IP Library Granted Patent US 7,019,835
Granted Patent B2
US 7,019,835 · App. 10/782,187 · Granted Mar 28, 2006

Method and system to measure characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,019,835
App. No.
10/782,187
Granted
Mar 28, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention is directed to providing a method and system to measure characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate. The method includes identifying a plurality of processing regions on the film; measuring characteristics of a subset of the plurality of processing regions, defining measured characteristics; determining a variation of one of the measured characteristics; and associating a cause of the variations based upon a comparison of the one of the measured characteristics to measured characteristics associated with the remaining processing regions of the subset. The system carries out the aforementioned method.

Claims (47)

1. A method for measuring characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate, said method comprising:

identifying a plurality of processing regions on said film;

measuring characteristics of a subset of said plurality of processing regions, defining measured characteristics;

determining a variation of one of said measured characteristics; and

associating a cause of said variation based upon a comparison of said one of said measured characteristics to measured characteristics associated with the remaining processing regions of said subset.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said variation is a defect.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said variation is an alignment error.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said variation is a critical dimension variation.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said cause is selected from a set of causes comprising a defect associated with an imprint head defining an imprint head defect, a defect associated with a support stack defining a support stack defect, a defect associated with a template defining a template defect and a defect associated with a substrate defining a substrate defect.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein measuring further includes obtaining a predetermined number of measurements in one of said plurality of processing regions and quantizing said predetermined number of measurements and obtaining a mean value and, with determining said variation further including comparing said mean value with a predetermined threshold.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein measuring further includes obtaining a predetermined number of measurements in one of said plurality of processing regions and quantizing said predetermined number of measurements and obtaining a mean value and a standard deviation from said mean value, with determining said variation further including comparing said standard deviation with a predetermined threshold.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein associating further includes ascertaining an additional variation in remaining processing regions of said subset having features common to said variation and associating said cause with one of a detect associated with a template defining a template defect and a defect associated with an imprint head defining an imprint head defect.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein associating further includes finding an absence of similarities between said variation and characteristics of the remaining processing regions of said subset and associating said cause with one of a defect associated with a support stack defining a support stack defect and defect associated with a substrate defining a substrate defect.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein measuring further includes impinging optical radiation upon said plurality of processing regions and sensing optical radiation reflecting from said film containing information corresponding to said characteristics.

11. A method for measuring characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate, said method comprising:

identifying a plurality of processing regions on said film;

measuring characteristics of a subset of said plurality of processing regions, defining measured characteristics;

obtaining a mean value and a standard deviation from said mean value for one of said measured characteristics;

determining a variation of said one of said measured characteristics by comparing said standard deviation with a predetermined threshold; and

associating a cause of said variation based upon a comparison of said one of said measured characteristics to measured characteristics associated with the remaining processing regions of said subset.

12. The method as recited in claim 11 wherein said cause is selected from a set of causes comprising a defect associated with an imprint head defining an imprint head defect, a defect associated with a support stack defining a support stack defect, a defect associated with a template defining a template defect and a defect associated with a substrate defining a substrate defect.

13. The method as recited in claim 11 wherein said cause is selected from a set of causes consisting of an alignment error and a critical dimension variation.

14. The method as recited in claim 12 wherein associating further includes ascertaining an additional variation in remaining processing regions of said subset having features common to said variation and associating said cause with one of said template defect and said imprint head defect.

15. The method as recited in claim 12 wherein associating further includes finding an absence of similarities between said variation and characteristics of the remaining processing regions of said subset and associating said cause with one of said substrate defect and said support stack detect.

16. A method for measuring characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate, said method comprising:

identifying a plurality of processing regions on said film;

measuring characteristics of a subset of said plurality of processing regions, defining measured characteristics;

determining an anomaly among said measured characteristics; and

associating a source of said anomaly based upon a comparison of said anomaly in said measured characteristics with characteristics in the remaining of said processing regions.

17. The method as recited in claim 16 wherein said source is selected from a set of causes comprising a defect associated with an imprint head defining an imprint head defect, a defect associated with a support stack defining a support stack defect, a defect associated with a template defining a template defect and a defect associated with a substrate defining a substrate defect.

18. The method as recited in claim 17 wherein measuring further includes obtaining a predetermined number of measurements in one of said plurality of processing regions and quantizing said predetermined number of measurements and obtaining a mean value and comparing said mean value with a predetermined threshold.

