Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system comprising: determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the task assignment system, a priority for each of a plurality of tasks; determining, by the at least one computer processor, an agent available for assignment to any of the plurality of tasks; and assigning, by the at least one computer processor, a first task of the plurality of tasks to the agent using a task assignment strategy, wherein the first task has a lower-priority than a second task of the plurality of tasks.
1. A method comprising:
determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in a contact center system, a set of M contacts;
determining, by the at least one computer processor, a number N that is less than the number M;
filtering, by the at least one computer processor, the set of M contacts to provide a plurality of contacts, wherein the plurality of contacts comprises N contacts, wherein the filtering is based on a wait time of each contact of the plurality of contacts; and
determining, by the at least one computer processor, a set of P agents, wherein P is any positive integer, and is different from N;
selecting, by the at least one computer processor, a contact of the plurality of contacts for pairing to an agent of the set of P agents based on a pairing strategy;
wherein N is inversely related to a likelihood of the pairing strategy selecting a longer-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts over a shorter-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the filtering further comprises adjusting, by the at least one computer processor, the number N, wherein increasing N during the filtering decreases a likelihood of the pairing strategy selecting a longest-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the selecting further comprises selecting, by the at least one computer processor, a lower priority contact while the plurality of contacts comprises an available higher priority contact.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein N comprises one of: 3, 6, 10, and 20.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of contacts comprises at least one contact associated with a lower priority and at least one contact associated with a higher priority.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein
N is a predetermined fixed value, or
N is determined based on any one or more of: (i) M, (ii) a number of tasks included in the set of M contacts, which are associated with a certain priority level, and/or (iii) a degree of choice for a behavioral pairing.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein P is equal to 1.
8. A system comprising:
at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in a contact center system,
wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:
determine a set of M contacts;
determine a number N that is less than the number M;
filter the set of M contacts to provide a plurality of contacts, wherein the plurality of contacts comprises N contacts, wherein the filtering is based on a wait time of each contact of the plurality of contacts; and
determine a set of P agents, wherein P is any positive integer, and is different from N;
select a contact of the plurality of contacts for pairing to an agent of the set of P agents based on a pairing strategy;
wherein N is inversely related to a likelihood of the pairing strategy selecting a longer-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts over a shorter-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts.
9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to filter by adjusting the number N, wherein increasing N during the filtering decreases a likelihood of the pairing strategy selecting a longest-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts.
10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to select by selecting a lower priority contact while the plurality of contacts comprises an available higher priority contact.
11. The system of claim 8 , wherein N comprises one of: 3, 6, 10, and 20.
12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of contacts comprises at least one contact associated with a lower priority and at least one contact associated with a higher priority.
13. The system of claim 8 , wherein
N is a predetermined fixed value, or
N is determined based on any one or more of: (i) M, (ii) a number of tasks included in the set of M contacts, which are associated with a certain priority level, and/or (iii) a degree of choice for a behavioral pairing.
14. The system of claim 8 , wherein P is equal to 1.
15. An article of manufacture comprising:
a non-transitory computer processor readable medium; and
instructions stored on the medium;
wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in a contact center system and thereby cause the at least one computer processor to operate so as to:
determine a set of M contacts;
determine a number N that is less than the number M;
filter the set of M contacts to provide a plurality of contacts, wherein the plurality of contacts comprises N contacts, wherein the filtering is based on a wait time of each contact of the plurality of contacts; and
determine a set of P agents, wherein P is any positive integer, and is different from N;
select a contact of the plurality of contacts for pairing to an agent of the set of P agents based on a pairing strategy;
wherein N is inversely related to a likelihood of the pairing strategy selecting a longer-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts over a shorter-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts.
16. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further caused to operate so as to filter by adjusting the number N, wherein increasing N during the filtering decreases a likelihood of the pairing strategy selecting a longest-waiting contact of the plurality of contacts.
17. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further caused to operate so as to select by selecting a lower priority contact while the plurality of contacts comprises an available higher priority contact.
18. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of contacts comprises at least one contact associated with a lower priority and at least one contact associated with a higher priority.
19. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein
N is a predetermined fixed value, or
N is determined based on any one or more of: (i) M, (ii) a number of tasks included in the set of M contacts, which are associated with a certain priority level, and/or (iii) a degree of choice for a behavioral pairing.
20. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein P is equal to 1.