IP Library Granted Patent US 12,280,540
Granted Patent B2
US 12,280,540 · App. 18/602,537 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

In situ partially degradable separation interface for fabrication of complex near net shape objects by pressure assisted sintering

Inventors: Charles Maniere (Toulouse, FR); Eugene Olevsky (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: San Diego State University Research Foundation
B29C64/153B22F10/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,280,540
App. No.
18/602,537
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a process for fabricating complex mechanical shapes, and in particular to fabricating complex mechanical shapes using a pressure-assisted sintering technique to address problems relating to variations in specimen thickness and tooling, or densification gradients, by 3-D printing of a polymer model that is surrounded by and filled with sintering powder material, wherein the 3-D polymer model decomposed into a graphite interface layer and facilitates release of the cast, e.g. metal, metal-alloy, ceramic, etc., manufactured item.

Claims (14)

1. A method consisting of:

1) generating via 3D printing or other methods a polymer shell skeleton that can be decomposed into an immersed powder (or porous media) graphite shell skeleton inner interface;

2) surrounding of this rigid or semi-rigid polymer skeleton, wherein the skeleton can have a highly complex geometry, by the powder of the material(s) to be formed, wherein the powder of the sacrificial area can be different from the powder of the main part;

3) transforming this assembly of powder/polymer into a pure powders assembly by a heat treatment under vacuum or oxygen/hydrogen free atmosphere enabling the controlled degradation of the polymer interface into a graphite (or other thermally stable products of the polymer partial degradation) powder interface that does not join the adjacent parts during the sintering allowing the post sintering releasing of the internal complex parts; and

4) after sintering, releasing the internal complex parts,

wherein the polymer shell model or polymer skeleton can be coated by an inner ceramic powder to prevent eventual undesired carbonization reaction between the graphite powder and the main part powders.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the polymer interface degradation can be in situ incorporated in the sintering process with a simple pre-heating, which allows a one-step complex shaping process.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the polymer shell model or the polymer skeleton can be designed for a simultaneous multiple parts sintering.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the polymer is selected from the group consisting of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC), polylactic acid (PLA), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), PC/ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), high impact polystyrene (HIPS), and combinations thereof.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the powder sintering material is selected from the group consisting of stainless steel powder, titanium alloy powder, nickel alloy powder, chromium alloy powder, and aluminum alloy powder.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the vacuum or oxygen/hydrogen free atmosphere heating is vacuum heating at a pressure of from 1-10 Torr and a temperature for sintering of metals or ceramics are between 500-1000° C. and 1000-2200° C. respectively.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the vacuum or oxygen/hydrogen free atmosphere heating is heating at a temperature for sintering of metals or ceramics are between 500-1000° C. and 1000-2200° C. respectively in an atmosphere of inert gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, argon, and helium, to provide an atmosphere conducive to sintering.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the powder sintering material in the die chamber around the polymer shell model is different from the powder sintering material within the cavities of the polymer shell model.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the polymer shell model is a double-layer 3D printed polymer shell model is prepared using an organic material on the inside and a ceramic material on the outside.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 18, 2025
From: OLEVSKY, EUGENE; MANIERE, CHARLES
To: SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 070551/0275 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2025
From: SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
To: SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 070463/0119 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17042176 · Sep 27, 2020
Related Publication 20250042083A1 · Feb 6, 2025
References Cited (53)
US 7195872B2 · Agrawal et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7509240B2 · Das et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7547449B2 · Gower et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7732002B2 · Kodas et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7745106B2 · Beretta et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7857756B2 · Warren et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8100996B2 · Simmons et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8153148B2 · Maspero et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8485861B2 · Boyden et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8932184B2 · Redmond · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9060931B2 · Boyden et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9402726B2 · Linderman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9463261B2 · Duvall et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9545507B2 · Ross · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9765271B2 · Myrick · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9801946B2 · Guelcher et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9804607B1 · Coleman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9925299B2 · Kaplan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9932238B2 · Shankman · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10001769B2 · Huang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10004602B2 · Chachques et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10029083B2 · Ross · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10166142B2 · De Juan, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10342965B2 · Ross · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10472909B2 · Xu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10709884B2 · Ross · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10731046B2 · Omenetto et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10912860B2 · Griffin et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20030108511A1 · Sawhney · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050147599A1 · Hunter et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050202008A1 · Williams et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050221072A1 · Dubrow et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060204738A1 · Dubrow et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070282247A1 · Desai et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080213593A1 · Subramaniam et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090162643A1 · Dubrow et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100074934A1 · Hunter · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100249913A1 · Datta et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110008765A1 · Vacanti et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110020196A1 · Grippi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138209A1 · Cragg et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130177972A1 · Green et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130220336A1 · Gopal et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140200511A1 · Boyden et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160331467A1 · Slamin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170014169A1 · Dean et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180009032A1 · Kelkar · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180140427A1 · Conway et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180318931A1 · Estournes · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190247650A1 · Tran · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190330064A1 · Tour et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200155323A1 · Lang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
FR 3042992 · 2017 [cited by examiner]