Methods and apparatus for a virtual test cell
View Patent ↗A method for calibrating a physical test cell includes the steps of: determining a set of inputs to be provided to the physical test cell based in part on a set of historical test data; providing the inputs to the physical test cell and receiving a set of outputs associated therewith, wherein the providing includes implementing a sequential space filling sampling procedure to substantially cover a region defined by the set of historical values; creating a virtual test cell comprising one or more response surfaces based on the set of outputs; and interrogating the virtual test cell to determine a calibration relationship between at least one of the inputs and at least one of the outputs. Smooth Kriging may be used to determine the virtual test cell.
1. A method for calibrating a physical test cell, the method comprising:
determining a set of inputs to be provided to the physical test cell based in part on a set of historical test data;
providing the inputs to the physical test cell and receiving a set of outputs associated therewith, wherein the providing includes implementing a sequential space filling sampling procedure to substantially cover a region defined by the set of historical values;
creating a virtual test cell comprising one or more response surfaces based on the set of outputs, wherein creating the virtual test cell includes storing instructions within a computer-readable medium, the instructions being configured to cause a processor to produce a virtual test cell output based on a virtual test cell input and the one or more response surfaces; and
interrogating the virtual test cell to determine a calibration relationship between at least one of the inputs and at least one of the outputs, wherein the interrogating includes providing a set of test points to the virtual test cell and receiving a set of virtual test cell outputs corresponding to the set of test points on the one or more response surfaces.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein creating the virtual test cell includes performing a Kriging interpolation step.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the Kriging interpolation includes smooth Kriging.
4. The method of claim 1 , further including performing a convergence check on each response surface based on a set of monitoring points.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the response surfaces are not based on the monitoring points.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of interrogating includes interrogating a set of test points not included in the providing step.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step includes determining a boundary of the historical test data, determining a test plan, and determining the inputs from the intersection of the boundary and the test plan.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interrogating step includes utilizing an optimization procedure including objective functions and constraints.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sequential space-filling sampling includes selecting points based on minimizing a penalty measure.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the set of inputs includes determining a set of inputs associated with an automotive powertrain.
11. A calibration system comprising:
a physical test cell;
a test system communicatively coupled to the physical test cell, the test system configured to: determining a set of inputs to be provided to the physical test cell based in part on a set of historical test data; provide the inputs to the physical test cell and receiving a set of outputs associated therewith, wherein the providing includes implementing a sequential space filling sampling procedure to substantially cover a region defined by the set of historical values; create a virtual test cell comprising one or more response surfaces based on the set of outputs; and interrogate the virtual test cell to determine a calibration relationship between at least one of the inputs and at least one of the outputs by providing a set of test points to the virtual test cell and receiving a set of virtual test cell outputs corresponding to the set of test points on the one or more response surfaces.
12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the test system is configured to perform Kriging interpolation.
13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the test system performs a convergence check on each response surface based on a set of monitoring points, and wherein the response surfaces are not based on the monitoring points.
14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the test system is configured to determine the inputs from the intersection of a test plan and a boundary associated with the historical test data.
15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the test system utilizes an optimization procedure including objective functions and constraints.
16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the test system performs sequential space-filling sampling by selecting points based on minimizing a penalty measure.
17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the physical test cell is an automotive powertrain.
18. A method for calibrating an automotive component, the method comprising:
determining a set of inputs to be provided to the automotive component based in part on a set of historical test data;
providing the inputs to the automotive component and receiving a set of outputs associated therewith, wherein the providing includes implementing a sequential space filling sampling procedure to substantially cover a region defined by the set of historical values;
creating a virtual test cell comprising one or more response surfaces based on the set of outputs and Kriging interpolation, wherein creating the virtual test cell includes storing instructions within a computer-readable medium, the instructions being configured to cause a processor to produce a virtual test cell output based on a virtual test cell input and the one or more response surfaces;
checking for convergence of the response surfaces based on a set of monitoring points that are not themselves used to calculate the response surfaces;
interrogating the virtual test cell to determine a calibration relationship between at least one of the inputs and at least one of the outputs, wherein the interrogating includes providing a set of test points to the virtual test cell and receiving a set of virtual test cell outputs corresponding to the set of test points on the one or more response surfaces.
19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the determining step includes determining a boundary of the historical test data, determining a test plan, and determining the inputs from the intersection of the boundary and the test plan.
20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the interrogating step includes utilizing an optimization procedure including objective functions and constraints.