IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,493,247
Granted Patent B2
US 12,493,247 · App. 17/780,960 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Method and system for predicting process information with a parameterized model

Inventors: Scott Anderson Middlebrooks (Duizel, NL); Patrick Warnaar (Tilburg, NL); Patrick Philipp Helfenstein (Eindhoven, NL); Alexander Prasetya Konijnenberg (Veldhoven, NL); Maxim Pisarenco (Son en Breugel, NL); Markus Gerardus Martinus Maria Van Kraaij (Eindhoven, NL)
Assignee: ASML Netherlands B.V.
G03F7/70633G03F7/70525G03F7/70675G06N3/08G06V10/145G06V10/82
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,493,247
App. No.
17/780,960
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for predicting complex electric field images with a parameterized model are described. A latent space representation of a complex electric field image is determined based on dimensional data in a latent space of the parameterized model for a given input to the parameterized model. The given input may be a measured amplitude (e.g., intensity) associated with the complex electric field image. The complex electric field image is predicted based on the latent space representation of the complex electric field image. The predicted complex electric field image includes an amplitude and a phase. The parameterized model comprises encoder-decoder architecture. In some embodiments, determining the latent space representation of the electric field image comprises minimizing a function constrained by a set of electric field images that could be predicted by the parameterized model based on the dimensional data in the latent space and the given input.

Claims (28)

1 . A computer-implemented method for improving metrology outputs during a semiconductor manufacturing process, comprising:

determining, using a first portion of a parameterized model, a latent space representation of an input electric field image, wherein the latent space representation has a lower dimensionality than the input electric field image;

predicting, using a second portion of the parameterized model, an output electric field image based on the latent space representation of the input electric field image, wherein the output electric field image includes amplitude and phase information; and

determining, using a third portion of the parameterized model, one or more metrology metrics for the semiconductor manufacturing process, wherein input to the third portion of the parameterized model includes one of the input electric field image, the output electric field image, or the latent space representation of the input electric field image; and

adjusting the one or more metrology metrics during the semiconductor manufacturing process.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

input to the first portion of the parameterized model further comprises a measured amplitude associated with the input electric field image, and

the amplitude comprises an intensity.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the determining the latent space representation of the input electric field image comprises minimizing a function constrained by a set of electric field images predicted by the parameterized model based on the dimensional data in a latent space of the parameterized model, and

the latent space representation of the input electric field image comprises a tensor.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameterized model is a machine learning model.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second portions of the parameterized model comprise encoder-decoder architecture.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the encoder-decoder architecture comprises variational encoder-decoder architecture and the method further comprises:

training the variational encoder-decoder architecture with a probabilistic latent space that generates realizations in an output space.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the probabilistic latent space comprises low dimensional encodings.

8 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the dimensional data in the latent space of the parameterized model is encoded by an encoder of the encoder-decoder architecture.

9 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising: training the parameterized model with a training set of complex electric field images.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the training comprises:

encoding the complex electric field images in the training set into the dimensional data in the latent space of parameterized model,

transforming the dimensional data in the latent space of the parameterized model into recovered versions of the complex electric field images in the training set to facilitate verification of the training, and

iteratively providing additional complex electric field images as input to the parameterized model, the additional complex electric field images determined based on an extent to which the recovered versions of the complex electric field images match the complex electric field images in the training set.

11 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the predicting the output electric field image based on the latent space representation of the input electric field image comprises passing the latent space representation of the input electric field image through a decoder of the encoder-decoder architecture.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the third portion of the parameterized model is a regression model.

13 . A metrology apparatus comprising one or more processors configured to perform operations comprising:

determining, using a first portion of a parameterized model, a latent space representation of an input electric field image, wherein the latent space representation has a lower dimensionality than the input electric field image;

predicting, using a second portion of the parameterized model, an output electric field image based on the latent space representation of the input electric field image, wherein the input electric field image includes amplitude and phase information;

determining, using a third portion of the parameterized model, one or more metrology metrics for a semiconductor manufacturing process, wherein input to the third portion of the parameterized model includes one of: the input electric field image, the output electric field image, or the latent space representation; and adjusting one or more parameters of the metrology apparatus used during a semiconductor manufacturing process used the one or more metrology metrics.

