IP Library Granted Patent US 7,612,891
Granted Patent B2
US 7,612,891 · App. 11/300,945 · Granted Nov 3, 2009

Measurement of thin films using fourier amplitude

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,612,891
App. No.
11/300,945
Granted
Nov 3, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

Thin-film thickness and refractive index are measured using the Fourier amplitude of a broadband interferometric spectrum. Due to the smooth nature of the Fourier amplitude as a function of wavelength, as compared to the fast varying Fourier phase conventionally used to measure thickness, increased stability and repeatability of measurement are achieved. As a result, measurements of ultra-thin films with thickness below 100 nm are possible with reliable results.

Claims (90)

1. A method for determining a property of a thin film placed over a substrate, comprising the following steps:

producing a test correlogram of said thin film over the substrate;

generating a test linear transform of the test correlogram and extracting a test transform amplitude from the test linear transform;

deriving a test-beam amplitude component of said test transform amplitude by removing a reference amplitude function, wherein the reference amplitude function comprises the product of the amplitude components contributed by the light source and the reference beam; and

finding a value of said property of the thin film by comparing said test-beam amplitude component to a model test-beam amplitude function.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said reference amplitude function is obtained by calibration using a reference substrate having a known reflectivity over a predetermined waveband.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein said calibration comprises the steps of:

generating a calibration correlogram with a broadband light source included within said predetermined waveband;

generating a calibration linear transform of the calibration correlogram;

extracting a calibration transform amplitude from the calibration linear transform; and

establishing said reference amplitude function from said calibration transform amplitude and said known reflectivity of the reference substrate, said reference amplitude function representing light-source and reference-beam amplitude components of the calibration transform amplitude.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein said known reflectivity of the reference substrate is substantially constant over said predetermined waveband.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein said reference amplitude function is established by dividing said calibration transform amplitude by a spectral amplitude of a test beam reflected from said reference substrate during said calibration steps.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said test-beam amplitude component is calculated by dividing the test transform amplitude by said reference amplitude function.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said finding step is carried out by defining an error function equal to a difference between said test-beam amplitude component and said model test-beam amplitude function, and by minimizing said error function with respect to said property of the thin film.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said model test-beam amplitude function is derived from a theoretical expression modeling a reflection from said thin film over the substrate.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein said theoretical expression is

ρ

(

k

,

d

)

=

r

01

+

r

12

exp

(

-

ⅈ2δ

)

1

+

r

01

r

12

exp

(

-

ⅈ2δ

)

=

b

(

k

,

d

)

exp

[

ⅈϕ

(

k

,

d

,

θ

)

]

,

where ρ(k,d) is a coefficient of total reflection, r 01 is a Fresnel coefficient of reflection at an incident-medium to film boundary, r 12 is a Fresnel coefficient of reflection at a film to substrate boundary, δ=2 knd cos θ is a phase difference between consecutive reflections off the film, n is an index of refraction of the film at wavenumber k, θ is a refractive angle in the film, d is a film thickness, and b′(k,d) is said theoretical test-beam amplitude function.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said reference amplitude function is derived from an optical model.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said linear transform is a Fourier transform.

12. The method of claim 3 , wherein said linear transform is a Fourier transform.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein said property is a thickness of the thin film.

14. The method of claim 3 , wherein said property is a thickness of the thin film.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein said property is an index of refraction of the thin film.

16. The method of claim 3 , wherein said property is an index of refraction of the thin film.

17. The method of claim 3 , wherein said linear transform is a Fourier transform; said property is a thickness of the thin film; said reference amplitude function is established by dividing said calibration transform amplitude by a spectral amplitude of a test beam reflected from said reference substrate during the calibration steps; said test-beam amplitude component is calculated by dividing the test transform amplitude by said reference amplitude function; said finding step is carried out by defining an error function equal to a difference between said test-beam amplitude component and said theoretical test-beam amplitude function, and by minimizing said error function with respect to said thickness of the thin film; and said model test-beam amplitude function is derived from a theoretical expression modeling a reflection from said thin film over the substrate.

18. The method of claim 3 , wherein said linear transform is a Fourier transform; said property is an index of refraction of the thin film; said reference amplitude function is established by dividing said calibration transform amplitude by a spectral amplitude of a test beam reflected from said reference substrate during the calibration steps; said test-beam amplitude component is calculated by dividing the test transform amplitude by said reference amplitude function; said finding step is carried out by defining an error function equal to a difference between said test-beam amplitude component and said theoretical test-beam amplitude function, and by minimizing said error function with respect to said index of refraction of the thin film; and said model test-beam amplitude function is derived from a theoretical expression modeling a reflection from said thin film over the substrate.

19. The method of claim 13 , further including the step of determining a profile of said substrate using said thickness of the thin film.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein said step of determining a profile of the substrate includes utilizing phase information extracted from said test correlogram.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein said thin film includes multiple layers, said property is a thickness of each layer, and said thickness of each layer is determined using a corresponding model test-beam amplitude function.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein said steps are repeated using light of different polarization to identify a bi-refringent thin film.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 11, 2012
From: VEECO METROLOGY INC.
To: BRUKER NANO INC.
Reel/Frame 028350/0420 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 28, 2010
From: VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
To: VEECO METROLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 025051/0290 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2005
From: WAN, DER-SHEN
To: VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
Reel/Frame 016955/0259 →