IP Library Granted Patent US 8,830,472
Granted Patent B2
US 8,830,472 · App. 12/920,984 · Granted Sep 9, 2014

Method of assessing a model of a substrate, an inspection apparatus and a lithographic apparatus

Inventors: Arie Jeffrey Den Boef (Waalre, NL); Hugo Augustinus Joseph Cramer (Eindhoven, NL); Marcus Adrianus Van De Kerkhof (Helmond, NL); Henricus Petrus Maria Pellemans (Veldhoven, NL); Martin Ebert (Valkenswaard, NL)
Assignee: ASML Netherlands B.V.
G01N21/9501G01N21/95607G01N21/47G01N2021/8845G03F7/70625
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,830,472
App. No.
12/920,984
Granted
Sep 9, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of assessing a model of a substrate is presented. A scatterometry measurement is taken using radiation at a first wavelength. The wavelength of the radiation is then changed and a further scatterometry measurement taken. If the scatterometry measurements are consistent across a range of wavelengths then the model is sufficiently accurate. However, if the scatterometry measurements change as the wavelength changes then the model of the substrate is not sufficiently accurate.

Claims (36)

1. A method comprising:

taking a first scatterometry measurement of a substrate using a first characteristic value of radiation comprising a known characteristic;

determining a first value of a characteristic of a feature of the substrate or a first residual using the first scatterometry measurement;

taking a second scatterometry measurement using a second characteristic value of the radiation;

determining a second value of the characteristic of the feature of the substrate or a second residual using the second scatterometry measurement; and

comparing the first value and the second value of the characteristic of the feature or the first residual and the second residual to determine an accuracy of a model of the feature of the substrate.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising changing a value of the characteristic of the radiation to a third value.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

taking a third scatterometry measurement using the third characteristic value of the radiation; and

determining a third value of the characteristic of the feature using the third scatterometry measurement;

comparing the first, second, and third values of the characteristic of the feature of the substrate.

4. The method according to claim 2 , further comprising changing the value of the characteristic of the radiation to a fourth value.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the radiation characteristic to be changed is a wavelength of the radiation.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the radiation characteristic to be changed is a polarization of the radiation.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the radiation characteristic to be changed is an angle of incidence on the substrate.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the radiation characteristic to be changed is an illumination mode of the radiation.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the comparing comprises determining whether the second value of the characteristic of the feature is within a predetermined range of the first value of the characteristic of the feature.

10. An inspection apparatus comprising:

a radiation projector configured to project radiation onto a substrate, the radiation comprising a characteristic that comprises a plurality of values;

a high numerical aperture lens; and

a detector configured to detect the radiation reflected from a surface of the substrate,

wherein the detector is configured to separate the detected radiation into a plurality of sub-divisions, each sub-division of the plurality of sub-divisions comprising a different value for the characteristic of the radiation.

11. The inspection apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the characteristic that differs between the sub-divisions is a wavelength.

12. The inspection apparatus according to claim 10 , further comprising:

an imaging spectrometer configured to separate the detected radiation into a plurality of sub-divisions, each sub-division of the plurality of sub-divisions comprising a different value for the characteristic of the radiation.

13. A lithographic apparatus comprising:

an illumination system arranged to illuminate a pattern;

a projection system arranged to project an image of the pattern on to a substrate; and

an inspection apparatus configured to measure a target on the substrate, the inspection apparatus comprising;

a radiation projector configured to project radiation onto the substrate, the radiation comprising a characteristic that comprises a plurality of values;

a high numerical aperture lens; and

a detector configured to detect the radiation reflected from a surface of the substrate,

wherein the detector is configured to separate the detected radiation into a plurality of sub-divisions, each sub-division of the plurality of sub-divisions comprising a different value for the characteristic of the radiation.

14. The inspection apparatus according to claim 13 , wherein the characteristic that differs between the sub-divisions is a wavelength.

15. The inspection apparatus according to claim 13 , further comprising:

an imaging spectrometer configured to separate the detected radiation into a plurality of sub-divisions, each sub-division of the plurality of sub-divisions comprising a different value for the characteristic of the radiation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2010
From: DEN BOEF, ARIE JEFFREY; CRAMER, HUGO AUGUSTINUS JOSEPH; VAN DE KERKHOF, MARCUS ADRIANUS; PELLEMANS, HENRICUS PETRUS MARIA; EBERT, MARTIN
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 025172/0051 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61071034 · Apr 9, 2008
Related Publication 20110026032A1 · Feb 3, 2011