IP Library Granted Patent US 11,863,708
Granted Patent B2
US 11,863,708 · App. 17/572,044 · Granted Jan 2, 2024

Matching using agent/caller sensitivity to performance

Inventors: Ittai Kan (McLean, VA); Zia Chishti (Washington, DC); Akbar A. Merchant (Bethesda, MD)
Assignee: Afiniti, Ltd.
H04M3/5233H04M3/00H04M3/5175H04M3/5191H04M3/523H04M3/5232H04M5/00H04M2203/402
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,863,708
App. No.
17/572,044
Granted
Jan 2, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system and program product, the method comprising: obtaining for each call in one set of calls a respective pattern representing multiple different respective data fields; obtaining performance data for the respective patterns of the calls; obtaining performance data for the respective agents; determining agent performance sensitivity to call pattern performance for agents in a set of agents comprising the agent performance data correlated to call performance data for the calls the agent handles; and matching a respective one of the agents from the set of agents to one of the calls based at least in part on the performance data for the respective pattern of the one call and on the agent sensitivity to call performance for the respective one agent of the set of agents.

Claims (43)

1. A method for pairing in a contact center system comprising:

obtaining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, historical contact-agent interaction data;

identifying, by the at least one computer processor, a plurality of agents;

determining, by the at least one computer processor, a performance sensitivity measurement for each agent of the plurality of agents based on the historical contact-agent interaction data;

determining, by the at least one computer processor, a first subset of agents of the plurality of agents and a second subset of agents of the plurality of agents based on the performance sensitivity measurement for each agent;

establishing, by a routing engine of the contact center system, a communications channel between communication equipment of a first agent of the first subset of agents and communication equipment of a first contact based upon a first matching strategy; and

establishing, by the routing engine of the contact center system, a communications channel between communication equipment of a second agent of the second subset of agents and communication equipment of a second contact based upon a second matching strategy.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first agent is relatively more likely to produce a favorable outcome than the second agent regardless of a performance measurement of the first contact.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first agent has a relatively low performance sensitivity measurement.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first agent is relatively less likely to produce a favorable outcome than the second agent regardless of a performance measurement of the first contact.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the first agent has a relatively high performance sensitivity measurement.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first subset of agents comprises agents in the plurality of agents with relatively low performance sensitivity measurements, and wherein the second subset of agents comprises agents in the plurality of agents with relatively high performance sensitivity measurements.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the performance sensitivity measurement is based on data for at least one of sales, customer retention, contact handle time, customer satisfaction, revenue, first call resolution, units sold, or transaction points.

8. A system for pairing in a contact center system comprising:

at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to perform contact-agent pairing operations in the contact center system, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:

obtain historical contact-agent interaction data;

identify a plurality of agents;

determine a performance sensitivity measurement for each agent of the plurality of agents based on the historical contact-agent interaction data;

determine a first subset of agents of the plurality of agents and a second subset of agents of the plurality of agents based on the performance sensitivity measurement for each agent;

establish, by a routing engine of the contact center system, a communications channel between communication equipment of a first agent of the first subset of agents and communication equipment of a first contact based upon a first matching strategy; and

establish, by the routing engine of the contact center system, a communications channel between communication equipment of a second agent of the second subset of agents and communication equipment of a second contact based upon a second matching strategy.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first agent is relatively more likely to produce a favorable outcome than the second agent regardless of a performance measurement of the first contact.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the first agent has a relatively low performance sensitivity measurement.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first agent is relatively less likely to produce a favorable outcome than the second agent regardless of a performance measurement of the first contact.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the first agent has a relatively high performance sensitivity measurement.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first subset of agents comprises agents in the plurality of agents with relatively low performance sensitivity measurements, and wherein the second subset of agents comprises agents in the plurality of agents with relatively high performance sensitivity measurements.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the performance sensitivity measurement is based on data for at least one of sales, customer retention, contact handle time, customer satisfaction, revenue, first call resolution, units sold, or transaction points.

15. An article of manufacture for pairing in a contact center system comprising:

a non-transitory processor readable medium; and

instructions stored on the medium;

wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to perform contact-agent pairing operations in the contact center system and thereby cause the at least one computer processor to operate so as to:

obtain historical contact-agent interaction data;

identify a plurality of agents;

determine a performance sensitivity measurement for each agent of the plurality of agents based on the historical contact-agent interaction data;

determine a first subset of agents of the plurality of agents and a second subset of agents of the plurality of agents based on the performance sensitivity measurement for each agent;

establish, by a routing engine of the contact center system, a communications channel between communication equipment of a first agent of the first subset of agents and communication equipment of a first contact based upon a first matching strategy; and

establish, by the routing engine of the contact center system, a communications channel between communication equipment of a second agent of the second subset of agents and communication equipment of a second contact based upon a second matching strategy.

16. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the first agent is relatively more likely to produce a favorable outcome than the second agent regardless of a performance measurement of the first contact.

17. The article of manufacture of claim 16 , wherein the first agent has a relatively low performance sensitivity measurement.

18. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the first agent is relatively less likely to produce a favorable outcome than the second agent regardless of a performance measurement of the first contact.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 18 , wherein the first agent has a relatively high performance sensitivity measurement.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the first subset of agents comprises agents in the plurality of agents with relatively low performance sensitivity measurements, and wherein the second subset of agents comprises agents in the plurality of agents with relatively high performance sensitivity measurements.

21. The article of manufacture of claim 20 , wherein the performance sensitivity measurement is based on data for at least one of sales, customer retention, contact handle time, customer satisfaction, revenue, first call resolution, units sold, or transaction points.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2025
From: VCP CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC
To: AFINITI, LTD.
Reel/Frame 070866/0614 →
PATENT ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2025
From: AFINITI AI HOLDINGS LLC
To: AFINITI AI LIMITED
Reel/Frame 069817/0001 →
PATENT ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2025
From: AFINITI, LTD.
To: AFINITI AI HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 069816/0656 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2025
From: AFINITI AI LIMITED
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
Reel/Frame 069816/0858 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 26, 2024
From: AFINITI, LTD.
To: VCP CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC
Reel/Frame 068793/0261 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 9, 2022
From: AFINITI INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.
To: AFINITI, LTD.
Reel/Frame 060327/0736 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 12, 2022
From: SATMAP INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.
To: AFINITI INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.
Reel/Frame 059986/0904 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2022
From: KAN, ITTAI; CHISHTI, ZIA; MERCHANT, AKBAR A.
To: SATMAP INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 059840/0840 →
Continuity (13)
Continuation 17001454 · Aug 24, 2020
Continuation 16573742 · Sep 17, 2019
Continuation 16359649 · Mar 20, 2019
Continuation 15987287 · May 23, 2018
Continuation 15193673 · Jun 27, 2016
Continuation 14035522 · Sep 24, 2013
Continuation 15987287
Continuation 15193687 · Jun 27, 2016
Continuation 15987287
Continuation 14035522 · Sep 24, 2013
Provisional Application 61705040 · Sep 24, 2012
Provisional Application 61705040 · Sep 24, 2012
Related Publication 20220131977A1 · Apr 28, 2022
Cited By (1)
US 12,333,553