IP Library Granted Patent US 11,748,846
Granted Patent B2
US 11,748,846 · App. 17/222,425 · Granted Sep 5, 2023

Systems, devices, and methods for providing feedback on and improving the accuracy of super-resolution imaging

Inventors: Matthew C. Putman (Brooklyn, NY); John B. Putman (Celebration, FL); Vadim Pinskiy (Wayne, NJ); Joseph Succar (Brooklyn, NY)
Assignee: Nanotronics Imaging, Inc.
G06T3/4038G06F18/2411G06F18/2413G06T3/4053G06T5/50G06V10/764G06V10/993G06V20/693
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,748,846
App. No.
17/222,425
Granted
Sep 5, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for feedback on and improving the accuracy of super-resolution imaging. In some embodiments, a low resolution image of a specimen can be obtained using a low resolution objective of a microscopy inspection system. A super-resolution image of at least a portion of the specimen can be generated from the low resolution image of the specimen using a super-resolution image simulation. Subsequently, an accuracy assessment of the super-resolution image can be identified based on one or more degrees of equivalence between the super-resolution image and one or more actually scanned high resolution images of at least a portion of one or more related specimens identified using a simulated image classifier. Based on the accuracy assessment of the super-resolution image, it can be determined whether to further process the super-resolution image. The super-resolution image can be further processed if it is determined to further process the super-resolution image.

Claims (60)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining, by a computing system, a training data set comprising a plurality of high confidence super-resolution images and a plurality of low confidence super-resolution images;

generating, by the computing system, a simulated image classifier for determining a confidence interval that measures a likelihood of a super-resolution image falls into a particular class by:

inputting the training data set into a machine learning algorithm; and

learning, via the machine learning algorithm, to classify super-resolution images of artifacts;

obtaining, by the computing system, a target super-resolution image of a specimen;

analyzing, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the target super-resolution image to determine a class associated with the target super-resolution image; and

determining, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the class of the target super-resolution image and a confidence interval of the class.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining, by the computing system, the training data set comprising the plurality of high confidence super-resolution images and the plurality of low confidence super-resolution images comprises:

obtaining a set of high confidence super-resolution images, wherein each high confidence super-resolution image in the set of high confidence super-resolution images comprises an image grade or image score associated therewith.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the class of the target super-resolution image and the confidence interval of the class comprises:

comparing, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the target super-resolution image with an acceptable image tolerance.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the target super-resolution image falls below the acceptable image tolerance, indicating that artifacts in the super-resolution image is to be scanned using a higher resolution objective.

5. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the target super-resolution image meets or exceeds the acceptable image tolerance, providing the target super-resolution image to an image assembly module.

6. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

utilizing a feedback mechanism to dynamically adjust the acceptable image tolerance based on an accuracy of the simulated image classifier.

7. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

dynamically adjusting, by the computing system, the acceptable image tolerance based on an importance of the specimen.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium having one or more sequences of instructions, which, when executed by one or more processors, causes a computing system to perform operations, comprising:

obtaining, by the computing system, a training data set comprising a plurality of high confidence super-resolution images and a plurality of low confidence super-resolution images;

generating, by the computing system, a simulated image classifier for determining a confidence interval that measures a likelihood of a super-resolution image falls into a particular class by:

inputting the training data set into a machine learning algorithm; and

learning, via the machine learning algorithm, to classify super-resolution images of artifacts;

obtaining, by the computing system, a target super-resolution image of a specimen;

analyzing, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the target super-resolution image to determine a class associated with the target super-resolution image; and

determining, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the class of the target super-resolution image and a confidence interval of the class.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein obtaining, by the computing system, the training data set comprising the plurality of high confidence super-resolution images and the plurality of low confidence super-resolution images comprises:

obtaining a set of high confidence super-resolution images, wherein each high confidence super-resolution image in the set of high confidence super-resolution images comprises an image grade or image score associated therewith.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein determining, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, that the class of the target super-resolution image and the confidence interval of the class comprises:

comparing, by the computing system via the simulated image classifier, the target super-resolution image with an acceptable image tolerance.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the target super-resolution image falls below the acceptable image tolerance, indicating that artifacts in the super-resolution image is to be scanned using a higher resolution objective.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the target super-resolution image meets or exceeds the acceptable image tolerance, providing the target super-resolution image to an image assembly module.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , further comprising:

utilizing a feedback mechanism to dynamically adjust the acceptable image tolerance based on an accuracy of the simulated image classifier.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , further comprising:

dynamically adjusting, by the computing system, the acceptable image tolerance based on an importance of the specimen.

15. A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory having programming instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the system to perform one or more operations, comprising:

obtaining a training data set comprising a plurality of high confidence super-resolution images and a plurality of low confidence super-resolution images;

generating a simulated image classifier for determining a confidence interval that measures a likelihood of a super-resolution image falls into a particular class by:

inputting the training data set into a machine learning algorithm; and

learning, via the machine learning algorithm, to classify super-resolution images of artifacts;

obtaining a target super-resolution image of a specimen;

analyzing, via the simulated image classifier, the target super-resolution image to determine a class associated with the target super-resolution image; and

determining, via the simulated image classifier, the class of the target super-resolution image and a confidence interval of the class.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein obtaining the training data set comprising the plurality of high confidence super-resolution images and the plurality of low confidence super-resolution images comprises:

obtaining a set of high confidence super-resolution images, wherein each high confidence super-resolution image in the set of high confidence super-resolution images comprises an image grade or image score associated therewith.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein determining, via the simulated image classifier, the class of the target super-resolution image and the confidence interval of the class comprises:

comparing, via the simulated image classifier, the target super-resolution image with an acceptable image tolerance.

18. The system of claim 17 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the target super-resolution image falls below the acceptable image tolerance, indicating that artifacts in the super-resolution image is to be scanned using a higher resolution objective.

19. The system of claim 17 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the target super-resolution image meets or exceeds the acceptable image tolerance, providing the target super-resolution image to an image assembly module.

20. The system of claim 17 , further comprising:

utilizing a feedback mechanism to dynamically adjust the acceptable image tolerance based on an accuracy of the simulated image classifier.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2023
From: NANOTRONICS IMAGING, INC.; NANOTRONICS HEALTH LLC; CUBEFABS INC.
To: ORBIMED ROYALTY & CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES IV, LP
Reel/Frame 065726/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2021
From: PUTMAN, MATTHEW C.; PUTMAN, JOHN B.; PINSKIY, VADIM; SUCCAR, JOSEPH R.
To: NANOTRONICS IMAGING, INC.
Reel/Frame 055825/0901 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17029703 · Sep 23, 2020
Continuation 16576732 · Sep 19, 2019
Continuation 16233258 · Dec 27, 2018
Continuation 16027056 · Jul 3, 2018
Related Publication 20210224966A1 · Jul 22, 2021