IP Library Granted Patent US 7,333,814
Granted Patent B2
US 7,333,814 · App. 10/379,998 · Granted Feb 19, 2008

Method of accommodating overlapping or adjacent networks

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,333,814
App. No.
10/379,998
Granted
Feb 19, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A multiple step process is performed at a local wireless network to limit interference between the local wireless network and a remote wireless network. Initially, a set of code words is chosen for the local wireless network to encode data with that have good cross correlation properties. If these initial code words are not adequate to prevent interference, then the local wireless network will adjust its transmission parameters by either shifting the transmission phase of its signals or by changing the code words it uses. If altering the transmission parameters does not alleviate the interference problem, then the local wireless network attempts to locate the interfering remote network and merge with it. If the merger is not possible or is unsuccessful, then the interference limiting process fails.

Claims (49)

1. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, comprising:

transmitting a first wireless signal within the local wireless network using a first set of transmission parameters;

performing a first signal analysis to determine whether the signal quality of the first wireless signal is above a quality threshold;

adjusting the first set of transmission parameters in the local wireless network to a second set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is below the quality threshold;

transmitting a second wireless signal within the local wireless network using the first set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is determined to be above the quality threshold in the step of performing a first signal analysis; and

transmitting a second wireless signal within the local wireless network using the second set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is determined to be below the quality threshold in the step of performing a first signal analysis,

wherein the first transmission parameters include a first transmission phase and a first set of code words used to encode data,

wherein the second transmission parameters include a second transmission phase and a second set of code words used to encode data, and

wherein the second transmission phase is the same as the first transmission phase and the second set of code words is different from the first set of code words.

2. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 1 ,

wherein the first set of code words has first cross correlation parameters such that correlation between any two of the first set of code words produces a first correlation value greater than an expected correlation value between two random code words, and

wherein the second set of code words has second cross correlation parameters such that correlation between any two of the second set of code words produces a second correlation value greater than the expected correlation, value between two random code words.

3. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a second signal analysis to determine whether the signal quality of the second wireless signal is above the quality threshold;

detecting whether a remote wireless network is in proximity with the local wireless network if the signal quality is below the quality threshold;

determining whether a merger of the local wireless network and the remote wireless network is acceptable, if the remote wireless network is detected; and

merging the local wireless network with the interfering wireless network if the determining step shows that the merger is acceptable.

4. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 3 , further comprising performing an error handling procedure if either detecting step does not detect the remote wireless network or the determining step shows that the merger is not acceptable.

5. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 3 ,

wherein the first set of code words has first cross correlation parameters such that correlation between any two of the first set of code words produces a first correlation value greater than an expected correlation value between two random code words, and

wherein the second set of code words has second cross correlation parameters such that correlation between any two of the second set of code words produces a second correlation value greater than the expected correlation value between two random code words.

6. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, comprising:

transmitting a first wireless signal within the local wireless network using a first set of transmission parameters;

performing a first signal analysis to determine whether the signal quality of the first wireless signal is above a quality threshold;

adjusting the first set of transmission parameters in the local wireless network to a second set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is below the quality threshold;

transmitting a second wireless signal within the local wireless network using the first set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is determined to be above the quality threshold in the step of performing a first signal analysis; and

transmitting a second wireless signal within the local wireless network using the second set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is determined to be below the quality threshold in the step of performing a first signal analysis,

wherein the first transmission parameters include a first transmission phase and a first set of code words used to encode data,

wherein the second transmission parameters include a second transmission phase and a second set of code words used to encode data, and

wherein the second transmission phase is different from the first transmission phase and the second set of code words is different from the first set of code words.

7. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 6 , wherein a difference between the second transmission phase and the first transmission phase is determined in a random manner.

8. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 6 ,

wherein the first set of code words has first cross correlation parameters such that correlation between any two of the first set of code words produces a first correlation value greater than an expected correlation value between two random code words, and

wherein the second set of code words has second cross correlation parameters such that correlation between any two of the second set of code words produces a second correlation value greater than the expected correlation value between two random code words.

9. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, comprising:

transmitting a first wireless signal within the local wireless network using a first set of transmission parameters;

performing a first signal analysis to determine whether the signal quality of the first wireless signal is above a quality threshold;

adjusting the first set of transmission parameters in the local wireless network to a second set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is below the quality threshold;

transmitting a second wireless signal within the local wireless network using the first set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is determined to be above the quality threshold in the step of performing a first signal analysis; and

transmitting a second wireless signal within the local wireless network using the second set of transmission parameters if the signal quality is determined to be below the quality threshold in the step of performing a first signal analysis,

performing a second signal analysis to determine whether the signal quality of the second wireless signal is above the quality threshold;

detecting whether a remote wireless network is in proximity with the local wireless network if the signal quality is below the quality threshold;

determining whether a merger of the local wireless network and the remote wireless network is acceptable, if the remote wireless network is detected; and

merging the local wireless network with the interfering wireless network if the determining step shows that the merger is acceptable.

10. A method of limiting interference in a local wireless network, as recited in claim 9 , further comprising performing an error handling procedure if either detecting step does not detect the remote wireless network or the determining step shows that the merger is not acceptable.

11. A method of limiting interference in a total wireless network, as recited in claim 9 ,

wherein the first transmission parameters include a first transmission phase and a first set of code words used to encode data,

wherein the second transmission parameters include a second transmission phase and a second set of code words used to encode data, and

wherein the second transmission phase is different from the first transmission phase and the second set of code words is the same as the first set of code words.

Assignments (23)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040925 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Feb 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V. F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 052917/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040928 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jan 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 052915/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037486 FRAME 0517. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Dec 10, 2019
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 053547/0421 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NO. FROM 13,883,290 TO 13,833,290 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 041703 FRAME 0536. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS.. Recorded Feb 20, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 048734/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE PATENTS 8108266 AND 8062324 AND REPLACE THEM WITH 6108266 AND 8060324 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037518 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 041703/0536 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 040928/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V., F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 040925/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2016
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: NORTH STAR INNOVATIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 037694/0264 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037518/0292 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 12, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037486/0517 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037354/0225 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037354/0688 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037356/0143 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037356/0553 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 6, 2013
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031591/0266 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 18, 2013
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030633/0424 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 13, 2010
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 024397/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 7, 2008
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 021194/0593 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 2, 2007
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; FREESCALE ACQUISITION CORPORATION; FREESCALE ACQUISITION HOLDINGS CORP.; FREESCALE HOLDINGS (BERMUDA) III, LTD.
To: CITIBANK, N.A. AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 018855/0129 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2005
From: MOTOROLA, INC.
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 015735/0156 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 7, 2004
From: MOTOROLA, INC
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 015360/0718 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 23, 2003
From: XTREMESPECTRUM, INC.
To: MOTOROLA, INC.
Reel/Frame 014815/0242 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2003
From: ROBERTS, RICHARD D.
To: XTREMESPECTRUM, INC.
Reel/Frame 014198/0681 →