IP Library Granted Patent US 12,284,445
Granted Patent B2
US 12,284,445 · App. 18/437,770 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Automated application of drift correction to sample studied under electron microscope

Inventors: Franklin Stampley Walden, II (Raleigh, NC); John Damiano, Jr. (Holly Springs, NC); David P. Nackashi (Raleigh, NC); Daniel Stephen Gardiner (Wake Forest, NC); Mark Uebel (Morrisville, NC); Alan Philip Franks (Durham, NC); Benjamin Jacobs (Apex, NC); Joshua Brian Friend (Raleigh, NC); Katherine Elizabeth Marusak (Cary, NC); Nelson L. Marthe, Jr. (Cary, NC); Benjamin Bradshaw Larson (Cary, NC)
Assignee: Protochips, Inc.
H04N23/695G06T7/215G06T7/337H01J37/20G06T2207/10061H01J2237/2594
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,284,445
App. No.
18/437,770
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for calibrating a transmission electron microscope are disclosed. A fiducial mark on the sample holder is used to identify known reference points so that a current collection area and a through-hole on the sample holder can be located. A plurality of beam current and beam area measurements are taken, and calibration tables are extrapolated from the measurements for a full range of microscope parameters. The calibration tables are then used to determine electron dose of a sample during an experiment at a given configuration.

Claims (46)

1. A method for measuring electron dose in a sample with a transmission electron microscope (TEM), the method comprising:

locating a fiducial mark on a TEM holder tip, wherein the TEM holder tip includes a through-hole located at a predetermined distance from the fiducial mark and a current collection area located at a predetermined distance from the fiducial mark;

calibrating the TEM for measuring beam area across a range of possible beam areas to generate a calibration table for beam area for the TEM;

calibrating the TEM for measuring beam current across a range of possible beam currents to generate a calibration table for beam current for the TEM; and

measuring electron dose on the sample during an experiment using the calibrated TEM having a defined configuration, wherein the measured electron dose is determined using the calibration table for beam area and the calibration table for beam current.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein calibrating the TEM for measuring beam area across the range of possible beam areas comprises:

locating the fiducial mark on the TEM holder tip;

translating the TEM to the through-hole of the TEM holder tip based on the location of the fiducial mark;

taking multiple beam area measurements of the TEM, with the multiple beam area measurements corresponding to multiple beam magnifications of the TEM; and

extrapolating the multiple beam area measurements to generate the calibration table for beam area for the TEM.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein calibrating the TEM for measuring beam current across a range of possible beam currents comprises:

locating the fiducial mark on the TEM holder tip;

translating the TEM to the current collection area of the TEM holder tip based on the location of the fiducial mark;

collecting current using a Faraday cup on the TEM holder tip;

taking multiple beam current measurements of the TEM from the collected current, with the multiple beam current measurements corresponding to multiple configurations of the TEM; and

extrapolating the multiple beam current measurements to generate the calibration table for beam current for the TEM.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the defined configuration of the TEM includes spot size, an aperture setting, an intensity or brightness setting, or an accelerating voltage.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising correlating measured beam current to beam current reported by a fluorescent screen or camera across a range of TEM configurations to determine a correction factor such that a true beam current value can be determined for a value of fluorescent screen current or camera current for the defined configuration.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising reducing an electron dose rate when a critical value for an electron dose rate or a cumulative electron dose has been reached.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the electron dose rate is reduced by changing an aperture setting, changing the spot size, changing a beam intensity, or changing the beam current.

8. A microscope control system for measuring electron dose in a sample with a transmission electron microscope (TEM), the system comprising:

a processor configured for:

calibrating the TEM for measuring beam area across a range of possible beam areas to generate a calibration table for beam area for the TEM;

calibrating the TEM for measuring beam current across a range of possible beam currents to generate a calibration table for beam current for the TEM; and

measuring electron dose on the sample during an experiment using the calibrated TEM having a defined configuration, wherein the measured electron dose is determined using the calibration table for beam area and the calibration table for beam current.

9. The microscope control system of claim 8 , wherein calibrating the TEM for measuring beam area across the range of possible beam areas comprises:

translating the TEM to a through-hole of a TEM holder tip based on a location of a fiducial mark on the TEM holder tip;

taking multiple beam area measurements of the TEM, with the multiple beam area measurements corresponding to multiple beam magnifications of the TEM; and

extrapolating the multiple beam area measurements to generate the calibration table for beam area for the TEM.

10. The microscope control system of claim 8 , wherein calibrating the TEM for measuring beam current across a range of possible beam currents comprises:

translating the TEM to a current collection area of a TEM holder tip based on a location of a fiducial mark on the TEM holder tip;

taking multiple beam current measurements of the TEM using readings from an ammeter that reads current collected using a Faraday cup on the TEM holder tip, with the multiple beam current measurements corresponding to multiple configurations of the TEM; and

extrapolating the multiple beam current measurements to generate the calibration table for beam current for the TEM.

11. The microscope control system of claim 8 , wherein the defined configuration of the TEM includes spot size, an aperture setting, an intensity or brightness setting, or an accelerating voltage.

