitative descriptions; and

a reporting unit configured to provide a monitoring report comprising qualitative descriptions of the respective change states.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the trained learning algorithm is configured to analyze historical data of one or more anatomical changes and corresponding change states to improve accuracy of later change state identifications, and wherein the identified one or more changes are used as input for the trained learning algorithm.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis unit is further configured to perform quantitative image data analysis on the first and subsequent anatomical image data.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the quantitative image data analysis includes determining at least one of: one or more region of interest size changes, a distance that a region of interest has shifted, or a total radiation dose that a region of interest has received.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the reporting unit is configured to generate one or more pictograms for inclusion in the monitoring report.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the reporting unit is configured to provide the monitoring report via a graphical user interface with one or more selectable features for displaying additional information.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis unit is further configured to receive dose distribution data of a treatment plan for the subject, and wherein the change state identification unit is further configured to identify change states using one or more changes between the dose distribution data and the subsequent anatomical image data.

8 . A method for monitoring one or more anatomical changes in a subject in radiation therapy, the method comprising:

receiving and analyzing, by an analysis unit, first and subsequent anatomical image data of the subject;

identifying, by a change state identification unit, one or more changes between the first and subsequent anatomical image data as respective change states, wherein identifying changes comprises using a trained learning algorithm for change state identification;

matching, by a qualitative translator, the identified respective change states to corresponding qualitative descriptions; and

providing, by a reporting unit, a monitoring report comprising one or more qualitative descriptions of the identified respective change states.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the trained learning algorithm analyzes historical data of one or more anatomical changes and corresponding change states to improve accuracy of later change state identifications, and wherein the identified one or more changes are used as input for the trained learning algorithm.

10 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

performing quantitative image data analysis on the first and subsequent anatomical image data.

11 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

generating one or more pictograms for inclusion in the monitoring report.

12 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving dose distribution data of a treatment plan for the subject; and

identifying one or more changes between the dose distribution data and the subsequent anatomical image data as respective change states.

13 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium with instructions stored thereon which, when performed by a processor of a computing device, cause the processor to:

receive and analyze first and subsequent anatomical image data of a subject in radiation therapy;

identify one or more changes between the first and subsequent anatomical image data as respective change states, wherein identifying one or more changes comprises using a trained learning algorithm for change state identification;

match the respective change states to corresponding qualitative descriptions; and

provide a monitoring report comprising qualitative descriptions of respective change states.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the trained learning algorithm analyzes historical data of one or more anatomical changes and corresponding change states to improve accuracy of later change state identifications, and wherein the identified one or more changes are used as input for the trained learning algorithm.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

perform quantitative image data analysis on the first and subsequent anatomical image data.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

generate one or more pictograms for inclusion in the monitoring report.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

receive dose distribution data of a treatment plan for the subject; and

identify one or more changes between the dose distribution data and the subsequent anatomical image data as the respective change states.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2024
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
To: ELEKTA INC.
Reel/Frame 068818/0474 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 5, 2024
From: BONDAR,, MARIA LUIZA; BAL,, MATTHIEU FREDERIC; ISOLA, ALFONSO AGATINO
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 067918/0515 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 18212534 · Dec 14, 2018 · regional
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17413539 · Dec 11, 2019
Related Publication 20250025721A1 · Jan 23, 2025
References Cited (40)
US 9600922B2 · Tsukagoshi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9764162B1 · Willcut et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9795806B2 · Matsuzaki et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9865048B2 · Wakai · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10022560B2 · Kumar et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10456595B2 · Ribbing et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10638989B2 · Van Beek et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111396A1 · Boucheron · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120207372A1 · Ichihashi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140132597A1 · Tsukagoshi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160263399A1 · Matsuzaki · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170091574A1 · Udupa et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170340901A1 · Haas et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3666335 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012024145 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013039360 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021533231 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 7561736 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020120531 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application No. 2024-137472, Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2025”, w English Translation, Sep. 16, 2025, 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT EP2019 084558, International Search Report mailed Feb. 28, 2020”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT EP2019 084558, Written Opinion mailed mailed Feb. 28, 2020”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT EP2019 084558, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 24, 2021”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/413,539, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 12, 2021”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/413,539, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2023”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/413,539, Response filed Feb. 23, 2024 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2023”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/413,539, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 20, 2024”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18212534.4, Extended European Search Report mailed Jun. 21, 2019”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18212534.4, Noting of Loss of Rights mailed Jan. 26, 2021”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Boch, Isabelle, “Mathematical Morphology on Bipolar Fuzzy Sets General Algebraic Framework”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning vol. 53, 2012, 2012, 1031-1060. [cited by applicant]
Dylia, Frank, “A Survey of Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Calculi-Algebraic and Computational Properties”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. V, 2016, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Li, Sanjiang, “Region Connection Calculus Its models and composition table”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 145, pp. 121-146, Apr. 2003, 26 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mohan, Vineet, “Correlating Scored Daily Anatomical Changes to Invivo EPID Dosimetry and Cone Beam CT Based Dose Calculations”, TU Delft University, 2017, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Moratz, Reinhard, “Qualitative spatial reasoning about relative point position”, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing vol. 19, 2008, pp. 75-98, 2008, 25 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Sabharwal, Chaman L., “Modeling Cardinal Direction Relations in 3D for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning”, Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration, 2014, pp. 199-214, 2004, 199-214. [cited by applicant]
Skiadopoulos, Spiros, “Composing cardinal direction relations”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 152, No. 2, pp. 143-171, Feb. 2004, Feb. 2004, 143-171. [cited by applicant]
Surucu, Murat, “Decision Trees Predicting TUmor Shrinkage for Head and Neck Cancer Implications for Adaptive Radiotherapy”, Radiotherapy, vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, 2015, 139-145. [cited by applicant]
Zegers, Catharina M.L., “Three-dimensional dose evaluation in breast cancer patients to define decision criteria for adaptive radiotherapy”, Acta Oncologica, vol. 56, Nno. 11, Nov. 2017, 1487-1494. [cited by applicant]
Zhou, Zhengdong, “An effective calculation method for an overlap volume histogram descriptor and its application in IMRT plan retrieval”, European Journal of Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 10, Oct. 2016, 1339-1343. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application No. 2024-137472, Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2026”, w English Translation, Apr. 4, 2026, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]