IP Library Granted Patent US 7,308,002
Granted Patent B2
US 7,308,002 · App. 10/718,624 · Granted Dec 11, 2007

Packet type arbitrator in WLAN and corresponding arbitrating method

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,308,002
App. No.
10/718,624
Granted
Dec 11, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

This specification discloses a packet type arbitrator in a wireless local area network (WLAN) and its arbitrating method. The arbitrator contains at least two packet type detectors and a packet type decider. The packet type detector is installed with a false alarm checking module and a timer according to the strength of the packet for delaying the decision from the packet type decider. Through the checking mechanism of the false alarm checking module and the timer, erroneous decision can be avoided when determining the packet type.

Claims (22)

1. A packet type arbitrator for a wireless local area network (WLAN), which comprises:

a first packet type detector, which detects a received packet and includes a false alarm checking module;

a second packet type detector, which detects the received packet and includes a timer; and

a packet type decider, which couples to the first packet type detector and the second packet type detector for determining the type of the received packet;

wherein after each of the packet type detectors gets the received packet and the timer and/or the false alarm checking module checks the packet, the packet type decider determines the type of the packet being received.

2. The packet type arbitrator of claim 1 , wherein the false alarm checking module uses a delay correlation value or any other value that helps determine the existence of a packet and compares it with a threshold so that when the packet type detector identifies the received packet is of the type corresponding to the packet type detector if the value is greater than the threshold.

3. The packet type arbitrator of claim 1 , wherein the timer uses a time parameter to check whether the checking is done within the time specified by the time parameter.

4. The packet type arbitrator of claim 1 , wherein the first packet type has a larger strength while the second packet type has a smaller strength.

5. The packet type arbitrator of claim 4 , wherein any packet with a smaller strength is detected earlier than any packet with a larger strength.

6. A packet type arbitrating method for a wireless local area network (WLAN), which comprises the steps of:

associating a first packet type with a larger strength and a second packet type with a smaller strength;

installing a false alarm checking mechanism in a first packet type detector;

installing a timer in a second packet type detector;

starting a false alarm checking when the first packet type detector receives a packet;

starting a timer checking when the second packet type detector receives a packet; and

using a packet type decider determines the type of the packet being received after each of the packet type detectors receives a packet and the false alarm checking or the timer checks the packet.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the any packet with a smaller strength is detected earlier than any packet with a larger strength.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein when both the first packet type detector and the second packet type detector detect the received packet the type of the received packet is determined by whether the false alarm checking passes through.

9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the packet type decider determines the received packet is of the first packet type if the false alarm checking passes.

10. The method of claim 6 , wherein the packet type decider determines the received packet is of the second packet type if the false alarm checking fails.

11. The method of claim 6 , wherein the false alarm checking module uses a delay correlation value or any other value that helps determine the existence of a packet and compares it with a threshold so that when the packet type detector identifies the received packet is of the type corresponding to the packet type detector if the value is greater than the threshold.

12. The method of claim 6 , wherein the timer uses a time parameter to check whether the checking is done within the time specified by the time parameter.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2022
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED; SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATMEL CORPORATION; MICROSEMI CORPORATION; MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 059358/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 28, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 059666/0545 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED; SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATMEL CORPORATION; MICROSEMI CORPORATION; MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 059333/0222 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2018
From: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED; SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATMEL CORPORATION; MICROSEMI CORPORATION; MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047103/0206 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2018
From: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED; SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATMEL CORPORATION; MICROSEMI CORPORATION; MICROSEMI STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 046426/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2017
From: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041675/0617 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2015
From: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY (BARBADOS) II INCORPORATED
To: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 036631/0442 →
MERGER Recorded Sep 6, 2015
From: ISSC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
To: MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY (BARBADOS) II INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 036561/0944 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 18, 2011
From: INTEGRATED SYSTEM SOLUTION CORP.
To: ISSC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Reel/Frame 027082/0905 →
CORRECTION TO ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 014742, FRAME 0695 Recorded Aug 15, 2005
From: LIAO, YEN-CHIN; MA, KUANG-PING; CHIU, CHIA-YUNG; HUANG, ERIC; CHEN, ALBERT
To: INTEGRATED SYSTEM SOLUTION CORP.
Reel/Frame 016888/0500 →
RE-RECORD TO CORRECT SIGNATURE PAGE ON A DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 014742, FRAME 0695 Recorded Aug 4, 2004
From: LIAO, YEN-CHIN; MA, KUANG-PING; CHIU, CHIA-YUNG; HUANG, ERIC; CHEN, ALBERT
To: INTEGRATED SYSTEM SOLUTIONS CORP.
Reel/Frame 016533/0247 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 24, 2003
From: LIAO, YEN-CHIN; MA, KUANG-PING; CHIU, CHIA-YUNG; HUANG, ERIC; CHEN, ALBERT
To: INTEGRATED SYSTEMS SOLUTION CORP.
Reel/Frame 014742/0695 →