IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,747,445
Granted Patent B2
US 12,747,445 · App. 16/967,072 · Granted Sep 29, 2026

Methods and compositions for increasing harvestable yield via editing GA20 oxidase genes to generate short stature plants

Inventors: Sivalinganna Manjunath (Chesterfield, MO); Linda A. Rymarquis (High Ridge, MO); Thomas L. Slewinski (Chesterfield, MO)
Assignee: MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
C12N15/8213A01H5/10A01H6/4684C12N15/8261
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,747,445
App. No.
16/967,072
Granted
Sep 29, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides compositions and methods for the editing or mutating of specific subtypes of GA20 oxidase genes and specific zygosity combinations of those edits or mutations. Modified plants, and plant parts and cells thereof, having mutations reducing the expression or activity of GA20 oxidase genes are further provided with improved characteristics, such as reduced plant height and increased lodging resistance, but without off-types. Methods are further provided for making modified plants, and plant parts and cells thereof, having one or more mutations in specific subtypes of GA20 oxidase genes.

Claims (29)

1 . A modified corn plant comprising a mutant allele of a GA20 oxidase_3gene at an endogenous GA20 oxidase_3 locus, wherein a wild-type allele of the GA20 oxidase_3gene encodes a GA20 oxidase_3 protein comprising an amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 9, and a mutant allele of a GA20 oxidase_5 gene at an endogenous GA20 oxidase_5 locus, wherein a wild-type allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene encodes a GA20oxidase_5 protein comprising an amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 15, wherein said modified corn plant is homozygous for the mutant allele of the GA20oxidase_3 gene and homozygous for the mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene, wherein said modified corn plant:

(a) has a 20% to 50% reduction in plant height relative to an unmodified control plant; and

(b) has an ear with no significant off-types, wherein said ear has:

(i) a number of kernels per ear that is at least 90% of the number of kernels per ear of the unmodified control plant; or

(ii) an average single kernel weight per ear that is at least 90% of the average single kernel weight per ear of the unmodified control plant.

2 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene comprises a mutation in a sequence region selected from the group consisting of a promoter, 5′ UTR, first exon, first intron, second exon, second intron, third exon, 3′ UTR, terminator, and any combination thereof.

3 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene comprises a mutation selected from the group consisting of a substitution, a deletion, an insertion, a duplication, and an inversion of one or more nucleotides relative to a wild-type allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene.

4 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene comprises a mutation in a sequence region selected from the group consisting of a promoter, 5′ UTR, first exon, first intron, second exon, second intron, third exon, 3′ UTR, terminator, and any combination thereof.

5 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene comprises a mutation selected from the group consisting of a substitution, a deletion, an insertion, a duplication, and an inversion of one or more nucleotides relative to a wild-type allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene.

6 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene, said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene, or both comprises one or more mutations in the first exon of the corresponding gene.

7 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene, said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene, or both comprises one or more mutations in the second exon of the corresponding gene.

8 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 170 to 193 or 206 to 217.

9 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene comprises a mutation identified by one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 182 to 193 relative to the corresponding reference sequence in SEQ ID NOs: 194 to 205.

10 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 218 to 239 or 251 to 261.

11 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene comprises a mutation identified by one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 229 to 239 relative to the corresponding reference sequence in SEQ ID NOs: 240 to 250.

12 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said modified corn plant has improved lodging resistance relative to the unmodified control plant.

13 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene comprises one or more mutation types selected from the group consisting of a nonsense mutation, a missense mutation, a frameshift mutation, a splice-site mutation, and any combination thereof.

14 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene results in one or more of the following: a GA20 oxidase_3 protein truncation, a non-translatable GA20 oxidase_3 gene transcript, a non-functional GA20 oxidase_3 protein, a premature stop codon in the GA20 oxidase_3 gene, and any combination thereof.

15 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene comprises one or more mutation types selected from the group consisting of a nonsense mutation, a missense mutation, a frameshift mutation, a splice-site mutation, and any combination thereof.

16 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene results in one or more of the following: a GA20 oxidase_5 protein truncation, a non-translatable GA20 oxidase_5 gene transcript, a non-functional GA20 oxidase_5 protein, a premature stop codon in the GA20 oxidase_5 gene, and any combination thereof.

17 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein the stalk or stem diameter of said modified corn plant at one or more stem internodes is at least 5% greater than the stalk or stem diameter at the same one or more internodes of the unmodified control plant.

18 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein the stalk or stem diameter of said modified corn plant at one or more of the first, second, third, and/or fourth internode below the ear is at least 5% greater than the same internode of the unmodified control plant.

