IP Library Granted Patent US 12,560,521
Granted Patent B2
US 12,560,521 · App. 18/382,011 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Determining initial pore pressure

Inventors: Hui-Hai Liu (Houston, TX); Jilin Jay Zhang (Houston, TX); Rabah Mesdour (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
G01N15/0826G01N33/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,560,521
App. No.
18/382,011
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes performing, on a core sample obtained from a reservoir and positioned in a permeability measurement assembly that includes a flow inlet, a permeability operation by flowing a test fluid from the flow inlet and into the core sample and changing an effective stress acting on the core sample. The method also includes determining a natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample as a function of the effective stress, and determining, as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial pore pressure of the reservoir.

Claims (37)

1 . A method, comprising:

performing, on a core sample obtained from a reservoir and positioned in a permeability measurement assembly that includes a flow inlet, a permeability operation by flowing a test fluid from the flow inlet and into the core sample and changing an effective stress acting on the core sample;

determining a natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample as a function of the effective stress; and

determining, as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial pore pressure of the reservoir.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

before determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir, determining, as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial effective stress of the core sample; and

wherein determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises determining, as a function of the initial effective stress of the core sample, the initial pore pressure of the reservoir.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the initial effective stress of the core sample is a point of effective stress at which a rate of change of the natural logarithm of permeability increases.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the initial effective stress of the core sample comprises generating a graph comprising an effective stress versus natural logarithm of permeability curve, and determining the initial effective stress of the core sample comprises determining a point of effective stress in the graph in which a slope of the curve increases.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein changing the effective stress comprises increasing the effective stress from a first value of effective stress that is less than the initial effective stress of the reservoir, to a value of effective stress that is greater than the initial effective stress of the reservoir.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein increasing the effective stress comprises increasing a pressure of a confining fluid residing within a pressurized container in which the core sample resides during the permeability operation.

7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the initial effective stress of the reservoir is an initial effective stress of the core sample under reservoir conditions, and determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir and a predetermined overburden stress of the reservoir.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises first determining the overburden stress of the reservoir as a function of i) depth of the core sample, ii) ground surface pressure, iii) gravitational acceleration, and iv) a density of overlying rock, and then subtracting the initial effective stress of the core sample under reservoir conditions from the overburden stress of the reservoir.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the permeability operation comprises using at least one of a steady-state flow method or a pressure pulse decay method.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the effective stress comprises a pressure differential between a pore pressure of the core sample and a confining pressure exerted on the core sample by a confining fluid, and increasing the effective stress comprises increasing the confining pressure while maintaining the pore pressure substantially constant.

11 . A method, comprising:

receiving, by a system comprising one or more computers in one or more locations, sensor feedback from one or more sensors of a core sample test assembly that comprises a flow inlet and a flow outlet, the core sample test assembly containing a core sample obtained from a reservoir, and the receiving comprising receiving the sensors feedback while the core sample test assembly performs a permeability operation on the core sample by flowing a test fluid from the flow inlet, across the core sample, and out of the flow outlet;

determining, by the system and as a function of the sensor feedback, an effective stress acting on the core sample as the effective stress acting on the core sample increases,

determining, by the system, a natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample as a function of the effective stress; and

determining, by the system and as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial pore pressure of the reservoir.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

before determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir, determining, by the system and as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial effective stress of the core sample; and

wherein determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises determining, by the system and as a function of the initial effective stress of the core sample, the initial pore pressure of the sample.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the initial effective stress of the core sample is a point of effective stress at which a rate of change of the natural logarithm of permeability increases.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the initial effective stress of the core sample comprises generating, by the system and on a user interface, a graph comprising an effective stress versus natural logarithm of permeability curve, and determining the initial effective stress of the core sample comprises determining a point of effective stress in the graph in which a slope of the curve increases.

15 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the initial effective stress of the core sample is an initial effective stress of the core sample under reservoir conditions, and determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises determining, by the system, the initial pore pressure of the reservoir as a function of the initial effective stress of the core sample under reservoir conditions and a predetermined overburden stress of the reservoir.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises first determining, by the system, the overburden stress of the reservoir as a function of i) depth of the core sample, ii) ground surface pressure, iii) gravitational acceleration, and iv) a density of overlying rock, and then determining, by the system, a difference between i) the initial effective stress of the core sample under reservoir conditions and ii) the overburden stress of the reservoir.

