IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,748,158
Granted Patent B2
US 12,748,158 · App. 17/671,868 · Granted Sep 29, 2026

Demand response optimization

Inventors: Norman Lu (Fairview, TX); Maximilian Parness (Takoma Park, MD)
Assignee: TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
G01R31/392H02J7/50H02J7/84
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,748,158
App. No.
17/671,868
Granted
Sep 29, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example operation includes one or more of determining a degradation of one or more mobile energy storage (MES) and one or more fixed energy storage (FES) for a location at a future time and determining a combined energy capacity of the one or more MES and FES at the future time based on the degradation.

Claims (47)

1 . A method performed by a server, the method comprising:

determining a combined degradation that will occur at a future time for a fixed energy storage (FES) at a location and a mobile energy storage (MES);

determining that one or more of the MES or the FES will be needed based on an emergency need at a certain time;

determining a time to initiate charging of one or more of the MES or the FES based on the combined degradation and the certain time; and

initiating the charging of one or more of the MES or the FES.

2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining a current charge level of the MES and the FES; and

receiving information regarding an amount of energy received by a third party from at least one of the MES or the FES at the future time.

3 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

obtaining a temperature forecast for the location during an upcoming time period;

identifying an earliest date in the upcoming time period that a less efficient energy transfer may occur based on the temperature forecast and one or more of an MES location or an FES location; and

providing an energy transfer to the one or more of the MES or the FES before the earliest date.

4 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining an expected performance of one or more of the MES or the FES at the future time;

determining a historical change in peak energy demand at the future time;

determining a difference between the expected performance and the peak energy demand; and

recommending a change to one or more of the MES or the FES to minimize the difference.

5 . A system, comprising:

a processor that, when executing instructions stored in a memory, is configured to:

determine a combined degradation that will occur at a future time for a fixed energy storage (FES) at a location and a mobile energy storage (MES);

determine that one or more of the MES or the FES will be needed based on an emergency need at a certain time;

determine a time to initiate charging of one or more of the MES or the FES based on the combined degradation and the certain time; and

initiate the charging of one or more of the MES or the FES.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the processor is configured to:

determine a current charge level of the MES and the FES; and

receive information regarding an amount of energy received by a third party from at least one of the MES or the FES at the future time.

7 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the processor is configured to:

obtain a temperature forecast for the location for a future time period;

identify an earliest date in the upcoming time period that a less efficient energy transfer may occur based on the temperature forecast and one or more of an MES location or an FES location; and

provide an energy transfer to the one or more of the MES or the FES before the earliest date.

8 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the processor is configured to:

determine an expected performance of one or more of the MES or the FES at the future time;

determine a historical change in peak energy demand to the future time;

determine a difference between the expected performance and the peak energy demand; and

recommend a change to one or more of the MES or the FES to minimize the difference.

9 . A computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform:

determining a combined degradation that will occur at a future time for a fixed energy storage (FES) at a location and a mobile energy storage (MES);

determining that one or more of the MES or the FES will be needed based on an emergency need at a certain time;

determining a time to initiate charging of one or more of the MES or the FES based on the combined degradation and the certain time; and

initiating the charging of one or more of the MES or the FES.

10 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform:

determining a current charge level of the MES and the FES; and

receiving information regarding an amount of energy received by a third party from at least one of the MES or the FES at the future time.

11 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform:

obtaining a temperature forecast for the location during an upcoming time period;

identifying an earliest date in the upcoming time period that a less efficient energy transfer may occur based on the temperature forecast and one or more of an MES location or an FES location; and

providing an energy transfer to the one or more of the MES or the FES before the earliest date.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2022
From: LU, NORMAN; PARNESS, MAXIMILIAN
To: TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 059013/0048 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230258731A1 · Aug 17, 2023
References Cited (27)
US 9956887B2 · Duan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10014561B2 · Sood et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10026998B2 · Li et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10197632B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10222427B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10283820B2 · Sugeno et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10283968B2 · ElBsat et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10298026B2 · Trimboli et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10401433B2 · Chow et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10556510B2 · Yazami · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10625617B2 · Miyaki · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10855081B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11267358B2 · Smolenaers · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11270243B1 · Roy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20150039391A1 · Hershkovitz · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160162849A1 · Matsuyama · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160377686A1 · Uchida et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190176639A1 · Kumar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187212A1 · Garcia et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394709A1 · Cella · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210086647A1 · Kiessling · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220261715A1 · Roy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230080777A1 · Frenger · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230259992A1 · Gopal · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 105277890A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012196028A · 2012 [cited by examiner]
JP 6555347B2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]