19 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein the level of one or more active GAs in at least one internode tissue of the stem or stalk of said modified corn plant is at least 5% lower than the same internode tissue of the unmodified control plant.

20 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein the level of one or more active GAs in at least one internode tissue of the stem or stalk of said modified corn plant is lower than the same internode tissue of the unmodified control plant.

21 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein said modified corn plant comprises one or more traits, relative to the unmodified control plant, selected from the group consisting of improved lodging resistance, reduced green snap, deeper roots, earlier canopy closure, higher stomatal conductance, lower ear height, increased foliar water content, improved drought tolerance, improved nitrogen use efficiency, reduced anthocyanin content and area in leaves under normal or nitrogen-limiting or water-limiting stress conditions.

22 . The modified corn plant of claim 1 , wherein the mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_3 gene and the mutant allele of the GA20 oxidase_5 gene are generated using an RNA-guided endonuclease and a guide RNA (gRNA) molecule, and wherein the gRNA molecule comprises a sequence that is at least 90% identical or complementary to one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 138 to 167.

23 . A plant part of the modified corn plant of claim 1 .

24 . The plant part of claim 23 , wherein said plant part is a meristem, a leaf, a stem, a node, a root, a flower, a floral organ structure, a seed, a fruit, a propagule, or any portion thereof.

