IP Library Granted Patent US 12,735,674
Granted Patent B1
US 12,735,674 · App. 18/129,376 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Cellulose constructs based on gas vesicles and bacterial cellulose

Inventor: Lina Gonzalez (Worcester, MA)
C12N1/22C08L1/02C12N1/20C12N2500/34C12N2500/76C12N2510/02C12N2533/78
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,735,674
App. No.
18/129,376
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

A material with a scaffold comprising a series of at least partially spaced fibers and gas vesicles locates between fibers. The gas vesicles comprise external anchoring modules that are effective to anchor the gas vesicles to the fibers.

Claims (17)

1 . An aerogel material comprising:

a bacterial cellulose-based scaffold comprising a series of at least partially spaced fibers; and

bacterially-derived gas vesicles located at least between fibers, wherein the gas vesicles comprise external cellulose binding modules (CBM) that anchor the gas vesicles to the fibers, and wherein the cellulose binding modules comprise CBM48 from at least one of Komagataeibacter sucrofermentans and Micromonas pusilla.

2 . The material of claim 1 , wherein the gas vesicles further comprise a polypeptide linker that promotes inter-molecular reaction between the gas vesicles and the fibers.

3 . The material of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the scaffold and the gas vesicles further comprise external hydrophobicity modules that comprise a hydrophobic protein.

4 . The material of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the scaffold and the gas vesicles further comprise external fire resistance modules that comprise bacterially-produced melanin.

5 . The material of claim 1 , wherein the gas vesicles are produced from genetically engineered cells that comprise a gene cluster that encodes production of gas vesicles.

6 . The material of claim 1 , wherein the bacterial cellulose is produced by at least one of genetically modified bacteria and wild bacteria.

7 . The material of claim 6 , wherein the bacteria are grown in a liquid medium comprising water, sugar, tea, and vinegar.

8 . The material of claim 7 , wherein the bacteria grow on a surface of the liquid medium and oxygen levels below the surface are reduced from ambient.

9 . The material of claim 7 , wherein the pH of the medium is adjusted to a pH of between about 4.5 and about 5.5.

10 . The material of claim 7 , wherein the vinegar comprises apple cider vinegar.

11 . The material of claim 1 , made by spraying gas vesicles on the cellulose mat as it grows.

12 . The material of claim 1 , wherein gas vesicles are embedded in other polymers or fibrous matrix.

13 . The material of claim 1 , wherein the scaffold is in the form of sheets or pellets that are processed by ethanol exchange and then drying at room temperature, critical point drying, or by lyophilizing.

14 . The material of claim 1 , wherein the gas vesicles are from organisms that are different than the bacteria that make the cellulose.

15 . The material of claim 1 , made by soaking the cellulose in a bath that includes gas vesicles.

References Cited (12)
US 12280348B2 · Gonzalez · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20140288411A1 · Shapiro · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140364381A1 · Ju · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20180030501A1 · Bourdeau · 2018 [cited by examiner]
Volkner et al., “Accessory Gvp Proteins Form a Complex During Gas Vesicle Formation of Haloarchaea” Frontiers in Microbiology vol. 11 pp. 1-13, DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.610179 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Portela et al., “Bacterial Cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications” microbial biotechnology vol. 12 No. 4 pp. 586-610, doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13392 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Stergar et al., “Review of aerogel-based materials in biomedical applications” J Sol-Gel Sci Technol vol. 77 pp. 738-752, DOI: 10.1007/s10971-016-3968-5 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Oliveira et al., “Synthesis and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose produced from bacterial cellulose” J Therm Anal Calorim vol. 106 pp. 703-709, DOI: 10.1007/s10973-011-1449-1 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Trache et al., “Microcrystalline cellulose: Isolation, characterization and bio-composites application—A review” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules vol. 93 pp. 789-804, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.05… [cited by examiner]
Valo et al., “Immobilization of protein-coated drug nanoparticles in nanofibrillar cellulose matrices—Enhanced stability and release” Journal of Controlled Release vol. 156 pp. 390-397, doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.016… [cited by examiner]
Janecek et al., “Structural and evolutionary aspects of two families of non-catalytic domains present in starch and glycogen binding proteins from microbes, plants, and animals” Enzyme and Microbial Technology vol. 49 p… [cited by examiner]
Honda et al., “Stoichiometrically controlled Immobilization of Multiple Enzymes on Magnetic Nanoparticles by the Magnetosome Display System for Efficient Cellulose Hydrolysis” Biomacromolecules vol. 16, pp. 3863-3868DOI… [cited by examiner]