17 . A system, comprising:

at least one processing device; and

a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processing device, the memory storing instructions which, when executed, cause the at least one processing device to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by the processing device, sensor feedback from one or more sensors of a core sample test assembly that comprises a flow inlet and a flow outlet, the core sample test assembly containing a core sample obtained from a reservoir, and the receiving comprising receiving the sensors feedback while the core sample test assembly performs a permeability operation on the core sample by flowing a test fluid from the flow inlet, across the core sample, and out of the flow outlet;

determining, by the processing device and as a function of the sensor feedback, an effective stress acting on the core sample as the effective stress acting on the core sample increases,

determining, by the processing device, a natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample as a function of the effective stress; and

determining, by the processing device and as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial pore pressure of the reservoir.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the operations further comprise, before determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir, determining, by the processing device and as a function of the natural logarithm of permeability of the core sample, an initial effective stress of the core sample, and wherein determining the initial pore pressure of the reservoir comprises determining, by the processing device and as a function of the initial effective stress of the core sample, the initial pore pressure of the reservoir.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the initial effective stress of the core sample is a point of effective stress at which a rate of change of the natural logarithm of permeability increases.

20 . The system of claim 17 , wherein determining the initial effective stress of the core sample comprises generating, by the processing device, an effective stress versus natural logarithm of permeability curve, and determining the initial effective stress of the core sample comprises determining a point of effective stress in the graph in which a slope of the curve increases.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 19, 2024
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066181/0861 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 19, 2024
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066181/0908 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2023
From: MESDOUR, RABAH
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065527/0886 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2023
From: LIU, HUI-HAI; ZHANG, JILIN JAY
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065527/0981 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250130154A1 · Apr 24, 2025
References Cited (56)
US 4193451A · Dauphine · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4345650A · Wesley · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 6871532B2 · Zazovsky · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 6968274B2 · Tutuncu · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 9746410B2 · Chertov et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9896919B1 · Chen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9983106B2 · Han et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10048179B2 · Lai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10180054B2 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10254207B2 · Lai et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10401274B2 · Liu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10415358B2 · Lai et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10416064B2 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10443367B2 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10571384B2 · Liu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10669829B2 · Liang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10760395B2 · Lai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10760396B2 · Chen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10801943B2 · Yue et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10845292B2 · Georgi · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10858936B2 · Chen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10920556B2 · Chen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11248446B2 · Liang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11530972B2 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11598711B2 · Liu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11643924B2 · Zhang · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11680887B1 · Zhang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20080216559A1 · Hilab · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20190309611A1 · Liang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190353575A1 · Clarkson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200363310A1 · Zhang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220112422A1 · Liang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214261A1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214262A1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220397034A1 · Alvarez · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 111999227A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021053193 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Machine Translation of CN-111999227-A (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
APMonitor.com [online], “Proportional integral derivative (PID),” Sep. 2020, retrieved Oct. 13, 2021, from URL<https://apmonitor.com/pdc/index.php/Main/ProportionalIntegralDerivative>, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Dependence of gas shale fracture permeability on effective stress and reservoir pressure: Model match and insights, ” Fuel, 2015, 139:383-392, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Civan et al., “Comparison of shale permeability to gas determined by pressure-pulse transmission testing of core plugs and crushed samples,” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Jul. 2015, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Clarkson et al., “Use of pressure- and rate-transient techniques for analyzing core permeability tests for unconventional reservoirs: Part 2,” SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Nov. 2013, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hildebrand et al., “DFIT Analysis and Simulation: A Utica Shale Field Study,” SPE-201413-MS, SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition originally scheduled to be held in Denver, Colorado, United States, Oct. 5-7, 202… [cited by applicant]
Jones, “A Technique for Faster Pulse-Decay Permeability Measurements in Tight Rocks,” SPE-28450-PA, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Mar. 1997, 12(1):19-25, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Karimi et al., “Formula of definite point overburden pressure of reservoir layers,” Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, Jun. 2014, 23(2):175-182, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “Correction of source-rock permeability measurements owing to slip flow and Knudsen diffusion: a method and its evaluation,” Petroleum Science, Dec. 2017, 15(1):116-125, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Metarocklab.com [online], “Pumps,” 2019, retrieved Oct. 13, 2021, from URL<https://www.metarocklab.com/product-page/pressure-generators>, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paroscientific.com [online], “Overview & product selection guide,” Jan. 28, 2017, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20170128184102/https://paroscientific.com/products.php>, retrieved… [cited by applicant]
Tang et al., “Impact of Stress-Dependent Matrix and Fracture Properties on Shale Gas Production,” Energies, Jul. 2017, 10(996):1-13, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/237,862, Liu et al., Systems and Methods for Enhancing Carbon Dioxide Injectivity Into a Subterranean Formation, filed on Aug. 24, 2023, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/382,011, Liu et al., Determining Initial Pore Pressure, filed Oct. 19, 2023, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/455,847, Liu et al., Caprock Analysis Methods and Systems, filed Aug. 25, 2023, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/481,731, Zhang et al., Determining Parameters of a Rock Sample, filed Oct. 5, 2023, 37 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/598,383, Zhang et al., Measuring Rock Permeability, filed Mar. 7, 2024, 45 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Matrix permeability measurement from fractured unconventional source-rock samples: Method and application,” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Aug. 2020, 233(103663):1-6, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zheng et al., “Relationships between permeability, porosity and effective stress for low-permeability sedimentary rock,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 78:304-318, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]