IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,702,215
Granted Patent B2
US 10,702,215 · App. 16/674,979 · Granted Jul 7, 2020

Systems and methods for dynamically and intelligently monitoring a host's glycemic condition after an alert is triggered

Inventors: Hari Hampapuram (Portland, OR); Anna Leigh Davis (Cardiff by the Sea, CA); Naresh C. Bhavaraju (San Diego, CA); Apurv Ullas Kamath (San Diego, CA); Claudio Cobelli (Padua, IT); Giovanni Sparacino (Padua, IT); Andrea Facchinetti (Padua, IT); Chiara Zecchin (Pernumia, IT)
Assignee: DexCom, Inc.
A61B5/746A61B5/0004A61B5/0022A61B5/0031A61B5/14503A61B5/14532A61B5/4848A61B5/4866A61B5/7221A61B5/7275G06F19/00A61B5/002
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,702,215
App. No.
16/674,979
Granted
Jul 7, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for providing sensitive and specific alarms indicative of glycemic condition are provided herein. In an embodiment, a method of processing sensor data by a continuous analyte sensor includes: evaluating sensor data using a first function to determine whether a real time glucose value meets a first threshold; evaluating sensor data using a second function to determine whether a predicted glucose value meets a second threshold; activating a hypoglycemic indicator if either the first threshold is met or if the second threshold is predicted to be met; and providing an output based on the activated hypoglycemic indicator.

Claims (38)

1. A method of activating hypoglycemic indicators based on continuous glucose sensor data, the method comprising:

evaluating sensor data using a first function to determine whether a real time glucose value meets one or more user settable first criteria;

evaluating sensor data using a second function to determine whether a parameter indicative of glucose value meets one or more non user settable second criteria;

providing an output including a first hypoglycemic indicator if the one or more user settable first criteria is met, and providing an output including a second hypoglycemic indicator if the one or more non user settable second criteria are met.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating sensor data using a first function to determine whether a real time glucose value meets one or more user settable first criteria comprises determining whether the real-time glucose value passes a glucose threshold.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the evaluating sensor data using a first function to determine whether a real time glucose value meets one or more user settable first criteria further comprises determining whether an amplitude of rate of change or direction of rate of change meets a rate of change criterion.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating sensor data using a first function to determine whether the real time glucose value meets one or more user settable first criteria comprises evaluating a static risk of a substantially real time glucose value.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating sensor data using a second function to determine whether the parameter indicative of glucose value meets one or more second criteria comprises evaluating a dynamic risk of the predicted glucose value.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second function comprises an artificial neural network model that uses at least one of exercise, stress, illness or surgery to determine the parameter indicative of glucose value, and wherein the parameter is a predicted glucose value.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second function utilizes a first order autoregressive model to determine the parameter indicative of glucose value, and wherein the parameter is a predicted glucose value.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the first order autoregressive model comprises a parameter alpha, and wherein alpha is estimated recursively each time a sensor data point is received.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating the sensor data using the first function and the second function allows for increased warning time of hypoglycemic alerts without substantially increasing the number of alerts as compared to evaluating the sensor data using the first function without evaluating the sensor data using the second function.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more user settable first criteria comprises a first threshold that is configured to be user settable.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the one or more non user settable second criteria comprises a second threshold that is not user settable.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hypoglycemic indicator comprises a flag that has a particular set of instructions associated with it depending on whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the first function meeting the one or more user settable first criteria or whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the second function meeting the one or more non user settable second criteria.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the output comprises at least one of an audible, tactile or visual output, and wherein the output is differentiated and/or provides information selectively based on whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the first function meeting the one or more user settable first criteria or whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the second function meeting the one or more non user settable second criteria.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein providing an output comprises transmitting a message to an insulin delivery device including instructions associated with at least one of: a) suspending insulin delivery, b) initiating a hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia minimizer algorithm, c) controlling insulin delivery or d) information associated with the hypoglycemia indicator.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more non user settable second criteria are programmed at the factory in such a way that no user is able to modify the second criteria.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the user is a host or a healthcare provider.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second function provides no more than one additional alarm per week based on a retrospective analysis comparing the use of the first function and the second function together as compared to the first function alone.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating the sensor data using the first function and the second function provides increased warning time of hypoglycemic alerts without substantially increasing the number of alerts as compared to evaluating the sensor data using the first function without evaluating the sensor data using the second function.