25 . The plant part of claim 23 , wherein the said plant part is a seed.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2022
From: MANJUNATH, SIVALINGANNA; RYMARQUIS, LINDA A.; SLEWINSKI, THOMAS L.
To: MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 061576/0026 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62710302 · Feb 16, 2018
Provisional Application 62631412 · Feb 15, 2018
Related Publication 20210032646A1 · Feb 4, 2021
References Cited (67)
US 7138567B2 · Okawa et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 10724047B2 · Allen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11319550B2 · Allen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11414670B2 · Allen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11441153B2 · Dietrich · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11472852B2 · Alves-Junior · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11702670B2 · Dietrich · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12024711B2 · Manjunath · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20040250315A1 · Okawa et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20110145940A1 · Voytas et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301073A1 · Gregory et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130117869A1 · Duchateau et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160208272A1 · Cigan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160230183A1 · Abad et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170114356A1 · Li et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20220298527A1 · Dietrich et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Song et al 2011 (Gene 482: p. 34-42) (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Ashikari et al 2002 (Breeding Science 52: p. 143-150) (Year: 2002). [cited by examiner]
Dhananjay Mani 2008 (Master's Thesis Texas A&M University) (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Petti et al 2015 (Plant Physiology p. 705-716) (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Altschul et al., “Basic local alignment search tool,” [cited by applicant]
Beurdeley et al., “Compact designer TALENs for efficient genome engineering,” [cited by applicant]
Cermak et al., “Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting,” [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “The Maize DWARF1 Encodes a Gibberellin 3-Oxidase and Is Dual Localized to the Nucleus and Cytosol,” [cited by applicant]
Chenna et al., “Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs,” [cited by applicant]
Colbert et al., “High-Throughput Screening for Induced Point Mutations,” [cited by applicant]
Doyle et al., “TAL Effector-Nucleotide Targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction,” [cited by applicant]
Gabsalilow et al., “Site- and strand-specific nicking of DNA by fusion proteins derived from MutH and I-Scel or TALE repeats,” [cited by applicant]
Gaj et al., “ZFN, TALEN and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering,” Trends Biotechnol., 31(7):397-405 (2013). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 17, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2019/018131 (19 pgs.). [cited by applicant]
Larkin et al., “Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0,” [cited by applicant]
McCallum et al., “Targeted screening for induced mutations,” [cited by applicant]
Plackett et al., “Analysis of the Developmental Roles of the [cited by applicant]
Song et al., “Genome-wide identification of gibberellins metabolic enzyme genes and expression profiling analysis during seed germination in maize,” [cited by applicant]
Thompson et al., “Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice,” [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system,” [cited by applicant]
Yanik et al., “TALE-Pvull Fusion Proteins—Novel Tools for Gene Targeting,” [cited by applicant]
Coles, J. P. et al. (1999). “Modification of Gibberellin Production and Plant Development in [cited by applicant]
Depalma, A. (Feb. 13, 2018) “Reaping Better Crops with Plant Genome Editing. Biocompare: The Buyer's Guide for Life Scientists” retrieved from the internet: URL:https://www.biocompare.com/Editorial-Articles/346955-Reapi… [cited by applicant]
GenBank Accession No. AC191666, last updated Sep. 24, 2013, located at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AC191666, last visited on Jun. 10, 2022, forty four pages. [cited by applicant]
GenBank Accession No. AC209074, last updated Sep. 13, 2014, located at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AC209074, last visited on Jun. 10, 2022, forty one pages. [cited by applicant]
GenBank Accession No. BT068785, last updated Jun. 15, 2012 located at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/BT068785.2/, last visited on Jun. 10, 2022, two pages. [cited by applicant]
GenBank Accession No. EF030816, last updated Sep. 28, 2006 located at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/EF030816.1/, last visited on Jun. 13, 2022, two pages. [cited by applicant]
GenBank Accession No. EF030817, last updated Sep. 28, 2006 located at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/EF030817.1/, last visited on Jun. 13, 2022, two pages. [cited by applicant]
Helliwell , C. et al. (Aug. 2003). “Constructs and Methods for High-Throughput Gene Silencing in Plants” Methods in Enzymology 30(4): 289-295. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report mailed on Jul. 16, 2019, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/018133 filed on Feb. 15, 2019, eighteen pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report mailed on Jun. 25, 2019, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/018128 filed on Feb. 15, 2019, twelve pages. [cited by applicant]
Qiao, F. et al. (Jun. 19, 2013). “Alteration of Rice Growth and Development via Antisense Expression of OsGA20ox2 gene,” African Journal of Biotechnology. 12(25): 3898-3904. [cited by applicant]
Spielmeyer, W. et al. (2002) “Semidwarf (sd-1), ‘Green Revolution’ Rice, Contains a Defective Gibberellin 20-oxidase Gene,” PNAS, 99(13):9043-9048. [cited by applicant]
Tomita, M. (2012), Combining Two Semidwarfing Genes d60 and sd1 for Reduced Height in ‘Minihikari’, a New Rice Germplasm in the ‘Koshihikari’ Genetic Background, Genetics Research 94: 235-244. [cited by applicant]
Uniprot Accession No. A0A1D6N5E5, last updated Nov. 30, 2016 located at https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/A0A1D6N5E5, last visited Jun. 13, 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Uniprot Accession No. A0A3L6FA55, last updated Feb. 13, 2019 located at https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/A0A3L6FA55, last visited Jun. 13, 2022, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Uniprot Accession No. COHFM9, last updated May 9, 2009 located at https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/C0HFM9, last visited Jun. 13, 2022, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Uniprot Accession No. K7VMU4, last updated Feb. 6, 2013 located at https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/K7VMU4, ast visited Jun. 13, 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chiang, H.-H. et al. (Feb. 1995). “Isolation of the Arabidopsis GA4 Locus,” The Plant Cell 7:195-201. [cited by applicant]
Unterseer, S. et al. (Jan. 27, 2017). “European Flint Reference Sequences Complement the Maize Pan-genome,” BioRxiv 103747, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Williams, J. et al. (1998). “Function and Substrate Specificity of the Gibberellin 3beta-Hydroxylase Encoded by the [cited by applicant]
Xu, Y.-L. et al. (Jul. 3, 1995). “The GA5 Locus of [cited by applicant]
Bunton-Stasyshyn, R. K. A. et al. (Feb. 1, 2019, e-pub. Jan. 2, 2019). “Prominent Role of Forebrain Excitatory Neurons in SCN8A Encephalopathy,” Brain 142(2):362-375. [cited by applicant]
Guerrero-Mendez, C. et al. (2024, e-pub. Nov. 15, 2023). “Factors Specifying Sex Determination in Maize,” Plant Reproduction 37:171-178. [cited by applicant]
Kusaba, M. et al. (Apr. 2004). “RNA Interference in Crop Plants,” Curr Opin Biotechnol. 15(2):139-143. [cited by applicant]
Schnable, J. A. et al. (Mar. 8, 2011, e-pub. Feb. 22, 2011). “Differentiation of the Maize Subgenomes by Genome Dominance and Both Ancient and Ongoing Gene Loss,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(10):4069-4074. [cited by applicant]
Slewinski, T. L. et al. (Nov. 2012, e-pub. Aug. 29, 2012). “Tie-dyed2 Encodes a Callose Synthase That Functions in Vein Development and Affects Symplastic Trafficking within the Phloem of Maize Leaves,” Plant Physiology… [cited by applicant]
Small, I. (Apr. 2007, e-pub. Feb. 6, 2007). “RNAi for Revealing and Engineering Plant Gene Functions,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 18:148-153. [cited by applicant]
Unniyampurath, U. et al. (Feb. 26, 2016). “RNA Interference in the Age of CRISPR: Will CRISPR Interfere with RNAi?” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17(3):291, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Arora, L. et al. (Nov. 8, 2017). “Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Caas 9 System,” Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1-21. [cited by applicant]
Izawa, T. et al. (Mar. 1996). “Becoming a Model Plant: The Importance of Rice to Plant Science,” Trends in Plant Science 1(3):95-99. [cited by applicant]