IP Library Granted Patent US 12,688,473
Granted Patent B2
US 12,688,473 · App. 18/615,815 · Granted Jul 21, 2026

Techniques for workforce management in a task assignment system

Inventor: Denys Liubyvyi (Washington, DC)
Assignee: AFINITI AI LIMITED
G06Q10/063114G06Q10/06312G06Q10/06398
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,688,473
App. No.
18/615,815
Filed
Mar 25, 2024
Granted
Jul 21, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3623
USPC
705/7.15
Abstract

Techniques for workforce management in a task assignment system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for workforce management in a task assignment system comprising: determining, by at least one computer processor configured to operate in the task assignment system, a first efficiency level of a first task assignment strategy for a first number of agents to be employed in the task assignment system; determining, by the at least one computer processor, a second efficiency level of a second task assignment strategy for a second number of agents to be employed in the task assignment system; comparing, by the at least one computer processor, the first and second efficiency levels; and selecting, by the at least one computer processor, one of the first and second numbers of agents having the higher of the first and second efficiency levels.

Claims (84)

1 . A method for a task assignment system, the method comprising:

determining, by at least one computer processor configured to perform workforce management operations in the task assignment system, that the task assignment system is in a first state, wherein at the time that the task assignment system is determined to be in the first state, there are N 1 number of agents available for pairing and further wherein N 1 is a non-negative integer;

after determining that the task assignment system is in the first state, calculating, by said at least one computer processor,

first value which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with N Increased number of agents, wherein N Increased is obtained as a result of increasing N 1 ; and

a second value which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with N Decreased number of agents, wherein N Decreased is obtained as a result of decreasing N 1 ; and

based on the comparison of the first and second values, determining whether to increase or decrease the N 1 number of agents;

storing, in a task queue, information regarding a task waiting to be paired with an available agent; and

establishing a communication link between an agent available for pairing and the task waiting to be paired with an available agent, wherein

establishing the communication link between the agent and the task comprises using a switch of the task assignment system to establish the communication link,

either increasing or decreasing the N 1 number of agents causes the task assignment system to transition from the first state to a second state which is different from the first state,

each of the first and second values is calculated based on:

a profit associated with performing pairings using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents;

a profit associated with performing pairings without using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents; and

a cost associated with performing pairings using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents,

the profit associated with performing pairings using the certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents is determined based at least on an expected loss of each of one or more tasks,

the expected loss of each of said one or more tasks is determined using a hazard function, and

the hazard function indicates a likelihood that a task will be lost with respect to a waiting time duration of the task.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

after determining that the task assignment system is in the first state, calculating, by said at least one computer processor, a plurality of values each of which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with each of candidate numbers of agents, wherein the candidate numbers of agents include N Increased and N Decreased ;

comparing the plurality of values with each other; and

based on the comparison of the plurality of values, selecting one of the candidate numbers of agents.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first value which indicates the estimated result of performing pairings with the N increased number of agents is calculated based on a profit associated with performing pairings with the N increased number of agents, and the second value which indicates the estimated result of performing pairings with the N Decreased number of agents is calculated based on a profit associated with performing pairings with the N Decreased number of agents.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the certain pairing strategy is a behavioral pairing strategy.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein

whether to increase or decrease the N 1 number of agents is determined based on a metric, and

the metric is related to one or more of:

a cost related to increasing the N 1 number of agents;

a benefit related to decreasing the N 1 number of agents;

a cost related to increasing a time duration during which agents are waiting to be paired;

a benefit related to decreasing a time duration during which agents are waiting to be paired;

a cost related to increasing a time duration during which tasks are waiting to be paired; and/or

a benefit related to decreasing a time duration during which tasks are waiting to be paired.

6 . A task assignment system comprising:

at least one memory; and

at least one computer processor configured to perform workforce management operations in the task assignment system, wherein the task assignment system is configured to:

determine that the task assignment system is in a first state, wherein at the time that the task assignment system is determined to be in the first state, there are N 1 number of agents available for pairing and further wherein N 1 is a non-negative integer; and

after determining that the task assignment system is in the first state, calculate:

a first value which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with N Increased number of agents, wherein N Increased is obtained as a result of increasing N 1 ; and

a second value which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with N Decreased number of agents, wherein N Decreased is obtained as a result of decreasing N 1 ; and

based on the comparison of the first and second values, determine whether to increase or decrease the N 1 number of agents;

