IP Library Granted Patent US 12,045,969
Granted Patent B2
US 12,045,969 · App. 17/034,640 · Granted Jul 23, 2024

Automated root cause analysis for defect detection during fabrication processes of semiconductor structures

Inventors: Jens Timo Neumann (Aalen, DE); Eugen Foca (Ellwangen, DE); Ramani Pichumani (Palo Alto, CA); Abhilash Srikantha (Neu-Ulm, DE); Christian Wojek (Aalen, DE); Thomas Korb (Schwaebisch Gmuend, DE); Joaquin Correa (Oakland, CA)
Assignee: Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
G06T7/0004H01L22/26G06T2207/10061G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30148
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,045,969
App. No.
17/034,640
Granted
Jul 23, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes obtaining at least one 2-D image dataset of semiconductor structures formed on a wafer including one or more defects during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process. The method also includes determining, based on at least one machine-learning algorithm trained on prior knowledge of the fabrication process and based on the at least one 2-D image dataset, one or more process deviations of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the one or more defects. A 3-D image dataset may be determined as a hidden variable.

Claims (49)

1. A method, comprising:

during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process, obtaining a 2-D image dataset of 3-D semiconductor structures formed on the wafer, the wafer comprising a defect of one of the 3-D semiconductor structures;

using a machine-learning algorithm to determine, based on the 2-D image dataset, a probability distribution of multiple 3-D image datasets imaging the defect, the probability distribution assigning probabilities to each of the multiple 3-D image datasets;

responsive to the probability distribution of the multiple 3-D image datasets comprising equal probabilities for two or more of the multiple 3-D image datasets due to ambiguity of a projection the 3-D semiconductor structures into an imaging plane of the 2-D image dataset, obtaining a further 2-D image dataset of the 3-D semiconductor structures to reduce the ambiguity, the 2-D image dataset and the further 2-D image dataset depicting the 3-D semiconductor structures using different poses; and

based on at least one of the 3-D image datasets, determining a process deviation of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the defect of the one of the 3-D semiconductor structures.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine-learning algorithm is trained on the prior knowledge of the predefined fabrication process.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to the wafer run and during a development phase of the predefined fabrication process, using invasive imaging to train the machine-learning algorithm, wherein the invasive imaging yields 3-D image datasets of the semiconductor structures.

4. A device, comprising:

control circuitry configured to:

during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process, obtain a 2-D image dataset of 3-D semiconductor structures formed on the wafer, the wafer comprising a defect of one of the 3-D semiconductor structures;

use a machine-learning algorithm to determine, based on the 2-D image dataset, a probability distribution of multiple 3-D image datasets imaging the defect, the probability distribution assigning probabilities to each of the multiple 3-D image datasets;

responsive to the probability distribution of the multiple 3-D image datasets comprising equal probabilities for two or more of the multiple 3-D image datasets due to ambiguity of a projection the 3-D semiconductor structures into an imaging plane of the 2-D image dataset, obtain a further 2-D image dataset of the 3-D semiconductor structures to reduce the ambiguity, the 2-D image dataset and the further 2-D image dataset depicting the 3-D semiconductor structures using different poses; and

based on at least one of the 3-D image data sets, determine a process deviation of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the defect of the one of the 3-D semiconductor structures.

5. A system, comprising:

control circuitry configured to:

during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process, obtain a 2-D image dataset of 3-D semiconductor structures formed on the wafer, the wafer comprising a defect of one of the 3-D semiconductor structures; and

use a machine-learning algorithm to determine, based on the 2-D image dataset, a probability distribution of multiple 3-D image datasets imaging the defect, the probability distribution assigning probabilities to each of the multiple 3-D image datasets;

responsive to the probability distribution of the multiple 3-D image datasets comprising equal probabilities for two or more of the multiple 3-D image datasets due to ambiguity of a projection the 3-D semiconductor structures into an imaging plane of the 2-D image dataset, obtain a further 2-D image dataset of the 3-D semiconductor structures to reduce the ambiguity, the 2-D image dataset and the further 2-D image dataset depicting the 3-D semiconductor structures using different poses; and

based on at least one of the 3-D image datasets, determine a process deviation of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the defect of the one of the 3-D semiconductor structures; and

production equipment configured to implement the predefined fabrication process.

6. The system of claim 5 , further comprising an image source.

7. The system of claim 5 , further comprising at least one microscope selected from the group consisting of an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope.

8. One or more machine-readable hardware storage devices comprising instructions that are executable by one or more processing devices to perform operations comprising the method of claim 1 .

9. A system comprising:

one or more processing devices; and

one or more machine-readable hardware storage devices comprising instructions that are executable by the one or more processing devices to perform operations comprising the method of claim 1 .

10. The system of claim 5 , further comprising:

an image source; and

an interface,

wherein the image source is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry.

11. The system of claim 5 , further comprising:

an optical microscope; and

an interface to the interface,

wherein the optical microscope is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry.

12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

a scanning electron microscope; and

an interface to the interface,

wherein the scanning electron microscope is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry.

13. The system of claim 5 , further comprising:

a scanning electron microscope; and

an interface to the interface,

wherein the scanning electron microscope is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using an image source to collect the 2-D image dataset.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising using production equipment to implement the predefined fabrication process.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using an optical microscope to collect the 2-D image dataset.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising using a scanning electron microscope to collect the 2-D image dataset.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising using production equipment to implement the predefined fabrication process.

19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using a scanning electron microscope to collect the 2-D image dataset.

20. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using production equipment to implement the predefined fabrication process.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2024
From: NEUMANN, JENS TIMO; FOCA, EUGEN; KORB, THOMAS; CORREA, JOAQUIN
To: CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
Reel/Frame 066347/0961 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2024
From: WOJEK, CHRISTIAN; SRIKANTHA, ABHILASH
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 066348/0079 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2024
From: PICHUMANI, RAMANI
To: CARL ZEISS SBE, LLC
Reel/Frame 066348/0204 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2024
From: CARL ZEISS SBE, LLC
To: CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
Reel/Frame 066348/0299 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2024
From: CARL ZEISS AG
To: CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
Reel/Frame 066348/0340 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62908822 · Oct 1, 2019
Related Publication 20210097673A1 · Apr 1, 2021