Assignments (4)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THE 4TH ASSIGNOR'S NAME TO ALEXANDER PRASETYA KONIJNENBERG PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 69920 FRAME 199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 4, 2025
From: MIDDLEBROOKS, SCOTT ANDERSON; WARNAAR, PATRICK; HELFENSTEIN, PATRICK PHILIPP; KONIJNENBERG, ALEXANDER PRASETYA; VAN KRAAIJ, MARKUS GERARDUS MARTINUS MARIA; PISARENCO, MAXIM
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 070099/0100 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THE 4TH ASSIGNOR'S NAME TO ALEXANDER PRASETYA KONIJNENBERG PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 69920 FRAME 37. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 4, 2025
From: MIDDLEBROOKS, SCOTT ANDERSON; PISARENCO, MAXIM; VAN KRAAIJ, MARKUS GERARDUS MARTINUS MARIA; KONIJNENBERG, ALEXANDER PRASETYA; HELFENSTEIN, PATRICK PHILIPP
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 070110/0564 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2025
From: MIDDLEBROOKS, SCOTT ANDERSON; PISARENCO, MAXIM; VAN KRAAIJ, MARKUS GERARDUS MARTINUS MARIA; KONIJENENBERG, ALEXANDER PRASETYA; HELFENSTEIN, PATRICK PHILIPP
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 069920/0037 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2025
From: MIDDLEBROOKS, SCOTT ANDERSON; WARNAAR, PATRICK; HELFENSTEIN, PATRICK PHILIPP; KONIJENENBERG, ALEXANDER PRASETYA; VAN KRAAIJ, MARKUS GERARDUS MARTINUS MARIA; PISARENCO, MAXIM
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 069920/0199 →
Priority Claims (2)
EP 19212419 · Nov 29, 2019 · regional
EP 20151169 · Jan 10, 2020 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230004096A1 · Jan 5, 2023
References Cited (41)
US 6952253B2 · Lof et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7701577B2 · Straaijer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7791724B2 · Den Boef et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8115926B2 · Straaijer · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8553227B2 · Jordanoska · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8681312B2 · Straaijer · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8692994B2 · Straaijer · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8792096B2 · Straaijer · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8797554B2 · Straaijer · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8823922B2 · Den Boef · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20100328655A1 · Den Boef · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110026032A1 · Den Boef et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110102753A1 · Van De Kerkhof et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110249244A1 · Leewis et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120044470A1 · Smilde et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130035888A1 · Kandel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130162996A1 · Straaijer et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160161863A1 · Den Boef et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160370717A1 · Den Boef et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170345140A1 · Zhang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180095037A1 · Tsuchiya · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CA 2961847A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109073996A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 1628164A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
EP 2942847A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
TW 201245906A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011012624A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018153866A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019034409A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020109074A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021043551A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority directed to related International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2020/077115, mailed Dec. 21, 2020; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zharnikov et al., “Modification of thiol-derived self-assembling monolayers by electron and x-ray irradiation: Scientific and lithographic aspects,” American Vacuum Society, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol… [cited by applicant]
Kingma et al., “Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes,” International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), May 2014; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Krebs et al., “Learning a Probabilistic Model for Diffeomorphic Registration,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, No. 9, Sep. 2019; pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Russell et al., “Hollow-core photonic crystal fibres for gas-based nonlinear optics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, Mar. 28, 2014; pp. 278-286. [cited by applicant]
Adams et al., “Large-Area Nanopatterning of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Alkanethiolates by Interferometric Lithography,” Langmuir, vol. 26, No. 16, Jul. 22, 2010; pp. 13600-13606. [cited by applicant]
Shamshad et al., “Robust Compressive Phase Retrieval via Deep Generative Priors,” Machine Learning, Aug. 17, 2018; pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
Turchanin et al., “Fabrication of Molecular Nanotemplates in Self-Assembled Monolayers by Extreme-Ultraviolet-Induced Chemical Lithography,” Small, vol. 3, No. 12, Dec. 4, 2007; pp. 2114-2119. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Full-chip application of machine learning SRAFs on DRAM case using auto pattern selection,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 10961, Optical Microlithography XXXII, Oct. 10, 2019; pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action directed to Chinese Patent Application No. 202080082760.5, mailed May 13, 2025; 28 pages. [cited by applicant]