storing, in a task queue, information regarding a task waiting to be paired with an available agent; and

establishing a communication link between an agent available for pairing and the task waiting to be paired with an available agent, wherein

establishing the communication link between the agent and the task comprises using a switch of the task assignment system to establish the communication link, and

either increasing or decreasing the N 1 number of agents causes the task assignment system to transition from the first state to a second state which is different from the first state each of the first and second values is calculated based on:

a profit associated with performing pairings using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents;

a profit associated with performing pairings without using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents; and

a cost associated with performing pairings using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents,

the profit associated with performing pairings using the certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents is determined based at least on an expected loss of each of one or more tasks,

the expected loss of each of said one or more tasks is determined using a hazard function, and

the hazard function indicates a likelihood that a task will be lost with respect to a waiting time duration of the task.

7 . The task assignment system of claim 6 , wherein the task assignment system is configured to:

after determining that the task assignment system is in the first state, calculate, by said at least one computer processor, a plurality of values each of which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with each of candidate numbers of agents, wherein the candidate numbers of agents include N Increased and N Decreased ;

compare the plurality of values with each other; and

based on the comparison of the plurality of values, select one of the candidate numbers of agents.

8 . The task assignment system of claim 6 , wherein the first value which indicates the estimated result of performing pairings with the N increased number of agents is calculated based on a profit associated with performing pairings with the N increased number of agents, and the second value which indicates the estimated result of performing pairings with the N Decreased number of agents is calculated based on a profit associated with performing pairings with the N Decreased number of agents.

9 . The task assignment system of claim 6 , wherein the certain pairing strategy is a behavioral pairing strategy.

10 . The task assignment system of claim 6 , wherein

whether to increase or decrease the N 1 number of agents is determined based on a metric, and

the metric is related to one or more of:

a cost related to increasing the N 1 number of agents;

a benefit related to decreasing the N 1 number of agents;

a cost related to increasing a time duration during which agents are waiting to be paired;

a benefit related to decreasing a time duration during which agents are waiting to be paired;

a cost related to increasing a time duration during which tasks are waiting to be paired; and/or

a benefit related to decreasing a time duration during which tasks are waiting to be paired.

11 . An article of manufacture comprising:

a non-transitory computer processor readable medium; and

instructions stored on the medium, wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one computer processor configured to perform workforce management operations in a task assignment system, thereby causing the at least one computer processor to operate so as to:

determine that the task assignment system is in a first state, wherein at the time that the task assignment system is determined to be in the first state, there are N 1 number of agents available for pairing and further wherein N 1 is a non-negative integer; and

after determining that the task assignment system is in the first state, calculate:

a first value which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with N Increased number of agents, wherein N Increased is obtained as a result of increasing N 1 ; and

a second value which indicates an estimated result of performing pairings with N Decreased number of agents, wherein N Decreased is obtained as a result of decreasing N 1 ; and

based on the comparison of the first and second values, determine whether to increase or decrease the N 1 number of agents;

storing, in a task queue, information regarding a task waiting to be paired with an available agent; and

establishing a communication link between an agent available for pairing and the task waiting to be paired with an available agent, wherein

establishing the communication link between the agent and the task comprises using a switch of the task assignment system to establish the communication link, and

either increasing or decreasing the N 1 number of agents causes the task assignment system to transition from the first state to a second state which is different from the first state,

each of the first and second values is calculated based on:

a profit associated with performing pairings using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents;

a profit associated with performing pairings without using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents; and

a cost associated with performing pairings using a certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents,

the profit associated with performing pairings using the certain pairing strategy with the N Increased number of agents or the N Decreased number of agents is determined based at least on an expected loss of each of one or more tasks,

the expected loss of each of said one or more tasks is determined using a hazard function, and

