IP Library Granted Patent US 7,739,639
Granted Patent B2
US 7,739,639 · App. 11/413,236 · Granted Jun 15, 2010

Method and apparatus of core timing prediction of core logic in the chip-level implementation process through an over-core window on a chip-level routing layer

Assignee: LSI Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,739,639
App. No.
11/413,236
Granted
Jun 15, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and/or an apparatus of core timing prediction is disclosed. In one embodiment, a method may include generating a core timing model of a core logic that is accurately transferable to any chip-level integration process. The method may reduce performance degradation and/or performance variation of the core logic caused by a number of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components in the chip-level integration process. In addition, the core timing model of the core logic may be generated by filling un-wired tracks with metal in any of an outermost layer of the core logic after a core logic routing and constructing a layer at least an area of and adjacent to any of the outermost layer of the core logic with grounded metal that is orthogonal to those of the metal used in the outermost layer of the core logic.

Claims (31)

1. A method, comprising:

generating a core timing model of a core logic that is accurately transferable to any chip-level integration process using a processor,

wherein there is an over-core window on a chip-level routing layer;

reducing any of a performance degradation and performance variation of the core logic caused by a plurality of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components in the chip-level integration process,

wherein to minimize impact of a parasitic environment of the core logic in which the core timing model of the core logic generated is reduced by grounded metal; and

reducing any of a cross-talk effect and a capacitive coupling effect and modeling any of a timing change and a behavior change due to any of a residual cross-talk effect and a residual capacitive coupling effect.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating the core timing model of the core logic after metal filling un-wired tracks in any of an outermost layer of the core logic after a core logic routing.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising constructing a core logic layer and any of a chip-level routing layer, having routes that are thinner and routes that are thicker, with the grounded metal of physical characteristics typical for routing in the layer,

wherein the grounded metal resides within a core window substantially similar to an area of the core logic, and

wherein no routing takes place within the over-core window of any of the chip-level routing layer.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising constructing the parasitic environment of the core logic caused by a plurality of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components preceding any chip-level integration process.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising reproducing the parasitic environment of the core logic caused by any of the plurality of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components during any chip-level integration process.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating the core timing model of the core logic to represent any over-core routing of any chip-level components preceding the chip-level integration process.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising decreasing a variation range of the core timing model to represent the over-core routing of any of the chip-level components.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising mitigating a fabrication process variation at the chip-level integration process on the accuracy of the core timing model.

9. A method, comprising:

generating a core timing model of a core logic that is accurately transferable to any chip-level integration process using a processor,

wherein there is an over-core window on a chip-level routing layer;

reducing any of a performance degradation and performance variation of the core logic caused by a plurality of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components in the chip-level integration process,

wherein to minimize impact of a parasitic environment of the core logic in which the core timing model of the core logic generated is reduced by grounded metal;

reducing any of a cross-talk effect and a capacitive coupling effect and modeling any of a timing change and a behavior change due to any of a residual cross-talk effect and a residual capacitive coupling effect; and

mitigating a fabrication process variation at any chip-level integration process on the accuracy of the core timing model.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising generating the core timing model of the core logic after metal filling un-wired tracks in any of an outermost layer of the core logic after a core logic routing.

11. The method of claim 9 further comprising constructing

a core logic layer and any of a chip-level routing layer, having routes that are thinner and routes that are thicker, with the grounded metal of physical characteristics typical for routing in the layer,

wherein the grounded metal resides within a core window substantially similar to an area of the core logic, and

wherein no routing takes place within the over-core window of any of the chip-level routing layer.

12. The method of claim 9 further comprising constructing the parasitic environment of the core logic caused by a plurality of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components preceding any chip-level integration process.

13. The method of claim 12 further comprising reproducing the parasitic environment of the core logic caused by any of the plurality of interactions between core logic components and chip-level components during any chip-level integration process.

14. The method of claim 9 further comprising generating the core timing model of the core logic to represent any over-core routing of any chip-level components preceding the chip-level integration process.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising decreasing a variation range of the core timing model to represent the over-core routing of any of the chip-level components.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2022
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
To: HILCO PATENT ACQUISITION 56, LLC; BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC
Reel/Frame 059720/0223 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2018
From: HILCO PATENT ACQUISITION 56, LLC; BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045216/0020 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2017
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.; BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC
Reel/Frame 044887/0109 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 3, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 041710/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037808/0001 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (RELEASES RF 032856-0031) Recorded Feb 2, 2016
From: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: LSI CORPORATION; AGERE SYSTEMS LLC
Reel/Frame 037684/0039 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 3, 2015
From: LSI CORPORATION
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 035390/0388 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 8, 2014
From: LSI CORPORATION; AGERE SYSTEMS LLC
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 032856/0031 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 15, 2012
From: LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
To: LSI CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029124/0870 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2006
From: MOLINA, RUBEN SALVADOR; TETELBAUM, ALEXANDER
To: LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 017822/0067 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070256041A1 · Nov 1, 2007