19. The method as recited in claim 17 wherein measuring further includes obtaining a predetermined number of measurements in one of said plurality of processing regions and quantizing said predetermined number of measurements and obtaining a mean value and a standard deviation from said mean value and comparing said standard deviation with a predetermined threshold.

20. The method as recited in claim 19 wherein associating further includes ascertaining an additional defect in the remaining processing regions of said subset having features common to said defect and associating said cause with one of said imprint head defect and said template defect.

21. The method as recited in claim 19 wherein associating further includes finding an absence of similarities between said defect and said additional defect in the remaining processing regions of said subset and associating said cause with one of said support stack defect and said substrate defect.

22. The method as recited in claim 19 wherein measuring further includes impinging optical radiation upon said plurality of processing regions and sensing optical radiation film containing information corresponding to said characteristics.

23. A system for measuring characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate, said system comprising:

a substrate support stack;

a substrate disposed on said substrate support stack;

an imprint head;

a template disposed on said imprint head;

a sensing system; and

a means for identifying a plurality of processing regions, a subset of which has characteristics associated therewith, and ascertaining a cause of an anomaly in characteristics of one of said plurality of processing regions by comparing of the characteristics of said one of said plurality of processing regions with characteristics associated with the remaining processing regions of said subset.

24. The system as recited in claim 23 further including a source of radiation to direct radiation along a path toward said support stack, with said template being disposed within said path and being transparent to said radiation.

25. The system as recited in claim 23 wherein said means for identifying further includes a processor and a memory device storing code to be operated on said processor, with said code including a first subroutine to control said sensing device to impinge optical radiation on the plurality of processing region of said subset and detect optical radiation reflected therefrom.

26. The system as recited in claim 25 wherein said cause is selected from a set of causes comprising a defect associated with an imprint head defining an imprint head defect, a defect associated with a support stack defining a support stack detect, a defect associated with a template defining a template defect and a defect associated with a substrate defining a substrate defect.

27. The system as recited in claim 25 said code further includes a second subroutine to control the operations of sad sensing device to obtain a predetermined number of measurements in said one of said plurality of processing regions and quantizing said predetermined number of measurements to obtain a mean value, with said first subroutine determining said variation by comparing said mean value with a predetermined threshold.

28. The system as recited in claim 25 said code further includes a second subroutine to control the operations of said sensing device to obtain a predetermined number of measurements in said one of said plurality of processing regions and quantizing said predetermined number of measurements to obtain a mean value and a standard deviation from said mean value, with said first subroutine determining said variation by comparing said standard deviation value with a predetermined threshold.

Assignments (13)
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Nov 7, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 050967/0138 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 22, 2019
From: MAGIC LEAP, INC.; MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.; MENTOR ACQUISITION ONE, LLC
To: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 050138/0287 →
CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT OF JOINT PATENT OWNERSHIP Recorded Apr 27, 2015
From: CANON NANOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 035507/0559 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 30, 2014
From: MII NEWCO, INC.
To: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 033449/0684 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 24, 2014
From: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
To: CANON NANOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033400/0184 →
ASSIGNMENT OF JOINT OWNERSHIP Recorded Jul 15, 2014
From: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
To: MII NEWCO, INC.
Reel/Frame 033329/0280 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR AND ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033161 FRAME 0705. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 25, 2014
From: CANON INC.
To: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 033227/0398 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 13, 2014
From: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
To: CANON INC.
Reel/Frame 033161/0705 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE FROM AN "ASSIGNMENT" TO "SECURITY AGREEMENT" PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026842 FRAME 0929. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT SUBMITTED WAS A "SECURITY AGREEMENT". Recorded Aug 13, 2013
From: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
To: CANON INC.
Reel/Frame 031003/0031 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 1, 2011
From: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
To: CANON INC.
Reel/Frame 026842/0929 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 27, 2007
From: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING IV, INC.
To: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 019072/0882 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 11, 2005
From: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
To: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING IV, INC.
Reel/Frame 016133/0369 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2004
From: MCMACKIN, IAN M.; SCHUMAKER, PHILLIP D.; CHOI, BYUNG-JIN; SREENIVASAN, SIDLGATA V.; WATTS, MICHAEL P.C.
To: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 015068/0045 →