19. A system for processing data, the system comprising:

a continuous analyte sensor configured to be implanted within a body; and

sensor electronics configured to receive and process sensor data output by the sensor, the sensor electronics including a processor configured to:

evaluate sensor data using a first function to determine whether a real time glucose value meets one or more user settable first criteria;

evaluate sensor data using a second function to determine whether a parameter indicative of a glucose value meets one or more non-user settable second criteria;

activate a first hypoglycemic indicator if the one or more user settable first criteria is met and activate a second hypoglycemic indicator if the one or more non user settable second criteria are met; and

provide an output based on the activated hypoglycemic indicator.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein evaluating the sensor data using the first function and the second function allows for increased warning time of hypoglycemic alerts without substantially increasing the number of alerts as compared to evaluating the sensor data using the first function without evaluating the sensor data using the second function.

21. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more user settable first criteria comprises a first threshold that is configured to be user settable.

22. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more non user settable second criteria comprises a second threshold that is not user settable.

23. The system of claim 19 , wherein the hypoglycemic indicator comprises a flag that has a particular set of instructions associated with it depending on whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the first function meeting the one or more user settable first criteria or whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the second function meeting the one or more non user settable second criteria.

24. The system of claim 19 , wherein the output comprises at least one of an audible, tactile or visual output, and wherein the output is differentiated and/or provides information selectively based on whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the first function meeting the one or more user settable first criteria or whether the hypoglycemic indicator was activated based on the second function meeting the one or more non user settable second criteria.

25. The system of claim 19 , wherein providing output comprises transmitting a message to an insulin delivery device including instructions associated with at least one of: a) suspending insulin delivery, b) initiating a hypoglycemia and/or hyperglycemia minimizer algorithm, c) controlling insulin delivery or d) information associated with the hypoglycemia indicator.

26. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more non user settable second criteria are programmed at the factory in such a way that no user is able to modify the non user settable second criteria.

27. The system of claim 19 , wherein the user is a host or a healthcare provider.

28. The system of claim 19 , wherein the second function provides no more than one additional alarm per week based on a retrospective analysis comparing the use of the first function and the second function together as compared to the first function alone.

29. The system of claim 19 , wherein the evaluation of the sensor data using the first function and the second function provides increased warning time of hypoglycemic alerts without substantially increasing the number of alerts as compared to evaluation of the sensor data using the first function without evaluation of the sensor data using the second function.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2020
From: COBELLI, CLAUDIO; FACCHINETTI, ANDREA; SPARACINO, GIOVANNI; ZECCHIN, CHIARA
To: UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA
Reel/Frame 052239/0919 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2020
From: BHAVARAJU, NARESH C.; HAMPAPURAM, HARI; KAMATH, APURV ULLAS; RACK-GOMER, ANNA LEIGH
To: DEXCOM, INC.
Reel/Frame 052239/0963 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2020
From: UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA
To: DEXCOM, INC.
Reel/Frame 052239/0980 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 16172550 · Oct 26, 2018
Continuation 15486704 · Apr 13, 2017
Continuation 14720668 · May 22, 2015
Continuation 13742841 · Jan 16, 2013
Continuation 13742694 · Jan 16, 2013
Provisional Application 61720286 · Oct 30, 2012
Related Publication 20200060630A1 · Feb 27, 2020
Cited By (12)
US 12,310,721 US 12,357,246 US 12,364,419 US 12,397,111 US 12,402,813 US 12,440,172 US 12,440,173 US 12,482,558 US 12,569,172 US 12,642,464 US 12,702,361 US 12,727,833