12. The microscope control system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured for correlating measured beam current to beam current reported by a fluorescent screen or camera across a range of TEM configurations to determine a correction factor such that a true beam current value can be determined for a value of fluorescent screen current or camera current for the defined configuration.

13. The microscope control system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured for reducing an electron dose rate when a critical value for an electron dose rate or a cumulative electron dose has been reached.

14. The microscope control system of claim 13 , wherein the electron dose rate is reduced by changing an aperture setting, changing the spot size, changing a beam intensity, or changing the beam current.

15. A transmission electron microscope (TEM) holder tip for measuring electron beam current, the TEM holder tip comprising:

a through-hole for allowing an electron beam to pass through the TEM holder tip;

a current collection area for capturing beam current of the electron beam; and

a fiducial mark positioned a predetermined distance from the collection area and a predetermined distance from the through-hole.

16. The TEM holder tip of claim 15 , wherein the beam current is measured using an ammeter.

17. The TEM holder tip of claim 16 , wherein a path from the current collection area to the ammeter comprises a low-resistance material and is electrically shielded to prevent interference.

18. The TEM holder tip of claim 15 , wherein the TEM holder comprises a material having a low atomic number and low electrical resistivity for minimizing electron backscatter.

19. The TEM holder tip of claim 15 , wherein the TEM holder tip comprises an aperture for minimizing electron backscatter.

20. The TEM holder tip of claim 15 , wherein the current collection area is electrically isolated from a body of the TEM holder tip to avoid leakage.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2025
From: PROTOCHIPS, INC.
To: SALEM INVESTMENT PARTNERS IV, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Reel/Frame 070620/0055 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2024
From: WALDEN, FRANKLIN STAMPLEY, II; DAMIANO, JOHN, JR.; NACKASHI, DAVID P.; GARDINER, DANIEL STEPHEN; UEBEL, MARK; FRANKS, ALAN PHILIP; JACOBS, BENJAMIN; FRIEND, JOSHUA BRIAN; MARUSAK, KATHERINE ELIZABETH; MARTHE, NELSON L., JR.; LARSON, BENJAMIN BRADSHAW
To: PROTOCHIPS, INC.
Reel/Frame 066437/0985 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 17585222 · Jan 26, 2022
Continuation In Part 17545651 · Dec 8, 2021
Continuation 17210702 · Mar 24, 2021
Continuation 16951297 · Nov 18, 2020
Continuation PCTUS2020045937 · Aug 12, 2020
Provisional Application 62888309 · Aug 16, 2019
Related Publication 20240267628A1 · Aug 8, 2024
References Cited (55)
US 5912462A · Takami · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6539106B1 · Gallarda · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 11902665B2 · Walden, II · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030201393A1 · Tsuneta et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040106862A1 · Kohama · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050035302A1 · Morrison · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050232493A1 · Satou et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060076492A1 · Taniguchi et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070023651A1 · Ishitani · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080073533A1 · Makino · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080135751A1 · Nishiyama · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20110233403A1 · Own · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120104253A1 · Tsuneta et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140022600A1 · Phaneuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140226003A1 · Phaneuf · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140231666A1 · Akima · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140380531A1 · Ukraintsev · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150116470A1 · Ovod · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150371102A1 · Yang · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160064187A1 · Tomimatsu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160172154A1 · Kakinuma et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170278664A1 · Sato et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180039054A1 · Hattori · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180074306A1 · Visscher · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180204704A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180204705A1 · Tomimatsu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180286630A1 · Takekoshi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190017811A1 · Watanabe · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190304745A1 · Suzuki · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210112203A1 · Walden, II · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210134555A1 · Tanokuchi · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210299665A1 · Drahotsky · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220377244A1 · Walden, II · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240267628A1 · Walden, II · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 108780729A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 63202834A · 1988 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001118535A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020180119699A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 101964529B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
ISA/KR; International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/045937 dated Mar. 30, 2021, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/951,297 dated Feb. 2, 2021, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/210,702 dated Jan. 21, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/545,651 dated Feb. 14, 2022, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
WIPO; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/045937 dated Mar. 3, 2022, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
JPO; Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-568360 dated Apr. 19, 2022, 10 pages (includes translation). [cited by applicant]
CNIPA; Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 202080040044.0 dated Jun. 17, 2022, 8 pages (includes translation of first 2 pages). [cited by applicant]
EPO, Extended European Search Report for corresponding European Patent Application No. 20854644.0, mailed Aug. 5, 2022, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Marturi, N. et al.: “Fast image drift compensation in scanning electron microscope using image registration”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), IEEE, Aug. 17, 2013 (Aug. 17… [cited by applicant]
JPO; Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-568360 dated Jul. 26, 2022, 5 pages (includes translation). [cited by applicant]
JPO, Decision of Refusal for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-568360, mailed Nov. 22, 2022, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Office Action for corresponding European Patent Application No. 20854644.0 mailed Jun. 20, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
ISA/US; International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/061348, mailed Sep. 29, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/061348 dated Jul. 30, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 18/581,051, mailed Sep. 18, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Partial European Search Report for corresponding European Patent Application No. 24182694.0, mailed Nov. 19, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]