the hazard function indicates a likelihood that a task will be lost with respect to a waiting time duration of the task.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2025
From: VCP CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC
To: AFINITI, LTD.
Reel/Frame 070866/0614 →
PATENT ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2025
From: AFINITI, LTD.
To: AFINITI AI HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 069816/0656 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2025
From: AFINITI AI LIMITED
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
Reel/Frame 069816/0858 →
PATENT ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2025
From: AFINITI AI HOLDINGS LLC
To: AFINITI AI LIMITED
Reel/Frame 069817/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 26, 2024
From: AFINITI, LTD.
To: VCP CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC
Reel/Frame 068793/0261 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17572030 · Jan 10, 2022
Continuation 15993498 · May 30, 2018
Related Publication 20240311714A1 · Sep 19, 2024
References Cited (355)
US 5155763A · Bigus et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5206903A · Kohler et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5327490A · Cave · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5537470A · Lee · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5702253A · Bryce et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5825869A · Brooks et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5903641A · Tonisson · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5907601A · David et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5926538A · Deryugin et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6049603A · Schwartz et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6052460A · Fisher et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6064731A · Flockhart et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6088444A · Walker et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6163607A · Bogart et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6222919B1 · Hollatz et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6292555B1 · Okamoto · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6324282B1 · McIllwaine et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6333979B1 · Bondi et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6389132B1 · Price · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6389400B1 · Bushey et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6408066B1 · Andruska et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6411687B1 · Bohacek et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6424709B1 · Doyle et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6434230B1 · Gabriel · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6496580B1 · Chack · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6504920B1 · Okon et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6519335B1 · Bushnell · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6535600B1 · Fisher et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6535601B1 · Flockhart et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6570980B1 · Baruch · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6587556B1 · Judkins et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6603854B1 · Judkins et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6639976B1 · Shellum et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6661889B1 · Flockhart et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6704410B1 · McFarlane et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6707904B1 · Judkins et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6714643B1 · Gargeya et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6744878B1 · Komissarchik · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6763104B1 · Judkins et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6774932B1 · Ewing et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6775378B1 · Villena et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6798876B1 · Bala · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6829348B1 · Schroeder et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6832203B1 · Villena et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6859529B2 · Duncan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6922466B1 · Peterson et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6937715B2 · Delaney · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6956941B1 · Duncan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6970821B1 · Shambaugh et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6978006B1 · Polcyn · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7023979B1 · Wu et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7039166B1 · Peterson et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7050566B2 · Becerra et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7050567B1 · Jensen · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7062031B2 · Becerra et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7068775B1 · Lee · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7092509B1 · Mears et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7103172B2 · Brown et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7158628B2 · McConnell et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7184540B2 · Dezonno et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7209549B2 · Reynolds et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7231032B2 · Nevman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7231034B1 · Rikhy et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7236584B2 · Torba · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7245716B2 · Brown et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7245719B2 · Kawada et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7266251B2 · Rowe · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7269253B1 · Wu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7353388B1 · Gilman et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7372952B1 · Wu et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7398224B2 · Cooper · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7593521B2 · Becerra et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7676034B1 · Wu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7725339B1 · Aykin · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7734032B1 · Kiefhaber et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7798876B2 · Mix · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7826597B2 · Berner et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7864944B2 · Khouri et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7899177B1 · Bruening et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7916858B1 · Heller et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7940917B2 · Lauridsen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7961866B1 · Boutcher et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7995717B2 · Conway et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8000989B1 · Kiefhaber et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8010607B2 · McCormack et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8094790B2 · Conway et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8126133B1 · Everingham et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8140441B2 · Cases et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8175253B2 · Knott et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8229102B2 · Knott et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8234141B1 · Flockhart · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8249245B2 · Jay et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8295471B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8300798B1 · Wu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8306212B2 · Arora · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8359219B2 · Chishti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8433597B2 · Chishti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8472611B2 · Chishti · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8565410B2 · Chishti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8612272B1 · Aykin · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8634542B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8644490B2 · Stewart · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8670548B2 · Xie · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8699694B2 · Chishti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8712821B2 · Spottiswoode · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8718271B2 · Spottiswoode · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8724797B2 · Chishti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8731178B2 · Chishti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8737595B2 · Chishti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8750488B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8761380B2 · Kohler et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8781100B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8781106B2 · Afzal · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8787552B1 · Zhao · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8792630B2 · Chishti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8824658B2 · Chishti · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8831207B1 · Agarwal · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8879715B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8903079B2 · Xie et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8913736B2 · Kohler et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8929537B2 · Chishti et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8938063B1 · Hackbarth et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8995647B2 · Li et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9020137B2 · Chishti et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9025757B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9215323B2 · Chishti · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9277055B2 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9288325B2 · Chishti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9300802B1 · Chishti · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9313332B1 · Kumar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9426296B2 · Chishti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9692898B1 · Chishti · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9712676B1 · Chishti · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9712679B2 · Chishti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9824130B1 · Korshunov · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9930180B1 · Kan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9942405B1 · Kan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10135987B1 · Chishti et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11144344B2 · Delker · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20010032120A1 · Stuart et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020018554A1 · Jensen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020046030A1 · Haritsa et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020059164A1 · Shtivelman · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020082736A1 · Lech et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020110234A1 · Walker et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020111172A1 · DeWolf et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020131399A1 · Philonenko · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020138285A1 · DeCotiis et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020143599A1 · Nourbakhsh et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020161765A1 · Kundrot et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020184069A1 · Kosiba et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020196845A1 · Richards et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030002653A1 · Uckun · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030081757A1 · Mengshoel et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030095652A1 · Mengshoel et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030169870A1 · Stanford · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030174830A1 · Boyer et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030217016A1 · Pericle · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040015973A1 · Skovira · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040028211A1 · Culp et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040057416A1 · McCormack · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040096050A1 · Das et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040098274A1 · Dezonno et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040101127A1 · Dezonno et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040109555A1 · Williams · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040133434A1 · Szlam et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040210475A1 · Starnes et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040230438A1 · Pasquale et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040267816A1 · Russek · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050013428A1 · Walters · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050043986A1 · McConnell et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050047581A1 · Shaffer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050047582A1 · Shaffer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050071223A1 · Jain et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050129212A1 · Parker · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050135593A1 · Becerra et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050135596A1 · Zhao · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050187802A1 · Koeppel · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050195960A1 · Shaffer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050286709A1 · Horton et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060098803A1 · Bushey et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060110052A1 · Finlayson · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060124113A1 · Roberts · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060184040A1 · Keller et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060222164A1 · Contractor et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060233346A1 · McIlwaine et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060262918A1 · Karnalkar et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060262922A1 · Margulies et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070036323A1 · Travis · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070071222A1 · Flockhart et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070121602A1 · Sin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070121829A1 · Tal et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070136342A1 · Singhai et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070153996A1 · Hansen · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070154007A1 · Bernhard · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070174111A1 · Anderson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070198322A1 · Bourne et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070219816A1 · Van Luchene et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070274502A1 · Brown · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080002823A1 · Fama et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080008309A1 · Dezonno et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080046386A1 · Pieraccinii et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080065476A1 · Klein et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080109797A1 · Khetarpal et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080118052A1 · Houmaidi et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080144803A1 · Jaiswal et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080152122A1 · Idan et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080181389A1 · Bourne et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080199000A1 · Su et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080205611A1 · Jordan et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080267386A1 · Cooper · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080273687A1 · Knott et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090043670A1 · Johansson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090086933A1 · Patel et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190740A1 · Chishti et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190743A1 · Spottiswoode · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190744A1 · Xie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190745A1 · Xie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190746A1 · Chishti et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190747A1 · Spottiswoode · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190748A1 · Chishti et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190749A1 · Xie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090190750A1 · Xie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090232294A1 · Xie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090234710A1 · Belgaied Hassine et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090245493A1 · Chen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090304172A1 · Becerra et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090305172A1 · Tanaka et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090318111A1 · Desai et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090323921A1 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100020959A1 · Spottiswoode · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100020961A1 · Spottiswoode · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100054431A1 · Jaiswal et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100054452A1 · Afzal · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100054453A1 · Stewart · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100086120A1 · Brussat et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111285A1 · Chishti · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111286A1 · Chishti · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111287A1 · Xie et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111288A1 · Afzal et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100142689A1 · Hansen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100142698A1 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100158238A1 · Saushkin · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100183138A1 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100303225A1 · Shashkov · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110022357A1 · Vock et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110031112A1 · Birang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110069821A1 · Korolev et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125048A1 · Causevic et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110310773A1 · Iyengar et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120051536A1 · Chishti et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120051537A1 · Chishti et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120224680A1 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120278136A1 · Flockhart et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130003959A1 · Nishikawa et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130022195A1 · Nimmagadda · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130251137A1 · Chishti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130287202A1 · Flockhart et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140044246A1 · Klemm et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140079210A1 · Kohler et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140119531A1 · Tuchman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140119533A1 · Spottiswoode et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140334619A1 · Placiakis · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140341370A1 · Li et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150055772A1 · Klemm et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150237209A1 · Chishti · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150281448A1 · Putra et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160080573A1 · Chishti · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160295020A1 · Shaffer · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170064080A1 · Chishti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170064081A1 · Chishti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170316438A1 · Konig et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180054525A1 · Mezhibovsky · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180191902A1 · Chishti · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200014801A1 · Mohiuddin · 2020 [cited by examiner]
AU 2008349500C1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
AU 2009209317B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
AU 2009311534B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
AU 2015203175A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
AU 2015243001A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 101093590A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 102164073A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102390184A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102555536A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 202965525U · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 203311505U · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 102301688B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 102017591B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 0493292A2 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
EP 0863651A2 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
EP 0949793A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
EP 1011974A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
EP 1032188A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
EP 1107557A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1335572A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
GB 2339643A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 11098252A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000069168A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000078291A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000078292A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000092213A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000507420A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000236393A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000253154A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001292236A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001518753A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002069168A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002297900A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 3366565B2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003187061A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004056517A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004227228A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006345132A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007324708A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009081627A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011511533A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011511536A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012075146A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 5421928B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 5631326B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 5649575B2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015514371A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
MX 316118 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
MX 322251 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
NZ 587100B · 2013 [cited by applicant]
NZ 587101B · 2013 [cited by applicant]
NZ 591486B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
NZ 592781B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
PH 12010501704 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
PH 12010501705 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO199917517A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0070849A2 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2001063894A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006124113A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008124113A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009097018A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009097210A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010053701A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011081514A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013148453A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016048290A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (2006) “Performance Based Routing in Profit Call Centers,” The Decision Makers' Direct, located at www.decisioncraft.com, Issue Jun. 2002 (3 pages). [cited by applicant]
Cleveland, William S., “Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 74, No. 368, pp. 829-836 (Dec. 1979) (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Cormen, T. H., et al., “Introduction to Algorithms,” 3rd Edition, Chapter 26 Maximum Flow, pp. 708-766 and Chapter 29 Linear Programming, pp. 843-897 (2009) (116 pages). [cited by applicant]
D. Shukla, “A Markov Chain Model for the Analysis of Round-Robin Scheduling Scheme”, Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-7 (2009) (Year: 2009). [cited by applicant]
Gans, N. & Zhou, Y., “Call-Routing Schemes for Call-Center Outsourcing”, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(1) , pp. 33-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0119, University of Pennsylvania. 2005 (Year:… [cited by applicant]
Gans, N. et al., “Telephone Call Centers: Tutorial, Review and Research Prospects,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, vol. 5, No. 2, 2003, pp. 79-141, (84 pages). [cited by applicant]
Koole, G. (2004). “Performance Analysis and Optimization in Customer Contact Centers,” Proceedings of the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, First International Conference, Sep. 27-30, 2004 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Koole, G. et al., “An Overview of Routing and Staffing Algorithms in Multi-Skill Customer Contact Centers,” Manuscript, Mar. 6, 2006, (42 pages). [cited by applicant]
Mor Armo, “Fair Dynamic Routing in Large-Scale Heterogeneous-Server Systems” Informs, Operations Research, vol. 58, No. 3, May-Jun. 2010, pp. 624-637, ISSN 0030-364X | eissn 1526-5463 1 10 1 5803 1 0624. (Year: 2010). [cited by applicant]
Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J., “Numerical Optimization,” Chapter 16 Quadratic Programming, pp. 448-496 (2006) 50 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ntzoufras, “Bayesian Modeling Using Winbugs”. Wiley Interscience, Chapter 5, Normal Regression Models, Oct. 18, 2007, Redacted version, pp. 155-220 (67 pages). [cited by applicant]
Press, W. H. and Rybicki, G. B., “Fast Algorithm for Spectral Analysis of Unevenly Sampled Data,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 338, pp. 277-280 (Mar. 1, 1989) (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Riedmiller, M. et al. (1993). “A Direct Adaptive Method for Faster Back Propagation Learning: The RPROP Algorithm,” 1993 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 28-Apr. 1, 1993, 1:586-5… [cited by applicant]
Stanley et al., “Improving Call Center Operations Using Performance-Based Routing Strategies,” California Journal of Operations Management, 6(1), 24-32, Feb. 2008; retrieved from http://userwww.sfsu.edu/saltzman/Publist… [cited by applicant]