IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,008,853
Granted Patent B2
US 11,008,853 · App. 16/297,465 · Granted May 18, 2021

Performing a downhole pressure test

Inventors: Christopher Michael Jones (Katy, TX); Bin Dai (Spring, TX); James M. Price (The Woodlands, TX); Anthony Herman van Zuilekom (Houston, TX); Darren George Gascooke (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B47/06G01V9/00G01V99/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,008,853
App. No.
16/297,465
Granted
May 18, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for performing a pressure test. The method may comprise inserting a formation testing tool into a wellbore to a first location within the wellbore, identifying one or more tool parameters of the formation testing tool, performing a first pre-test with the pressure transducer when the pressure has stabilized to identify formation parameters, inputting the formation parameters and the one or more tool parameters into a forward model, changing the one or more tool parameters to a second set of tool parameters; performing a second pre-test with the second set of tool parameters; and comparing the first pre-test to the second pre-test. A system may comprise at least one probe, a pump disposed within the formation testing tool, at least one stabilizer, a pressure transducer disposed at least partially in the at least one fluid passageway, and an information handling system.

Claims (48)

1. A method for performing a pressure test comprising:

inserting a formation testing tool into a wellbore to a first location within the wellbore, wherein the formation testing tool includes:

at least one probe;

a pump disposed within the formation testing tool and connect to the at least one probe by at least one probe channel and at least one fluid passageway; and

at least one stabilizer disposed on an opposite side of the formation testing tool as the at least one probe;

identifying one or more tool parameters of the formation testing tool;

activating the at least one stabilizer, wherein the at least one stabilizer is activated into a surface of the wellbore;

activating the at least one probe, wherein the at least one probe is activated into a mudcake, wherein the mudcake is disposed on the surface of the wellbore;

activating the pump, wherein a formation fluid is drawn in through the at least one probe into the at least one probe channel and the at least one fluid passageway by the pump and increasing pressure with the at least one fluid passageway;

reading the pressure in the at least one fluid passageway by a pressure transducer;

performing a first pre-test with the pressure transducer when the pressure has stabilized to identify formation parameters;

inputting the formation parameters and the one or more tool parameters into a forward model;

changing the one or more tool parameters to a second set of tool parameters;

performing a second pre-test with the second set of tool parameters; and

comparing the first pre-test to the second pre-test.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing the pressure test within a safety envelope.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising performing a third pre-test with a third drawdown.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the third pre-test is a quality control test with a complete buildup.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second pre-test includes a second drawdown with at least a partial buildup using results of the forward model.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising creating the forward model from historical pressure test which include one or more drawdown volumes, one or more drawdown rates, one or more drawdown pressures, the one or more tool parameters, or the formation parameters, and a figure of merit.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the forward model is a Gaussian Process Regression model, Gradient Boosted Regression model, K nearest neighbor's model, support vector machine model, multi-layer perceptron, or artificial neural network model.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing the pressure testing with one or more tool parameters identified by the forward model.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the forward model includes historic pressure test from an analog well.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing three more pre-test and changing the one or more tool parameters during each pre-test.

11. A system for performing a pressure test comprising:

a formation testing tool comprising:

at least one probe;

a pump disposed within the formation testing tool and connect to the at least one probe by at least one probe channel and at least one fluid passageway;

at least one stabilizer disposed on an opposite side of the formation testing tool as the at least one probe;

a pressure transducer disposed at least partially in the at least one fluid passageway; and

an information handling system configured to:

input one or more formation parameters and one or more tool parameters into a forward model from a first pre-test;

change the one or more tool parameters to a second set of tool parameters for a second pre-test; and

compare the first pre-test to the second pre-test.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the information handling system is further configured to create the forward model from historical pressure test which include one or more drawdown volumes, one or more drawdown rates, one or more drawdown pressures, the one or more tool parameters, or the one or more formation parameters, and a figure of merit.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the forward model is a Gaussian Process Regression model, Gradient Boosted Regression model, K nearest neighbor's model, support vector machine model, multi-layer perceptron, or artificial neural network model.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the forward model includes historic pressure test from an analog well.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the information handling system is further configured to change the one or more tool parameters three or more times for three or more pre-test.

16. A method for performing a pressure test comprising:

performing a first pre-test with a pressure transducer when pressure has stabilized to identify one or more formation parameters;

inputting the one or more formation parameters and one or more tool parameters into a forward model;

changing the one or more tool parameters to a second set of one or more tool parameters;

performing a second pre-test with the second set of one or more tool parameters; and

comparing the first pre-test to the second pre-test.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising performing the first pre-test and the second pre-test within a safety envelope.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the second pre-test include a second drawdown with at least a partial buildup using results from the forward model.

19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising performing a third pre-test with a third drawdown.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the third pre-test is a quality control test with a complete buildup.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2023
From: JONES, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 065796/0666 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF 4TH INVENTORS LAST NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 050001 FRAME: 0716. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 15, 2020
From: JONES, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL; DAI, BIN; PRICE, JAMES M.; VAN ZUILEKOM, ANTHONY HERMAN; GASCOOKE, DARREN GEORGE
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 054762/0088 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2019
From: JONES, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL; DAI, BIN; PRICE, JAMES M.; VAN ZUILEKOM, ANTHONY HERMAN; GASCOOKE, DARREN GEORGE
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 050001/0716 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200284140A1 · Sep 10, 2020
Cited By (4)
US 12,265,196 US 12,467,357 US 12,473,823 US 12,596,109